Happy New Year!
I am in need of some package reviews to update parts of the OCaml stack:
- ocaml-bos: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031160
- ocaml-odoc-parser: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036395
- ocaml-mdx: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036396
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033063
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Test-Kwalitee-1.28-3.e
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033569
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033967
Bug 2033967 depends on bug 2034013, which changed state.
Bug 2034013 Summary: Please branch and build perl-Test-Without-Module for EPEL-9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034013
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033063
Bug 2033063 depends on bug 2033569, which changed state.
Bug 2033569 Summary: Please branch and build perl-Test-FailWarnings for EPEL-9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033569
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032425
Bug 2032425 depends on bug 2034013, which changed state.
Bug 2034013 Summary: Please branch and build perl-Test-Without-Module for EPEL-9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034013
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034013
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA
Greetings!
I've been banging my head against this wall for a while now, and would
really appreciate some pointers.
I can no longer record Google Meet meetings using RecordRTC
(https://www.webrtc-experiment.com/RecordRTC/). This promptly became a
problem once I upgraded from F33 to F35. I'm
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing
icewm-2.9.4-1.el8
mbedtls-2.16.12-1.el8
Details about builds:
icewm-2.9.4-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e97eb82632)
Window manager
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 3/15 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20211225.0):
ID: 1093952 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1093952
ID: 1093956 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036215
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
On Sat, Jan 01, 2022 at 12:52:57PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > Given that the "shared-memory file contains no persistent content",
> > it seems like "rpmdb.sqlite-shm" could be a symlink to
> > /dev/shm/rpmdb.sqlite-shm", or to some other tmpfs location.
> It does seem like maybe it could.
On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 01:41:01PM -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> Given that the "shared-memory file contains no persistent content",
> it seems like "rpmdb.sqlite-shm" could be a symlink to
> /dev/shm/rpmdb.sqlite-shm", or to some other tmpfs location.
It does seem like maybe it could. I'd
On Sat, Jan 1, 2022 at 5:51 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 31/12/2021 20:03, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > Sounds like, if this is enabled, they'll need a GPG key associated
> > with their personal repository.
>
> Locally built packages are always unsigned.
>
They don't have to be, but
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
24 of 43 required tests failed, 17 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 103/228 (x86_64), 68/159 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not
On 01/01/2022 13:09, Tom Hughes via devel wrote:
Surely a symlink from mo to ro would be better so that people
can set LANG=ro (the correct code) and get all the translations
for Moldovan regardless of whether packages use the old or new
code for it.
I think this would create problems since
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036427
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-DBD-CSV-0.59-1.fc36
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036432
Bug ID: 2036432
Summary: perl-System-Info-0.062 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-System-Info
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036429
Bug ID: 2036429
Summary: Please branch and build perl-Want for EPEL-9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Want
Assignee: lkund...@v3.sk
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036426
Bug ID: 2036426
Summary: perl-Data-Peek-0.51 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Data-Peek
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036427
Bug ID: 2036427
Summary: perl-DBD-CSV-0.59 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-DBD-CSV
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20211231.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220101.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 35
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
On 01/01/2022 12:01, Fabio Valentini wrote:
I'm pretty sure I won't add ownership of /usr/share/locale/mo to
literally dozens of packages just so this minor issue is "fixed". I
think the filesystem package should create and own it.
Surely a symlink from mo to ro would be better so that people
On Sat, Jan 1, 2022 at 12:46 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 02:41:56PM +0100, Arthur Bols wrote:
> > The origin of /usr/share/locale/mo/LC_MESSAGES/[iso_3166.mo|iso_3166-1.mo]
> > is [1]. This file provides translation of ISO 3166-1 to Moldovan. The file
> >
On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 02:41:56PM +0100, Arthur Bols wrote:
> The origin of /usr/share/locale/mo/LC_MESSAGES/[iso_3166.mo|iso_3166-1.mo]
> is [1]. This file provides translation of ISO 3166-1 to Moldovan. The file
> names seems to be created using iso-639 codes, but the problem is that the
> "mo"
Fabio Valentini writes:
> On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 9:09 PM Matthew Miller
> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 25, 2021 at 09:15:38PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>> > So ... maybe we could have a mailing list for this?
>> >
>> > Maybe "awesome-announce" or "the-new-shinyness" (I'm kidding! I'm bad
>> >
On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 03:33:05PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Let me sum up what the Copr team did during 2021:
Lots of great stuff, thanks!
>We had an initial meeting about rebase-helper automatically opening PR in
> src.fedoraproject.org. There is even some
>code written
On Sat, Jan 1, 2022 at 11:12 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
(snip)
>
> rust-ambient-authority.spec
> rust-base100.spec
> rust-cap-primitives.spec
> rust-cap-rand.spec
> rust-cap-std.spec
> rust-cranelift-bforest.spec
> rust-cranelift-codegen-meta.spec
> rust-cranelift-codegen-shared.spec
>
On 31/12/2021 20:03, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
Sounds like, if this is enabled, they'll need a GPG key associated
with their personal repository.
Locally built packages are always unsigned.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
I am processing results of license-validate audit, but it takes longer...
So I am providing raw results of what I have. If you are maintainer one of these packages you may expect either BZ
report or Pagure PR for your package in upcoming days/weeks.
In the attachment you will find more
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211231.0):
ID: 1093330 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20211231.0):
ID: 1093314 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
32 matches
Mail list logo
