[Bug 2041002] perl-Test-LWP-UserAgent-0.036 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041002 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-Test-LWP-UserAgent-0.0

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

Hi Jakub, On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 03:31:43PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > gcc 12 snapshot has landed as the system compiler into rawhide today. > GCC 12 is going to enter its stage4 development phase (only regression > and documentation bugfixes allowed) on Monday 17th, so there should

[EPEL-devel] Re: Heads-up: trousers (TPM 1.2) silently orphaned

On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 11:42:34AM +, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 4:20 AM Michel Alexandre Salim > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 12:35:59PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > > > It does seem to be used by robosignatory (the thing that signs Fedora > > >

Re: Heads-up: trousers (TPM 1.2) silently orphaned

On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 11:42:34AM +, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 4:20 AM Michel Alexandre Salim > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 12:35:59PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > > > It does seem to be used by robosignatory (the thing that signs Fedora > > >

[EPEL-devel] Re: The incredibly shrinking RHEL

On 15. 01. 22 18:41, Orion Poplawski wrote: I was also confused about two things here: - It's retired on the "main" branch, but the c9s branch seems intact. Indeed, that is how this was done for many (all?) retired c9s packages. I believe this is confusing. - What does "retired for

[EPEL-devel] Re: The incredibly shrinking RHEL

On 15. 01. 22 21:42, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 1/15/22 12:22, Andrew C Aitchison wrote: On Sat, 15 Jan 2022, Miro Hrončok wrote: python-pytest-cov is something I've lobbied has no business in an enterprise distro at all.  ...    ... As for EPEL I strongly suggest not to introduce

[EPEL-devel] Re: The incredibly shrinking RHEL

On 15. 01. 22 20:22, Andrew C Aitchison wrote: On Sat, 15 Jan 2022, Miro Hrončok wrote: python-pytest-cov is something I've lobbied has no business in an enterprise distro at all. ...    ... As for EPEL I strongly suggest not to introduce python-pytest-cov either. If your package

Re: Proposal: Make -r (include runtime deps) the default for %pyproject_buildrequires

On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 01:55:39PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello Pythonistas. > > When we invented the %pyproject_buildrequires BuildRequires generator, it > generated build-dependencies. Imediatelly we realized that for several > reasons, also generating the runtime dependencies as

[Bug 2038286] Please branch and build perl-Search-Xapian for EPEL8 and EPEL9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038286 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(emmanuel@seyman.f

Re: Workflow and other problems with the Fedora container infrastructure

On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 02:14:19PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > One of the things that has recently happened in the Koji space is the > addition of a kiwi-build task to build images using the KIWI tool[1]. > > KIWI supports building all kinds of operating system images, including > OCI

[Bug 2038283] Please branch and build perl-Plack-Middleware-ReverseProxy for EPEL8 and EPEL9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038283 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(emmanuel@seyman.f

[EPEL-devel] Re: The incredibly shrinking RHEL

On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 1:29 PM Orion Poplawski wrote: > > On 1/14/22 05:02, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 5:31 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> > >> On 14. 01. 22 5:11, Orion Poplawski wrote: > >>> While working on EPEL9, it seems that even more packages are missing from > >>> RHEL9

[EPEL-devel] Re: The incredibly shrinking RHEL

On 1/15/22 12:22, Andrew C Aitchison wrote: On Sat, 15 Jan 2022, Miro Hrončok wrote: python-pytest-cov is something I've lobbied has no business in an enterprise distro at all. ...    ... As for EPEL I strongly suggest not to introduce python-pytest-cov either. If your package

[EPEL-devel] Re: The incredibly shrinking RHEL

On 1/14/22 10:33, Troy Dawson wrote: On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 8:13 AM Stephen John Smoogen > wrote: On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 at 10:57, Stephen John Smoogen mailto:smo...@gmail.com>> wrote: I mirrored the source rpms down and did the following for 8 and

[EPEL-devel] Re: The incredibly shrinking RHEL

On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 6:29 PM Orion Poplawski wrote: > I don't buy any of these arguments, and it doesn't really address the > situation of "missing -devel" packages. The missing devel packages for shipped libraries are a clear pain point for those that just want build something for their EL

[Bug 2041077] New: Please build perl-Net-XMPP for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041077 Bug ID: 2041077 Summary: Please build perl-Net-XMPP for EPEL 9 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component:

[Bug 2041074] Please build perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041074 Robert Scheck changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Please build gnustep-make |Please build |for

[Bug 2041074] New: Please build gnustep-make for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041074 Bug ID: 2041074 Summary: Please build gnustep-make for EPEL 9 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component:

[EPEL-devel] Re: The incredibly shrinking RHEL

On Sat, 15 Jan 2022, Miro Hrončok wrote: python-pytest-cov is something I've lobbied has no business in an enterprise distro at all. ... ... As for EPEL I strongly suggest not to introduce python-pytest-cov either. If your package depends on it, please drop the dependency

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

To clarify, this is affecting the https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/json package and (since it is a header-only library) some or all of the many packages that use it. Here’s the upstream issue: https://github.com/nlohmann/json/issues/3138 It looks like they’re not sure what to do about it

[EPEL-devel] Re: The incredibly shrinking RHEL

On 1/14/22 05:02, Josh Boyer wrote: On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 5:31 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: On 14. 01. 22 5:11, Orion Poplawski wrote: While working on EPEL9, it seems that even more packages are missing from RHEL9 than were in RHEL8. The latest I found was cppunit, which appears to be

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

On 14/01/2022 15:31, Jakub Jelinek wrote: gcc 12 snapshot has landed as the system compiler into rawhide today. Another regression: FAILED: test/CMakeFiles/test-regression1.dir/src/unit-regression1.cpp.o /usr/bin/g++ -DDOCTEST_CONFIG_SUPER_FAST_ASSERTS -DJSON_DIAGNOSTICS=0

[EPEL-devel] Re: The incredibly shrinking RHEL

On 1/14/22 19:45, epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote: On 1/14/22 03:29, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 14. 01. 22 5:11, Orion Poplawski wrote: While working on EPEL9, it seems that even more packages are missing from RHEL9 than were in RHEL8.  The latest I found was cppunit, which appears to be

Re: Review swap

I can take this Can you take https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2041042 in exchange? Thanks Sandro On 15.01.22 14:25, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: Is anyone available for a review swap? I've got https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038675 waiting in the queue, I

Review swap

Is anyone available for a review swap? I've got https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038675 waiting in the queue, I can offer a review in return (possibly not rust-* or golang-* stuff, where I have little or no knowledge about). Thanks Mattia

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

I (and others) encountered this too. It’s reported here[1], with a fix promised today. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2040825 On Sat, Jan 15, 2022, at 7:06 AM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 14/01/2022 15:31, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >> gcc 12 snapshot has landed as the

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 01:06:48PM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 14/01/2022 15:31, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > gcc 12 snapshot has landed as the system compiler into rawhide today. > > On ppc64le: > > gcc -c -std=gnu99 -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g >

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

On 14/01/2022 15:31, Jakub Jelinek wrote: gcc 12 snapshot has landed as the system compiler into rawhide today. On ppc64le: gcc -c -std=gnu99 -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2

Re: Heads-up: trousers (TPM 1.2) silently orphaned

On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 4:20 AM Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 12:35:59PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Fri, 2021-12-17 at 10:35 -0800, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 10:11:53AM -0800, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > > > > Hi all, > >

[EPEL-devel] Re: The incredibly shrinking RHEL

On 15. 01. 22 11:19, Miro Hrončok wrote: As for EPEL I strongly suggest not to introduce python-pytest-cov either. If your package depends on it, please drop the dependency instead, see https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_linters And this goes without saying: If

[EPEL-devel] Re: The incredibly shrinking RHEL

On 15. 01. 22 3:45, Orion Poplawski wrote: Others: python-pytest-cov ->   python-pyttest-xdist ->     python-execnet ->   python-gevent ->     python-zope-interface ->   python-zope-testing   python-apipkg

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

CCing Martin. On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 09:04:35AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > There is a new warning in gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36.x86_64. In this code: > > int > guestfs_int_create_socketname (guestfs_h *g, const char *filename, > char

Fedora-Cloud-34-20220115.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220114.0): ID: 1105419 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

There is a new warning in gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36.x86_64. In this code: int guestfs_int_create_socketname (guestfs_h *g, const char *filename, char (*sockpath)[UNIX_PATH_MAX]) { if (guestfs_int_lazy_make_sockdir (g) == -1) return -1; if (strlen

Fedora-Cloud-35-20220115.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220114.0): ID: 1105403 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: