https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064808
--- Comment #13 from Paul Howarth ---
polymake is now done:
$ koji list-tagged f35-build-side-52326
Build Tag Built by
EPEL has a stalled request policy [0] that allows packagers to get
themselves added as collaborators on epel* branches. Prior to this
policy being implemented, requests to add Fedora packages to EPEL
would often go unanswered for long periods of time. Packagers wanting
to help had only one
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069471
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2065327
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Scalar-List-Utils-1.62 |perl-Scalar-List-Utils-1.62
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064808
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064642
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-PAR-Packer-1.054-2.fc3 |perl-PAR-Packer-1.054-2.fc3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2066103
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064353
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Module-CoreList-5.2022 |perl-Module-CoreList-5.2022
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2066104
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Module-CoreList-5.2022 |perl-Module-CoreList-5.2022
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061310
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2
(removing us...@lists.fedoraproject.org)...
On Wed, Mar 23 2022 at 01:58:33 PM +0100, Zdenek Dohnal
wrote:
Unfortunately there is no clean upgrade path to solve the migration
automatically because of unrealistic requirements such as:
- the USB device would have needed to be plugged in and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064353
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Module-CoreList-5.2022 |perl-Module-CoreList-5.2022
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061310
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2066104
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Module-CoreList-5.2022 |perl-Module-CoreList-5.2022
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2066103
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2
FWIW Alexander's plan sounds reasonable to me.
On Tue, Mar 29 2022 at 03:34:49 PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi
wrote:
Well, we just shipped beta today, so I think it's too late to land any
f36 changes at this point.
This is a non-default configuration that I strongly suspect nobody or
almost nobody
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 6/229 (x86_64), 6/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220328.n.0):
ID: 1202569 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso anaconda_help
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1202569
ID: 1202672 Test: x86_64
Hi,
ImageMagick 6.9.12.x have a bunch security fixes since 6.9.10.x .
I'd like update ImageMagick (IM) on epel8 with soname bump .
ImageMagick-6.9.10 last version, have almost 2 years and keep it and
just pull security patches, it would have a lot more work in my
opinion.
so in
Hi,
ImageMagick 6.9.12.x have a bunch security fixes since 6.9.10.x .
I'd like update ImageMagick (IM) on epel8 with soname bump .
ImageMagick-6.9.10 last version, have almost 2 years and keep it and
just pull security patches, it would have a lot more work in my
opinion.
so in
OLD: Fedora-36-20220328.n.0
NEW: Fedora-36-20220329.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 161
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 814.09 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 08:12:47PM +0200, Alexander Sosedkin wrote:
>
> "You know these lights in the theaters that go out gradually?
> When the guy ve-ery slo-o-owly pulls the plug out?"
> - a joke from my childhood.
>
>
> Hello, it's been quiet for a while, and I've been busy
> but kept
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 05:57:52PM -, Damon Lynch wrote:
> Greetings Fedora community, I am the developer of Rapid Photo Downloader. The
> package for it in Fedora is about two years old, and crashes during start-up
> under Python 3.10.
>
> As the subject says, I'm looking for a
I submitted "showinflemanager" as a package to fedora any review are welcomed.
URL: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2069851
Regards,
Onuralp Sezer (he/him/his)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
On Tuesday, 29 March 2022 at 21:29, Jiri Kucera wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am working on a gpgme update from 1.17.0 to 1.17.1 (bz#2061192). Since
> the update changes libqgpgme SONAME from libqgpgme.so.7 to libqgpgme.so.15,
> I requested the side tag f37-build-side-52334 and do a build in it:
[...]
>
On 3/29/22 13:57, Damon Lynch wrote:
> Greetings Fedora community, I am the developer of Rapid Photo Downloader. The
> package for it in Fedora is about two years old, and crashes during start-up
> under Python 3.10.
>
> As the subject says, I'm looking for a provenpackager to update the
Hello,
I am working on a gpgme update from 1.17.0 to 1.17.1 (bz#2061192). Since
the update changes libqgpgme SONAME from libqgpgme.so.7 to libqgpgme.so.15,
I requested the side tag f37-build-side-52334 and do a build in it:
- commit:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 7:40 PM Alexander Sosedkin wrote:
>
> Hello, community, I need your wisdom for planning a disruptive change.
>
> Fedora 28 had https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/StrongCryptoSettings
> Fedora 33 had https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/StrongCryptoSettings2
> I
Meeting started at the wrong time and was cancelled because of lack of quorum.
See you next week, one hour earlier.
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2022-03-29/fesco.2022-03-29-18.00.html
Minutes (text):
Greetings Fedora community, I am the developer of Rapid Photo Downloader. The
package for it in Fedora is about two years old, and crashes during start-up
under Python 3.10.
As the subject says, I'm looking for a provenpackager to update the package.
I'm posting this message here at the
Il 24/03/22 09:12, Petr Pisar ha scritto:
> V Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 05:40:28PM +, Mattia Verga via devel napsal(a):
>> So, now that we have side-tags to perform this kind of builds, does the
>> buildroot override existence still make sense? Is there any use case
>> that still requires BR
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project:
`perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10` that you are following:
``
Fix detection of openssl library (bug #2069748)
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10/pull-request/5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069748
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project:
`perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10` that you are following:
``
Fix detection of openssl library (bug #2069748)
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10/pull-request/4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069748
Bug ID: 2069748
Summary: Fix functionality of Crypt::OpenSSL::Guess in
Makefile.PL
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component:
> On Tue, 2022-03-29 at 14:38 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > > > > Can we get a link to the actual software stack being
> > > > > > proposed?
> > > > > > The link in this proposal is a marketing post ...
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, that was an oversight, for reference:
> > > > >
On Tue, 2022-03-29 at 14:38 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > > > Can we get a link to the actual software stack being
> > > > > proposed?
> > > > > The link in this proposal is a marketing post ...
> > > >
> > > > Yes, that was an oversight, for reference:
> > > >
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 3:45 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 10:38 AM Peter Robinson wrote:
> >
> > > > > > Can we get a link to the actual software stack being proposed?
> > > > > > The link in this proposal is a marketing post ...
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, that was an
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.libera.chat.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2022-03-29 17:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 10:38 AM Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> > > > > Can we get a link to the actual software stack being proposed?
> > > > > The link in this proposal is a marketing post ...
> > > >
> > > > Yes, that was an oversight, for reference:
> > > >
> > > > Can we get a link to the actual software stack being proposed?
> > > > The link in this proposal is a marketing post ...
> > >
> > > Yes, that was an oversight, for reference:
> > > https://github.com/fedora-iot/fido-device-onboard-rs
> >
> > For reference it's under scope where I
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 10:29 AM Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 3:26 PM Peter Robinson wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 3:25 PM Simo Sorce wrote:
> > >
> > > Can we get a link to the actual software stack being proposed?
> > > The link in this proposal is a marketing
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Fedora Source-git SIG on 2022-03-30 from 14:30:00 to 15:30:00 GMT
At meet.google.com/mic-otnv-kse
The meeting will be about:
Meeting of the Fedora source-git SIG
Agenda:
https://pagure.io/fedora-source-git/sig/issues?tags=meeting=Open
SIG
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 3:26 PM Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 3:25 PM Simo Sorce wrote:
> >
> > Can we get a link to the actual software stack being proposed?
> > The link in this proposal is a marketing post ...
>
> Yes, that was an oversight, for reference:
>
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 3:25 PM Simo Sorce wrote:
>
> Can we get a link to the actual software stack being proposed?
> The link in this proposal is a marketing post ...
Yes, that was an oversight, for reference:
https://github.com/fedora-iot/fido-device-onboard-rs
> On Tue, 2022-03-29 at 09:50
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/IoTArtifactsWithOSBuild
== Summary ==
Build the key Fedora IoT artifacts such as the raw images and the
traditional anaconda installer with osbuild.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:pwhalen| Paul Whalen]]
* Email: [mailto:pwha...@redhat.com| pwha...@redhat.com]
Fedora Linux 36 Beta was released today [1]. Our Fedora CoreOS `next` stream
has been migrated to Fedora Linux 36 content. Existing nodes on the `next`
stream will update as normal over the following days.
In addition to the Fedora Project accepted changes for Fedora 36 [2], there
are a few
Can we get a link to the actual software stack being proposed?
The link in this proposal is a marketing post ...
On Tue, 2022-03-29 at 09:50 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FIDODeviceOnboarding
>
> == Summary ==
> Package and enable the
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/IoTArtifactsWithOSBuild
== Summary ==
Build the key Fedora IoT artifacts such as the raw images and the
traditional anaconda installer with osbuild.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:pwhalen| Paul Whalen]]
* Email: [mailto:pwha...@redhat.com| pwha...@redhat.com]
Fedora Linux 36 Beta Released
--
The Fedora Project is pleased to announce the immediate availability
of Fedora 36 Beta, the next step towards our planned Fedora 36 release
at the end of April.
Download the prerelease from our Get Fedora site:
* Get Fedora
Fedora Linux 36 Beta Released
--
The Fedora Project is pleased to announce the immediate availability
of Fedora 36 Beta, the next step towards our planned Fedora 36 release
at the end of April.
Download the prerelease from our Get Fedora site:
* Get Fedora
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FIDODeviceOnboarding
== Summary ==
Package and enable the
[https://fidoalliance.org/fido-alliance-creates-new-onboarding-standard-to-secure-internet-of-things-iot/
FIDO Device Onboarding] software stack for Zero Touch Onboarding on
Fedora IoT.
== Owner ==
*
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FIDODeviceOnboarding
== Summary ==
Package and enable the
[https://fidoalliance.org/fido-alliance-creates-new-onboarding-standard-to-secure-internet-of-things-iot/
FIDO Device Onboarding] software stack for Zero Touch Onboarding on
Fedora IoT.
== Owner ==
*
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064808
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(p...@city-fan.org |
|)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064808
--- Comment #10 from Michal Josef Spacek ---
Perl build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=84883465
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064808
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(p...@city-fan.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069471
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069430
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl` that you are
following.
Merged pull-request:
``
5.34.1 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl/pull-request/5
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10`
that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
0.19 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10/pull-request/3
___
perl-devel mailing list --
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10`
that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
0.19 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project:
`perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10` that you are following:
``
0.19 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10/pull-request/3
___
perl-devel
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project:
`perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10` that you are following:
``
0.19 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069471
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
On Mon, 2022-03-28 at 16:43 -0500, Ron Olson wrote:
> Hey all-
> I’m unable to build Swift on Fedora 36 and Rawhide while it does
> build on F35. I’ve been able to condense the entire issue down to the
> following sample code that demonstrates the problem:
> nothing.S:
> #define
Hi Ivan,
Thanks for replying and starting to work on the issue.
I see that you built for F36 but still no build for rawhide. Please remember to
build it for rawhide as well!
Best,
Fale
On Mon, Mar 28, 2022, at 15:50, Ivan Savciuc wrote:
> Hi Fabio,
>
> Thanks for reaching out, by some reason
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl` that you are
following:
``
5.34.1 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl/pull-request/5
___
perl-devel mailing list --
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220327.0):
ID: 1202012 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
I already claimed go-rpm-macros.
On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 10:53 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a
68 matches
Mail list logo
