[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

2021-07-18 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 52 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-1f259a45ef openjpeg2-2.3.1-11.el7 7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-ddb4fcb22a opendmarc-1.4.1.1-3.el7 The following builds have

Re: rpmautospec deployment into production

2021-07-18 Thread Dan Čermák
Otto Urpelainen writes: > Dan Čermák kirjoitti 17.7.2021 klo 23.10: >> Robert-André Mauchin writes: >> >>> What is the situation wrt new packages? Should we enforce the use of >>> rpmautospec during reviews or is it completely optional? >> >> I think we should encourage the usage of

[EPEL-devel] Re: Do we need Mock supported on EL7?

2021-07-18 Thread Pavel Raiskup
On Saturday, July 17, 2021 3:18:02 PM CEST Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 17:59, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > > > We touched this topic several times before in our team. Perhaps we should > > move > > on and do it... it would simplify a development (the yum/dnf hacks, > >

Re: [EPEL-devel] Re: Do we need Mock supported on EL7?

2021-07-18 Thread Pavel Raiskup
On Saturday, July 17, 2021 3:18:02 PM CEST Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 17:59, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > > > We touched this topic several times before in our team. Perhaps we should > > move > > on and do it... it would simplify a development (the yum/dnf hacks, > >

[EPEL-devel] Re: Do we need Mock supported on EL7?

2021-07-18 Thread Pavel Raiskup
On Saturday, July 17, 2021 9:08:48 PM CEST Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 9:19 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > > On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 17:59, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > > > > > We touched this topic several times before in our team. Perhaps we > > > should move > > > on

Re: [EPEL-devel] Do we need Mock supported on EL7?

2021-07-18 Thread Pavel Raiskup
On Saturday, July 17, 2021 9:08:48 PM CEST Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 9:19 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > > On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 17:59, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > > > > > We touched this topic several times before in our team. Perhaps we > > > should move > > > on

[EPEL-devel] Re: gcc-gnat

2021-07-18 Thread Robert Scheck
Hello Erick, On Mon, 13 Jul 2020, Erick Wittman wrote: > I am using CentOS 8 and am using various packages in the EPEL > repository. I am interested in seeing gcc-gnat added to EPEL. > > I cannot find a current Fedora maintainer listed for this package, but > it is available in Fedora (at least

Fedora-IoT-35-20210718.0 compose check report

2021-07-18 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64), 6/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210717.0): ID: 930498 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/930498 ID: 930501 Test: x86_64

Re: Review swaps: A bunch of PHP libraries

2021-07-18 Thread Christopher Engelhard
On 18.07.21 16:06, Otto Urpelainen wrote: > mt32emu - C/C++ library for emulating Roland MT-32, CM-32L and LAPC-I > synthesizer modules > A cmake project that is somewhat complicated by the fact that it comes > from a monorepo that also contains other related projects. >

Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2021-07-19)

2021-07-18 Thread Fabio Valentini
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Monday at 19:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2021-07-19 19:00 UTC' Links to all issues can be

Fedora-Rawhide-20210718.n.0 compose check report

2021-07-18 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check! All required tests passed Failed openQA tests: 5/199 (x86_64), 10/138 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210717.n.0): ID: 930172 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso support_server URL:

Re: Review swaps: A bunch of PHP libraries

2021-07-18 Thread Otto Urpelainen
Christopher Engelhard kirjoitti 16.7.2021 klo 11.39: Hi all, I finally found some time to unbundle all the 3rdparty PHP/composer libraries from the nextcloud package. The bad news is that due to their various dependency trees, I now have a total of 24 new packages that need reviewing. The good

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210718.n.0 changes

2021-07-18 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210717.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210718.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:2 Upgraded packages: 59 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 10.89 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: Why so long for EPEL-8?

2021-07-18 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 6:09 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 17/07/2021 23:15, Ron Olson wrote: > > I’m curious as to why submitting a new build to Bodhi takes a week to be > > pushed to stable, but two weeks for EPEL-8. > > Enterprise-grade stability. > That's not really the reason

[Bug 1983408] New: perl-Math-BigRat-0.2617 is available

2021-07-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983408 Bug ID: 1983408 Summary: perl-Math-BigRat-0.2617 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Math-BigRat Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: Why so long for EPEL-8?

2021-07-18 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 17/07/2021 23:15, Ron Olson wrote: I’m curious as to why submitting a new build to Bodhi takes a week to be pushed to stable, but two weeks for EPEL-8. Enterprise-grade stability. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel

Fedora-Cloud-34-20210718.0 compose check report

2021-07-18 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210717.0): ID: 930136 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

Re: rpmautospec deployment into production

2021-07-18 Thread Otto Urpelainen
Dan Čermák kirjoitti 17.7.2021 klo 23.10: Robert-André Mauchin writes: What is the situation wrt new packages? Should we enforce the use of rpmautospec during reviews or is it completely optional? I think we should encourage the usage of rpmautospec for new packages, provided that the

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210718.0 compose check report

2021-07-18 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210717.0): ID: 930120 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: