No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20211127.0):
ID: 1072427 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Sat, 2021-11-27 at 09:01 -0500, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> Adam Williamson writes:
>
> > [...]
> >
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/UsersAndGroups/#_dynamic_allocation
> >
> > say:
> >
> > "Create a .sysusers file with the user definition and add
> > where usr/li
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 8:37 PM Susi Lehtola
>> I am experiencing problems updating packages employing GitHub source
>> URLs. For instance,
[...]
>> https://github.com/pyscf/pyscf/archive/v2.0.1/pyscf-2.0.1.tar.gz
>> Download failed:
>> 404 Client Error: Not Found for url:
>>
On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 04:52:08PM +, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) via devel wrote:
>
> Nov 27, 2021 11:28:57 AM Adam Saleh :
>
> > Please join #fedora-admin or #fedora-noc on irc.freenode.net
> > or add comments to the ticket for this outage above.
>
>
> Shouldn't this be changed to Libera Chat?
On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 12:35 PM Matthew Miller
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 09:10:13AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > IMO this is ugly and unfortunate.
> > The design around sysusers expects a model where files are unpacked
> > and *then* scripts are run. RPM doesn't work that way, which ma
On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 6:42 PM Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 09:10:13AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > IMO this is ugly and unfortunate.
> > The design around sysusers expects a model where files are unpacked
> > and *then* scripts are run. RPM doesn't work that way, which make
On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 09:10:13AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > IMO this is ugly and unfortunate.
> The design around sysusers expects a model where files are unpacked
> and *then* scripts are run. RPM doesn't work that way, which makes all
> of this fall apart. In the ideal case, we could generate
On Sat, 2021-11-27 at 15:40 +0100, Marius Schwarz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i just noticed, that the gnome main image and the cinnamon spin image
> offering different install options.
>
> Gnome does not ask or allow to set the root user account / password,
> while the cinnamon spin does offer this optio
Ok thanks
On Sat, 27 Nov 2021 at 17:19, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 04:35:24PM +, Ahmed Almeleh wrote:
> > Are candidates allowed to vote on their own application? I voted for
> > council / mindshare as i'm not in the running for those.
>
> Yes, we don't thin
On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 04:35:24PM +, Ahmed Almeleh wrote:
> Are candidates allowed to vote on their own application? I voted for
> council / mindshare as i'm not in the running for those.
Yes, we don't think there's any expectation that candidates will not
vote.
Zbyszek
_
Nov 27, 2021 11:28:57 AM Adam Saleh :
> Please join #fedora-admin or #fedora-noc on irc.freenode.net
> or add comments to the ticket for this outage above.
Shouldn't this be changed to Libera Chat?
--
Maxwell G (@gotmax23)
Pronouns: He/Him/His
PGP Key Fingerprint: f57c76e5a238fe0a628e2ecef79e4e
Are candidates allowed to vote on their own application? I voted for
council / mindshare as i'm not in the running for those.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedor
Planned Outage - bodhi.fedoraproject.org - 2021-11-29 7:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting on monday at 2021-11-29 7:00 UTC
which will last approximately 2 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2021-11
On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 9:41 AM Marius Schwarz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> i just noticed, that the gnome main image and the cinnamon spin image
> offering different install options.
>
> Gnome does not ask or allow to set the root user account / password,
> while the cinnamon spin does offer this option.
>
I don't see any reason to force the Cinnamon spin to follow Gnome's bad choices.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraprojec
On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 9:40 AM Igor Raits
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 2:51 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 4:36 AM Igor Raits
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Seems rust-srpm-macros and rust-packaging are in the RHEL9 which means it
>> > is not possible to get them in EPEL9. That
Hi,
i just noticed, that the gnome main image and the cinnamon spin image
offering different install options.
Gnome does not ask or allow to set the root user account / password,
while the cinnamon spin does offer this option.
Shouldn't "Fedora" Images be consitent here?
Best regards,
Mari
On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 2:51 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 4:36 AM Igor Raits
> wrote:
> >
> > Seems rust-srpm-macros and rust-packaging are in the RHEL9 which means
> it is not possible to get them in EPEL9. That also means, they are already
> outdated and do not support our la
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
3 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 5/208 (x86_64), 12/142 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-202
On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 9:02 AM Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>
> Adam Williamson writes:
>
> > [...]
> >
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/UsersAndGroups/#_dynamic_allocation
> >
> > say:
> >
> > "Create a .sysusers file with the user definition and add
> > where usr/lib/sy
Adam Williamson writes:
> [...]
>
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/UsersAndGroups/#_dynamic_allocation
>
> say:
>
> "Create a .sysusers file with the user definition and add
> where usr/lib/sysusers.d/geekotest.conf is the path to one of the
> sysusers config file withi
On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 4:36 AM Igor Raits
wrote:
>
> Seems rust-srpm-macros and rust-packaging are in the RHEL9 which means it is
> not possible to get them in EPEL9. That also means, they are already outdated
> and do not support our latest greatest consistent packaging across Fedora
> versio
Voted :)
On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 1:11 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
> Voting in the Fedora Linux 35 elections is now open. Go to the
> Elections app[1] to cast your vote. Voting closes at 23:59 UTC on
> Thursday 9 December. Don't forget to claim your "I Voted" badge when
> you cast your ballot. Links to
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20211126.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20211127.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 72
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
Blaise Pabon kirjoitti 26.11.2021 klo 18.01:
Hi Otto,
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 2:27 AM Otto Urpelainen wrote:
Blaise Pabon kirjoitti 25.11.2021 klo 5.43:
When the docs were migrated, the intent was, of course, to make them
better, not worse. If things have regressed in some way, I would l
Seems rust-srpm-macros and rust-packaging are in the RHEL9 which means it
is not possible to get them in EPEL9. That also means, they are already
outdated and do not support our latest greatest consistent packaging across
Fedora versions… Right now, I suppose it is still possible to get that
stuff
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20211126.0):
ID: 1071886 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
27 matches
Mail list logo
