Missing package build for Fedora 34
Hello package wranglers, I maintain the python-cffsubr package for Fedora. It was added to the repo and built on 2021-03-17 (during the beta freeze timeline of Fedora 34). The package was built for f33, f34 & f35; see [1]. But probably because of beta freeze, the f34 build didn’t go to repo. That build is now deleted in koji. I have tried ‘fedpkg build && fedpkg update’ (after the build was deleted) but that errors out with the message “package is already built”. Question is, how do I create a build for f34 and push it to stable channel now? Do I have to bump the release and create a fresh build? I have checked the package maintenance guidelines and ask.fp.org etc., but didn’t find a way to accomplish that. Any pointers would be appreciated. [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=33360 -- Rajeesh https://rajeeshknambiar.wordpress.com ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1976544] New: perl-Finance-Quote-1.50 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976544 Bug ID: 1976544 Summary: perl-Finance-Quote-1.50 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Finance-Quote Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: nott...@splat.cc Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@splat.cc, p...@city-fan.org, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 1.50 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.49-7.fc35 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Finance-Quote Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/6888/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1976544] perl-Finance-Quote-1.50 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976544 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- An HTTP error occurred downloading the package's new Source URLs: Getting https://cpan.metacpan.org/modules/by-module/Finance/Finance-Quote-1.50.tar.gz to ./Finance-Quote-1.50.tar.gz -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-0209079fce aom-3.1.1-1.el8 5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-698907eb45 quassel-0.13.1-8.el8 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing appliance-tools-011.1-4.el8 livecd-tools-28.2-1.el8 Details about builds: appliance-tools-011.1-4.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-28a6b0ea69) Tools for building Appliances Update Information: Various fixes to make generated images bootable in both UEFI and legacy BIOS environments ChangeLog: * Sat Jun 26 2021 Neal Gompa - 011.1-4 - Backport fix to deal with grub-install errors for UEFI * Fri Jun 4 2021 Python Maint - 011.1-3 - Rebuilt for Python 3.10 * Tue Jan 26 2021 Fedora Release Engineering - 011.1-2 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Mass_Rebuild References: [ 1 ] Bug #1942038 - livecd-creator fails with multiple problems here listed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942038 [ 2 ] Bug #1969562 - The created iso is not bootable https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1969562 [ 3 ] Bug #1971631 - livecd-creator builds unbootable iso's https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1971631 livecd-tools-28.2-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-28a6b0ea69) Tools for building live CDs Update Information: Various fixes to make generated images bootable in both UEFI and legacy BIOS environments ChangeLog: * Sat Jun 26 2021 Neal Gompa - 1:28.2-1 - Release 28.2 (ngompa13) - rearrange xorrisofs options to make image efi bootable (sobjerke) - place efiboot.img and macboot.img in /isolinux (sobjerke) - Remove duplicate sentence (35056002+BessieTheCookie) * Fri Jun 4 2021 Python Maint - 1:28.1-2 - Rebuilt for Python 3.10 References: [ 1 ] Bug #1942038 - livecd-creator fails with multiple problems here listed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942038 [ 2 ] Bug #1969562 - The created iso is not bootable https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1969562 [ 3 ] Bug #1971631 - livecd-creator builds unbootable iso's https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1971631 ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1963221] Please build perl-File-Share for EPEL8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1963221 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-File-Share-0.25-20.el8 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-06-27 01:47:01 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2021-c3ba5610f6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1976484] perl-Rose-DB-Object-0.820 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976484 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-b34153dde6 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-b34153dde6` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-b34153dde6 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 11:50 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Hello. > > fmt 8.0.x update will include soversion bump from .7 to .8. > > All dependent packages must be rebuilt in Rawhide. > This is ambiguous... Are you going to rebuild the dependencies or are you expecting the maintainers to rebuild? In a side-tag? Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: No schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2021-06-28)
On 26. 06. 21 23:02, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 05:35:37PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: I cannot chair the following meeting next week, if any other FESCo member can do that, please let me know. I can. Thank you, Zbyszek. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
wlroots 0.14.0 is coming to rawhide
Greetings, wlroots 0.14.0 was released this week with a lot of bugfixes, new pixman software renderer for not-so-recent hardware and continuation of renderer refactoring. As usual, the update is API and ABI breaking and all dependent packages must be rebuilt. I'll be taking care of all rebuilds except `cage`, `labwc` and `wayfire`. I'll notify maintainers of those packages additionally (and send a PR with compatibility patches for `labwc`) once the side-tag is ready. `phoc` will continue using wlroots0.12 compat package; no actions required here. Rawhide update ETA is in a week from this message or when all the required builds are complete. -- Best regards, Aleksei Bavshin OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: No schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2021-06-28)
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 05:35:37PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > There are no topics to be discussed in the > FESCo meeting Monday at 19:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on > irc.libera.chat. > > To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto > > or run: > date -d '2021-06-28 19:00 UTC' > > > = Discussed and Voted in the Ticket = > > Nonresponsive maintainer: Mairi Dulaney jdulaney > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2613 > APPROVED (+1, 0, -0) > > F35 Change: Replace the Anaconda product configuration files with profiles > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2622 > APPROVED (+6, 0, -0) > > F35 Change: Use yescrypt as default hashing method for shadow passwords > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2623 > APPROVED (+6, 0, -0) > > > If you would like to add something to the agenda, you can > reply to this e-mail, file a new issue at > https://pagure.io/fesco or e-mail me directly. Note > that added topics may be deferred until the following meeting. > > If there are no topics scheduled, the meeting will be cancelled. > > PS I cannot chair the following meeting next week, if any other > FESCo member can do that, please let me know. I can. Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: New RPM submission
* Joan Moreau via devel [26/06/2021 19:36] : > > What is next ? The answer is the same one you were given two months ago. You need to seek out a sponsor: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1976484] perl-Rose-DB-Object-0.820 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976484 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-b34153dde6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-b34153dde6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: New RPM submission
ok
I updated https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953340
What is next ?
Thank you so much
On 2021-06-26 17:49, Sérgio wrote:
kinit -R @ FEDORAPROJECT
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Kerberos
A 23 de junho de 2021 18:34:20 WEST, Joan Moreau via devel
escreveu:
Hello
How can I move forward on this ?
Thank you
On April 27, 2021 21:51:53 Joan Moreau via devel
wrote:
Hi Emmanuel
I am trying my best to foloow the process but I get nowhere
Now I get a "koji" error ("AuthError: unable to obtain a session")
I tried "fedpkg request-repo --exception dovecot-fts-xapian" -> Lead
some error ("fedpkg request-repo --exception dovecot-fts-xapian")
I filed a "bug" on redhat :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953340
And now, how to get things moving ?
Isnt' there just a repo where to push the RPM ? (similar to Arch)
thank you so much
On 2021-04-25 15:51, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
* Joan Moreau via devel [24/04/2021 18:49] :
It looks overwhelmingly complicated.
Out of curiosity, which part of the process looks complicated.
Perhaps we can simplify it.
Emmanuel
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
--
Enviado a partir do meu dispositivo Android com o K-9 Mail. Peço
desculpa pela brevidade.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1976501] New: perl-Throwable-1.000 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976501 Bug ID: 1976501 Summary: perl-Throwable-1.000 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Throwable Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: emman...@seyman.fr, iarn...@gmail.com, jples...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 1.000 Current version/release in rawhide: 0.201-3.fc35 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Throwable/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/7186/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: New RPM submission
The process is complicated for multiple reasons: 1. There are a lot of steps to deal with corner cases which have come up over the years which need to be dealt with. 2. There are some steps to make sure that the package is going to be maintained versus just dropped and forgotten as a lot of packages have been. 3. There are a lot of warts/headaches/problems which have been there but people who have packaged for 20 years no longer see (or in a Stockholm syndrome feel they NEED to be there.) In packaging software there are a set of steps you need to ask yourself: 1. Why are you wanting to do this task? 2. What do you expect to get out of this? 3. How committed are you to continually packaging this software? 4. What does this software bring to a complete operating system? 5. Why this operating system? The first three questions are mostly about personal motivations but it is something that I see people not answering and then burning themselves out on finding out how complicated packaging is. Packaging up software is a long term commitment. It is saying 'I think this software is useful and will be maintained for years at a time.' If the software is more of a short term project or you really don't think that you (or others) want to keep fixing/maintaining it for years.. then the software doesn't really need to be in a distribution but in some sort of PPA or COPR. The fourth and fifth are to deal with marketing the software. Just having it in a distribution isn't going to get it to be used. [In most distribution early years, they don't take this part seriously and then end up with hundreds or thousands of ghost packages which end up being a pain. A distribution then starts adding more 'does anyone need this really???' type roadblocks which may go into overkill. Or it may be that putting it in the operating system is going to be a headache the entire time because the way the operating system deals with the language set is more work than you care for. For Fedora/RHEL, programs written in newer languages like Java, Go, Rust are going to have a lot of rules which seem completely antithetical to how the language is set up elsewhere. Getting software written in these is going to need a LOT of extra work which requires even more dedication. [I am not saying that they shouldn't be done, but it is more like the 'packaging game' is set to Instadeath/Torment X mode. On Sat, 26 Jun 2021 at 06:38, Joan Moreau via devel wrote: > > Honeslt y , process is so complicated > > Now, I am again getting errors about "unaotirzed url" > > How to make things happens intesaod of all thisnightmare ? > > Thank you > > > > On Wed, 2021-06-23 at 19:58 +0200, Arthur Bols wrote: > > On 23/06/2021 19:34, Joan Moreau via devel wrote: > > Hello > > How can I move forward on this ? > > Thank you > > Hi Joan, > > Could you elaborate please? > > As Emmanuel said, you have two options: > > a) use a COPR repository and publish instructions on enabling the repo > b) find an existing maintainer to do the heavy lifting and sign on as > a co-maintainer to deal with upstream-related issues. The primary > maintainer will then only have to deal with Fedora-related issues. > > > Arthur > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > > > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure -- Stephen J Smoogen. I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Flame wars in sci.astro.orion. I have seen SPAM filters overload because of Godwin's Law. All those moments will be lost in time... like posts on BBS... time to reboot. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Rust dependency detection bug
I forgot that. I shouldn't do so much things at the same time. Envoyé depuis ProtonMail mobile \ Message d'origine Le 26 juin 2021 13 h 07, Fabio Valentini < decatho...@gmail.com > a écrit : > > > > On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 6:57 PM Rémi Lauzier via devel > wrote: > > > > Hi. > > There seem to have a bug with rust dependency detection with > > owned\_ttf-parser. > > I am not sure what components create the bug. > > [https://github.com/alexheretic/ab-glyph/issues/37\#issuecomment-868976786][https_github.com_alexheretic_ab-glyph_issues_37_issuecomment-868976786] > > > > It should have detect that the version doesn't match. > > It would have, if you didn't patch it in yourself, according to the .spec > file: > > \# Downgrade owned-ttf-parser to 0.6 > Patch0: ab\_glyph-fix-metadata.diff > > Fabio > \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing\_list\_guidelines][https_fedoraproject.org_wiki_Mailing_list_guidelines] > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > [https_github.com_alexheretic_ab-glyph_issues_37_issuecomment-868976786]: https://github.com/alexheretic/ab-glyph/issues/37#issuecomment-868976786 [https_fedoraproject.org_wiki_Mailing_list_guidelines]: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines publickey - EmailAddress(s=remilauzier@protonmail.com) - 0xC69091A8.asc Description: application/pgp-keys signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Rust dependency detection bug
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 6:57 PM Rémi Lauzier via devel wrote: > > Hi. > There seem to have a bug with rust dependency detection with owned_ttf-parser. > I am not sure what components create the bug. > https://github.com/alexheretic/ab-glyph/issues/37#issuecomment-868976786 > > It should have detect that the version doesn't match. It would have, if you didn't patch it in yourself, according to the .spec file: # Downgrade owned-ttf-parser to 0.6 Patch0: ab_glyph-fix-metadata.diff Fabio ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Rust dependency detection bug
Hi. There seem to have a bug with rust dependency detection with owned_ttf-parser. I am not sure what components create the bug. https://github.com/alexheretic/ab-glyph/issues/37#issuecomment-868976786 It should have detect that the version doesn't match. Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. publickey - remilauzier@protonmail.com - 0xC69091A8.asc Description: application/pgp-keys signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: New RPM submission
kinit -R @ FEDORAPROJECT
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Kerberos
A 23 de junho de 2021 18:34:20 WEST, Joan Moreau via devel
escreveu:
>Hello
>
>How can I move forward on this ?
>
>Thank you
>
>
>On April 27, 2021 21:51:53 Joan Moreau via devel
> wrote:
>> Hi Emmanuel
>> I am trying my best to foloow the process but I get nowhere
>> Now I get a "koji" error ("AuthError: unable to obtain a session")
>> I tried "fedpkg request-repo --exception dovecot-fts-xapian" -> Lead
>some
>> error ("fedpkg request-repo --exception dovecot-fts-xapian")
>> I filed a "bug" on redhat :
>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953340
>>
>> And now, how to get things moving ?
>> Isnt' there just a repo where to push the RPM ? (similar to Arch)
>> thank you so much
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2021-04-25 15:51, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
>>> * Joan Moreau via devel [24/04/2021 18:49] :
It looks overwhelmingly complicated.
>>>
>>> Out of curiosity, which part of the process looks complicated.
>>> Perhaps we can simplify it.
>>>
>>> Emmanuel
>>> ___
>>> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>> Fedora Code of Conduct:
>>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>>> List Guidelines:
>https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>>> List Archives:
>>>
>https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
>>> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>> ___
>> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Fedora Code of Conduct:
>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> List Guidelines:
>https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives:
>>
>https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
>> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
--
Enviado a partir do meu dispositivo Android com o K-9 Mail. Peço desculpa pela
brevidade.___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1976496] perl-Data-OptList-0.112 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976496 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of perl-Data-OptList-0.112-1.fc32.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=70863819 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: use unit names in systemd output by default?
I've written a code heavily based on the above-mentioned PR:15957 but I've added some missing code (new option StatusUnitFormat=combined). Now you can set StatusUnitFormat=combined in the configuration file or as a kernel command line argument systemd.status_unit_format=combined The output format is unit_name (unit description) Live system examples: combined: Jun 26 18:24:19 fedora systemd[1]: Starting firewalld.service (firewalld - dynamic firewall daemon)... Jun 26 18:24:20 fedora systemd[1]: Started firewalld.service (firewalld - dynamic firewall daemon). name: Jun 26 18:31:06 fedora systemd[1]: Starting firewalld.service... Jun 26 18:31:06 fedora systemd[1]: Started firewalld.service. description: Jun 26 18:32:04 fedora systemd[1]: Starting firewalld - dynamic firewall daemon... Jun 26 18:32:04 fedora systemd[1]: Started firewalld - dynamic firewall daemon. The code: https://github.com/sunwire/systemd/commit/07cd929872c1cd6809e2e17085d703ea2eeb6ea0 https://github.com/sunwire/systemd/commit/07cd929872c1cd6809e2e17085d703ea2eeb6ea0.diff https://github.com/sunwire/systemd/commit/07cd929872c1cd6809e2e17085d703ea2eeb6ea0.patch ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1976496] perl-Data-OptList-0.112 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976496 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1794838 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1794838=edit [patch] Update to 0.112 (#1976496) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1976496] New: perl-Data-OptList-0.112 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976496 Bug ID: 1976496 Summary: perl-Data-OptList-0.112 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Data-OptList Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: p...@city-fan.org Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: mspa...@redhat.com, p...@city-fan.org, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, rob.my...@gtri.gatech.edu Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 0.112 Current version/release in rawhide: 0.110-16.fc35 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Data-OptList/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/2769/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Rawhide-20210626.n.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 2 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 7/199 (x86_64), 12/134 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210625.n.0): ID: 916583 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso anaconda_help URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916583 ID: 916816 Test: aarch64 universal install_kickstart_firewall_disabled@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916816 ID: 916820 Test: aarch64 universal install_cyrillic_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916820 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210625.n.0): ID: 916566 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_remote_logging_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916566 ID: 916568 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916568 ID: 916574 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916574 ID: 916577 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_remote_logging_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916577 ID: 916610 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916610 ID: 916619 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916619 ID: 916657 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso anaconda_help@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916657 ID: 916693 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916693 ID: 916697 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916697 ID: 916698 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916698 ID: 916718 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_browser@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916718 ID: 916719 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_printing@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916719 ID: 916723 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_terminal@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916723 ID: 916812 Test: aarch64 universal install_european_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916812 ID: 916823 Test: aarch64 universal install_arabic_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916823 ID: 916824 Test: aarch64 universal install_asian_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916824 Soft failed openQA tests: 3/199 (x86_64), 3/134 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210625.n.0): ID: 916637 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916637 ID: 916644 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916644 ID: 916701 Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916701 ID: 916727 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916727 ID: 916736 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916736 ID: 916766 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_realmd_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916766 Passed openQA tests: 119/134 (aarch64), 189/199 (x86_64) New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210625.n.0): ID: 916720 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz unwanted_packages@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916720 ID: 916722 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_update_graphical@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916722 ID: 916831 Test: aarch64 universal support_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916831 ID: 916854 Test: aarch64 universal install_kickstart_nfs@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916854 Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload: System load changed from 0.07 to 0.19 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916023#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916535#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi: Used swap changed from 7 MiB to 6 MiB Average CPU usage changed from 13.57619048 to 24.23809524 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916072#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916584#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64
No schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2021-06-28)
There are no topics to be discussed in the FESCo meeting Monday at 19:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2021-06-28 19:00 UTC' = Discussed and Voted in the Ticket = Nonresponsive maintainer: Mairi Dulaney jdulaney https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2613 APPROVED (+1, 0, -0) F35 Change: Replace the Anaconda product configuration files with profiles https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2622 APPROVED (+6, 0, -0) F35 Change: Use yescrypt as default hashing method for shadow passwords https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2623 APPROVED (+6, 0, -0) If you would like to add something to the agenda, you can reply to this e-mail, file a new issue at https://pagure.io/fesco or e-mail me directly. Note that added topics may be deferred until the following meeting. If there are no topics scheduled, the meeting will be cancelled. PS I cannot chair the following meeting next week, if any other FESCo member can do that, please let me know. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1976426] perl-Data-Dump-1.25 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976426 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Data-Dump-1.25-1.fc35 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Last Closed||2021-06-26 15:31:33 --- Comment #2 from Paul Howarth --- Build done: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=70859427 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1976484] perl-Rose-DB-Object-0.820 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976484 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of perl-Rose-DB-Object-0.820-1.fc32.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=70858143 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1976484] perl-Rose-DB-Object-0.820 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976484 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1794768 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1794768=edit [patch] Update to 0.820 (#1976484) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1976484] New: perl-Rose-DB-Object-0.820 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976484 Bug ID: 1976484 Summary: perl-Rose-DB-Object-0.820 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Rose-DB-Object Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: wf...@worldbroken.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, wf...@worldbroken.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 0.820 Current version/release in rawhide: 0.819-5.fc35 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Rose-DB-Object/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/3299/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-IoT-35-20210626.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 7/15 (aarch64), 2/16 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210625.0): ID: 916884 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_rpmostree_rebase@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916884 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210625.0): ID: 916868 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916868 ID: 916872 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_ignition URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916872 ID: 916874 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916874 ID: 916875 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916875 ID: 916876 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916876 ID: 916881 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916881 ID: 916883 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_rpmostree_overlay@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916883 ID: 916885 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_ignition@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916885 Soft failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64), 1/15 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210625.0): ID: 916857 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916857 ID: 916858 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916858 ID: 916863 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916863 ID: 916873 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916873 Passed openQA tests: 11/16 (x86_64), 7/15 (aarch64) Installed system changes in test aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload@uefi: System load changed from 3.84 to 0.84 Average CPU usage changed from 95.23809524 to 12.45714286 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916459#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916873#downloads -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210626.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210625.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210626.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 83 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 2.18 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded packages: 7.13 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 44.37 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = = DROPPED IMAGES = = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: python-aexpect-1.6.1-2.fc35 Summary: A python library to control interactive applications RPMs:python3-aexpect Size:90.65 KiB Package: python-apt-2.2.0-1.fc35 Summary: Python bindings for APT RPMs:python3-apt Size:1.19 MiB Package: python-avocado-82.0-2.fc35 Summary: Framework with tools and libraries for Automated Testing RPMs:python-avocado-bash python-avocado-common python-avocado-examples python3-avocado python3-avocado-plugins-glib python3-avocado-plugins-golang python3-avocado-plugins-loader-yaml python3-avocado-plugins-output-html python3-avocado-plugins-result-upload python3-avocado-plugins-resultsdb python3-avocado-plugins-varianter-cit python3-avocado-plugins-varianter-pict python3-avocado-plugins-varianter-yaml-to-mux Size:920.19 KiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: 64tass-1.56.2625-1.fc35 Old package: 64tass-1.55.2200-3.fc34 Summary: 6502 assembler RPMs: 64tass Size: 1.76 MiB Size change: 114.51 KiB Changelog: * Fri Jun 25 2021 Dan Hor??k - 1.56.2625-1 - Update to 1.56.2625 (#1953379) - Use distro-wide compiler/linker flags Package: COPASI-4.33.246-2.fc35 Old package: COPASI-4.33.246-1.fc35 Summary: Biochemical network simulator RPMs: COPASI COPASI-data COPASI-doc COPASI-gui python3-COPASI Size: 66.62 MiB Size change: -4.86 KiB Changelog: * Fri Jun 25 2021 Antonio Trande - 4.33.246-2 - Rebuild for qwtplot3d-qt5 Package: Carla-1:2.3.0-4.fc35 Old package: Carla-1:2.3.0-3.fc35 Summary: Audio plugin host RPMs: Carla Carla-devel Carla-vst lv2-carla Size: 61.39 MiB Size change: 20.75 KiB Changelog: * Wed Jun 16 2021 Martin Gansser - 1:2.3.0-4 - Rebuilt for fluidsynth-2.2.1 Package: GoldenCheetah-1:3.6-0.7.20200905gitd17d3c5.fc35 Old package: GoldenCheetah-1:3.6-0.6.20200905git6164dd9.fc35 Summary: Cycling Performance Software RPMs: GoldenCheetah GoldenCheetah-data GoldenCheetah-doc Size: 35.42 MiB Size change: 399.63 KiB Changelog: * Fri Jun 25 2021 Martin Gansser - 3.6-0.7.20210608gitd17d3c5 - Update to 3.6-0.7.20210608gitd17d3c5 - Add GoldenCheetah-LoadedMedia_not_declared.patch Package: ansible-pcp-2.1.4-1.fc35 Old package: ansible-pcp-2.1.3-1.fc35 Summary: Ansible Metric collection for Performance Co-Pilot RPMs: ansible-pcp Size: 117.60 KiB Size change: -49 B Changelog: * Fri Jun 25 2021 Nathan Scott 2.1.4-1 - Latest upstream release Package: ardour6-6.7.0-2.fc35 Old package: ardour6-6.7.0-1.fc35 Summary: Digital Audio Workstation RPMs: ardour6 ardour6-backend-alsa ardour6-backend-dummy ardour6-backend-jack ardour6-backend-pulseaudio Size: 63.34 MiB Size change: 5.14 KiB Changelog: * Tue Jun 15 2021 Nils Philippsen - 6.7.0-2 - rebuild for fluidsynth-2.2.1 Package: audacious-plugins-4.1-3.fc35 Old package: audacious-plugins-4.1-2.fc35 Summary: Plugins for the Audacious audio player RPMs: audacious-plugins audacious-plugins-amidi audacious-plugins-exotic audacious-plugins-jack Size: 9.14 MiB Size change: -211.10 KiB Changelog: * Mon Jun 21 2021 Gwyn Ciesla - 4.1-3 - Fluidsynth rebuild. Package: awscli-1.19.101-1.fc35 Old package: awscli-1.19.100-1.fc35 Summary: Universal Command Line Environment for AWS RPMs: awscli Size: 2.06 MiB Size change: 70 B Changelog: * Fri Jun 25 2021 Gwyn Ciesla - 1.19.101-1 - 1.19.101 Package: calf-0.90.3-9.fc35 Old package: calf-0.90.3-8.fc34 Summary: Audio plugins pack RPMs: calf dssi-calf-plugins ladspa-calf-plugins lv2-calf-plugins lv2-calf-plugins-gui Size: 65.43 MiB Size change: -140.08 KiB Changelog: * Tue Jun 15 2021 Gwyn Ciesla - 0.90.3-9 - Fluidsynth rebuild. Package: cinnamon-5.0.3-1.fc35 Old package: cinnamon-5.0.2-2.fc35 Summary: Window management and application launching for GNOME RPMs: cinnamon cinnamon-devel-doc Size: 8.63 MiB Size change: 1.45 KiB Changelog: * Fri Jun 25 2021 Leigh Scott - 5.0.3-1 - Update to 5.0.3 release Package: cinnamon-control-center-5.0.2-1.fc35 Old package: cinnamon-control-center-5.0.1-1.fc35 Summary: Utilities to configure the Cinnamon desktop RPMs: cinnamon-control-center cinnamon-control-center-devel cinnamon-control-center-filesystem Size
Re: New RPM submission
Maybe there is a way to import RPM packages from Debian ? https://packages.debian.org/bullseye/dovecot-fts-xapian On Sat, 2021-06-26 at 12:37 +0200, Joan Moreau via devel wrote: > Honeslt y , process is so complicated > > Now, I am again getting errors about "unaotirzed url" > > How to make things happens intesaod of all thisnightmare ? > > Thank you > > > > On Wed, 2021-06-23 at 19:58 +0200, Arthur Bols wrote: > > On 23/06/2021 19:34, Joan Moreau via devel wrote: > > > Hello > > > > > > How can I move forward on this ? > > > > > > Thank you > > Hi Joan, > > > > Could you elaborate please? > > > > As Emmanuel said, you have two options: > > > a) use a COPR repository and publish instructions on enabling the > > > repo > > > b) find an existing maintainer to do the heavy lifting and sign > > > on as > > > a co-maintainer to deal with upstream-related issues. The primary > > > maintainer will then only have to deal with Fedora-related > > > issues. > > > > Arthur > > ___ > > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Fedora Code of Conduct: > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > > List Guidelines: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > List Archives: > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: New RPM submission
Honeslt y , process is so complicated Now, I am again getting errors about "unaotirzed url" How to make things happens intesaod of all thisnightmare ? Thank you On Wed, 2021-06-23 at 19:58 +0200, Arthur Bols wrote: > On 23/06/2021 19:34, Joan Moreau via devel wrote: > > Hello > > > > How can I move forward on this ? > > > > Thank you > Hi Joan, > > Could you elaborate please? > > As Emmanuel said, you have two options: > > a) use a COPR repository and publish instructions on enabling the > > repo > > b) find an existing maintainer to do the heavy lifting and sign on > > as > > a co-maintainer to deal with upstream-related issues. The primary > > maintainer will then only have to deal with Fedora-related issues. > > Arthur > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Cloud-34-20210626.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210625.0): ID: 916507 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916507 ID: 916516 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916516 Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64), 7/8 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1976453] New: F35FailsToInstall: perl-Alien-pkgconf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976453 Bug ID: 1976453 Summary: F35FailsToInstall: perl-Alien-pkgconf Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Alien-pkgconf Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com Reporter: mhron...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com Blocks: 1927313 (F35FailsToInstall,RAWHIDEFailsToInstall) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Hello, Please note that this comment was generated automatically. If you feel that this output has mistakes, please contact me via email (mhron...@redhat.com). Your package (perl-Alien-pkgconf) Fails To Install in Fedora 35: can't install perl-Alien-pkgconf: - nothing provides libpkgconf-devel(x86-64) = 1.7.3 needed by perl-Alien-pkgconf-0.17-7.fc35.x86_64 If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem. If you don't react accordingly to the policy for FTBFS/FTI bugs (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/), your package may be orphaned in 8+ weeks. P.S. The data was generated solely from koji buildroot, so it might be newer than the latest compose or the content on mirrors. P.P.S. If this bug has been reported in the middle of upgrading multiple dependent packages, please consider using side tags: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#updating-inter-dependent-packages Thanks! Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1927313 [Bug 1927313] Fedora 35 Fails To install Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Cloud-33-20210626.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210625.0): ID: 916491 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916491 ID: 916500 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/916500 Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64), 7/8 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
