[Bug 2080452] perl-WWW-Mechanize-2.07 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080452 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-WWW-Mechanize-2.07-1.f |perl-WWW-Mechanize-2.07-1.f

[Bug 2080452] perl-WWW-Mechanize-2.07 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080452 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

Re: F37 proposal: Install Using GPT on x86_64 BIOS by Default (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 6:56 AM Peter Boy wrote: > > > > > Am 14.05.2022 um 18:45 schrieb Ben Cotton : > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GPTforBIOSbyDefault > > > > This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes > > process, proposals are publicly announced in

[Bug 2091432] perl-Number-Tolerant-1.709 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091432 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of perl-Number-Tolerant-1.709-1.fc34.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=87661875 --

[Bug 2091432] New: perl-Number-Tolerant-1.709 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091432 Bug ID: 2091432 Summary: perl-Number-Tolerant-1.709 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Number-Tolerant Keywords: FutureFeature,

[Bug 2091432] perl-Number-Tolerant-1.709 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091432 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1884912 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1884912=edit Update to 1.709 (#2091432) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for

[Bug 2091430] New: perl-MooseX-OneArgNew-0.006 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091430 Bug ID: 2091430 Summary: perl-MooseX-OneArgNew-0.006 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-MooseX-OneArgNew Keywords: FutureFeature,

Cannot report selinux bug...

I was told to report an selinux bug. I clicked the report bug button and was asked for my API key. Then I created the API key and plugged that in and hit OK. Now I am being asked to unlock a keyring (?) with the name "default". It is not locked with my password. I'm on KDE. Is this "default" a

Fedora-Rawhide-20220529.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Minimal raw-xz armhfp Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check! All required tests passed Failed openQA tests: 10/231 (x86_64), 13/161 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220528.n.0): ID: 1283030 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso

Re: F37 proposal: Install Using GPT on x86_64 BIOS by Default (System-Wide Change proposal)

> Am 14.05.2022 um 18:45 schrieb Ben Cotton : > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GPTforBIOSbyDefault > > This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes > process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive > community feedback. This proposal will only be

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20220529.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220528.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220529.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 32 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size

Fedora-Cloud-34-20220529.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220528.0): ID: 1282957 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

Fedora-IoT-36-20220529.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 2/15 (x86_64), 3/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20220523.0): ID: 1282931 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1282931 ID: 1282938 Test: x86_64

Re: F37 proposal: Build all JDKs in Fedora against in-tree libraries and with static stdc++lib (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 29/05/2022 02:57, Gerald Henriksen wrote: There is no indication that the JDK is such a thing - in fact given the packagers are struggling that is a good indication that the JDK is being regularly updated. Every 3 months in a patch release. I don't think maintainers will manually backport

Fedora-Cloud-36-20220529.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-36-20220528.0): ID: 1282911 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

Re: F37 proposal: Build all JDKs in Fedora against in-tree libraries and with static stdc++lib (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 2:57 AM Gerald Henriksen wrote: > > On Sat, 28 May 2022 20:52:51 +0200, you wrote: > > >On 28/05/2022 19:31, drago01 wrote: > >> That's incorrect. They can be outdated, but there is no inherit reason > >> why they have to be. > > > >Most upstreams don't care about bundled