On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 11:15 PM Reon Beon via devel
wrote:
>
> Thoughts?
No. Kate is more complex and confusing. KWrite was introduced as a
deliberately simpler text editor, which is why we ship it by default
instead of Kate. Kate is *built* on KWrite and extends it with lots of
Hello,
I am new to this group and not yet part of the Packager group. I would like to
contribute in maintaining of orphan package plantuml, if I am allowed to do so.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ga...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/6MY3KDQ3GQBVDULLOHOWMN7AAK2VLQ6V/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code
I have proposed a python-colored-traceback package at:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033730
Would anyone like to do a review swap?
I am anxious to get python-colored-traceback reviewed, because the
existing python-pwntools package will require python-colored-traceback
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 11:00 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> So will the default version be the "ghc" package going forward?
That's correct - general Haskell users/consumers should just continue to
use the main ghc package and ghc-* libraries.
ghcX.Y is for people who need/want to use or test
Thoughts?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
Hello,
This is a non-responsive maintainer check for halfie. I have filed a bug for
epel8/9 branch[1] and one for non-responsive maintainer[2].
Does anyone know how to contact halfie?
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030902
[2]
There's been a (short) discussion about having a wishlist last month:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/K3O5WRMT75UCWMRE6PCMBHRGMHMIBM63/
A.FI.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-1526755a59
singularity-3.8.5-2.el7
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-afc31f929c
seamonkey-2.53.10.1-1.el7
The following builds
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031492
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Data-MessagePack-1.01-
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-79302e6110
singularity-3.8.5-2.el8
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-820fb1124a
seamonkey-2.53.10.1-1.el8
The following builds
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034048
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034850
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033606
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028913
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031731
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034851
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032513
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030731
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030680
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031234
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031484
Bug 2031484 depends on bug 2031490, which changed state.
Bug 2031490 Summary: Please branch and build perl-Clone-PP in epel9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031490
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031490
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031450
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 11:56 PM Jakub Kadlčík wrote:
> TL;DR What about a place where people could ask for something to be
> packaged in Fedora?
There is https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_maintainers_wishlist
___
devel mailing list --
Hello,
TL;DR What about a place where people could ask for something to be
packaged in Fedora?
I haven't seen almost any distribution having a package wishlist so it
is either a bad idea (and doesn't have any real value) or everybody
else missed a good opportunity. Or possibly they (maybe even
On 22. 12. 21 18:44, Tom Stellard wrote:
I wasn't suggesting modifying the extension flags directly. What I meant was
that we should be able to specify a set of flags for extensions to use
when we build python, for example. And then extensions would pick up those
flags up the same way they do
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 5:16 AM Barry Scott wrote:
> I have added a patch for the spec file for python-tzlocal.spec
> that allows the 4.1 release to build.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1993583
>
> I can raise a PR if that helps, but I have not done that before
> so pointers to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033606
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034639
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|NEW
On 12/22/21 01:56, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 21. 12. 21 v 21:56 Tom Stellard napsal(a):
On 12/21/21 01:42, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi Tom,
Since you are digging into this and AFAIK you are involved with toolchains,
this reminds me this dreaded issue:
On Wednesday, December 22, 2021 4:22:29 PM CET Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 10:14 AM Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> >
> > On Wednesday, December 22, 2021 9:36:01 AM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, December 21, 2021 5:49:34 PM CET Maxwell G wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, December 21,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005844
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034048
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028913
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
There are the "Fedora rawhide compose report" email coming (almost)
daily into this ML, which contains list of added packages. Nevertheless,
the "Changes" [1] process is the main way to announce and increase
visibility of the new features which goes to Fedora.
Vít
[1]
Yes, this can't be updated until someone packages ROCM-Device-Libs
unfortunately.
If anyone volunteers, I'm happy to help review.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 10:14 AM Pavel Raiskup wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, December 22, 2021 9:36:01 AM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > On Tuesday, December 21, 2021 5:49:34 PM CET Maxwell G wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, December 21, 2021 8:22:55 AM CST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > > On 19. 12. 21 22:39, Pavel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034850
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034851
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
I have taken freexl.
I am willing to take pyshp, python-OWSLib, and readosm, but they have
not been orphaned.
Co-maintainers are (always) welcome.
- Ben Beasley (FAS music)
On 12/12/21 17:18, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
* Volker Fröhlich [12/12/2021 23:03] :
All of my packages are up for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031731
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 2:38 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GHC_parallel_version_installs
>
>
> == Summary ==
> Introduce ghcX.Y packages to Fedora which can be parallel installed,
> in addition to the main ghc package.
>
> == Owner ==
> * Name:
Hi Barry,
I'm an aspiring Fedora packager with a focus on python. I'm likely to run
into the same situation soon. If you don't get any traction on this, I am
happy to look around and see if I can find some useful examples.
I'm in eastern time zone if you want to have a second pair of eyes.
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20211212.1):
ID: 1090534 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1090534
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests
If newpackage is chosen in Bodhi update, it can be listed from it:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?search==__current__=__pending__=newpackage=1
Slight problem is rawhide only builds do not have newpackage updates in
bodhi. I think they do not have any good place to watch them. It lists
Le 21/12/2021 à 15:47, Remi Collet a écrit :
Hi,
Pavel is non responsive for a while
Already managed 4 years ago
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1758
I've been maintaining for a while
- php-pecl-gmagick
- php-pecl-imagick
- php-pecl-xmldiff
Do you I need to follow the full workflow,
or a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031731
--- Comment #2 from Jitka Plesnikova ---
I have admin rights to the package repo and I requested the branch. All
dependencies are satisfied.
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/40007
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Hello people.
First of all, I'm not a developer or a packager, I just try to help with
the little things I know to do. One thing I try to do is to check news,
forums, ML and places where people talk about Fedora.
A thing I noted is that a lot of people in magazines and news sites like
phoronix,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031731
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
---
> On 22 Dec 2021, at 11:12, Barry Scott wrote:
>
> I have added a patch for the spec file for python-tzlocal.spec
> that allows the 4.1 release to build.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1993583
>
> I can raise a PR if that helps, but I have not done that before
> so pointers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031815
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||p...@city-fan.org
Doc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032513
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034738
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Text-CSV_XS-1.47-1.fc3
On ke, 22 joulu 2021, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On ke, 22 joulu 2021, Mat Booth wrote:
On Tue, 21 Dec 2021 at 14:35, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
I picked up wsdl4j to prevent actions which would lead to tomcat, Dogtag, and
FreeIPA being orphaned over Christmas break.
Have you tried building
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034850
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|holca...@gmail.com |jples...@redhat.com
Hi,
for a new project hopefully coming to soon to Fedora, I like to know
the policy for really big data rpms.
The project could offer 18 language files for a voice recognition
system, which is ( unpacked ) up to 2.4 GB each and packed upto around
1.6~1.8 GB each.
+ 18 small ones ~50-60 MB
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034851
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030731
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #5 from
I see that there are packages for qt6, but no python-qt6 yet.
What is the plan for this please?
I have built PyQt5 in the past and, time permitting, can
offer help.
Barry
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031818
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2031796
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032447
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2031796
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034851
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2031796
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034851
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034850
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2031796
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033663
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2031796
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034030
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2031796
Referenced Bugs:
I have added a patch for the spec file for python-tzlocal.spec
that allows the 4.1 release to build.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1993583
I can raise a PR if that helps, but I have not done that before
so pointers to the work flow would be welcomed.
I need the 4.1 version for one
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031796
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2033663, 2032447, 2034850,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034851
Bug ID: 2034851
Summary: Please branch and build perl-Sub-Override in epel9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Throwable
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034850
Bug ID: 2034850
Summary: Please branch and build perl-Sub-Override in epel9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Sub-Override
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033663
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2031798
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031798
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2033663, 2032430
Doc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032430
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2031798
Referenced Bugs:
Dne 21. 12. 21 v 21:56 Tom Stellard napsal(a):
On 12/21/21 01:42, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi Tom,
Since you are digging into this and AFAIK you are involved with
toolchains, this reminds me this dreaded issue:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284684
In short, various languages,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030731
--- Comment #4 from Paul Howarth ---
perl-DBD-CSV-0.58-3.el9 is built and added as a buildroot override.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030731
On Wednesday, December 22, 2021 9:36:01 AM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 21, 2021 5:49:34 PM CET Maxwell G wrote:
> > On Tuesday, December 21, 2021 8:22:55 AM CST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > On 19. 12. 21 22:39, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > > On Sunday, December 19, 2021 10:22:57 PM
On ke, 22 joulu 2021, Mat Booth wrote:
On Tue, 21 Dec 2021 at 14:35, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
I picked up wsdl4j to prevent actions which would lead to tomcat, Dogtag, and
FreeIPA being orphaned over Christmas break.
Have you tried building tomcat without wsdl? I can't see where in the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030680
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
On Tue, 21 Dec 2021 at 14:35, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
>
> I picked up wsdl4j to prevent actions which would lead to tomcat, Dogtag, and
> FreeIPA being orphaned over Christmas break.
>
Have you tried building tomcat without wsdl? I can't see where in the
tomcat source it is used. Is it really a
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20211221.0):
ID: 1090365 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
On Tuesday, December 21, 2021 5:49:34 PM CET Maxwell G wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 21, 2021 8:22:55 AM CST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 19. 12. 21 22:39, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > On Sunday, December 19, 2021 10:22:57 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > >> So it seems that fedpkg doesn't (yet) know
82 matches
Mail list logo
