This change won't be applied, so no action is required.
Ondrej
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 8:14 PM Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jul 2021, Simo Sorce wrote:
>
> >> SQLite is a general-purpose tool. Not every use of SHA-1 is
> >> cryptographically relevant. Most uses in the context of SQLite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981927
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-b3da202f28 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981927
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-765587b9ab has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
48 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-1f259a45ef
openjpeg2-2.3.1-11.el7
12 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-4cfaa8ab63
djvulibre-3.5.25.3-24.el7
3
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
12 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-d4c3bbff96
libolm-3.2.4-2.el8
12 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-15c5b7660c
suricata-5.0.7-1.el8
12
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981927
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814107
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 03:21:24PM -0500, Tony Asleson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 7:04 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 01:26:19PM -0500, Tony Asleson wrote:
> > > Upstream pywbem project took 2 internal libraries and broke them out
> > > into separate libraries. I
Does anyone know how to contact Markus? non-responsive tracker:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982444
He's not responded to PRs on his Phoronix package for 4 months:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/phoronix-test-suite/pull-requests
and has not responded to a PR for his other
Hi everyone,
The deadline for F35 Self-Contained Change proposals is Tuesday 20 July:
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-35/f-35-key-tasks.html
Your proposals must be in the ChangeReadyForWrangler category by the
end of the day on Tuesday. The Code Complete (testable) deadline is 10
Hi everyone,
The deadline for F35 Self-Contained Change proposals is Tuesday 20 July:
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-35/f-35-key-tasks.html
Your proposals must be in the ChangeReadyForWrangler category by the
end of the day on Tuesday. The Code Complete (testable) deadline is 10
On 7/14/21 3:00 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14 2021 at 02:28:50 PM -0400, Ben Cotton
> wrote:
>> Rebase libffi in Fedora 34
>
> Is this a typo? F34 or F35?
Sorry. Fixed. Typo.
We've been carrying this change proposal since F34 as we work with
upstream to release libffi 3.4.
--
On 7/14/21 2:33 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 7/14/21 11:28 AM, Ben Cotton wrote:
>> == Upgrade/compatibility impact ==
>> Packages built on the previous version of libffi will have an
>> auto-requires on the old SONAME and will cause dnf to install
>> libffi3.1 (compat package with runtime). When
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982436
Bug ID: 1982436
Summary: perl-CPAN-FindDependencies-3.09 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-CPAN-FindDependencies
Keywords:
José, thanks for the message. Yes, I do have a sponsor--Pat Riehecky.
Kyle
On Jul 14, 2021, at 1:23 PM, José Abílio Matos
mailto:jama...@fc.up.pt>> wrote:
On Wednesday, 14 July 2021 14.09.15 WEST Kyle Knoepfel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm Kyle Knoepfel, a software developer at Fermi National
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 3:40 AM Karolina Surma wrote:
> I've taken python-pytest-datadir and python-pytest-regressions which I
> started to work on independently.
Thank you! Let me know if I can do anything for you.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
Hi,
[1] apache-ivy is only required by ivy-local from javapackages-tools-
6.0.0~alpha-7.fc35.src.rpm
apache-ivy is a FTBFS on rawhide
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/6387/71866387/build.log
I'd bring back to Fedora fedora-review-plugin-java
Review Request:
On Wed, Jul 14 2021 at 02:28:50 PM -0400, Ben Cotton
wrote:
Rebase libffi in Fedora 34
Is this a typo? F34 or F35?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora
On 7/14/21 11:28 AM, Ben Cotton wrote:
== Upgrade/compatibility impact ==
Packages built on the previous version of libffi will have an
auto-requires on the old SONAME and will cause dnf to install
libffi3.1 (compat package with runtime). When packages are rebuilt
against libffi 3.4 they will
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Enhanced_Inscript_as_default_Indic_IM
== Summary ==
The recommended default input method for Indic languages will be
changed from Inscript to Enhanced Inscript keymaps.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Pnemade| Parag Nemade]]
* Email:
== Detailed Description
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LIBFFI34
== Summary ==
Rebase libffi in Fedora 34 from libffi 3.1 to libffi 3.4 (released
June 28 2021), and provide a libffi3.1 compatibility package to handle
the library SONAME transition.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:codonell| Carlos O'Donell]]
* Email:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Enhanced_Inscript_as_default_Indic_IM
== Summary ==
The recommended default input method for Indic languages will be
changed from Inscript to Enhanced Inscript keymaps.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Pnemade| Parag Nemade]]
* Email:
== Detailed Description
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LIBFFI34
== Summary ==
Rebase libffi in Fedora 34 from libffi 3.1 to libffi 3.4 (released
June 28 2021), and provide a libffi3.1 compatibility package to handle
the library SONAME transition.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:codonell| Carlos O'Donell]]
* Email:
On Wednesday, 14 July 2021 14.09.15 WEST Kyle Knoepfel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm Kyle Knoepfel, a software developer at Fermi National Accelerator
> Laboratory. The majority of my projects are C++ based with a little Python
> mixed in (a few of them can be found at https://github.com/knoepfel).
>
On Mon, 12 Jul 2021, Simo Sorce wrote:
SQLite is a general-purpose tool. Not every use of SHA-1 is
cryptographically relevant. Most uses in the context of SQLite probably
aren't, so the removal just annoys users for no good reason.
Note that this is a Sqlite decision, from RHEL engineering
On 08. 07. 21 16:48, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 29. 06. 21 8:28, Felix Schwarz wrote:
Am 28.06.21 um 21:44 schrieb Miro Hrončok:
The semantics is quite simple:
%check
%py3_check_import mymodule mymodule.submodule
Looks great! Thank you.
Please let us know when we should start
On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 03:21:44PM +0200, Lukas Javorsky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm announcing the soname bump of the *libpcre2-posix.so *library (pcre2
> package) happening this Wednesday.
>
> Library has some ABI changes which lead to this bump (you can read more
> about it here
Hi folks!
As everyone may remember, last year our annual contributor conference Flock
to Fedora was moved to a virtual event, Nest with Fedora. *Please join us
for the second edition of Nest with Fedora, August 5th-7th.* We are excited
to see all of the familiar (and new!) faces and to catch up
Hi folks!
As everyone may remember, last year our annual contributor conference Flock
to Fedora was moved to a virtual event, Nest with Fedora. *Please join us
for the second edition of Nest with Fedora, August 5th-7th.* We are excited
to see all of the familiar (and new!) faces and to catch up
On Wed, 14 Jul 2021 17:36:00 +0200
Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> FYI - I think this is worth a copy to Fedora devel.
it is :-) Thanks to everyone involved.
Dan
> Miroslav
>
> Přeposlaná zpráva
> Předmět: Architecture "ppc64le" again in Fedora Copr
> Datum:
FYI - I think this is worth a copy to Fedora devel.
Miroslav
Přeposlaná zpráva
Předmět:Architecture "ppc64le" again in Fedora Copr
Datum: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 16:25:46 +0200
Od: Pavel Raiskup
Adresa pro odpověď: Discussion of Fedora build system
Společnost:
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2021-07-15 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.libera.chat.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Thursday ==
2021-07-15 09:00 PDT US/Pacific
2021-07-15
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
will be retired from Fedora 35 approximately one week before branching (August
2021).
Policy:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
The packages
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 5/15 (aarch64), 3/16 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210712.0):
ID: 928166 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/928166
ID: 928167 Test:
On 7/14/21 8:09 AM, Kyle Knoepfel wrote:
Hi all,
I'm Kyle Knoepfel, a software developer at Fermi National Accelerator
Laboratory. The majority of my projects are C++ based with a little
Python mixed in (a few of them can be found at
https://github.com/knoepfel
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 7:00 AM wrote:
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>Prioritized bugs and issues on 2021-07-14 from 11:00:00 to 12:00:00
> America/Indiana/Indianapolis
>At fedora-meetin...@libera.chat
>
> More information available at:
>
Hi all,
I'm Kyle Knoepfel, a software developer at Fermi National Accelerator
Laboratory. The majority of my projects are C++ based with a little Python
mixed in (a few of them can be found at https://github.com/knoepfel).
I've volunteered to maintain the EPEL7 branch of nlohmann_json, which
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
3 of 43 required tests failed, 1 result missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 8/199 (x86_64), 8/138 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in
On 14/07/2021 11:55, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 14. 07. 21 11:49, David Sommerseth wrote:
Hi,
So I'm running some builds for the openvpn3-linux project on Fedora Rawhide
... And we have this little line in configure.ac:
AM_PATH_PYTHON([3.5],, [:])
When ./configure runs, it reports:
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210713.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210714.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 7
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 80
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 3.66 MiB
Size of dropped packages:2.91
This should be also fixed in Fedora already
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/automake/c/3327906e94b767330433fda3da2d0997292c55ad?branch=rawhide
Ondrej
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 12:11 PM Richard W.M. Jones
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 11:49:23AM +0200, David Sommerseth wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
>
On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 at 21:42, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> (1) Missing files vs. No /usr/share/zoneinfo.
>
> All existing third-party software must handle zone name changes today,
> so there must be some way to handle the error that a given zone is
> missing (changed names).
>
> Let me talk a bit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981927
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-813118785a has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-813118785a
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 11:49:23AM +0200, David Sommerseth wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> So I'm running some builds for the openvpn3-linux project on Fedora
> Rawhide ... And we have this little line in configure.ac:
>
> AM_PATH_PYTHON([3.5],, [:])
>
> When ./configure runs, it reports:
>
>
On 14. 07. 21 11:49, David Sommerseth wrote:
Hi,
So I'm running some builds for the openvpn3-linux project on Fedora Rawhide
... And we have this little line in configure.ac:
AM_PATH_PYTHON([3.5],, [:])
When ./configure runs, it reports:
checking for python3 version... 3.1
As
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814107
--- Comment #6 from Robert Scheck ---
You are welcome...I actually need the package myself ;-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing
Hi,
So I'm running some builds for the openvpn3-linux project on Fedora
Rawhide ... And we have this little line in configure.ac:
AM_PATH_PYTHON([3.5],, [:])
When ./configure runs, it reports:
checking for python3 version... 3.1
As a colleague said, mathematically this is
Hey Jerry,
I've taken python-pytest-datadir and python-pytest-regressions which I
started to work on independently.
Cheers,
Karolina
On 7/14/21 1:02 AM, Jerry James wrote:
A new version of python-networkx is out. In order to keep building
documentation for it, the following new packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981927
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-b3da202f28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-b3da202f28
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981927
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-765587b9ab has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-765587b9ab
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
Hello.
> nothing provides libtidy.so.5()(64bit) needed by
psi-plugins-1.5-3.fc34.x86_64
It looks like the tidy-5.8.0-1.fc35 update bumps soversion from .5 to .58.
Please untag or rebuild all dependent packages.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981927
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981927
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Link ID||CPAN 137599
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981927
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
V Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 06:06:48PM +0200, Mark Wielaard napsal(a):
> Is there are place to see which tests are pending?
At Automated Tests tab of an update in a Bodhi web page you can see which of
the tests at plan level (e.g. fedora-ci.koji-build.tier0.functional,
55 matches
Mail list logo
