On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 05:30:28PM +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> rpmautospec[1] is now deployed on the Koji builders. It took a little
> longer than expected, but went smoothly otherwise—at most, you should
> have noticed any currently running builds of yours being restarted
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814107
--- Comment #5 from Marc Dequènes (Duck) ---
Thank you for working on this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982022
Bug ID: 1982022
Summary: perl-DBIx-Class-Schema-Config-0.001014 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-DBIx-Class-Schema-Config
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
47 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-1f259a45ef
openjpeg2-2.3.1-11.el7
13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-bd790583ee
seamonkey-2.53.8-1.el7
11
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981476
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-78746edd3f has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136745
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Convert-PEM-0.08-14.fc |perl-Convert-PEM-0.08-14.fc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976330
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|ctstream-30-1.fc35 |ctstream-30-1.fc35
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981476
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-f9126345dc has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1971305
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-7ca1547aa0 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981476
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 05:30:28PM +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> rpmautospec[1] is now deployed on the Koji builders. It took a little
> longer than expected, but went smoothly otherwise—at most, you should
> have noticed any currently running builds of yours being restarted
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814107
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from
A new version of python-networkx is out. In order to keep building
documentation for it, the following new packages are needed. I am
willing to swap reviews, or help out with fixing a bug in exchange for
a review.
python-bash-kernel: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981993
Hullo!
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 02:06:59PM -, David wrote:
> Hi, I see Neovim 0.5 stable has come to Fedora 34. Is it possible it could be
> released for EPEL8? Thanks.
>
> At the moment there is only a very old version:
>
> ```
> Available Packages
> Name : neovim
> Version :
On 7/13/21 12:47 PM, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
There's an update in testing that should fix that:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-d3ba1c0d71
Or you can directly install python3-packaging.
Thanks - that got typing-booster working again.
--
--Per Bothner
On 7/13/21 8:12 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
> On 12. 07. 21 18:31, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>> If you can minimally provide the tables of possible zones, and
>> provide an easy way to detect a zone is missing, then the APIs can
>> determine: "Yes you could do that, but your system is missing the
>>
On 7/13/21 11:17 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
> On 13. 07. 21 16:31, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>> It's possible to remove all tzdata.
>>
>> However, without *some* data it is not easy to distinguish between these
>> two scenarios if you want to offer a different error message:
>>
>> - Is this zone
https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/pull/4834
--
Directory Server Development Team
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Miro Hrončok kirjoitti 12.7.2021 klo 14.30:
Hello,
I happen to maintain some applications in Fedora where I am strongly
confident our users would prefer "latest and greatest" over 100 %
"stability" of the user interface and/or results.
For some of them, I've been more or less silently
On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 7:04 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 01:26:19PM -0500, Tony Asleson wrote:
> > Upstream pywbem project took 2 internal libraries and broke them out
> > into separate libraries. I asked if they would be OK with maintaining
> > these new packages in fedora
On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 at 13:29, Per Bothner wrote:
>
> This is a follow-up to "ibus-typing-boster - testcase instruction error".
>
> Run ibus-setup in a terminal;
> select the "Input Method" tab;
> click on "Other - Typing Booster" to select it;
> click "Preferences".
>
> I get:
>
> Traceback (most
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 6:07 PM Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-07-13 at 14:52 +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > V Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 02:27:57PM +0200, Mark Wielaard napsal(a):
> > > Or How do you trigger a fedora-ci.koji-build.tier0.functional run for a
> > > package?
> > >
> >
> > $
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814107
Robert Scheck changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Please make it available on |Please make perl-Text-Iconv
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814107
Robert Scheck changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814107
Robert Scheck changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||Triaged
Version|33
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981927
Bug ID: 1981927
Summary: APC::ThreadMutex is not available on x86_64 mod_perl
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Hardware: x86_64
Status: NEW
Component: mod_perl
On 7/13/21 5:48 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 08:10:05AM +0200, David wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have been trying to build git-cola for EPEL8, but the buildSRPMFromSCM
>> is stuck for over 5 hours:
>> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=71779476
>>
>> It is already
This is a follow-up to "ibus-typing-boster - testcase instruction error".
Run ibus-setup in a terminal;
select the "Input Method" tab;
click on "Other - Typing Booster" to select it;
click "Preferences".
I get:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 01:30:19PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I happen to maintain some applications in Fedora where I am strongly
> confident our users would prefer "latest and greatest" over 100 %
> "stability" of the user interface and/or results.
>
> For some of them, I've been
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Committee on 2021-07-14 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting.
A general agenda is the following:
#meetingname
On Tue, 2021-07-13 at 14:52 +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> V Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 02:27:57PM +0200, Mark Wielaard napsal(a):
> > Or How do you trigger a fedora-ci.koji-build.tier0.functional run for a
> > package?
> >
>
> $ bodhi updates trigger-tests UPDATE_ID
Thanks! That worked, the test were
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981581
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 08:10:05AM +0200, David wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been trying to build git-cola for EPEL8, but the buildSRPMFromSCM
> is stuck for over 5 hours:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=71779476
>
> It is already the second try, the first I have canceled after
On 13. 07. 21 17:18, Miro Hrončok wrote:
...
If you see a package that can be rebuilt, please do so.
Package (co)maintainers Latest build
=
...
proxyfuzz psklenar
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
will be retired from Fedora 35 approximately one week before branching (August
2021).
Policy:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
The packages
On 13. 07. 21 16:31, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
On 7/12/21 12:16 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 06. 07. 21 20:38, David Cantrell wrote:
On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 01:20:47PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/tzdata-minimal
== Summary ==
Split the tzdata package into two
On 7/12/21 12:16 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
> On 06. 07. 21 20:38, David Cantrell wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 01:20:47PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/tzdata-minimal
>>>
>>> == Summary ==
>>> Split the tzdata package into two parts - tzdata and
Hi, I see Neovim 0.5 stable has come to Fedora 34. Is it possible it could be
released for EPEL8? Thanks.
At the moment there is only a very old version:
```
Available Packages
Name : neovim
Version : 0.3.8
Release : 1.el8.1
Architecture : x86_64
Size : 5.1 M
Source
No missing expected images.
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 4/199 (x86_64), 10/129 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210712.n.0):
ID: 926740 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso
Thanks for your work! That should help a lot.
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
Le mardi 13 juillet 2021 à 08:10, Fabio Valentini a
écrit :
> Hi everybody,
>
> The Rust SIG has recently worked on a few new features and fixes for
>
> rust2rpm, and they
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1971305
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-7ca1547aa0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-7ca1547aa0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1971305
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
CC|
V Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 02:27:57PM +0200, Mark Wielaard napsal(a):
> For example the last rawhide build just says that fedora-ci.koji-
> build.tier0.functional didn't have any results:
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-5d732932ff
>
> Is there a place where I can inspect why a
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210712.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210713.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 164
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 2.32 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Hi,
For valgrind we added some integration tests, and they seem useful (for
example they caught a change in gdb breakpoint location when set after
attaching to the valgrind gdbserver). But sometimes they don't trigger
and then the package is just stuck waiting till the CI tests are ran.
For
On 12. 07. 21 18:31, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
On 7/6/21 2:38 PM, David Cantrell wrote:
On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 01:20:47PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/tzdata-minimal
== Summary ==
Split the tzdata package into two parts - tzdata and tzdata-minimal.
tzdata will
Dne 13. 07. 21 v 11:33 Lukáš Zaoral napsal(a):
My name's Lukas Zaoral (FAS: lzaoral) and I work for Red Hat on automated
formal analysis
Welcome Lukas.
of RPM packages. I've created a review request for a tool called KLEE that can
be, besides
other things, used for exhaustive generation
Hi everybody,
The Rust SIG has recently worked on a few new features and fixes for
rust2rpm, and they are now available with version 18 for fedora 34 and
rawhide.
New features include:
- Add simple %license and %doc file auto-detection
This should reduce the amount of busy-work for version
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1979815
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Link ID||CPAN 137397
--- Comment #10 from Petr
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 35 Rawhide 20210713.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973919
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1970393
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981581
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981578
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981577
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981578
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981577
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Hello!
My name's Lukas Zaoral (FAS: lzaoral) and I work for Red Hat on automated
formal analysis
of RPM packages. I've created a review request for a tool called KLEE that can
be, besides
other things, used for exhaustive generation of tests:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981739
FYI
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/libmemcached-awesome
libmemcached 1.0.18 have been retired from Rawhide
libmemcached-awesome 1.1.0 is now available
Remi
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981476
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981476
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-f9126345dc has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-f9126345dc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981476
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-78746edd3f has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-78746edd3f
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981476
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
Ok, this is exactly the kind of issue we track in the
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues.
As I suppose you can't log-in, I took the liberty to create one for you :-)
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/10096
Adam
___
devel mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981476
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1981565
Referenced Bugs:
Hi,
I have been trying to build git-cola for EPEL8, but the buildSRPMFromSCM
is stuck for over 5 hours:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=71779476
It is already the second try, the first I have canceled after 20 hours.
Is the autochangelog feature the cause?
Is there
66 matches
Mail list logo
