https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1991286
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
72 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-1f259a45ef
openjpeg2-2.3.1-11.el7
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-1405677543
putty-0.76-1.el7
4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1991286
Bug ID: 1991286
Summary: perl-PDL-2.056 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-PDL
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Björn Persson kirjoitti 6.8.2021 klo 2.44:
Petr Menšík wrote:
No, that is the reason why I proposed it. Guidelines already state
*-filesystem packages does not have to be depended on [1]. Just one,
probably systemd or systemd-libs, should depend on it to get it
installed. All other can then
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required tests failed, 1 result missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
MISSING:
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210807.0):
ID: 943676 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/943676
Soft failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64), 1/15
On 8/8/21 10:10 AM, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
Il 07/08/21 21:30, Nikolay Nikolov ha scritto:
On 8/7/21 6:19 PM, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
So, I still haven't seen anything posted in gitlab or mailing lists, so I've
posted to the FPC forums:
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210806.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210808.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 9
Dropped packages:8
Upgraded packages: 180
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 24.62 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Also you should inform upstream to remove exec flag from this files in
their repo/sources.
вс, 8 авг. 2021 г., 15:06 :
> I will remove the executable flag with:
> chmod 0644 *.pm
>
> Thanks a lot
> Martin
> ___
> devel mailing list --
I will remove the executable flag with:
chmod 0644 *.pm
Thanks a lot
Martin
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On 08/08/2021 13:44, Vascom wrote:
But in /usr/share should not be executables, as I know.
Yes. 0644 will remove executable flag.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
But in /usr/share should not be executables, as I know.
вс, 8 авг. 2021 г., 14:43 Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>:
> On 08/08/2021 13:01, linux4mar...@gmx.de wrote:
> > How can i solve this ?
>
> Set chmod 0644 or add a shebang by patching them.
>
> --
> Sincerely,
>
On 08/08/2021 13:01, linux4mar...@gmx.de wrote:
How can i solve this ?
Set chmod 0644 or add a shebang by patching them.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
Hi,
when running rpmlint -v /home/martin/rpmbuild/SRPMS/shutter-0.98-2.fc34.src.rpm
/home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/shutter-0.98-2.fc34.noarch.rpm on the shutter
binary
i get this error message:
shutter.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
Hi,
I'll take this for a review.
Regards,
Jarek Prokop
On 08/08/2021 11:13, Georg Sauthoff wrote:
Hello,
I packaged a command line gist uploader - rubygem-gist - a few weeks
ago:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1979081
So far, nobody picked it up for review.
Thus, if you have
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976544
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976544
Bug 1976544 depends on bug 1977229, which changed state.
Bug 1977229 Summary: Review Request: perl-Date-Range - Work with a range of
dates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977229
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982979
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988610
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1990867
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-WWW-Mechanize-2.04-1.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1990679
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989753
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Fixed In Version|
Hello,
On Sun, Aug 1, 2021 at 7:46 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
[..]
> We do have memtester in the repository, which is a user space memory
> tester. But I can't really assess whether it's better or worse than
> one that runs in the pre-boot environment. On the one hand, less
> memory is being tested
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210807.0):
ID: 943183 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
Hello,
I packaged a command line gist uploader - rubygem-gist - a few weeks
ago:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1979081
So far, nobody picked it up for review.
Thus, if you have experience in reviewing ruby packages it would be
great if you could review it.
The package is quite
Il 07/08/21 19:57, Florian Weimer ha scritto:
> * Mattia Verga via devel:
>
>> So, I still haven't seen anything posted in gitlab or mailing lists, so I've
>> posted to the FPC forums:
>> https://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,55723.0.html
> You left out the most useful piece of
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210807.0):
ID: 943167 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
Il 07/08/21 21:30, Nikolay Nikolov ha scritto:
> On 8/7/21 6:19 PM, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
>> So, I still haven't seen anything posted in gitlab or mailing lists, so I've
>> posted to the FPC forums:
>> https://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,55723.0.html
> The gitlab
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting on Monday. Again I don't
have anything in particular for the agenda.
If you're aware of anything it would be useful to discuss this week,
please do reply to this mail and we can go ahead and run the meeting.
Thanks!
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA
29 matches
Mail list logo
