Miroslav Suchý kirjoitti 7.9.2021 klo 19.14:
sudo dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 \
--enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \
distro-sync
Error:
Problem 1: package arduino-core-1:1.8.13-5.fc34.noarch requires
mvn(org.ow2.asm:asm-all),
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
2 of 43 required tests failed, 1 result missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210905.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210907.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 25
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 173
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 68.04 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0
Error:
Problem: problem with installed package
watchman-2021.04.26.00-1.fc34.x86_64
- watchman-2021.04.26.00-1.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
- nothing provides libfolly.so.2021.04.12.00()(64bit) needed by
watchman-2021.04.12.00-1.fc35.x86_64
(try to add
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000524
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-7ab47be34a has been pushed to the Fedora 35 Modular testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996268
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-7ab47be34a has been pushed to the Fedora 35 Modular testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
El mar, 07-09-2021 a las 18:14 +0200, Miroslav Suchý escribió:
> sudo dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 \
> --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \
> distro-sync
Transaction Summary
On 07.09.2021 18:14, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
> and try to run:
>
> sudo dnf module reset '*'
> sudo dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 \
> --enablerepo=updates-testing
Miroslav Suchý writes:
> Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run:
>
> # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
> # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
> sudo dnf module reset '*'
>
> sudo dnf
Testing went fine in Virtualbox
Updated a Fedora 34 Respin Image to the Fedora 35 from today and it went
fine, but took its while as it was a 1,7GB download and 3443 package
updates
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 9:53 PM Rex Dieter wrote:
> Should be fixed with
>
>
>
Should be fixed with
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/qt5-qtbase/c/70d501d41e08f3f2b18d54367d46c0be81afc73f
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 2:13 PM Marcin Juszkiewicz
wrote:
> On 07.09.2021 20:47, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> > [root@puchatek hrw]# LANGUAGE=C LC_ALL=C LANG=C dnf --releasever=35
> >
Hi!
Everythings seems to be ok.
Regards.
Le 2021-09-07 18:14, Miroslav Suchý a écrit :
Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your
time and try to run:
# Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
# next time you run any DNF command default modules will be
On 9/7/21 6:14 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
and try to run:
# Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
# next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
sudo dnf module reset '*'
sudo dnf
On 9/7/21 11:14 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
> and try to run:
Heck yeah! Sign me up!
> # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
> # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
> sudo dnf
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 2:24 PM Steven A. Falco
wrote:
> I get errors mentioning gnuradio and codec2, probably as a result of the
> version change in codec2; i.e., codec2-1.0.0-1.fc35.2.x86_64 versus
> codec2-0.9.2-7.fc34.x86_64.
>
I'll take a look when I have a second, I thought I had already
I get errors mentioning gnuradio and codec2, probably as a result of the
version change in codec2; i.e., codec2-1.0.0-1.fc35.2.x86_64 versus
codec2-0.9.2-7.fc34.x86_64.
Full report below.
Steve
# dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35
On 9/7/21 1:57 PM, Digimer wrote:
Error:
Problem 1: problem with installed package
python3-opencensus-0.7.13-1.fc34.noarch
- python3-opencensus-0.7.13-1.fc34.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
- nothing provides (python3.10dist(google-api-core) < 2 with
On 07.09.2021 20:47, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
[root@puchatek hrw]# LANGUAGE=C LC_ALL=C LANG=C dnf --releasever=35
--setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 --enablerepo=updates-testing
--enablerepo=updates-testing-modular distro-sync
Last metadata expiration check: 0:28:08 ago on Tue Sep 7
On 2021-09-07 12:14 p.m., Miroslav
Suchý wrote:
Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of
your time and try to run:
# Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
# next time you run any DNF command default
On 07.09.2021 18:14, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
and try to run:
# Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
# next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
sudo dnf module reset '*'
sudo dnf
On 7/9/21 13:14, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your
time and try to run:
# Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
# next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
sudo dnf module reset '*'
sudo dnf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
LGTM :)
Install 22 Packages
Upgrade 427 Packages
Remove 3 Packages
Total download size: 451 M
Is this ok [y/N]:
On Tue, 2021-09-07 at 18:14 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 8:05 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 11:52 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
>
> (...)
>
> > Package (co)maintainers
> Status Change
> >
>
> >
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 11:52 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
(...)
> Package (co)maintainers Status
> Change
>
> cbi-plugins eclipse-sig, kdaniel, mbooth,
Problem 1: package arduino-core-1:1.8.13-5.fc34.noarch requires
mvn(org.ow2.asm:asm-all), but none of the providers can be installed
- objectweb-asm-8.0.1-2.fc34.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
- problem with installed package arduino-core-1:1.8.13-5.fc34.noarch
Problem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000524
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-a5f90eba60 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 Modular testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996268
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-a5f90eba60 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 Modular testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1967434
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-3848097ce2 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 Modular testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1956708
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-3848097ce2 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 Modular testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000524
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996268
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-92b9d61173 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 Modular testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
Hey!
Started helping out with this now during this evening
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 6:15 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
> and try to run:
>
> # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
> # next time you run any DNF
On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 06:13:32PM +0200, Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 5:45 PM Zebediah Figura
> wrote:
> > On 9/7/21 2:12 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 05:59:41PM -0500, Zebediah Figura wrote:
> > >> Thanks everyone for their input.
> > >>
> > >>
Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
try to run:
# Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
# next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
sudo dnf module reset '*'
sudo dnf --releasever=35
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 5:45 PM Zebediah Figura wrote:
> On 9/7/21 2:12 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 05:59:41PM -0500, Zebediah Figura wrote:
> >> Thanks everyone for their input.
> >>
> >> There seems to be a consensus that Fedora would prefer that we use
> >> their
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Committee on 2021-09-08 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting.
A general agenda is the following:
#meetingname
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing
proftpd-1.3.5e-11.el7
yascreen-1.86-1.el7
Details about builds:
proftpd-1.3.5e-11.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-7f33ec2b58)
Flexible, stable
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-303db869be
chromium-93.0.4577.63-1.el8
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing
proftpd-1.3.6e-4.el8
sparse-0.6.4-1.el8
On 9/7/21 2:12 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 05:59:41PM -0500, Zebediah Figura wrote:
Thanks everyone for their input.
There seems to be a consensus that Fedora would prefer that we use
their MinGW dynamic libraries. However, this leaves a couple of
questions:
* As I
I'll take php-google-apiclient1, php-pear-OLE, and php-fedora-autoloader to
keep Moodle in Fedora, but if someone more involved in PHP wants them instead
or wants to be a co-maintainer, please let me know.
--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
in your
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 7:00 AM wrote:
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>Prioritized bugs and issues on 2021-09-08 from 11:00:00 to 12:00:00
> America/Indiana/Indianapolis
>At fedora-meetin...@libera.chat
>
> More information available at:
>
Hey there,
I'm in the process of updating azure-cli to 2.28.0, but it added a new
requirement for another SDK component called
azure-synapse-managedprivateendpoints. That one isn't packaged currently, but
I've proposed a package in BZ 2001918[0].
The package is quite simple and matches
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1967434
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-3848097ce2 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34
Modular. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-3848097ce2
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1956708
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-3848097ce2 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34
Modular. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-3848097ce2
--
You are receiving this mail
Hi all,
a new version rpkg-1.63 together with fedpkg-1.41 are released containing
both features and bugfixes.
Currently, packages for Fedora 34 are present in stable repositories.
Fedora 33, Fedora 35, epel7, epel8 are in the testing repositories. Feel
free to try these waiting distributions in
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
* Emmanuel Seyman [25/07/2021 22:42] :
>
>
> Sometime over the coming week, I'm going to update the
> perl-Data-Properties package from the current 0.02 to 1.05.
> Among other changes, the license changes from ASL 2.0 to the Perl
> license (GPL+ or Artistic).
Upstream has re-released 0.02 with
* Emmanuel Seyman [25/07/2021 22:42] :
>
>
> Sometime over the coming week, I'm going to update the
> perl-Data-Properties package from the current 0.02 to 1.05.
> Among other changes, the license changes from ASL 2.0 to the Perl
> license (GPL+ or Artistic).
Upstream has re-released 0.02 with
Dne 07. 09. 21 v 9:26 Hans de Goede napsal(a):
Hi,
On 9/6/21 5:13 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Not sure if that is intentional, but if I am not mistaken, boot menu used to be
hidden if there were no issues, but it seems to be always on ATM. Is this
intentional?
What is the output of running:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997397
Johan Vromans changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|unspecified |urgent
Doc Type|---
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210906.0):
ID: 970565 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
Hi folks,
I'd like to get these two Python modules reviewed please. Would anyone
like to swap reviews?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2001678
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2001684
They're required to package datalad, which is required for
spikeextractors---both on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000524
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-a5f90eba60 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33
Modular. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-a5f90eba60
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996268
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-a5f90eba60 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33
Modular. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-a5f90eba60
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996268
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-92b9d61173 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34
Modular. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-92b9d61173
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000524
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-92b9d61173 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34
Modular. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-92b9d61173
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996268
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-7ab47be34a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35
Modular. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-7ab47be34a
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000524
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--- Comment #7 from
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210906.0):
ID: 970549 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
Hi,
On 9/6/21 5:13 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Not sure if that is intentional, but if I am not mistaken, boot menu used to
> be hidden if there were no issues, but it seems to be always on ATM. Is this
> intentional?
What is the output of running:
sudo grub2-editenv - list
Also is this a
On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 05:59:41PM -0500, Zebediah Figura wrote:
> Thanks everyone for their input.
>
> There seems to be a consensus that Fedora would prefer that we use
> their MinGW dynamic libraries. However, this leaves a couple of
> questions:
>
> * As I described in [1], we *may* be able
62 matches
Mail list logo
