Re: FF builds

On Friday, 10 September 2021 at 15:32, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 09. 09. 21 v 18:54 Demi Marie Obenour napsal(a): > > Can the Firefox build be distributed among multiple machines? > > I would love to see a benchmark how much it speed up big packages and how it > slow downs smaller packages.

Re: Heads-Up: Matrix clients need urgent update

On 10/09/2021 19:03, Marius Schwarz wrote: Fedora is offering a range of different native Matrix clients. I suggest to have an eye open on monday for related maintainers: I'm a Fedora package maintainer for the following Matrix clients and libraries: neochat, nheko, spectral, purple-matrix,

Re: FF builds

On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 2:11 PM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > Small correction. Miroslav didn't say COPR uses ccache. He said COPR > uses ramdisk for mock. Oh, whoops. Got it. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

Re: FF builds

On Fri, 10 Sept 2021 at 14:05, Ken Dreyer wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 9:33 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > We use this in Copr. AFAIK Koji does not use it. You can join Fedora infra > > to change it :) > > Is there more documentation about how Copr uses ccache? I was grepping > around

Re: Fedora Linux 35 Beta blocker status summary

The Go/No-Go meeting for the target date #1 is Thursday! Action summary Accepted blockers - 1. mesa — gnome-shell: cogl_texture_get_gl_texture(): gnome-shell killed by SIGSEGV — NEW ACTION: Maintainers to diagnose and fix issue 2. freeipa — DNS often stops

Re: FF builds

On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 9:33 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > We use this in Copr. AFAIK Koji does not use it. You can join Fedora infra to > change it :) Is there more documentation about how Copr uses ccache? I was grepping around https://pagure.io/copr/copr for "ccache" and I see the

Heads-Up: Matrix clients need urgent update

Hi, Fedora is offering a range of different native Matrix clients. I suggest to have an eye open on monday for related maintainers: 2021-09-10 — Security — Matrix Security Hi all, A critical security vulnerability impacting several popular

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

#fedora-meeting: Fedora ELN SIG (2021-09-10) Meeting started by sgallagh at 16:00:58 UTC. The full logs are available at fedora-meeting/2021-09-10/eln.2021-09-10-16.00.log.html . Meeting summary

Re: RH Bugzilla extrem slow loading at enter_bug.cgi for Fedora

On Fri, 10 Sept 2021 at 12:50, Marius Schwarz wrote: > > Hi, > > since a few days, loading the enter_bug.cgi for "Product=Fedora" on RH > BZ takes very long. > It's quite possible, that it's happening for any other product too ;) > > It's over a minute ATM. > > Can someone take a look at this, or

RH Bugzilla extrem slow loading at enter_bug.cgi for Fedora

Hi, since a few days, loading the enter_bug.cgi for "Product=Fedora" on RH BZ takes very long. It's quite possible, that it's happening for any other product too ;) It's over a minute ATM. Can someone take a look at this, or do i need to contact rh's adminteam? best regards, Marius Schwarz

Fedora-35-20210910.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 8/141 (aarch64), 7/205 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20210909.n.0): ID: 976005 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_hd_variation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/976005 ID: 976122

Re: F35 3x slower boot than F34

On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 2:11 AM Marius Schwarz wrote: > > Am 03.09.21 um 18:51 schrieb Chris Murphy: > > Bug 2001057 - F35 boots 3x slower than F34, large time gaps in systemd > > journal > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2001057 > > > > > > This one really has gotten my goat. I'm

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-7f33ec2b58 proftpd-1.3.5e-11.el7 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing drupal7-7.82-1.el7

Re: FF builds

On Fri, 10 Sept 2021 at 09:33, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Dne 09. 09. 21 v 18:54 Demi Marie Obenour napsal(a): > > Can the Firefox build be distributed among multiple machines? > > I would love to see a benchmark how much it speed up big packages and how it > slow downs smaller packages. Whole

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-303db869be chromium-93.0.4577.63-1.el8 3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-0123b5931c proftpd-1.3.6e-4.el8 The following builds

[Bug 2003159] perl-Prima-1.63 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2003159 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 2003159] perl-Prima-1.63 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2003159 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- Many new changes. A Drawable alpha renamed to bar_alpha. Suitable for Rawhide only. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

Re: libvirt and systemd-resolved integration?

On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 04:57:56PM +0200, Peter Boy wrote: > Hi all, > > I’m working on an update of the Fedora Server virtlib documentation > (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-server/virtualization-install/), > specifically the part about the DNS configration. > > I would like to

[Bug 2003159] perl-Prima-1.63 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2003159 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value

Re: Modularity: New modulemd-packager format for building modules

V Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 08:50:44AM -0400, Neal Gompa napsal(a): > On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 8:26 AM Petr Pisar wrote: > > > > Good news, module maintainers. > > > > I'm relieved to announce an availability of the new module packaging format, > > modulemd-packager, version 3. > > > > So this

Re: libvirt and systemd-resolved integration?

Hi all, I’m working on an update of the Fedora Server virtlib documentation (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-server/virtualization-install/), specifically the part about the DNS configration. I would like to include and integrate the solutions presented in this thread by Daniel

Re: FF builds

On Thu, 9 Sep 2021 12:42:09 -0400 Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > On 9/8/21 10:49 PM, Bojan Smojver via devel wrote: > > Just being devil's advocate for a second here... > > > > Two days to build FF in koji? Has it gotten that big or are the > > builds that slow? > > > > :-) > > This is also a

Re: Disable locale forwarding in OpenSSH

On Thu, 2021-09-09 at 12:07 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > There is a movement towards C.UTF-8 for small images (containers and > VMs). C.UTF-8 has both size and performance improvements over the more > traditional en_US.UTF-8 locale. (The performance improvement is > currently in upstream glibc

Fedora-Rawhide-20210910.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Xfce raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 1 of 43 required test results missing Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests: MISSING: fedora.Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2.x86_64.64bit - compose.cloud_autocloud Failed openQA

Fedora 35 compose report: 20210910.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-35-20210909.n.0 NEW: Fedora-35-20210910.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:32.51 KiB Size

[Bug 2003159] New: perl-Prima-1.63 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2003159 Bug ID: 2003159 Summary: perl-Prima-1.63 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Prima Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: FF builds

Dne 09. 09. 21 v 18:54 Demi Marie Obenour napsal(a): Can the Firefox build be distributed among multiple machines? I would love to see a benchmark how much it speed up big packages and how it slow downs smaller packages. Whole rpmbuild part. FYI Mock has CCache plugin, which speeds the

Re: Modularity: New modulemd-packager format for building modules

On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 8:26 AM Petr Pisar wrote: > > Good news, module maintainers. > > I'm relieved to announce an availability of the new module packaging format, > modulemd-packager, version 3. > So this certainly solves a lot of issues, but it's still frustrating to see that we *need* to

Modularity: New modulemd-packager format for building modules

Good news, module maintainers. I'm relieved to announce an availability of the new module packaging format, modulemd-packager, version 3. Skip to "WHAT IS CHANGING" section to see the main message. HISTORY === Up to now, you wrote a YAML document in modulemd-v2 format

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210910.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210909.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210910.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:2 Upgraded packages: 81 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 113.62 MiB Size of dropped packages

Fedora-IoT-34-20210910.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210820.0): ID: 975473 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/975473 Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64) (Tests

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

ELN Agenda for this meeting: * s390x container images * DistroBuildSync update * Content Resolver and ELN-Extras ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of

Review swap request: python-datalad

Hi folks, The deps are all packaged so datalad is also up for review now: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2002848 Happy to swap reviews, as always :) It's an awesome tool for use in scientific (and other) work. Here's the handbook for a quick glance:

Fedora-Cloud-34-20210910.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210909.0): ID: 975442 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

Re: F35 3x slower boot than F34

Am 03.09.21 um 18:51 schrieb Chris Murphy: Bug 2001057 - F35 boots 3x slower than F34, large time gaps in systemd journal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2001057 This one really has gotten my goat. I'm not finding any reason why it's taking this long to boot. Usually the

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210910.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210909.0): ID: 975426 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: