Re: Pipeware issue in KDE after F34->F35
Am 19.10.21 um 17:44 schrieb Miroslav Suchý: Any hints, please? JFYI, pipewire has been replaced by pulseaudio on the Fedora Pinephone Edition, because pipewire had issues with profile switching, which pulseaudio does not have. We also had missing audio devices, which was an interaction between alsa and pipewire. Try to swap pipewire-pulseaudio with pulseaudio package and recheck your issue. best regards, Marius Schwarz ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Pipeware issue in KDE after F34->F35
On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 3:52 PM Tom Seewald wrote: > > Looks like someone has reported this bug [1] feel free to add any additional > details. I ran into this bug myself and consider it to be a pretty big > problem if 34->35 upgrades are going to leave some users without working > audio. > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016253 I think I have an idea of what's happening and I may be able to fix it. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Pipeware issue in KDE after F34->F35
Looks like someone has reported this bug [1] feel free to add any additional details. I ran into this bug myself and consider it to be a pretty big problem if 34->35 upgrades are going to leave some users without working audio. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016253 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-35-20211024.n.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 5/141 (aarch64), 3/204 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20211023.n.1): ID: 1038919 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_package_install_remove@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038919 ID: 1038929 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_btrfs_preserve_home_uefi@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038929 ID: 1038966 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038966 ID: 1039047 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_xfs@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1039047 ID: 1039092 Test: aarch64 universal install_cyrillic_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1039092 ID: 1039125 Test: aarch64 universal install_multi@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1039125 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-35-20211023.n.1): ID: 1038833 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_sssd URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038833 ID: 1038880 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038880 Soft failed openQA tests: 3/141 (aarch64), 4/204 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-35-20211023.n.1): ID: 1038981 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz gedit@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038981 Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-35-20211023.n.1): ID: 1038861 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso gedit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038861 ID: 1038900 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso evince URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038900 ID: 1038901 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso gedit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038901 ID: 1038910 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038910 ID: 1038977 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038977 ID: 1038994 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038994 Passed openQA tests: 197/204 (x86_64), 133/141 (aarch64) New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-35-20211023.n.1): ID: 1038830 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038830 ID: 1038835 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038835 ID: 1038837 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038837 ID: 1038863 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_background URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038863 ID: 1038921 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_btrfs_preserve_home@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038921 ID: 1038926 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso anaconda_help@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038926 ID: 1038933 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_lvm_ext4@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038933 ID: 1038935 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038935 ID: 1038943 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038943 ID: 1038951 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_remote_logging_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038951 ID: 1038957 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_resize_lvm@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038957 ID: 1039019 Test: x86_64 universal install_package_set_kde URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1039019 ID: 1039071 Test: x86_64 universal install_software_raid@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1039071 ID: 1039118 Test: aarch64 universal install_kickstart_hdd@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1039118 Installed system changes in test x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload: System load changed from 0.69 to 0.51 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038005#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038845#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload: System load changed from 1.00 to 0.89 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038031#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038871#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi: Used swap changed from 9 MiB to 6 MiB System load changed from 0.50 to 0.84 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038049#downloads Current test data:
Fedora-IoT-36-20211024.0 compose check report
Missing expected images: Iot dvd x86_64 Iot dvd aarch64 Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 1/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20211020.0): ID: 1039130 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1039130 ID: 1039150 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1039150 Passed openQA tests: 15/16 (x86_64), 14/15 (aarch64) Installed system changes in test x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi: System load changed from 0.05 to 0.18 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1035382#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1039129#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload: System load changed from 0.31 to 0.20 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1035384#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1039131#downloads -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora 35 compose report: 20211024.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-35-20211023.n.1 NEW: Fedora-35-20211024.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded packages: 0 B Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 0 B Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = = DROPPED IMAGES = = ADDED PACKAGES = = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = = DOWNGRADED PACKAGES = ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide
On 10/24/21 15:11, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: Hello Antonio, Hi Alexander. On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 3:05 PM Antonio T. sagitter wrote: We are ready to push openbabel3 in Rawhide Will it be just Rawhide? Yes. Will you please let us know when the build is done in order to rebuild dependent packages? Not before one week at least. I will mail you again just before i have created a side-tag in Rawhide. Are we saying goodbye to Avogadro 1.x? Well, Avogadro 1 is no longer under active development since September 2021. We have Avogadro 2 now. Thank you for all the work you've put into this, A. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/ OpenPGP_0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide
Hello Antonio, On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 3:05 PM Antonio T. sagitter wrote: > > We are ready to push openbabel3 in Rawhide Will it be just Rawhide? Will you please let us know when the build is done in order to rebuild dependent packages? Are we saying goodbye to Avogadro 1.x? Thank you for all the work you've put into this, A. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide
Hi all. We are ready to push openbabel3 in Rawhide, all packages (except chemtool that requires openbabel in runtime) have been rebuilt: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/Openbabel-3/builds/ -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/ OpenPGP_0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: kernel mod build on Ryzen5/f34/kernel-5.14.13 builds OK, but FAILs @ modprobe insertion: "ERROR: could not insert ... Exec format error" ?
randomly poking at headers, just dnf reinstall kernel-devel made no difference to the problem but, complete removal/install dnf remove kernel-devel dnf reinstall kernel-core dnf install kernel-devel dkms bison flex did. now, after nvidia install & subsequent modprobe, lsmod | grep nvidia nvidia_drm 69632 0 nvidia_modeset 1200128 1 nvidia_drm nvidia 35332096 1 nvidia_modeset drm_kms_helper303104 2 amdgpu,nvidia_drm drm 630784 8 gpu_sched,drm_kms_helper,nvidia,amdgpu,drm_ttm_helper,nvidia_drm,ttm no idea why on a new/clean install this was necessary, or what diagnostic should've indicated the problem. in any case, sorted. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Intent to retire: Field3D
I don't think anyone will care about this but just in case... OpenImageIO is the only consumer that I know of and upstream has started the process to depreciate it. OpenVDB has been a replacement for quite some time. Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: kernel mod build on Ryzen5/f34/kernel-5.14.13 builds OK, but FAILs @ modprobe insertion: "ERROR: could not insert ... Exec format error" ?
On 10/24/21 00:10, Reon Beon via devel wrote: This is what I found. "11 hour ago" https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/t/nvidia-470-74-build-error-unable-to-load-the-nvidia-drm-kernel-module-modprobe-error-could-not-insert-nvidia-drm-exec-format-error/19287 Right. I posted it. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Cloud-34-20211024.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211023.0): ID: 1038717 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038717 ID: 1038718 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038718 Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64), 7/8 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2015632] perl-HTTP-BrowserDetect-3.35 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2015632 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Fixed In Version||perl-HTTP-BrowserDetect-3.3 ||5-1.fc36 Status|NEW |CLOSED Last Closed||2021-10-24 09:27:39 --- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman --- Built for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1848211 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2015632 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2016417] perl-Mojolicious-9.22 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016417 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Fixed In Version||perl-Mojolicious-9.22-1.fc3 ||6 Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2021-10-24 09:27:02 --- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman --- Built for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1848216 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016417 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Rawhide-20211023.n.1 compose check report
Missing expected images: Xfce raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 2 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 5/206 (x86_64), 7/141 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20211021.n.0): ID: 1038378 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_database_server **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038378 ID: 1038383 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_database_client **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038383 ID: 1038436 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_printing URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038436 ID: 1038450 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038450 ID: 1038646 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_server_64bit@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038646 ID: 1038656 Test: aarch64 universal support_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038656 ID: 1038668 Test: aarch64 universal install_iscsi@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038668 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20211021.n.0): ID: 1038443 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038443 ID: 1038491 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso anaconda_help@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038491 ID: 1038494 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_btrfs_preserve_home_uefi@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038494 ID: 1038546 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz gedit@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038546 ID: 1038687 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_minimal_64bit@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038687 Soft failed openQA tests: 3/141 (aarch64), 4/206 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20211021.n.0): ID: 1038531 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038531 Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20211021.n.0): ID: 1038424 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso gedit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038424 ID: 1038463 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso evince URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038463 ID: 1038464 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso gedit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038464 ID: 1038469 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038469 ID: 1038542 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038542 ID: 1038559 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038559 Passed openQA tests: 197/206 (x86_64), 130/141 (aarch64) New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-Rawhide-20211021.n.0): ID: 1038347 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038347 ID: 1038445 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038445 ID: 1038453 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso anaconda_help URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038453 ID: 1038496 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_remote_logging_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038496 ID: 1038516 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_remote_logging_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038516 ID: 1038552 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz evince@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038552 ID: 1038658 Test: aarch64 universal install_delete_partial@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038658 ID: 1038661 Test: aarch64 universal install_serial_console@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038661 ID: 1038688 Test: aarch64 universal install_addrepo_metalink_graphical@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038688 Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default: 1 packages(s) added since previous compose: libbpf 2 packages(s) removed since previous compose: iproute-tc, linux-atm-libs Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1035952#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038348#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi: 1 packages(s) added since previous compose: libbpf 2 packages(s) removed since previous compose: iproute-tc, linux-atm-libs Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1036007#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038403#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64
Fedora-Cloud-33-20211024.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20211023.0): ID: 1038701 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038701 ID: 1038702 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1038702 Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64), 7/8 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Converting montserrat spec to new version
On 2021-10-21 02:01, Michael J Gruber wrote: Have you managed to get this to work, or what is the particular issue? Seeing "%fontmeta" in there reminds me of the unbreaking which I did back then for adf-accanthis-fonts. The upshot was that a packager suggested new font packaging macros which required a change in rpm (or base macros, don't remember), moved some font packages to the new macros and then rage-quit when the rpm changes were not accepted, leaving some font packages in a state of FTBFS. I unbroke the package above by undoing some changes, (maybe unnecessarily) removing %fontmeta, undong some %expand-magic and adding back "-a" to a few calls. I would hope that the current template leads to a working font spec for a simple font, but the templates might be from that mentioned phase, and I haven't checked whether the rpm side ever got changed. Maybe take this to font SIG? ___ Not yet. I haven't got the time to fully work the spec file. Trying to generate a font specfile for testing purpose from rpmdev-newspec failed due to missing template even tough |fonts-rpm-templates is already installed. | I will post on fonts mailing list and see what they will say. -- Luya Tshimbalanga Fedora Design Team Fedora Design Suite maintainer ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
