Hi,
I'm going to start packaging LLVM 13.0.0-final for rawhide and f35. The
13.0.0-final release has a different ABI than 13.0.0-rc1, so I will be
rebuilding the following packages as part of the update:
castxml
doxygen
gnome-builder
mesa
openshadinglanguage
qt-creator
qt6-qttools
zig
-Tom
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007812
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-b044121caa has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007812
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-e0b79b5250 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2006089
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-4604cd8cda has been pushed to the Fedora 34 Modular stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2006089
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-44a16eb2a7 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 Modular stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-f005e1b879
debmirror-2.35-1.el7
1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-b88139122e
python-mpmath-1.0.0-2.el7
The following builds have
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2006089
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-8320b27b17 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 Modular stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007812
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007855
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
I am trying to find what exactly is raising the error/problem
the directory where mock is building the distro...
at /var/lib/mock/fedora-32-x86_64/root
i've tried
# grep -r "Could not connect" ./usr/*
./usr/tmp/alorax.log:2021-09-30 14:41:19,955 INFO pylorax: Unable to
init server: Could
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2006977
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 4:18 PM Ron Olson wrote:
>
> Thank you Alexander, my search-engine prowess failed me here. :)
>
You can also just add "Provides: swiftlang = %{version}-%{release}"
instead of renaming the package.
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
Thank you Alexander, my search-engine prowess failed me here. :)
Ron
On 30 Sep 2021, at 15:03, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> Hello Ron,
>
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 9:55 PM Ron Olson wrote:
>>
>> I haven’t found any info about renaming an existing project/package, and was
>> wondering what the
Hello Ron,
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 9:55 PM Ron Olson wrote:
>
> I haven’t found any info about renaming an existing project/package, and was
> wondering what the procedures would be.
We have this:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Renaming_Process/
Hey all-
To be consistent with other flavors of Linux, I’m thinking of changing the
package name from “swift-lang” to “swiftlang”. I haven’t found any info about
renaming an existing project/package, and was wondering what the procedures
would be.
Thanks!
Ron
On Thu, 30 Sept 2021 at 18:40, Ravindra Kumar wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/ is not accessible. How do I add a
> contributor to my project?
>
> Appreciate any help on this.
Wow, PkgDb has been gone a long time now :-) Go to:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/
Hi folks,
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/ is not accessible. How do I add a
contributor to my project?
Appreciate any help on this.
Thanks in advance,
Ravindra
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 6/204 (x86_64), 6/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20210928.n.0):
ID: 1007391 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso
install_btrfs_preserve_home_uefi@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1007391
ID: 1007397
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required test results missing
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
MISSING: fedora.Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2.x86_64.64bit - compose.cloud_autocloud
Failed openQA
Notification time stamped 2021-09-29 23:00:18 UTC
From 5ae78633fa4ba0db8034bf428fa288f5054fe935 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom spot Callaway
Date: Sep 29 2021 22:59:44 +
Subject: 0.106
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 53ac27b..ad4d9c6 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++
Notification time stamped 2021-09-29 22:59:52 UTC
From 5ae78633fa4ba0db8034bf428fa288f5054fe935 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom spot Callaway
Date: Sep 29 2021 22:59:44 +
Subject: 0.106
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 53ac27b..ad4d9c6 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 3:26 PM Stephen Gallagher
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 6:00 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > On 29. 09. 21 9:11, Sahana Prasad wrote:
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > Reminder to kindly think about porting your packages to
> > > avoid build failures with OpenSSL 3.0.0.
>
V Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 09:01:25AM -0500, Ron Olson napsal(a):
> Hey all-
>
> I’m trying to install the packaging tools in a container image of Fedora 35
> and keep getting this error when it reaches the “RUN dnf install -y
> fedora-packager fedora-review” command:
>
> The downloaded packages
OLD: Fedora-35-20210928.n.0
NEW: Fedora-35-20210930.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 41
Dropped packages:6
Upgraded packages: 175
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 126.02 MiB
Size of dropped packages:64.86 MiB
Hey all-
I’m trying to install the packaging tools in a container image of Fedora 35 and
keep getting this error when it reaches the “RUN dnf install -y fedora-packager
fedora-review” command:
The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful
transaction.
You can remove
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2008998
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-bignum-0.60-1.fc36
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2008998
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009006
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Math-BigRat-0.2618-1.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009006
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2008970
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:20 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-c6d9aa26ae is
> resubmitted.
>
Awesome. Thanks!
Richard
___
devel mailing list --
On Wed, 29 Sept 2021 at 18:49, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
>
> As an aside, I'm somewhat surprised that the only commit on the Java
> SIG's main wiki page in nearly 4 years is one that simply fixes a
> spelling mistake. This doesn't jive with the amount of discussion we've
> had on this list nor
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210929.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210930.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 81
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 827.87 KiB
Size of dropped packages
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 09:35:23AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> In the end, we have never been able to keep a pool of people
> interested in making Java work. We aren't the only ones as this
> problem occurs in Debian also (and it occurs in other languages like
> Ruby, JS, Python also).
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:13 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 11:17 AM Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 1:51 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > Since the @java-maint-sig group is esentially non-responsive, I suggest
> > > we do
> > > the following:
> >
>
On 9/30/21 03:12, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> you're back, and bad-mouthing all the work the SIG
wtf? um. no.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
Saying insulting/derogatory comments and making personal attacks.
pot. kettle. black.
marbles gone home i guess.
this is
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 11:17 AM Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 1:51 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Since the @java-maint-sig group is esentially non-responsive, I suggest we
> > do
> > the following:
>
> Thanks for making this distinction - @java-maint-sig group is not the
>
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210929.0):
ID: 1006777 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
Hi
I can take these.
I'd have a bunch of mingw-qt6-* packages up for review, all straight
forward:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2009214 -
mingw-qt6-qtlocation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2009215 -
mingw-qt6-qtsensors
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 1:51 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Since the @java-maint-sig group is esentially non-responsive, I suggest we do
> the following:
Thanks for making this distinction - @java-maint-sig group is not the
same as Java SIG.
Some of the most active members of Java SIG (like me or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007812
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-db1f59f364 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-db1f59f364
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007812
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-e0b79b5250 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-e0b79b5250
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007812
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-b044121caa has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-b044121caa
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
Works for me :)
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 3:45 AM Luya Tshimbalanga
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> A new version of default time of day wallpaper for Fedora 35 is
> available for testing and ready for the applications like Software needed
> to display the availability of Fedora 35.
>
> Link:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 4:06 PM PGNet Dev wrote:
>
> Many valid/interesting points being made. Most of them sound, reasonably,
> like developer-/maintainer-centric issues.
>
> Question: Is a primary goal of Fedora distro (JAVA sig, etc) to 'service' its
> (java app) users?
There is no single
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007812
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.48
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-DateTime-TimeZone`
that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-DateTime-TimeZone/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 1:25 AM Mat Booth wrote:
>
> On Wed, 29 Sept 2021 at 23:48, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> > On that topic, I've just read an interview of Nicolas Lécureuil, the
> > president of the Mageia board, in which he says that Mageia's Java stack
> > is based on Fedora's and that he
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project:
`perl-DateTime-TimeZone` that you are following:
``
Tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-DateTime-TimeZone/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009211
Bug ID: 2009211
Summary: perl-Cache-FastMmap-1.57 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Cache-FastMmap
Keywords: FutureFeature,
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (aarch64), 1/8 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210929.0):
ID: 1006765 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007812
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2008970
Bug 2008970 depends on bug 2008973, which changed state.
Bug 2008973 Summary: perl-Math-BigInt-1.999825 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2008973
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2008973
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Math-BigInt` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
1.999825 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Math-BigInt/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list --
jplesnik commented on the pull-request: `1.999825 bump` that you are following:
``
Thanks for the update. There is only missing new BR perl(Scalar::Util). I'll
add it.
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Math-BigInt/pull-request/2
Neal Gompa writes:
>>
>> On that topic, I've just read an interview of Nicolas Lécureuil, the
>> president of the Mageia board, in which he says that Mageia's Java stack
>> is based on Fedora's and that he interacts with Fedora's Java team
>> (leading me to wonder who exactly he is interacting
57 matches
Mail list logo
