[Bug 1977590] perl-Inline-Python-0.56-16.fc35 FTBFS: all tests fail: Parse errors: Bad plan

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977590 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Release Engineering --- Dear Maintainer, your package has an open Fails To Build From Source bug for Fedora 35. Action is required from you. If you can fix your package to build, perform a build in koji, and

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-8676850578 chromium-91.0.4472.164-1.el8 9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-1b74f2e3ca tor-0.4.5.9-1.el8 8

[Bug 1982677] perl-DateTimeX-Easy: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982677 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-DateTimeX-Easy-0.089-2 |perl-DateTimeX-Easy-0.089-2

[Bug 1979815] perl-DateTime-Format-Flexible-0.34 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1979815 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-DateTime-Format-Flexib |perl-DateTime-Format-Flexib

[Bug 1982677] perl-DateTimeX-Easy: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982677 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-DateTimeX-Easy-0.089-2 |perl-DateTimeX-Easy-0.089-2

[Bug 1979815] perl-DateTime-Format-Flexible-0.34 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1979815 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-DateTime-Format-Flexib |perl-DateTime-Format-Flexib

Re: Assimp soname bump

On 4/18/20 8:16 PM, Rich Mattes wrote: Hi, I plan to update assimp from 3.3.1 to the latest release (5.0.1) in rawhide this week.  The following packages will be affected: fawkes-0:1.3.0-11.fc33.src mrpt-0:1.4.0-17.fc33.src pioneer-0:20200203-1.fc33.src

Re: Need help with Rawtherapee F35 FTB

On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 2:05 PM Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > I need some help with Rawtherapee FTB with the recent mass rebuild: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=72487558 > > I tried asking upstream, but they weren't too friendly, they suggested > that may be a toolchain

Re: replace memtest86+ with pcmemtest, needs maintainer

On 31/07/2021 19:47, Chris Murphy wrote: I'm referring to memtest86+ not memtest86 Memtest86+ is a fork of the opensource version of memtest86. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing list --

[Bug 1988752] perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509-1.909 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988752 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509-1.909-1.fc32.src.rpm for rawhide failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=73037616 --

[Bug 1988752] perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509-1.909 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988752 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1809743 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1809743=edit [patch] Update to 1.909 (#1988752) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug 1988752] New: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509-1.909 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988752 Bug ID: 1988752 Summary: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509-1.909 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 Keywords:

Re: replace memtest86+ with pcmemtest, needs maintainer

On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 1:28 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 31/07/2021 02:57, Chris Murphy wrote: > > This bug might be gcc, but also includes a note about the upstream > > being kinda weak, possibly non-existent these days. > > They just closed the sources. Memtest86 is a commercial

Need help with Rawtherapee F35 FTB

I need some help with Rawtherapee FTB with the recent mass rebuild: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=72487558 I tried asking upstream, but they weren't too friendly, they suggested that may be a toolchain problem: https://github.com/Beep6581/RawTherapee/issues/6324 Is it

Fedora-Rawhide-20210731.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 1 of 43 required test results missing Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests: MISSING: fedora.Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2.x86_64.64bit - compose.cloud_autocloud Failed openQA tests: 9/203

Fedora-IoT-35-20210731.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210729.0): ID: 938644 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/938644 Soft failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64), 1/15

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210731.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210729.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210731.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:6 Dropped images: 3 Added packages: 10 Dropped packages:11 Upgraded packages: 243 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 6.85 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: Review requests: perl-Regexp-Pattern-DefHash, mingw-Imath, {mingw-python-}pyephem, mingw-qt6-*

On 31.07.21 14:57, Richard Shaw wrote: On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 6:26 AM Sandro Mani > wrote: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988364 - mingw-Imath: needed to update to mingw-openexr 3.x

Re: Review requests: perl-Regexp-Pattern-DefHash, mingw-Imath, {mingw-python-}pyephem, mingw-qt6-*

On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 6:26 AM Sandro Mani wrote: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988364 - mingw-Imath: > needed to update to mingw-openexr 3.x > I can take Imath since I'm the non-mingw maintainer as long as you're not in a hurry. I'm still on vacation for a few more days.

Re: Package with deps not detected

On 24. 07. 21 21:53, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: Hi, I'm trying to convert one of my Python package to the new guidelines. With the former guidelines, it had the following BR: BuildRequires:  python3-devel BuildRequires:  python3dist(click) BuildRequires:  python3dist(pytest) BuildRequires: 

[Bug 1988711] New: perl-Linux-Inotify2-2.3 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988711 Bug ID: 1988711 Summary: perl-Linux-Inotify2-2.3 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Linux-Inotify2 Keywords: FutureFeature,

[Test-Announce] Fedora 35 Rawhide 20210731.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 35 Rawhide 20210731.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Review requests: perl-Regexp-Pattern-DefHash, mingw-Imath, {mingw-python-}pyephem, mingw-qt6-*

Hi I'd appreciate reviews of the following packages: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1985637 - perl-Regexp-Pattern-DefHash: needed to update perl-Hash-DefHash https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988364 - mingw-Imath: needed to update to mingw-openexr 3.x

Re: replace memtest86+ with pcmemtest, needs maintainer

On 31/07/2021 12:37, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: Just to be sure, you are talking about Memtest86, not Memtest86+, right? Yes. From the official website: Based on the well-known original memtest86 written by Chris Brady, memtest86+ is a port by some members of the x86-secret team, now

Re: replace memtest86+ with pcmemtest, needs maintainer

Hi Vitaly, On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 10:28 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > They just closed the sources. Memtest86 is a commercial product now. It > has full UEFI support, etc. Just to be sure, you are talking about Memtest86, not Memtest86+, right?

Re: replace memtest86+ with pcmemtest, needs maintainer

El sáb, 31 jul 2021 a las 2:58, Chris Murphy () escribió: > Neal Gompa mentioned pcmemtest earlier this year > https://github.com/martinwhitaker/pcmemtest > > It would need a maintainer. Any takers? > > Hi, I'm not interested in owning the package, but I've created a test build because I want to

Fedora-Cloud-34-20210731.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210730.0): ID: 938266 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

Re: FTBFS due to use of %{_target_platform}, use %{_vpath_builddir} instead

Il 30/07/21 15:26, Eike Rathke ha scritto: > Hi, > > It just hit me and I didn't find it on this list, so.. > In spec after %cmake_install a > cd %{_target_platform} > failed for the rawhide mass rebuild with no such directory. > > After being pointed out (thanks Neal) to change that to > cd

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210731.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210730.0): ID: 938250 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2021-07-31 - 95% PASS

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/07/31/report-389-ds-base-2.0.7-20210731git24d458afb.fc34.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: replace memtest86+ with pcmemtest, needs maintainer

On 31/07/2021 02:57, Chris Murphy wrote: This bug might be gcc, but also includes a note about the upstream being kinda weak, possibly non-existent these days. They just closed the sources. Memtest86 is a commercial product now. It has full UEFI support, etc. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev

Successful Mail Delivery Report

This is the mail system at host mailman01.iad2.fedoraproject.org. Your message was successfully delivered to the destination(s) listed below. If the message was delivered to mailbox you will receive no further notifications. Otherwise you may still receive notifications of mail delivery errors

[Bug 1988610] perl-FCGI-0.82 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988610 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-FCGI-0.81 is available |perl-FCGI-0.82 is