Fedora-Rawhide-20220318.n.1 compose check report

Missing expected images: Minimal raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 1 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 12/231 (x86_64), 20/161 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed

[Test-Announce] 2022-03-21 @ ** 16:00 ** UTC - Fedora 36 Blocker Review Meeting

# F36 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2022-03-21 # Time: ** 16:00 ** UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.libera.chat Hi folks! We have 1 proposed Beta blocker, 1 proposed Beta freeze exception issue, and 4 proposed Final blockers to review, so let's have a review meeting on Monday.

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2022-03-21 Fedora QA Meeting

Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting on Monday. I don't have anything important for the agenda, so let's give folks a break before the blocker review meeting! If you're aware of anything it would be useful to discuss this week, please do reply to this mail and we can go ahead and run

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20220318.n.1 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220316.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220318.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 16 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 214 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 29.14 MiB Size of dropped packages:0

[Bug 2065866] New: perl-Devel-PPPort-3.68 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2065866 Bug ID: 2065866 Summary: perl-Devel-PPPort-3.68 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Devel-PPPort Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

No daemon-reload or restart with %systemd_postun_with_restart

The only thing that https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- guidelines/Scriptlets/ tells me to do is to put %systemd_postun_with_restart in my %post. However: 1) systemd complains that it wants a daemon-reload, in order to pick up an updated .service file 2) I still must manually

Re: Splitting alternative Python packages into subpackages, e.g. python3.11{,libs,devel,...}

On 18. 03. 22 21:34, Neal Gompa wrote: On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 4:28 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: On 16. 03. 22 17:12, Tomáš Orsava wrote: Hi Python-devel, we are considering splitting the alternative Python versions from a single-package format (e.g. python3.11) to multiple subpackages (e.g.

Re: Splitting alternative Python packages into subpackages, e.g. python3.11{,libs,devel,...}

On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 4:28 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 16. 03. 22 17:12, Tomáš Orsava wrote: > > Hi Python-devel, > > we are considering splitting the alternative Python versions from a > > single-package format (e.g. python3.11) to multiple subpackages (e.g. > >

Re: Splitting alternative Python packages into subpackages, e.g. python3.11{,libs,devel,...}

On 16. 03. 22 17:12, Tomáš Orsava wrote: Hi Python-devel, we are considering splitting the alternative Python versions from a single-package format (e.g. python3.11) to multiple subpackages (e.g. python3.11{,-libs,-devel,-tkinter,-test,-idle}). We do this already with the main `python3`

Re: FESCo wants to know what you use i686 packages for

Hi, On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 09:54:12 -0400 David Cantrell wrote: > If you use i686 packages for something now, please respond to this > thread. As many others, I need 32-bit printer drivers for my ~10 year old color laser: $ rpm -qa | grep i686 libgcc-11.2.1-9.fc35.i686

Re: F36 Beta blocker status summary

Action summary Accepted blockers - 1. anaconda — When running anaconda on Wayland with two keyboard layouts configured, hitting any modifier key with the second layout selected switches to the first layout — ON_QA ACTION: QA to verify FEDORA-2022-840ea87072

Re: [fyi] Folly stack temporarily switched to Clang for Fedora 36+

On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 11:37:03AM -0800, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > Dear all, > > Just a heads-up that Folly and packages built against it are mostly* > switched to build using Clang for the time being, when compiled on > Fedora 36 and above. > > * the exception is watchman, which needs

Fedora-36-20220318.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 10/161 (aarch64), 9/229 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220317.n.0): ID: 1181389 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1181389 ID: 1181404 Test:

[Bug 2046804] perl-File-RsyncP: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f36: blib/arch/auto/File/RsyncP/FileList/FileList.so: undefined symbol: strlcpy at /usr/lib64/perl5/DynaLoader.pm line 193.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046804 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from

[Bug 2059502] perl-Crypt-SMIME-0.28-2.fc37 FTBFS: Failed test 'No extra files that aren't in MANIFEST'

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2059502 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from

Fedora-IoT-36-20220318.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (x86_64), 3/15 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20220316.0): ID: 1181608 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_rpmostree_rebase@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1181608 Old failures (same test

[Test-Announce] Fedora-IoT 36 RC 20220318.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora-IoT 36 RC 20220318.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see:

Fedora 36 compose report: 20220318.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-36-20220317.n.0 NEW: Fedora-36-20220318.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 5 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Re: What has the PDC ever done for us?

On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 3:59 AM Petr Pisar wrote: > > V Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 12:58:54PM -0400, Christopher napsal(a): > > Even if PDC is the most valuable thing to Fedora composes ever, casual > > contributors who only work on packaging should never have to care > > about it. > > > You should

Re: Package downgrades on upgrade from F35 to F36 + categorized list

Hau idatzi du Fabio Valentini (decatho...@gmail.com) erabiltzaileak (2022 mar. 18, or. (14:33)): > > Hi all, > > - gojq-0:0.12.7-1.fc35 > gojq-0:0.12.6-2.fc36 > Version 0.12.7 was built for F35+, but no bodhi update for F36 was submitted.

[Bug 2007247] perl-Crypt-SSLeay-0.72-32.fc36 FTBFS with OpenSSL 3: SSLeay.so: undefined symbol: SSLv3_client_method

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007247 Thierry Vignaud changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tvign...@redhat.com --- Comment #4

Re: Package downgrades on upgrade from F35 to F36 + categorized list

Dne 18. 03. 22 v 14:32 Fabio Valentini napsal(a): - The "I'm going to build this update for F34, F35, F37/Rawhide, EPEL7, EPEL8, and EPEL9, but never wonder about the missing number between F35 and F37" cases are almost funny. :) This is missing "git pull" or "git fetch" after branching. So

Re: Package downgrades on upgrade from F35 to F36 + categorized list

On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 14:32:13 +0100 Fabio Valentini wrote: > "Forgotten" F36 updates: > > ... > > - perl-Net-DNS-0:1.33-1.fc35 > perl-Net-DNS-0:1.32-3.fc36 > Version 1.33 was built on F34, F35, F37 / Rawhide, but not F36. Fixed:

Package downgrades on upgrade from F35 to F36 + categorized list

Hi all, Yes, it's that time of the year again. Looks like it's not *that* bad this time round, but the fact that this keeps happening probably means some of our processes are broken ... (or, since some usernames are attached to multiple entries in the list below, maybe it's just a lack of

Re: FESCo wants to know what you use i686 packages for

On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 9:54 AM David Cantrell wrote: > > Hi, > > Our most recent FESCo meeting involved discussing the proposal to drop i686 > builds of jdk8,11,17 from Fedora 37 onward. The topic quickly changed to the > larger question of "what do people use i686 packages for?" > > Rather

Re: What has the PDC ever done for us?

V Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 01:24:09PM +0100, Fabio Valentini napsal(a): > On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 8:58 AM Petr Pisar wrote: > > > > V Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 12:58:54PM -0400, Christopher napsal(a): > > > Even if PDC is the most valuable thing to Fedora composes ever, casual > > > contributors who only

Re: What has the PDC ever done for us?

On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 8:58 AM Petr Pisar wrote: > > V Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 12:58:54PM -0400, Christopher napsal(a): > > Even if PDC is the most valuable thing to Fedora composes ever, casual > > contributors who only work on packaging should never have to care > > about it. > > > You should

[Bug 2064642] F37FailsToInstall: perl-PAR-Packer

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064642 --- Comment #16 from Paul Howarth --- polymake build for f36 is still running, 24 hours so far, all done apart from armv7hl. The releng build in January took less than 10 hours. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug 2046804] perl-File-RsyncP: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f36: blib/arch/auto/File/RsyncP/FileList/FileList.so: undefined symbol: strlcpy at /usr/lib64/perl5/DynaLoader.pm line 193.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046804 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-9f00fd has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-9f00fd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 2064642] F37FailsToInstall: perl-PAR-Packer

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064642 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1992487 (F36FailsToInstall) --- Comment

[Bug 2065640] F36FailsToInstall: perl-PAR-Packer

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2065640 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE CC|

[Bug 2064642] F37FailsToInstall: perl-PAR-Packer

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064642 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Version|rawhide |36 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 2064642] F37FailsToInstall: perl-PAR-Packer

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064642 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WORKSFORME |--- Status|CLOSED

[Bug 2046804] perl-File-RsyncP: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f36: blib/arch/auto/File/RsyncP/FileList/FileList.so: undefined symbol: strlcpy at /usr/lib64/perl5/DynaLoader.pm line 193.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046804 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 2065640] New: F36FailsToInstall: perl-PAR-Packer

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2065640 Bug ID: 2065640 Summary: F36FailsToInstall: perl-PAR-Packer Product: Fedora Version: 36 Status: NEW Component: perl-PAR-Packer Assignee: jples...@redhat.com

[Bug 2064642] F37FailsToInstall: perl-PAR-Packer

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064642 Miro Hrončok changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 2046804] perl-File-RsyncP: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f36: blib/arch/auto/File/RsyncP/FileList/FileList.so: undefined symbol: strlcpy at /usr/lib64/perl5/DynaLoader.pm line 193.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046804 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Link ID||CPAN 141822 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 2065567] perl-DBD-SQLite-1.70-2.fc37 FTBFS: Failed test 'data type is correct' at t/51_table_column_metadata.t line 22.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2065567 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED

Fedora-Cloud-34-20220318.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220317.0): ID: 1180723 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

Re: FESCo wants to know what you use i686 packages for

On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 2:56 PM David Cantrell wrote: > If you use i686 packages for something now, please respond to this thread. > There are some game-related packages (not dependencies) which need to be installed as i686 so that they can apply to 32bit games. I know of the following: *

[Bug 2065567] perl-DBD-SQLite-1.70-2.fc37 FTBFS: Failed test 'data type is correct' at t/51_table_column_metadata.t line 22.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2065567 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|jples...@redhat.com |ppi...@redhat.com Status|NEW

Fedora-Cloud-35-20220318.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220317.0): ID: 1180706 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

[Bug 2065567] New: perl-DBD-SQLite-1.70-2.fc37 FTFBS:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2065567 Bug ID: 2065567 Summary: perl-DBD-SQLite-1.70-2.fc37 FTFBS: Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-DBD-SQLite Assignee: jples...@redhat.com

[Bug 2065567] perl-DBD-SQLite-1.70-2.fc37 FTFBS:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2065567 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Link ID||Github |

[Bug 2059502] perl-Crypt-SMIME-0.28-2.fc37 FTBFS: Failed test 'No extra files that aren't in MANIFEST'

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2059502 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-cb9b8847e5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-cb9b8847e5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 2059502] perl-Crypt-SMIME-0.28-2.fc37 FTBFS: Failed test 'No extra files that aren't in MANIFEST'

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2059502 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|steve.tray...@cern.ch |ppi...@redhat.com

Re: FESCo wants to know what you use i686 packages for

On 3/17/22 18:14, Carlos "casep" Sepulveda wrote: On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 at 13:55, David Cantrell > wrote: If you use i686 packages for something now, please respond to this thread. steam / wine Ditto. Not very often perhaps but that's the primary case.

Re: What has the PDC ever done for us?

V Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 12:58:54PM -0400, Christopher napsal(a): > Even if PDC is the most valuable thing to Fedora composes ever, casual > contributors who only work on packaging should never have to care > about it. > You should reavaluate importance of composes. Without a compose no package

[Bug 2064808] Update perl to 5.34.1

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064808 Michal Josef Spacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |ASSIGNED --- Comment #5 from

Re: What has the PDC ever done for us?

On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 5:35 PM Petr Pisar wrote: > V Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 04:13:44PM +0100, Tomas Hrcka napsal(a): > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 3:09 PM Petr Pisar wrote: > > > Having the dist-git retirement as a primary source of truth has the > problem > > > that you need to clone a dist-git