[Bug 2077403] perl-Dumbbench-0.503 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077403 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Dumbbench-0.503-1.fc37 |perl-Dumbbench-0.503-1.fc37

[Bug 2076071] perl-Test-Harness-3.44 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076071 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Test-Harness-3.44-1.fc |perl-Test-Harness-3.44-1.fc

[Bug 2078560] perl-libwww-perl-6.64 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078560 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 2074593] perl-Math-BigInt-1.999830 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2074593 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Math-BigInt-1.9998.30- |perl-Math-BigInt-1.9998.30-

[Bug 2076017] perl-Net-GitHub-1.03 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076017 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|ON_QA

[Bug 2077027] perl-local-lib-2.000029 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077027 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-local-lib-2.29-1.f |perl-local-lib-2.29-1.f

[Bug 2078705] perl-Perl-Critic-StricterSubs-0.06 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078705 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-901d774743 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 2079105] perl-App-cpm-0.997011 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079105 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-App-cpm-0.997.011-1.fc |perl-App-cpm-0.997.011-1.fc

[Bug 2078251] perl-Text-Bidi-2.16 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078251 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Text-Bidi-2.16-1.fc37 |perl-Text-Bidi-2.16-1.fc37

[Bug 2077281] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20220420 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077281 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2

[Bug 2076025] perl-App-cpm-0.997010 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076025 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-App-cpm-0.997.010-1.fc |perl-App-cpm-0.997.010-1.fc

[Bug 2075839] perl-Code-TidyAll-0.82 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2075839 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Fixed In

[Bug 2071593] Upgrade perl-Net-OpenSSH to 0.82

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071593 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 2073667] perl-Prima-1.65 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2073667 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Fixed In

[Bug 2073858] perl-CPAN-FindDependencies-3.11 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2073858 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-FindDependencies- |perl-CPAN-FindDependencies-

[Bug 2074594] perl-Math-BigRat-0.2621 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2074594 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 2073511] perl-DateTime-Locale-1.34 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2073511 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Fixed In

[Bug 2075210] perl-Math-BigRat-0.2622 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2075210 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Math-BigRat-0.2622-1.f |perl-Math-BigRat-0.2622-1.f

[Bug 2073654] perl-XML-LibXSLT-2.000000 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2073654 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 2072835] perl-Encode-3.17 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2072835 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|ON_QA

[Bug 2068943] perl-CPAN-2.33 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2068943 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-2.33-1.fc37 |perl-CPAN-2.33-1.fc37

[Bug 2069285] perl-HTML-Parser-3.78 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069285 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-HTML-Parser-3.78-1.fc3 |perl-HTML-Parser-3.78-1.fc3

[Bug 2070684] perl-Chart-2.400.5 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2070684 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Chart-2.400.5-1.fc37 |perl-Chart-2.400.5-1.fc37

[Bug 2071865] perl-libwww-perl-6.62 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071865 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-libwww-perl-6.62-1.fc3 |perl-libwww-perl-6.62-1.fc3

[Bug 2070025] perl-Test-Smoke-1.79 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2070025 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|ON_QA

[Bug 2069471] perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10-0.19 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069471 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10-0

[Bug 2069748] Fix functionality of Crypt::OpenSSL::Guess in Makefile.PL

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069748 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10-0 |perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10-0

[Bug 2082759] perl-Net-eBay-0.62 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082759 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of perl-Net-eBay-0.62-1.fc34.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=86755708 -- You are

[Bug 2082759] New: perl-Net-eBay-0.62 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082759 Bug ID: 2082759 Summary: perl-Net-eBay-0.62 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Net-eBay Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 2082759] perl-Net-eBay-0.62 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082759 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1877719 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1877719=edit Update to 0.62 (#2082759) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for

[Bug 2082623] Request to build ack for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082623 Robin Lee changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value

[Bug 2082747] New: perl-Carton-1.0.35 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082747 Bug ID: 2082747 Summary: perl-Carton-1.0.35 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Carton Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

chafa-libs soname bump from 0.6.0 to 0.7.1

I'm planning to do https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/chafa/pull-request/3 Nothing depends on chafa-libs in Fedora, so I won't wait a week. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 2082526] Please branch and build perl-Time-Duration in epel9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082526 --- Comment #4 from Jitka Plesnikova --- I tagged the build perl-Time-Duration-1.21-10.el9 to epel9-build-side-53475. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 2082526] Please branch and build perl-Time-Duration in epel9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082526 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from

Re: F37 Change: Enable read only /sysroot for Fedora Silverblue & Kinoite (Self-Contained Change proposal)

> We could also probably make this even more conservative and have it only > enabled once all > your deployments have the new kernel option. This should avoid the case where > you can not > bee an older deployment anymore. Hello I would like to ask how it will work if I have pinned deployments

[Bug 2082697] New: perl-TAP-Formatter-JUnit-0.15 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082697 Bug ID: 2082697 Summary: perl-TAP-Formatter-JUnit-0.15 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-TAP-Formatter-JUnit Keywords:

[Bug 2082697] perl-TAP-Formatter-JUnit-0.15 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082697 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Scratch build failed. Details below: BuilderException: Build started, but failure happened during post build operations: Command '['rpmbuild', '-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .',

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 37 Boost 1.78 rebuilds starting in a side tag

On 06. 05. 22 19:35, Tristan Cacqueray wrote: On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 10:46 Miro Hrončok wrote: supercollider CMake Warning: Ignoring extra path from command line: "/builddir/build/BUILD/SuperCollider-3.12.2-Source" CMake Error: The source directory

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 37 Boost 1.78 rebuilds starting in a side tag

On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 10:46 Miro Hrončok wrote: > supercollider > CMake Warning: >Ignoring extra path from command line: > "/builddir/build/BUILD/SuperCollider-3.12.2-Source" > CMake Error: The source directory >

Review request: liblerc

Hi I've packaged liblerc which I'd like to use for the upcoming gdal-3.5.0. Review request is here [1]. It's a simple cmake/c++ library, and I've also added the mingw subpackages. Happy to review in exchange. Thanks Sandro [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2082662

Re: Packit automates Koji Builds and Bodhi updates

On 06. 05. 22 18:18, Tomas Tomecek wrote: On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 5:54 PM Miro Hrončok > wrote: On 06. 05. 22 17:37, Frantisek Lachman wrote: The problem is I have not explicitly opted in yet I am afraid this will block my work. Before a more robust

Re: Packit automates Koji Builds and Bodhi updates

On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 5:54 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 06. 05. 22 17:37, Frantisek Lachman wrote: > > The problem is I have not explicitly opted in yet I am afraid this will > block > my work. Before a more robust solution is found, please at least provide > me a > way how I can temporarily

Fedora-IoT-37-20220506.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Iot dvd x86_64 Iot dvd aarch64 Failed openQA tests: 2/15 (aarch64) ID: 1258449 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1258449 ID: 1258462 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification@uefi URL:

Re: Packit automates Koji Builds and Bodhi updates

On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 4:12 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 06. 05. 22 15:50, Frantisek Lachman wrote: > > 1) configurable allow-list / block list for committers (for the user > and/or for > > the whole service) > > * For our projects, we would allow just the `packit` user that we use > for > >

Re: Packit automates Koji Builds and Bodhi updates

On 06. 05. 22 17:37, Frantisek Lachman wrote: On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 4:12 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: That is the case for any rebuilds that happen in side tags. Most recently e.g. the boost rebuilds. Sometimes, maintainers do that for their own packages as well, but provenpackagers do that at

Fedora-Rawhide-20220506.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Minimal raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 8 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 17/231 (x86_64), 35/161 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed

Re: Packit automates Koji Builds and Bodhi updates

On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 4:12 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > That is the case for any rebuilds that happen in side tags. Most recently e.g. > the boost rebuilds. Sometimes, maintainers do that for their own packages as > well, but provenpackagers do that at larger scale. For Python packages, > that'll

[Bug 2082623] New: Request to build ack for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082623 Bug ID: 2082623 Summary: Request to build ack for EPEL 9 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Status: NEW Component: ack Assignee: robinlee.s...@gmail.com

Fedora-36-20220506.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 8/229 (x86_64), 7/161 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220505.n.0): ID: 1258026 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1258026 ID: 1258030 Test:

Re: libgps soname bump (gpsd-3.24)

Miroslav Lichvar wrote on 2022/05/05 0:46: libgps from the gpsd package had an API and ABI break. As usual, the following packages need to be rebuilt: collectd direwolf foxtrotgps marble plasma-workspace vfrnav viking I tried to rebuild them locally. It seems only direwolf needs a new patch.

Re: Packit automates Koji Builds and Bodhi updates

On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 2:21 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 06. 05. 22 11:06, Frantisek Lachman wrote: > > You can also check the activities of the packit FAS user in Koji > > (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/userinfo?userID=4641 > > ) or

Re: A way to prepare custom source tarballs from .spec file to improve CI experience

On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 12:17 PM Marián Konček wrote: > > I agree with Vit, I want to add to this: > > * still having to maintain a custom script is not an improvement over our > current situation. > * make sure that $VERSION can be processed, there are cases when for example > the tilde "~"

Re: Packit automates Koji Builds and Bodhi updates

On 06. 05. 22 15:50, Frantisek Lachman wrote: Hi Miro,  that's a really valid point that we should somehow resolve. Is this always the case with the mass rebuilds that they should be left unbuilt or just with your Python rebuilds? That is the case for any rebuilds that happen in side

Re: Packit automates Koji Builds and Bodhi updates

Yes, sure. Thanks for the example. František On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 2:21 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 06. 05. 22 11:06, Frantisek Lachman wrote: > > You can also check the activities of the packit FAS user in Koji > > (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/userinfo?userID=4641 > >

Re: Packit automates Koji Builds and Bodhi updates

On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 3:51 PM Frantisek Lachman wrote: > > Hi Miro, > > that's a really valid point that we should somehow resolve. Is this always > the case with the mass rebuilds that they should be left unbuilt or just with > your Python rebuilds? > > I am thinking about multiple options

Re: Packit automates Koji Builds and Bodhi updates

Hi Miro, that's a really valid point that we should somehow resolve. Is this always the case with the mass rebuilds that they should be left unbuilt or just with your Python rebuilds? I am thinking about multiple options here: 1) configurable allow-list / block list for committers (for the user

Successful Mail Delivery Report

This is the mail system at host mailman01.iad2.fedoraproject.org. Your message was successfully delivered to the destination(s) listed below. If the message was delivered to mailbox you will receive no further notifications. Otherwise you may still receive notifications of mail delivery errors

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 8:00 AM wrote: > > Dear all, > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >ELN SIG on 2022-05-06 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern >At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat > > The meeting will be about: I don't have a specific agenda for today's meeting, so I'll hold

[Bug 2082526] Please branch and build perl-Time-Duration in epel9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082526 --- Comment #2 from Mikel Olasagasti Uranga --- Jitka, would it be possible once the branch is created to build the package against the epel9-build-side-53475 sidetag? moreutils has perl-Time-Duration as runtime dep and I already tagged the

Re: pyproject-rpm-macros 1.2.0: Improved support for alternate build backends (e.g. hatchling)

Thank you for working on this! I’m excited that this approach turned out to be reasonably practical. This update makes it vastly more practical to deal with packages that use the hatchling backend. I’ve already updated python-hatchling itself and a handful of other packages to use the new

Non-responsive packagers: michaelanguskelly

Good Morning Everyone, The packagers listed here have been receiving a daily email asking them to either adjust their bugzilla or their FAS account so the email address in FAS matches an existing bugzilla account. Having a bugzilla account is mandatory per:

Re: pyproject-rpm-macros 1.2.0: Improved support for alternate build backends (e.g. hatchling)

On 06. 05. 22 13:55, Major Hayden wrote: On Fri, May 6, 2022, at 05:07, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello Pythonistas. I am glad to announce the release of pyproject-rpm-macros 1.2.0. The new version is available in rawhide and waits for your karma in updates-testing for older Fedoras:

Fedora 36 compose report: 20220506.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-36-20220505.n.0 NEW: Fedora-36-20220506.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 6 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Re: Packit automates Koji Builds and Bodhi updates

On 06. 05. 22 11:06, Frantisek Lachman wrote: You can also check the activities of the packit FAS user in Koji (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/userinfo?userID=4641 ) or Bodhi ( https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/users/packit

Re: Packit automates Koji Builds and Bodhi updates

On 06. 05. 22 11:06, Frantisek Lachman wrote: Hello all, You might have heard some rumours that the Packit team is working on automation for downstream activities you need to do when working on a new release of a package to Fedora. And the rumours are true – I am really pleased to announce

CPE Weekly Update – Week 18 2022

Hi everyone, This is a weekly report from the CPE (Community Platform Engineering) Team. If you have any questions or feedback, please respond to this report or contact us on #redhat-cpe channel on libera.chat (https://libera.chat/). Week: 2nd - 6th May 2022 If you wish to read this in form of

Re: pyproject-rpm-macros 1.2.0: Improved support for alternate build backends (e.g. hatchling)

On Fri, May 6, 2022, at 05:07, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello Pythonistas. > > I am glad to announce the release of pyproject-rpm-macros 1.2.0. > > The new version is available in rawhide and waits for your karma in > updates-testing for older Fedoras: > >

[Bug 2082526] Please branch and build perl-Time-Duration in epel9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082526 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20220506.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220505.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220506.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 9 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 90 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 372.80 KiB Size of dropped packages

[Bug 2082526] New: Please branch and build perl-Time-Duration in epel9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082526 Bug ID: 2082526 Summary: Please branch and build perl-Time-Duration in epel9 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Status: NEW Component: perl-Time-Duration Assignee:

Re: A way to prepare custom source tarballs from .spec file to improve CI experience

I agree with Vit, I want to add to this: * still having to maintain a custom script is not an improvement over our current situation. * make sure that $VERSION can be processed, there are cases when for example the tilde "~" needs to be swapped for dash "-". * More complex case of $VERSION:

pyproject-rpm-macros 1.2.0: Improved support for alternate build backends (e.g. hatchling)

Hello Pythonistas. I am glad to announce the release of pyproject-rpm-macros 1.2.0. The new version is available in rawhide and waits for your karma in updates-testing for older Fedoras: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-80586f3147

Fedora-Cloud-34-20220506.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220505.0): ID: 1257491 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

Re: A way to prepare custom source tarballs from .spec file to improve CI experience

Dne 05. 05. 22 v 19:35 Fabio Valentini napsal(a): On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 1:50 PM Marián Konček wrote: Adding onto this, as I mentioned an additional step, I can also imagine defining some macros which would be used in the .spec file. We could have a simple generic one that would be available

Packit automates Koji Builds and Bodhi updates

Hello all, You might have heard some rumours that the Packit team is working on automation for downstream activities you need to do when working on a new release of a package to Fedora. And the rumours are true – I am really pleased to announce that Packit now covers the whole workflow from