Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F35 to F36
On 3/12/22 04:43, Miroslav Suchý wrote: dnf --releasever=36 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f36 \ --enablerepo=updates-testing \ $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \ --assumeno distro-sync For me the only error I received was: Error: Problem: package VirtualBox-6.1-6.1.32_149290_fedora33-1.x86_64 requires libvpx.so.6()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - libvpx-1.10.0-2.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package VirtualBox-6.1-6.1.32_149290_fedora33-1.x86_64 (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) -- Ian Laurie ilau...@bigpond.net.au ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2063611] New: perl-Dancer2-0.400000 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063611 Bug ID: 2063611 Summary: perl-Dancer2-0.40 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Dancer2 Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: emman...@seyman.fr, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 0.40 Current version/release in rawhide: 0.301004-3.fc36 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Dancer2 Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/5847/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063611 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: F37 Change: Curl-minimal as default (System-Wide Change proposal)
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 09:52:41AM +0100, Petr Pisar wrote: > That misses the point that telnet is a protocol which e.g. prescribes how to > encode an end of line. Specifically this feature mismatches with the shell > environement we speak about. And because telnet is an underlying layer of > many protocols like SMTP, or HTTP, your recommendation will break any > debugging of them. I know this is into deep old-timey esoterica, but SMTP and HTTP do not use telnet as an underlying layer. It's actually exactly the opposite — the telnet protocol does things that aren't what you want at all. It is just happening to work, because the telnet client in Fedora Linux (and most of them!) defaults to skipping Telnet protocol negotation — and because you're not sending anything containing IAC (byte 0xff). It's _handy_ that the end-of-line characters get converted to crlf, and for basic diagnostics the IAC problem doesn't come up, but it's still really not a tool _meant_ for the job. -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F35 to F36
| # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules | # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again | sudo dnf module reset '*' | | dnf --releasever=36 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f36 \ | --enablerepo=updates-testing \ | $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \ | --assumeno distro-sync I ran it on mine and had no issues. Transaction Summary == Install 47 Packages Upgrade2806 Packages Remove7 Packages Downgrade 6 Packages Total download size: 2.9 G Operation aborted. Excellent work! Harish -- Harish Pillay 9v1hp hpil...@redhat.com +65.9636.9253 gpg id: 0x746809E3 signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: compile a basic example to arm executable on Fedora
Cătălin George Feștilă wrote:
> cat hello.c
> #include
> using namespace std;
> int main(void)
> {
> std::cout << "Hello word! from Fedora Linux!" << std::endl;
> return 0;
> }
This is C++ code and does not belong in a source file with .c extension.
> I install wit the dnf tool
>
> dnf install -y libstdc++-static.x86_64
A static library for x86_64 will be of no use when compiling ARM
executables. This is really not an issue for the devel list, there is
nothing wrong with how Fedora is developed here, it is a user error.
> dnf install -y llvm
> dnf install -y glib-static
Here, you are not specifying the architecture explicitly, but if this is on
an x86_64 host, you are going to get the x86_64 versions of these too. (And
you almost certainly do not want glib (version 1), maybe glib2, or did you
mean glibc?)
> arm-none-eabi-g++
Are you sure you want to target arm-none-eabi and not arm-linux-gnueabi or
even aarch64-linux-gnu? What device are you targeting? If it runs some form
of GNU/Linux, try:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/lantw44/arm-linux-gnueabi-toolchain/
or:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/lantw44/aarch64-linux-gnu-toolchain/
instead of the arm-none-eabi target.
arm-none-eabi is a generic freestanding (no operating system) target. It
assumes you explicitly link to an implementation of some basic operating
system functions, or even include them as part of your source code. (It is
common for devices truly without an operating system to build an application
with a bundled small operating system, typically an RTOS (real-time
operating system).) For devices with an operating system, you should instead
use the specific target corresponding to that operating system.
In short, this is off-topic for this list, there are many issues with what
you are doing, and none in Fedora so far.
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: QEMU-kvm installation a dependency hell?
> Am 13.03.2022 um 22:20 schrieb Chris Adams : > > Once upon a time, Peter Boy said: >> ... >> I’m wondering, why I need Wayland or X11 etc for kernel virtualization and >> running virtual machines? It turns my headless server into a graphical >> workstation. It installs software that I don't need for running a headless >> server, and don't want there. > > If you install qemu-kvm, that includes GUI console support, so you get a > bigger set of dependencies (qemu-kvm is a virtual package that just > pulls in all the necessary things). You can instead install > qemu-kvm-core to get a more "headless" setup. I think that some of the > graphical libraries are related to supporting graphical VMs (e.g. > Windows), but I'm not sure. > > There's not a companion libvirt-daemon-kvm-core though, so I think you > just have to pick and chose the libvirt-daemon-* packages you want > manually (libvirt-daemon-kvm is another virtual package that pulls in, > among other things, the qemu-kvm virtual package). Folks, thanks for all the information. It didn't occur to me that the management software, and then as a GUI, would be installed at the same time in one step. I always saw that as a separate area, and I always used virtual manager remotely. > So, a package set that might be more what you are looking for would be: > > qemu-kvm-core > libvirt-daemon-driver-qemu > libvirt-daemon-driver-network > libvirt-daemon-driver-storage-core > virt-install That looks way better, indeed. I'm just trying to figure out if this is all I need or what else is missing. > There are two comps groups for virtualization: Virtualization and > Headless Virtualization, but the "headless" group still pulls in the > full qemu-kvm and libvirt-daemon-kvm virtual packages, so a bigger > footprint with a bunch of GUI support. I just managed to find the virtualization-headless group, it’s hidden. Do you know why it is? Maybe we could create a group virtualization-really-headless and make it public. :-) Thanks for the quick info. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: nextcloud-client orphaned
Thanks for the information ;) On 13/03/2022 22:50, Otto Urpelainen wrote: py0xc3 kirjoitti 13.3.2022 klo 22.12: Hi all, I'm Chris, I'm currently mostly active in ask.fedora and since some time in the Docs. I just started to check out the mailing list to find out if I can support here or at testing as well :) I just recognized that the package nextcloud-client seems to be orphaned. That is not what I see. In the Package Sources page for that package [1], I see a named maintainer (left pane, under "Bugzilla Assignee: Fedora"), and under "Members", also two co-maintainers. [1]: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nextcloud-client The version in the updates repo is 3.3.6-1.fc35, which is from 28 Oct 2021 and outdated since 20 Dec 2021 (then updated to release 3.4.1). Current is 3.4.3: In the same page, I see that 3.4.2 has been submitted for testing in F34 and F35. But it seems to have spent two months there. The relevant Bodhi update [2] has some discussion if you want to know, why. [2]: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-23aa0e100b Unfortunately, I have no experience in packaging yet (is there someone specific in charge for this package?). If the package really was orphaned, it would mean exactly that there is nobody in charge. But as the package is not orphaned, the maintainer listed in Package Sources is in charge. In general, if you want to request a package update, you should file a Bugzilla issue about that. Fedora also has tooling to file such issues automatically, so there is an issue for 3.4.3 already [3]. Apart from Bugzilla, it is often useful to query also Bodhi, Koji and Package Sources to get a picture what is going on with a package. Of course you can also ask here on devel if there is something that bothers you. [3]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2058760 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: compile a basic example to arm executable on Fedora
I asked because I don't think arm development is well implemented. An answer would be as correct as possible from a developer who has worked with something like this, considering that it is not very well documented and I have not seen the tests with this tool that would work with development libraries. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: nextcloud-client orphaned
Are you talking about the "nextcloud-client" package? [0] 'cause that one isn't orphaned, and nonamedotc [1] is listed as the maintainer. Also, v3.4.2 is currently in testing, but has not been pushed to stable due to reported bugs. [2] A.FI. [0] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nextcloud-client [1] https://accounts.fedoraproject.org/user/nonamedotc [2] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-23aa0e100b ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: nextcloud-client orphaned
py0xc3 kirjoitti 13.3.2022 klo 22.12: Hi all, I'm Chris, I'm currently mostly active in ask.fedora and since some time in the Docs. I just started to check out the mailing list to find out if I can support here or at testing as well :) I just recognized that the package nextcloud-client seems to be orphaned. That is not what I see. In the Package Sources page for that package [1], I see a named maintainer (left pane, under "Bugzilla Assignee: Fedora"), and under "Members", also two co-maintainers. [1]: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nextcloud-client The version in the updates repo is 3.3.6-1.fc35, which is from 28 Oct 2021 and outdated since 20 Dec 2021 (then updated to release 3.4.1). Current is 3.4.3: In the same page, I see that 3.4.2 has been submitted for testing in F34 and F35. But it seems to have spent two months there. The relevant Bodhi update [2] has some discussion if you want to know, why. [2]: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-23aa0e100b Unfortunately, I have no experience in packaging yet (is there someone specific in charge for this package?). If the package really was orphaned, it would mean exactly that there is nobody in charge. But as the package is not orphaned, the maintainer listed in Package Sources is in charge. In general, if you want to request a package update, you should file a Bugzilla issue about that. Fedora also has tooling to file such issues automatically, so there is an issue for 3.4.3 already [3]. Apart from Bugzilla, it is often useful to query also Bodhi, Koji and Package Sources to get a picture what is going on with a package. Of course you can also ask here on devel if there is something that bothers you. [3]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2058760 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: QEMU-kvm installation a dependency hell?
Once upon a time, Peter Boy said: > I just checked installation of qemu-kvm & libvirt & virt-install on a Fedora > Server Edition, that is a headless server. It installed 338 packages / 158 > mb including poppler, mesa, wayland, libX11, gtk3, cairo and a lot of > additional graphic related software. > > I’m wondering, why I need Wayland or X11 etc for kernel virtualization and > running virtual machines? It turns my headless server into a graphical > workstation. It installs software that I don't need for running a headless > server, and don't want there. If you install qemu-kvm, that includes GUI console support, so you get a bigger set of dependencies (qemu-kvm is a virtual package that just pulls in all the necessary things). You can instead install qemu-kvm-core to get a more "headless" setup. I think that some of the graphical libraries are related to supporting graphical VMs (e.g. Windows), but I'm not sure. There's not a companion libvirt-daemon-kvm-core though, so I think you just have to pick and chose the libvirt-daemon-* packages you want manually (libvirt-daemon-kvm is another virtual package that pulls in, among other things, the qemu-kvm virtual package). So, a package set that might be more what you are looking for would be: qemu-kvm-core libvirt-daemon-driver-qemu libvirt-daemon-driver-network libvirt-daemon-driver-storage-core virt-install There are two comps groups for virtualization: Virtualization and Headless Virtualization, but the "headless" group still pulls in the full qemu-kvm and libvirt-daemon-kvm virtual packages, so a bigger footprint with a bunch of GUI support. The only difference for the "headless" group is that it doesn't include the desktop GUI VM management tools virt-manager and virt-viewer -- Chris Adams ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: compile a basic example to arm executable on Fedora
> On 13 Mar 2022, at 20:46, Cătălin George Feștilă
> wrote:
>
> I try to create a hello word arm static executable, with the default example
> but I got these errors.
> I search on the web and fedora packages to find a way to solve this issue.
This list is for developing fedora itself, not a programming development list.
I think you are better off asking on the fedora arm mailing list or the fedora
users mailing list.
Barry
> I used a basic example source code:
>
> cat hello.c
> #include
> using namespace std;
> int main(void)
> {
> std::cout << "Hello word! from Fedora Linux!" << std::endl;
> return 0;
> }
>
> I install wit the dnf tool
>
> dnf install -y libstdc++-static.x86_64
> dnf install -y llvm
> dnf install -y glib-static
> I try also with -static and
> arm-none-eabi-g++ -static-libstdc++ hello.c -o arm_hello-static
> but , I got these errors, any help ?
>
> [root@fedora mythcat]# arm-none-eabi-g++ hello.c -o arm_hello
> /usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/11.1.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/bin/ld:
> /usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/11.1.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/lib/libc.a(lib_a-exit.o):
> in function `exit':
> /builddir/build/BUILD/newlib-4.1.0/build-newlib/arm-none-eabi/newlib/libc/stdlib/../../../../../newlib/libc/stdlib/exit.c:64:
> undefined reference to `_exit'
> /usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/11.1.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/bin/ld:
> /usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/11.1.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/lib/libc.a(lib_a-abort.o):
> in function `abort':
> /builddir/build/BUILD/newlib-4.1.0/build-newlib/arm-none-eabi/newlib/libc/stdlib/../../../../../newlib/libc/stdlib/abort.c:59:
> undefined reference to `_exit'
> /usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/11.1.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/bin/ld:
> /usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/11.1.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/lib/libc.a(lib_a-fstatr.o):
> in function `_fstat_r':
> /builddir/build/BUILD/newlib-4.1.0/build-newlib/arm-none-eabi/newlib/libc/reent/../../../../../newlib/libc/reent/fstatr.c:55:
> undefined reference to `_fstat'
> /usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/11.1.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/bin/ld:
> /usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/11.1.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/lib/libc.a(lib_a-openr.o):
> in function `_open_r':
> /builddir/build/BUILD/newlib-4.1.0/build-newlib/arm-none-eabi/newlib/libc/reent/../../../../../newlib/libc/reent/openr.c:50:
> undefined reference to `_open'
> /usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/11.1.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/bin/ld:
> /usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/11.1.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/lib/libc.a(lib_a-sbrkr.o):
> in function `_sbrk_r':
> /builddir/build/BUILD/newlib-4.1.0/build-newlib/arm-none-eabi/newlib/libc/reent/../../../../../newlib/libc/reent/sbrkr.c:51:
> undefined reference to `_sbrk'
> /usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/11.1.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/bin/ld:
> /usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/11.1.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/lib/libc.a(lib_a-signalr.o):
> in function `_kill_r':
> /builddir/build/BUILD/newlib-4.1.0/build-newlib/arm-none-eabi/newlib/libc/reent/../../../../../newlib/libc/reent/signalr.c:53:
> undefined reference to `_kill'
> /usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/11.1.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/bin/ld:
> /usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/11.1.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/lib/libc.a(lib_a-signalr.o):
> in function `_getpid_r':
> /builddir/build/BUILD/newlib-4.1.0/build-newlib/arm-none-eabi/newlib/libc/reent/../../../../../newlib/libc/reent/signalr.c:83:
> undefined reference to `_getpid'
> /usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/11.1.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/bin/ld:
> /usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/11.1.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/lib/libc.a(lib_a-writer.o):
> in function `_write_r':
> /builddir/build/BUILD/newlib-4.1.0/build-newlib/arm-none-eabi/newlib/libc/reent/../../../../../newlib/libc/reent/writer.c:49:
> undefined reference to `_write'
> /usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/11.1.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/bin/ld:
> /usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/11.1.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/lib/libc.a(lib_a-closer.o):
> in function `_close_r':
> /builddir/build/BUILD/newlib-4.1.0/build-newlib/arm-none-eabi/newlib/libc/reent/../../../../../newlib/libc/reent/closer.c:47:
> undefined reference to `_close'
> /usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/11.1.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/bin/ld:
> /usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/11.1.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/lib/libc.a(lib_a-isattyr.o):
> in function `_isatty_r':
> /builddir/build/BUILD/newlib-4.1.0/build-newlib/arm-none-eabi/newlib/libc/reent/../../../../../newlib/libc/reent/isattyr.c:52:
> undefined reference to `_isatty'
> /usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/11.1.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/bin/ld:
> /usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/11.1.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/lib/libc.a(lib_a-lseekr.o):
> in function `_lseek_r':
> /builddir/build/BUILD/newlib-4.1.0/build-newlib/arm-none-eabi/newlib/libc/reent/../../../../../newlib/libc/reent/lseekr.c:49:
> undefined reference to `_lseek'
> /usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/11.1.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/bin/ld:
> /usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/11.1.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/lib/libc.a(lib_a-readr.o):
> in
Re: QEMU-kvm installation a dependency hell?
On 3/13/22 13:45, Peter Boy wrote: I just checked installation of qemu-kvm & libvirt & virt-install on a Fedora Server Edition, that is a headless server. It installed 338 packages / 158 mb including poppler, mesa, wayland, libX11, gtk3, cairo and a lot of additional graphic related software. I’m wondering, why I need Wayland or X11 etc for kernel virtualization and running virtual machines? It turns my headless server into a graphical workstation. It installs software that I don't need for running a headless server, and don't want there. If I install the same combo on a Debian / Ubuntu headless Server it installs about 40 packages / 20 mb. I know, the packages are not the same, but Debian/Ubunt doesn’t need X11, poppler, mesa, etc. for virtualization on a headless server. Can't we do the same? qemu-kvm is a metapackage which points to qemu-system-x86. That is also a metapackage which brings in all the qemu packages including the graphical parts. If you don't want that, then you have to install just the packages that you need. "dnf repoquery --requires qemu-system-x86" will give you the list of included packages. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: QEMU-kvm installation a dependency hell?
On Sun, Mar 13, 2022 at 4:45 PM Peter Boy wrote: > > I just checked installation of qemu-kvm & libvirt & virt-install on a Fedora > Server Edition, that is a headless server. It installed 338 packages / 158 > mb including poppler, mesa, wayland, libX11, gtk3, cairo and a lot of > additional graphic related software. > > I’m wondering, why I need Wayland or X11 etc for kernel virtualization and > running virtual machines? It turns my headless server into a graphical > workstation. It installs software that I don't need for running a headless > server, and don't want there. > qemu-kvm installs the full graphical virtualization stack. You want qemu-kvm-core to get a subset without the graphical UI. Those libraries are required for the QEMU GUI to work, which people *do* use. It also allows QEMU to work properly as an X11/Wayland client app in a desktop environment. > If I install the same combo on a Debian / Ubuntu headless Server it installs > about 40 packages / 20 mb. I know, the packages are not the same, but > Debian/Ubunt doesn’t need X11, poppler, mesa, etc. for virtualization on a > headless server. Can't we do the same? > By default, Debian does the same thing. The qemu-system-x86 package recommends the qemu-system-gui package, which pulls in that stuff. This is not "dependency hell". "Dependency hell" is a *very* specific thing, and this isn't it. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
compile a basic example to arm executable on Fedora
I try to create a hello word arm static executable, with the default example
but I got these errors.
I search on the web and fedora packages to find a way to solve this issue.
I used a basic example source code:
cat hello.c
#include
using namespace std;
int main(void)
{
std::cout << "Hello word! from Fedora Linux!" << std::endl;
return 0;
}
I install wit the dnf tool
dnf install -y libstdc++-static.x86_64
dnf install -y llvm
dnf install -y glib-static
I try also with -static and
arm-none-eabi-g++ -static-libstdc++ hello.c -o arm_hello-static
but , I got these errors, any help ?
[root@fedora mythcat]# arm-none-eabi-g++ hello.c -o arm_hello
/usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/11.1.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/bin/ld:
/usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/11.1.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/lib/libc.a(lib_a-exit.o):
in function `exit':
/builddir/build/BUILD/newlib-4.1.0/build-newlib/arm-none-eabi/newlib/libc/stdlib/../../../../../newlib/libc/stdlib/exit.c:64:
undefined reference to `_exit'
/usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/11.1.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/bin/ld:
/usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/11.1.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/lib/libc.a(lib_a-abort.o):
in function `abort':
/builddir/build/BUILD/newlib-4.1.0/build-newlib/arm-none-eabi/newlib/libc/stdlib/../../../../../newlib/libc/stdlib/abort.c:59:
undefined reference to `_exit'
/usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/11.1.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/bin/ld:
/usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/11.1.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/lib/libc.a(lib_a-fstatr.o):
in function `_fstat_r':
/builddir/build/BUILD/newlib-4.1.0/build-newlib/arm-none-eabi/newlib/libc/reent/../../../../../newlib/libc/reent/fstatr.c:55:
undefined reference to `_fstat'
/usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/11.1.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/bin/ld:
/usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/11.1.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/lib/libc.a(lib_a-openr.o):
in function `_open_r':
/builddir/build/BUILD/newlib-4.1.0/build-newlib/arm-none-eabi/newlib/libc/reent/../../../../../newlib/libc/reent/openr.c:50:
undefined reference to `_open'
/usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/11.1.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/bin/ld:
/usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/11.1.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/lib/libc.a(lib_a-sbrkr.o):
in function `_sbrk_r':
/builddir/build/BUILD/newlib-4.1.0/build-newlib/arm-none-eabi/newlib/libc/reent/../../../../../newlib/libc/reent/sbrkr.c:51:
undefined reference to `_sbrk'
/usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/11.1.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/bin/ld:
/usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/11.1.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/lib/libc.a(lib_a-signalr.o):
in function `_kill_r':
/builddir/build/BUILD/newlib-4.1.0/build-newlib/arm-none-eabi/newlib/libc/reent/../../../../../newlib/libc/reent/signalr.c:53:
undefined reference to `_kill'
/usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/11.1.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/bin/ld:
/usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/11.1.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/lib/libc.a(lib_a-signalr.o):
in function `_getpid_r':
/builddir/build/BUILD/newlib-4.1.0/build-newlib/arm-none-eabi/newlib/libc/reent/../../../../../newlib/libc/reent/signalr.c:83:
undefined reference to `_getpid'
/usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/11.1.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/bin/ld:
/usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/11.1.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/lib/libc.a(lib_a-writer.o):
in function `_write_r':
/builddir/build/BUILD/newlib-4.1.0/build-newlib/arm-none-eabi/newlib/libc/reent/../../../../../newlib/libc/reent/writer.c:49:
undefined reference to `_write'
/usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/11.1.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/bin/ld:
/usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/11.1.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/lib/libc.a(lib_a-closer.o):
in function `_close_r':
/builddir/build/BUILD/newlib-4.1.0/build-newlib/arm-none-eabi/newlib/libc/reent/../../../../../newlib/libc/reent/closer.c:47:
undefined reference to `_close'
/usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/11.1.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/bin/ld:
/usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/11.1.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/lib/libc.a(lib_a-isattyr.o):
in function `_isatty_r':
/builddir/build/BUILD/newlib-4.1.0/build-newlib/arm-none-eabi/newlib/libc/reent/../../../../../newlib/libc/reent/isattyr.c:52:
undefined reference to `_isatty'
/usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/11.1.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/bin/ld:
/usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/11.1.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/lib/libc.a(lib_a-lseekr.o):
in function `_lseek_r':
/builddir/build/BUILD/newlib-4.1.0/build-newlib/arm-none-eabi/newlib/libc/reent/../../../../../newlib/libc/reent/lseekr.c:49:
undefined reference to `_lseek'
/usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/11.1.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/bin/ld:
/usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/11.1.0/../../../../arm-none-eabi/lib/libc.a(lib_a-readr.o):
in function `_read_r':
/builddir/build/BUILD/newlib-4.1.0/build-newlib/arm-none-eabi/newlib/libc/reent/../../../../../newlib/libc/reent/readr.c:49:
undefined reference to `_read'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
QEMU-kvm installation a dependency hell?
I just checked installation of qemu-kvm & libvirt & virt-install on a Fedora Server Edition, that is a headless server. It installed 338 packages / 158 mb including poppler, mesa, wayland, libX11, gtk3, cairo and a lot of additional graphic related software. I’m wondering, why I need Wayland or X11 etc for kernel virtualization and running virtual machines? It turns my headless server into a graphical workstation. It installs software that I don't need for running a headless server, and don't want there. If I install the same combo on a Debian / Ubuntu headless Server it installs about 40 packages / 20 mb. I know, the packages are not the same, but Debian/Ubunt doesn’t need X11, poppler, mesa, etc. for virtualization on a headless server. Can't we do the same? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: strange output
right , is a binary gcc on that folder ! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
nextcloud-client orphaned
Hi all, I'm Chris, I'm currently mostly active in ask.fedora and since some time in the Docs. I just started to check out the mailing list to find out if I can support here or at testing as well :) I just recognized that the package nextcloud-client seems to be orphaned. The version in the updates repo is 3.3.6-1.fc35, which is from 28 Oct 2021 and outdated since 20 Dec 2021 (then updated to release 3.4.1). Current is 3.4.3: https://github.com/nextcloud/desktop/releases However, there are no new CVEs since, but only several bug fixes. So, nothing security critical, at least up to today. Unfortunately, I have no experience in packaging yet (is there someone specific in charge for this package?). Chris ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2060995] perl-IPC-Shareable-1.12 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2060995 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-IPC-Shareable-1.11 is |perl-IPC-Shareable-1.12 is |available |available --- Comment #8 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Latest upstream release: 1.12 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.06-2.fc36 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/IPC-Shareable Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/7130/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2060995 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2060995] perl-IPC-Shareable-1.12 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2060995 --- Comment #9 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Scratch build failed. Details bellow: BuilderException: Build started, but failure happened during post build operations: Command '['rpmbuild', '-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .', '-bs', '/var/tmp/thn-wwpasvm7/perl-IPC-Shareable.spec']' returned non-zero exit status 1. StdOut: error: Bad source: ./IPC-Shareable-1.12.tar.gz: No such file or directory Traceback: File "/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/hotness/use_cases/package_scratch_build_use_case.py", line 56, in build result = self.builder.build(request.package, request.opts) File "/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/hotness/builders/koji.py", line 188, in build raise BuilderException( If you think this issue is caused by some bug in the-new-hotness, please report it on the-new-hotness issue tracker: https://github.com/fedora-infra/the-new-hotness/issues -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2060995 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: strange output
On 3/13/22 15:29, Cătălin George Feștilă wrote: > I run this command on my root > > #cat /usr/bin/gcc > > ... and I got a large strange output ... > > What is this? Is it a bug? It’s normal: you are viewing the contents of `/usr/bin/gcc`, which is a binary file. -- Sincerely, Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers) OpenPGP_0xB288B55FFF9C22C1.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: strange output
On Sun, Mar 13, 2022 at 07:29:27PM -, Cătălin George Feștilă wrote: > I run this command on my root > > #cat /usr/bin/gcc > > ... and I got a large strange output ... You just printed executable binary. It is not supposed to be displayed like that. > What is this? Is it a bug? No, it is not. What did you expect? -- Tomasz Torcz “God, root, what's the difference?” to...@pipebreaker.pl “God is more forgiving.” ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
strange output
I run this command on my root #cat /usr/bin/gcc ... and I got a large strange output ... What is this? Is it a bug? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2060627] perl-HTTP-Daemon-6.14 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2060627 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-HTTP-Daemon-6.14-1.fc3 |perl-HTTP-Daemon-6.14-1.fc3 |5 |5 ||perl-HTTP-Daemon-6.14-1.fc3 ||4 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-50c45f6080 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2060627 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2060156] perl-Locale-Codes-3.70 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2060156 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Locale-Codes-3.70-1.fc |perl-Locale-Codes-3.70-1.fc |35 |35 ||perl-Locale-Codes-3.70-1.fc ||34 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-7af28c8989 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2060156 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2060627] perl-HTTP-Daemon-6.14 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2060627 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Fixed In Version||perl-HTTP-Daemon-6.14-1.fc3 ||5 Last Closed||2022-03-13 18:01:16 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-fc19dac8fa has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2060627 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2060156] perl-Locale-Codes-3.70 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2060156 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Fixed In Version||perl-Locale-Codes-3.70-1.fc ||35 Last Closed||2022-03-13 18:00:53 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-b8f711ecbc has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2060156 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2061505] perl-CGI-Ex-2.54 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061505 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Fixed In Version||perl-CGI-Ex-2.54-1.fc37 Status|NEW |CLOSED Last Closed||2022-03-13 16:53:58 --- Comment #4 from Emmanuel Seyman --- Built for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1933247 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061505 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2060149] perl-Workflow-1.60 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2060149 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-Workflow-1.60-1.fc37 Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2022-03-13 16:52:20 --- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman --- built for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1933248 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2060149 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2059032] perl-Search-Xapian-1.2.25.5 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2059032 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Fixed In Version||perl-Search-Xapian-1.2.25.5 ||-1.fc37 Status|NEW |CLOSED Last Closed||2022-03-13 16:50:43 --- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman --- Built for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1933251 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2059032 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Icon issues in a number of applications - f36 and rawhide
On Sun, Mar 13 2022 at 03:55:40 PM +, Philip Wyett wrote: People are aware of the issue that has recently arisen? Yeah, so the TL;DR here is adwaita-icon-theme has removed a bunch of color icons. GNOME applications should for the most part only be using symbolic icons, so it's probably not very disruptive for GNOME apps, but it could be very disruptive for third-party apps that don't follow our guidelines. I will avoid expressing an opinion on whether removing icons that applications depend on is a good thing to do. Recommendation: Third-party applications should limit themselves to depending on standard icon names listed at https://specifications.freedesktop.org/icon-naming-spec/icon-naming-spec-latest.html only. All other icons should be installed by your app to guarantee that they don't disappear out from under you. gnome-icon-theme is just an obsolete, older version of adwaita-icon-theme. Installing it is not recommended, but it is still hanging around in Fedora in case you need it. Michael ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Icon issues in a number of applications - f36 and rawhide
Hi,
Before the bug reports start, I thought I would ask opinion here as not my real
area of knowledge.
It seems that many applications running on GNOME under f36 and rawhide are
having icon issues.
Example 1: Under GNOME, rednotebook has no menu bar icons.
Example 2: Pitivi will fail to start[1] due to a missing icon.
Both issues are resolved by installing the gnome-icon-theme package.
People are aware of the issue that has recently arisen?
[1]:
[philwyett@ks-chewbacca ~]$ pitivi
Missing soft dependency:
- libav GStreamer plug-in not found on the system
-> additional multimedia codecs through the GStreamer Libav library
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib64/python3.10/site-packages/pitivi/application.py", line 203,
in do_activate
self.create_main_window()
File "/usr/lib64/python3.10/site-packages/pitivi/application.py", line 210,
in create_main_window
self.gui.setup_ui()
File "/usr/lib64/python3.10/site-packages/pitivi/mainwindow.py", line 134, in
setup_ui
self.editor.setup_ui()
File "/usr/lib64/python3.10/site-packages/pitivi/editorperspective.py", line
103, in setup_ui
self._create_ui()
File "/usr/lib64/python3.10/site-packages/pitivi/editorperspective.py", line
215, in _create_ui
self.trans_list = TransitionsListWidget(self.app)
File "/usr/lib64/python3.10/site-packages/pitivi/transitions.py", line 57, in
__init__
self._question_icon = icon_theme.load_icon("dialog-question", 48, 0)
gi.repository.GLib.GError: gtk-icon-theme-error-quark: Icon 'dialog-question'
not present in theme
Adwaita (0)
[philwyett@ks-chewbacca ~]$ sudo dnf list installed | grep icon-theme
[sudo] password for philwyett:
adwaita-icon-theme.noarch42~beta-
1.fc36 @anaconda
hicolor-icon-theme.noarch0.17-
12.fc36@anaconda
highcontrast-icon-theme.noarch 3.28-
14.fc36@anaconda
[philwyett@ks-chewbacca ~]$ sudo dnf install gnome-icon-theme
Fedora 36 - x86_64 5.0 MB/s | 80 MB 00:15
Fedora 36 openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_641.7 kB/s | 2.5 kB 00:01
Fedora Modular 36 - x86_64 2.4 MB/s | 2.3 MB 00:00
Fedora 36 - x86_64 - Updates338 B/s | 257 B 00:00
Fedora Modular 36 - x86_64 - Updates245 B/s | 257 B 00:01
Fedora 36 - x86_64 - Test Updates 2.8 MB/s | 8.1 MB 00:02
Fedora Modular 36 - x86_64 - Test Updates 200 kB/s | 319 kB 00:01
Dependencies resolved.
PackageArchitecture Version RepositorySize
Installing:
gnome-icon-theme noarch 3.12.0-17.fc36 fedora 9.6 M
Transaction Summary
Install 1 Package
Total download size: 9.6 M
Installed size: 9.9 M
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
gnome-icon-theme-3.12.0-17.fc36.noarch.rpm 2.8 MB/s | 9.6 MB 00:03
Total 2.5 MB/s | 9.6 MB 00:03
Running transaction check
Transaction check succeeded.
Running transaction test
Transaction test succeeded.
Running transaction
Preparing:1/1
Installing : gnome-icon-theme-3.12.0-17.fc36.noarch 1/1
Running scriptlet: gnome-icon-theme-3.12.0-17.fc36.noarch 1/1
Verifying: gnome-icon-theme-3.12.0-17.fc36.noarch 1/1
Installed:
gnome-icon-theme-3.12.0-17.fc36.noarch
Complete!
[philwyett@ks-chewbacca ~]$ pitivi
Missing soft dependency:
- libav GStreamer plug-in not found on the system
-> additional multimedia codecs through the GStreamer Libav library
[philwyett@ks-chewbacca ~]$
Regards
Phil
--
*** Playing the game for the games own sake. ***
WWW: https://kathenas.org
Twitter: @kathenasorg
IRC: kathenas
GPG: 724AA9B52F024C8B
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-36-20220313.n.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 8/229 (x86_64), 10/161 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220312.n.0): ID: 1172418 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso desktop_terminal URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172418 ID: 1172464 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172464 ID: 1172485 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172485 ID: 1172517 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_update_graphical@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172517 ID: 1172628 Test: x86_64 universal install_multi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172628 ID: 1172690 Test: aarch64 universal install_multi_empty@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172690 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-36-20220312.n.0): ID: 1172385 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso eog URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172385 ID: 1172408 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172408 ID: 1172509 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz eog@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172509 ID: 1172515 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz gnome_text_editor@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172515 ID: 1172538 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade gnome_text_editor URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172538 ID: 1172539 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172539 ID: 1172552 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade eog@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172552 ID: 1172558 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade gnome_text_editor@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172558 ID: 1172592 Test: x86_64 universal install_arabic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172592 ID: 1172593 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172593 ID: 1172658 Test: aarch64 universal install_arabic_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172658 ID: 1172666 Test: aarch64 universal install_asian_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172666 Soft failed openQA tests: 7/229 (x86_64), 3/161 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-36-20220312.n.0): ID: 1172370 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172370 ID: 1172373 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_browser URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172373 ID: 1172404 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_browser URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172404 ID: 1172415 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso eog URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172415 ID: 1172423 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso desktop_browser URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172423 ID: 1172433 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172433 ID: 1172513 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_browser@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172513 ID: 1172524 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172524 ID: 1172531 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_browser URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172531 ID: 1172557 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_browser@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172557 Passed openQA tests: 148/161 (aarch64), 214/229 (x86_64) New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-36-20220312.n.0): ID: 1172462 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_hd_variation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172462 ID: 1172473 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172473 ID: 1172575 Test: x86_64 universal install_software_raid@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172575 ID: 1172618 Test: x86_64 universal install_repository_http_variation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172618 ID: 1172620 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_uefi@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172620 ID: 1172671 Test: aarch64 universal install_btrfs@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172671 Installed system changes in test x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default: System load changed from 0.13 to 0.53 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1171016#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172362#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi: Used swap changed from 21 MiB
Re: Problem with SSL in Fedora 36
> On 13 Mar 2022, at 13:58, Barry wrote: > > > > >>> On 13 Mar 2022, at 09:44, José Abílio Matos wrote: >>> >> >> In one, and just one, of my email accounts the upgrade to F36 failed with >> this: >> >> The underlying socket is having troubles when processing connection to >> imap.xxx.xx.xx:993: Error during SSL handshake: error:0A0C0103:SSL >> routines::internal error >> >> No email program works, I tried kmail, trojitá, thunderbird. The connection >> fails immediatelly with the above error. >> >> Where should I fill this report, under openssl? >> >> Searching a bit this seems related to: >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/OpenSSL3.0 >> > It’s not in use yet (last I heard). I am out of date. It should openssl 3. > > I suggest that you use the openssl s_client command to connect to the ip and > port to see what happens. And ask openssl it’s version I am expecting you see > it’s 1.1.1. > > Barry > >> Regards, >> -- >> José Abílio >> ___ >> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Fedora Code of Conduct: >> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> List Archives: >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: >> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-IoT-36-20220313.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 3/15 (aarch64), 2/15 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20220311.0): ID: 1172712 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172712 ID: 1172724 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_ignition@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172724 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20220311.0): ID: 1172697 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172697 ID: 1172709 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_ignition@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172709 ID: 1172710 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172710 Passed openQA tests: 13/15 (x86_64), 12/15 (aarch64) Installed system changes in test x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload@uefi: System load changed from 0.04 to 0.22 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1169927#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172696#downloads -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Problem with SSL in Fedora 36
> On 13 Mar 2022, at 09:44, José Abílio Matos wrote: > > > In one, and just one, of my email accounts the upgrade to F36 failed with > this: > > The underlying socket is having troubles when processing connection to > imap.xxx.xx.xx:993: Error during SSL handshake: error:0A0C0103:SSL > routines::internal error > > No email program works, I tried kmail, trojitá, thunderbird. The connection > fails immediatelly with the above error. > > Where should I fill this report, under openssl? > > Searching a bit this seems related to: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/OpenSSL3.0 > It’s not in use yet (last I heard). I suggest that you use the openssl s_client command to connect to the ip and port to see what happens. And ask openssl it’s version I am expecting you see it’s 1.1.1. Barry > Regards, > -- > José Abílio > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Rawhide-20220313.n.0 compose check report
Missing expected images: Minimal raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 1 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 18/231 (x86_64), 21/161 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220312.n.0): ID: 1172017 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso anaconda_help URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172017 ID: 1172110 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz evince@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172110 ID: 1172189 Test: x86_64 universal install_mirrorlist_graphical **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172189 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220312.n.0): ID: 1171971 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1171971 ID: 1171975 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1171975 ID: 1171982 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_login URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1171982 ID: 1171993 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_printing URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1171993 ID: 1172012 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172012 ID: 1172013 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172013 ID: 1172018 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172018 ID: 1172021 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172021 ID: 1172065 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172065 ID: 1172086 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso mediakit_repoclosure@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172086 ID: 1172092 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172092 ID: 1172094 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_sssd@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172094 ID: 1172109 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_printing@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172109 ID: 1172120 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_browser@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172120 ID: 1172122 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz gnome_text_editor@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172122 ID: 1172124 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_update_graphical@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172124 ID: 1172139 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_printing URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172139 ID: 1172140 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_login URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172140 ID: 1172146 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172146 ID: 1172150 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_fprint URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172150 ID: 1172158 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_printing@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172158 ID: 1172163 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade evince@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172163 ID: 1172164 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_browser@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172164 ID: 1172165 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade gnome_text_editor@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172165 ID: 1172176 Test: x86_64 universal install_european_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172176 ID: 1172199 Test: x86_64 universal install_arabic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172199 ID: 1172200 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172200 ID: 1172228 Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172228 ID: 1172265 Test: aarch64 universal install_arabic_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172265 ID: 1172272 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172272 ID: 1172273 Test: aarch64 universal install_asian_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172273 ID: 1172275 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_realmd_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172275 ID: 1172285 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172285 ID: 1172287 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_realmd_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1172287 ID: 1172288 Test: aarch64 universal install_cyrillic_language@uefi URL:
Fedora 36 compose report: 20220313.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-36-20220312.n.0 NEW: Fedora-36-20220313.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded packages: 0 B Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 0 B Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = = DROPPED IMAGES = = ADDED PACKAGES = = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = = DOWNGRADED PACKAGES = ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora rawhide compose report: 20220313.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220312.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220313.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 74 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:574.63 KiB Size of upgraded packages: 1.48 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 10.89 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = = DROPPED IMAGES = = ADDED PACKAGES = = DROPPED PACKAGES = Package: mozilla-lightbeam-2.1.0-9.fc36 Summary: An add-on for visualizing HTTP requests between websites in real time RPMs:mozilla-lightbeam Size:574.63 KiB = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: Cython-0.29.26-2.fc37 Old package: Cython-0.29.26-1.fc36 Summary: Language for writing Python extension modules RPMs: emacs-cython-mode python3-Cython Size: 10.42 MiB Size change: -13.20 KiB Changelog: * Wed Jan 19 2022 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.29.26-2 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_36_Mass_Rebuild Package: abcm2ps-8.14.13-1.fc37 Old package: abcm2ps-8.14.11-4.fc36 Summary: A program to typeset ABC tunes into Postscript RPMs: abcm2ps abcm2ps-doc Size: 13.10 MiB Size change: -27 B Changelog: * Sat Mar 12 2022 Stuart Gathman - 8.14.13-1 - New upstream release Package: abseil-cpp-20211102.0-1.fc37 Old package: abseil-cpp-20210324.2-4.fc37 Summary: C++ Common Libraries RPMs: abseil-cpp abseil-cpp-devel Size: 5.85 MiB Size change: 432.69 KiB Changelog: * Fri Feb 18 2022 Benjamin A. Beasley - 20211102.0-1 - Update to 20211102.0 (close RHBZ#2019691) - Drop --output-on-failure, already in %ctest expansion - On s390x, instead of ignoring all tests, skip only the single failing test - Use ninja backend for CMake: speeds up build with no downsides - Drop patch for armv7hl Package: baresip-2.0.0-1.fc37 Old package: baresip-1.1.0-8.fc36 Summary: Modular SIP user-agent with audio and video support RPMs: baresip baresip-aac baresip-alsa baresip-av1 baresip-codec2 baresip-ctrl_dbus baresip-g722 baresip-g726 baresip-gsm baresip-gst baresip-gst_video baresip-gtk baresip-jack baresip-mpa baresip-mqtt baresip-omx baresip-opus baresip-plc baresip-portaudio baresip-pulse baresip-sdl baresip-snapshot baresip-sndfile baresip-tools baresip-v4l2 baresip-vp8 baresip-vp9 baresip-x11 Added RPMs: baresip-av1 Dropped RPMs: baresip-rst baresip-speex_pp baresip-x11grab Size: 5.26 MiB Size change: -62.40 KiB Changelog: * Sun Mar 13 2022 Robert Scheck 2.0.0-1 - Upgrade to 2.0.0 (#2063451) Package: bear-3.0.18-3.fc37 Old package: bear-3.0.18-1.fc36 Summary: Tool that generates a compilation database for clang tooling RPMs: bear Size: 2.40 MiB Size change: 76.55 KiB Changelog: * Wed Jan 19 2022 Fedora Release Engineering 3.0.18-2 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_36_Mass_Rebuild * Wed Mar 09 2022 Dan ??erm??k 3.0.18-3 - Rebuild for abseil-cpp 20211102.0 Package: blender-1:3.1.0-5.fc37 Old package: blender-1:3.1.0-1.fc37 Summary: 3D modeling, animation, rendering and post-production RPMs: blender blender-rpm-macros Size: 154.79 MiB Size change: 6.62 MiB Changelog: * Sat Mar 12 2022 Luya Tshimbalanga 1:3.1.0-2 - Reenable USD support * Sat Mar 12 2022 Luya Tshimbalanga 1:3.1.0-3 - oidn support only for x86_64 arch * Sat Mar 12 2022 Luya Tshimbalanga 1:3.1.0-4 - Bump release to sync with f35 version * Sat Mar 12 2022 Luya Tshimbalanga 1:3.1.0-5 - Empty commit Package: bloaty-1.1-15.fc37 Old package: bloaty-1.1-14.fc36 Summary: A size profiler for binaries RPMs: bloaty Size: 688.88 KiB Size change: 296 B Changelog: * Wed Mar 09 2022 Rich Mattes - 1.1-15 - Rebuild for abseil-cpp 20211102.0 Package: bottles-2022.2.28-2.fc37 Old package: bottles-2022.2.28-1.fc37 Summary: Easily manage Wine prefix in a new way RPMs: bottles Size: 330.18 KiB Size change: -760 B Changelog: * Sat Mar 12 2022 Artem Polishchuk - 2022.2.28-2 - build: Add gtksourceview4 dep Package: ccdciel-0.9.78-1.fc37 Old package: ccdciel-0.9.77-1.fc36 Summary: CCD capture software RPMs: ccdciel ccdciel-doc Size: 22.54 MiB Size change: 589.70 KiB Changelog: * Sat Mar 12 2022 Mattia Verga 0.9.78-1 - Update to 0.9.78 (fedora#2061152) Package: cobbler-3.3.2-1.fc37 Old package: cobbler-3.3.1-1.fc37 Summary: Boot server configurator RPMs: cobbler cobbler-tests Size: 633.76 KiB Size change: 3.79 KiB Changelog: * Sat Mar 12 2022 Orion Poplawski - 3.3.2-1 - Update to 3.3.2 Package: dummy-test-package-gloster-0-7606.fc37 Old package: dummy-test-package-gloster-0-7590.fc37 Summary: Dummy Test
[Bug 2063504] New: perl-App-Cme-1.038 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063504 Bug ID: 2063504 Summary: perl-App-Cme-1.038 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-App-Cme Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: jples...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 1.038 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.037-1.fc36 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/App-Cme/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/9059/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063504 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Problem with SSL in Fedora 36
In one, and just one, of my email accounts the upgrade to F36 failed with this: The underlying socket is having troubles when processing connection to imap.xxx.xx.xx:993: Error during SSL handshake: error:0A0C0103:SSL routines::internal error No email program works, I tried kmail, trojitá, thunderbird. The connection fails immediatelly with the above error. Where should I fill this report, under openssl? Searching a bit this seems related to: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/OpenSSL3.0 Regards, -- José Abílio___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Cloud-34-20220313.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220312.0): ID: 1171899 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1171899 ID: 1171905 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1171905 Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64), 7/8 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Cloud-35-20220313.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220312.0): ID: 1171883 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1171883 ID: 1171889 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1171889 Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64), 7/8 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
