Hi,
Thank you for the update Ian. It was not meant the way every packager is
ignoring the opened issues, we appreciate your work on this autoconf-2.71
issue. Sorry for generalizing this.
Glad to hear that it will build OK today.
HEADS-UP:
Starting with merging autoconf-2.71 changes. This week
Hi,
soundtouch was update from 2.1.2 to 2.3.0 on rawhide and now use cmake
as build system , is not a soname bump , because we still provide
libSoundTouch.so.2 , but I advice rebuild the dependent packages [1].
If no problems reported , soundtouch-2.3.0 should go to F35 too .
Best regards,
On 8/1/21 3:54 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
But that doesn't stop anyone from maintaining an unsigned version.
The documentation suggests that the UEFI binary can be loaded directly
(which I've done), or through the EFI handover protocol. I haven't done
the latter successfully yet. If I work out
On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 01:41:05PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 12:30 PM Mattia Verga via devel
> wrote:
> >
> > I've pushed siril 0.99.10.1 into Rawhide, which corrects its license.
> >
> > Some code derived from sleef.org is licensed under Boost license,
> > therefore I
On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 12:30 PM Mattia Verga via devel
wrote:
>
> I've pushed siril 0.99.10.1 into Rawhide, which corrects its license.
>
> Some code derived from sleef.org is licensed under Boost license,
> therefore I changed siril license from "GPLv3+" to "GPLv3+ and Boost".
>
> I assume
I've pushed siril 0.99.10.1 into Rawhide, which corrects its license.
Some code derived from sleef.org is licensed under Boost license,
therefore I changed siril license from "GPLv3+" to "GPLv3+ and Boost".
I assume there's no problem to push this new version with the newer
license into stable
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 19/205 (x86_64), 12/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20210827.n.1):
ID: 961666 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/961666
ID: 961678
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
2 of 43 required tests failed, 1 result missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
MISSING:
OLD: Fedora-35-20210827.n.1
NEW: Fedora-35-20210829.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:3
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:974.55 KiB
Size
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20210828.0):
ID: 961632 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/961632
Soft failed openQA
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210828.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210829.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 80
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 455.38 KiB
Size of dropped packages
Hello,
New releases of rpkg and fedpkg are now in testing [1]. There are many
improvements included, of which I would like to point out "Add config
option for writing dist-git build results to a subdirectory" [2] because
it is not enabled by default, at least not yet.
The new feature is
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210828.0):
ID: 961253 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210828.0):
ID: 961237 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
14 matches
Mail list logo
