[Bug 2091242] perl-Devel-REPL-1.003029 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091242



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e6c95c20ca has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e6c95c20ca

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091242
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2091432] perl-Number-Tolerant-1.709 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091432



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-6242cfa086 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-6242cfa086`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-6242cfa086

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091432
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2091242] perl-Devel-REPL-1.003029 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091242



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-3582e42bde has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-3582e42bde`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-3582e42bde

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091242
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2091432] perl-Number-Tolerant-1.709 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091432



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-57cf8e4bc3 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-57cf8e4bc3`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-57cf8e4bc3

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091432
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2091256] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20220527 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091256



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-2f871bc149 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-2f871bc149`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-2f871bc149

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091256
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2091242] perl-Devel-REPL-1.003029 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091242



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-d22de37282 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-d22de37282`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-d22de37282

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091242
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2088880] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20220528 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=200



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-7c7c797ec7 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-7c7c797ec7`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-7c7c797ec7

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=200
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2091256] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20220527 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091256

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-3a6d995044 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-3a6d995044`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-3a6d995044

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091256
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2088880] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20220528 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=200

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-5b0d047ba9 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-5b0d047ba9`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-5b0d047ba9

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=200
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2091432] perl-Number-Tolerant-1.709 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091432

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-83353dfde5 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-83353dfde5`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-83353dfde5

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091432
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2091242] perl-Devel-REPL-1.003029 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091242

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-b9f97ad65d has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-b9f97ad65d`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-b9f97ad65d

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091242
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F37 Proposal: Strong crypto settings: phase 3, forewarning 1/2 (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 08:59:28AM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> V Tue, May 31, 2022 at 08:07:57AM +0200, Alexander Sosedkin napsal(a):
> > On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 10:34 PM Garry T. Williams  
> > wrote:
> > > On Friday, April 29, 2022 5:49:05 PM EDT Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > > Cryptographic policies will be tightened in Fedora 38-39,
> > > > SHA-1 signatures will no longer be trusted by default.
> > > > Fedora 37 specifically doesn't come with any change of defaults,
> > > > and this Fedora Change is an advance warning filed for extra visibility.
> > > > Test your setup with FUTURE today and file bugs so you won't get bit
> > > > by Fedora 38-39.
> > > >
> > > After looking in
> > > /usr/share/crypto-policies/policies/modules, I tried again with:
> > >
> > > $ sudo update-crypto-policies --set FUTURE:SHA1
> > > Setting system policy to FUTURE:SHA1
> > >
> > > But that didn't get me back.  I got the same error doing dnf upgrade.
> > >
> > > I had to do:
> > >
> > > $ sudo update-crypto-policies --set DEFAULT
> > >
> > > to get back to dnf working again.
> > >
> > > > file bug reports against the affected components if not filed already.
> > >
> > > I really don't know what "component" to use filing a bug.
> > 
> > Yeah, that seems like a case when
> > the service administrator is the one to be notified.
> 
> Reported to . The real
> cause is not SHA-1. It's a 2048-bit RSA key of an intermediate certificate.

Right. This has been reported before: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1832292

As far as I can tell, we can't get a digicert cert that doesn't use
2048bit CA or intermediate. I think they do offer better/different, but
those are reserved for the EV certs which require a bunch of validation
of your business (which fedoraproject isn't). 

We might be able to replace it with a letsencrypt cert, I've not looked
to see if they have moved to a higher bit CA/intermediate yet. 

But even with that, do note that lots and lots and lots of other
websites will not work at all either, so I don't think setting FUTURE
is too great a experence right now. ;(

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Ceph, virt packages (Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers)

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 02:05:58PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 30. 05. 22 10:09, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 09:31:21AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> > > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for 
> > > sure
> > > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
> > > 
> > > Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the 
> > > affected
> > > packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the affected 
> > > package or
> > > retire your depending package to avoid broken dependencies, otherwise your
> > > package will fail to install and/or build when the affected package gets 
> > > retired.
> > > 
> > > Request package ownership via the *Take* button in he left column on
> > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/
> > > 
> > > Full report available at:
> > > https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2022-05-30.txt
> > > grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain.
> > 
> > ...
> > 
> > > python-repoze-lru infra-sig, jcaratzas, orphan 0 
> > > weeks ago
> > 
> > Looks like it's this package which causes the ceph & hence virt
> > breakage.  It seems to have a co-maintainer already.
> 
> Looking at the commit log, no maintainer touched that package for almost 4 
> years.

Well, pingou updated it 3years ago. ;) 

Update to 0.7
Pierre-Yves Chibon • 3 years ago   f29

> It seems the biggest transient consumer of this is python-routes trough
> which it goes to ceph and & virt.

I'm ok to just take it myself, but I already have way too many
packages... so I would prefer if someone(s) else did. 

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2062562] [RFE: EPEL9] EPEL9 branch for perl-Proc-ProcessTable

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2062562

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||perl-Proc-ProcessTable-0.63
   ||4-1.el9
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
Last Closed||2022-06-01 01:33:55



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-bc94919274 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2062562
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2062024] [RFE: EPEL9] EPEL9 branch for perl-Proc-Daemon

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2062024
Bug 2062024 depends on bug 2062562, which changed state.

Bug 2062562 Summary: [RFE: EPEL9] EPEL9 branch for perl-Proc-ProcessTable
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2062562

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2062024
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2088927] perl-Pod-Parser-1.65 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088927

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-Pod-Parser-1.65-1.fc36 |perl-Pod-Parser-1.65-1.fc36
   ||perl-Pod-Parser-1.65-1.fc35



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-fd4630d0bc has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088927
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2088927] perl-Pod-Parser-1.65 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088927

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
   Fixed In Version||perl-Pod-Parser-1.65-1.fc36
 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
Last Closed||2022-06-01 01:23:56



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-b55dc94b32 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088927
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora-Rawhide-20220531.n.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

Missing expected images:

Minimal raw-xz armhfp

Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed

Failed openQA tests: 8/231 (x86_64), 11/161 (aarch64)

New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220530.n.0):

ID: 1285782 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso anaconda_help
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1285782
ID: 1285896 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso gnome_text_editor
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1285896
ID: 1286032 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_browser@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1286032
ID: 1286033 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_printing@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1286033
ID: 1286035 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_printing_builtin@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1286035
ID: 1286074 Test: x86_64 universal support_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1286074
ID: 1286102 Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1286102
ID: 1286158 Test: aarch64 universal install_kickstart_hdd@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1286158
ID: 1286170 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1286170

Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220530.n.0):

ID: 1285871 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1285871
ID: 1285876 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1285876
ID: 1285958 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1285958
ID: 1286014 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_fprint
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1286014
ID: 1286029 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade gnome_text_editor@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1286029
ID: 1286037 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade evince@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1286037
ID: 1286038 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_terminal@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1286038
ID: 1286046 Test: x86_64 universal install_arabic_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1286046
ID: 1286122 Test: aarch64 universal install_arabic_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1286122
ID: 1286162 Test: aarch64 universal install_asian_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1286162

Soft failed openQA tests: 5/231 (x86_64), 3/161 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220530.n.0):

ID: 1285889 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso evince
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1285889
ID: 1285890 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso eog
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1285890
ID: 1285895 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso desktop_browser
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1285895
ID: 1285904 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1285904
ID: 1285919 Test: aarch64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1285919
ID: 1285998 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1285998
ID: 1286039 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade eog@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1286039
ID: 1286190 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso eog
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1286190

Passed openQA tests: 218/231 (x86_64), 124/161 (aarch64)

New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220530.n.0):

ID: 1285781 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1285781
ID: 1285861 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_login
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1285861
ID: 1285863 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso anaconda_help
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1285863
ID: 1285932 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1285932
ID: 1285934 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_lvm_ext4@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1285934
ID: 1285953 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_resize_lvm@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1285953
ID: 1285957 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso release_identification@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1285957
ID: 1285960 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_resize_lvm@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1285960
ID: 1286013 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_login
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1286013
ID: 1286019 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade apps_startstop
URL: 

jplesnik pushed to perl-Return-Type (rawhide). "Perl 5.36 rebuild"

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-06-01 00:38:39 UTC

From 27682bffe7454b974f0b453cbf8b7d37482226d5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova 
Date: Jun 01 2022 00:38:33 +
Subject: Perl 5.36 rebuild


---

diff --git a/perl-Return-Type.spec b/perl-Return-Type.spec
index ba3fdf7..cf0a019 100644
--- a/perl-Return-Type.spec
+++ b/perl-Return-Type.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-Return-Type
 Version:0.007
-Release:5%{?dist}
+Release:6%{?dist}
 Summary:Specify a return type for a function
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:https://metacpan.org/release/Return-Type
@@ -57,6 +57,9 @@ library are supported.
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 01 2022 Jitka Plesnikova  - 0.007-6
+- Perl 5.36 rebuild
+
 * Fri Jan 21 2022 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.007-5
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_36_Mass_Rebuild
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Return-Type/c/27682bffe7454b974f0b453cbf8b7d37482226d5?branch=rawhide
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

jplesnik pushed to perl-Specio (rawhide). "Perl 5.36 rebuild"

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-06-01 00:36:59 UTC

From 23a3aa0e4721c3554a9186282682a0fb6b122185 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova 
Date: Jun 01 2022 00:36:53 +
Subject: Perl 5.36 rebuild


---

diff --git a/perl-Specio.spec b/perl-Specio.spec
index 3f20239..9cca38c 100644
--- a/perl-Specio.spec
+++ b/perl-Specio.spec
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 
 Name:  perl-Specio
 Version:   0.47
-Release:   5%{?dist}
+Release:   6%{?dist}
 Summary:   Type constraints and coercions for Perl
 # lib/Specio/PartialDump.pm:   GPL+ or Artistic
 #  

@@ -162,6 +162,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/Test::Specio.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 01 2022 Jitka Plesnikova  - 0.47-6
+- Perl 5.36 rebuild
+
 * Fri Jan 21 2022 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.47-5
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_36_Mass_Rebuild
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Specio/c/23a3aa0e4721c3554a9186282682a0fb6b122185?branch=rawhide
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

jplesnik pushed to perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian (rawhide). "Perl 5.36 rebuild"

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-06-01 00:35:18 UTC

From daf57fa09498fd0e0799150180249a17705b1953 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova 
Date: Jun 01 2022 00:35:14 +
Subject: Perl 5.36 rebuild


---

diff --git a/perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian.spec 
b/perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian.spec
index 26009bf..f8e5b51 100644
--- a/perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian.spec
+++ b/perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:  perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian
 Version:   0.107
-Release:   1%{?dist}
+Release:   2%{?dist}
 License:   GPL+ or Artistic
 Summary:   Julian Calendar support for DateTime.pm
 Url:   https://metacpan.org/release/DateTime-Calendar-Julian
@@ -39,6 +39,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/DateTime::Calendar::Julian.3pm*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 01 2022 Jitka Plesnikova  - 0.107-2
+- Perl 5.36 rebuild
+
 * Tue Feb  1 2022 Tom Callaway  - 0.107-1
 - update to 0.107
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian/c/daf57fa09498fd0e0799150180249a17705b1953?branch=rawhide
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

jplesnik pushed to perl-Mail-Transport (rawhide). "Perl 5.36 rebuild"

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-06-01 00:33:22 UTC

From 47200cb6abb9429e33e2e5a52c5de149a784a0f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova 
Date: Jun 01 2022 00:33:16 +
Subject: Perl 5.36 rebuild


---

diff --git a/perl-Mail-Transport.spec b/perl-Mail-Transport.spec
index 66247a4..cceb876 100644
--- a/perl-Mail-Transport.spec
+++ b/perl-Mail-Transport.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:  perl-Mail-Transport
 Version:   3.005
-Release:   5%{?dist}
+Release:   6%{?dist}
 Summary:   Email message exchange
 License:   GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:   https://metacpan.org/release/Mail-Transport
@@ -68,6 +68,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/Mail::Transport::Sendmail.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 01 2022 Jitka Plesnikova  - 3.005-6
+- Perl 5.36 rebuild
+
 * Fri Jan 21 2022 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
3.005-5
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_36_Mass_Rebuild
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Mail-Transport/c/47200cb6abb9429e33e2e5a52c5de149a784a0f0?branch=rawhide
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

jplesnik pushed to perl-Validation-Class (rawhide). "Perl 5.36 rebuild"

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-06-01 00:28:57 UTC

From 83a927005bb127ce8b6145182cc7dafcbcf91006 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova 
Date: Jun 01 2022 00:28:52 +
Subject: Perl 5.36 rebuild


---

diff --git a/perl-Validation-Class.spec b/perl-Validation-Class.spec
index e892bea..ac6ab87 100644
--- a/perl-Validation-Class.spec
+++ b/perl-Validation-Class.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-Validation-Class
 Version:7.900057
-Release:17%{?dist}
+Release:18%{?dist}
 Summary:Powerful Data Validation Framework
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:https://metacpan.org/release/Validation-Class
@@ -71,6 +71,9 @@ complete set of pre-defined validations and filters referred 
to as
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 01 2022 Jitka Plesnikova  - 7.900057-18
+- Perl 5.36 rebuild
+
 * Fri Jan 21 2022 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
7.900057-17
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_36_Mass_Rebuild
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Validation-Class/c/83a927005bb127ce8b6145182cc7dafcbcf91006?branch=rawhide
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

jplesnik pushed to perl-Params-ValidationCompiler (rawhide). "Perl 5.36 rebuild"

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-06-01 00:23:59 UTC

From c313aa5f327886c2ed464df3c767a4c99ae01024 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova 
Date: Jun 01 2022 00:23:55 +
Subject: Perl 5.36 rebuild


---

diff --git a/perl-Params-ValidationCompiler.spec 
b/perl-Params-ValidationCompiler.spec
index 8f03255..c615a4b 100644
--- a/perl-Params-ValidationCompiler.spec
+++ b/perl-Params-ValidationCompiler.spec
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 
 Name:  perl-Params-ValidationCompiler
 Version:   0.30
-Release:   14%{?dist}
+Release:   15%{?dist}
 Summary:   Build an optimized subroutine parameter validator once, use it 
forever
 License:   Artistic 2.0
 URL:   https://metacpan.org/release/Params-ValidationCompiler
@@ -87,6 +87,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/Params::ValidationCompiler::Exceptions.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 01 2022 Jitka Plesnikova  - 0.30-15
+- Perl 5.36 rebuild
+
 * Fri Jan 21 2022 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.30-14
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_36_Mass_Rebuild
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Params-ValidationCompiler/c/c313aa5f327886c2ed464df3c767a4c99ae01024?branch=rawhide
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

jplesnik pushed to perl-Sub-Exporter-Lexical (rawhide). "Perl 5.36 rebuild"

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-06-01 00:19:06 UTC

From d87a553374df891aabf381ae597ea73367759bca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova 
Date: Jun 01 2022 00:19:02 +
Subject: Perl 5.36 rebuild


---

diff --git a/perl-Sub-Exporter-Lexical.spec b/perl-Sub-Exporter-Lexical.spec
index 40fdb1d..333a996 100644
--- a/perl-Sub-Exporter-Lexical.spec
+++ b/perl-Sub-Exporter-Lexical.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-Sub-Exporter-Lexical
 Version:0.092292
-Release:17%{?dist}
+Release:18%{?dist}
 Summary:Export lexically-available subs with Sub::Exporter
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:https://metacpan.org/release/Sub-Exporter-Lexical
@@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{perl_vendorlib}/Sub/Exporter/snippet.pl
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 01 2022 Jitka Plesnikova  - 0.092292-18
+- Perl 5.36 rebuild
+
 * Fri Jan 21 2022 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.092292-17
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_36_Mass_Rebuild
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Sub-Exporter-Lexical/c/d87a553374df891aabf381ae597ea73367759bca?branch=rawhide
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

jplesnik pushed to perl-Net-LDAP-Server-Test (rawhide). "Perl 5.36 rebuild"

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-06-01 00:11:30 UTC

From e93bd00a98613e314efed718eed2dfc5b6c0ccd9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova 
Date: Jun 01 2022 00:11:24 +
Subject: Perl 5.36 rebuild


---

diff --git a/perl-Net-LDAP-Server-Test.spec b/perl-Net-LDAP-Server-Test.spec
index 5ad1609..73a549f 100644
--- a/perl-Net-LDAP-Server-Test.spec
+++ b/perl-Net-LDAP-Server-Test.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-Net-LDAP-Server-Test
 Version:0.22
-Release:17%{?dist}
+Release:18%{?dist}
 Summary:Test Net::LDAP code
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:https://metacpan.org/release/Net-LDAP-Server-Test
@@ -69,6 +69,9 @@ Test your Net::LDAP code without having a real LDAP server 
available.
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 01 2022 Jitka Plesnikova  - 0.22-18
+- Perl 5.36 rebuild
+
 * Fri Jan 21 2022 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.22-17
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_36_Mass_Rebuild
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-LDAP-Server-Test/c/e93bd00a98613e314efed718eed2dfc5b6c0ccd9?branch=rawhide
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

jplesnik pushed to perl-Mail-Message (rawhide). "Perl 5.36 rebuild"

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-06-01 00:08:45 UTC

From de0d5c36a7b1abfbf45fc646f6e7867a0426347e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova 
Date: Jun 01 2022 00:08:40 +
Subject: Perl 5.36 rebuild


---

diff --git a/perl-Mail-Message.spec b/perl-Mail-Message.spec
index d720260..902472f 100644
--- a/perl-Mail-Message.spec
+++ b/perl-Mail-Message.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:  perl-Mail-Message
 Version:   3.012
-Release:   1%{?dist}
+Release:   2%{?dist}
 Summary:   MIME message handling
 License:   GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:   https://metacpan.org/release/Mail-Message
@@ -123,6 +123,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/Mail::*.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 01 2022 Jitka Plesnikova  - 3.012-2
+- Perl 5.36 rebuild
+
 * Tue Mar  1 2022 Paul Howarth  - 3.012-1
 - Update to 3.012
 - Use author-independent source URL



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Mail-Message/c/de0d5c36a7b1abfbf45fc646f6e7867a0426347e?branch=rawhide
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20220531.n.0 changes

[Fedora Rawhide Report]

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220530.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220531.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images:  1
Added packages:  0
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages:   99
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  0 B
Size of dropped packages:2.73 MiB
Size of upgraded packages:   1.09 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   11.82 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =

= DROPPED IMAGES =
Image: Silverblue dvd-ostree aarch64
Path: 
Silverblue/aarch64/iso/Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-aarch64-Rawhide-20220530.n.0.iso

= ADDED PACKAGES =

= DROPPED PACKAGES =
Package: quilter-3.3.0-4.fc36
Summary: Focus on your writing
RPMs:quilter
Size:2.73 MiB


= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  NetworkManager-1:1.38.0-2.fc37
Old package:  NetworkManager-1:1.38.0-1.fc37
Summary:  Network connection manager and user applications
RPMs: NetworkManager NetworkManager-adsl NetworkManager-bluetooth 
NetworkManager-cloud-setup NetworkManager-config-connectivity-fedora 
NetworkManager-config-server NetworkManager-dispatcher-routing-rules 
NetworkManager-initscripts-ifcfg-rh NetworkManager-initscripts-updown 
NetworkManager-libnm NetworkManager-libnm-devel NetworkManager-ovs 
NetworkManager-ppp NetworkManager-team NetworkManager-tui NetworkManager-wifi 
NetworkManager-wwan
Size: 24.02 MiB
Size change:  -803 B
Changelog:
  * Mon May 30 2022 Ana Cabral  - 1:1.38.0-2
  - rpm: include an informational file in ifcfg files directory


Package:  amavis-2.12.2-8.git35407e9.fc37
Old package:  amavis-2.12.2-7.gitb561924.fc37
Summary:  Email filter with virus scanner and spamassassin support
RPMs: amavis amavis-doc amavis-snmp perl-Amavis
Size: 868.88 KiB
Size change:  816 B
Changelog:
  * Mon May 30 2022 Juan Orti Alcaine  - 
2.12.2-8.git35407e9
  - Update to latest git snapshot


Package:  ansible-collection-community-general-5.0.1-1.fc37
Old package:  ansible-collection-community-general-5.0.0-1.fc37
Summary:  Modules and plugins supported by Ansible community
RPMs: ansible-collection-community-general
Size: 1.33 MiB
Size change:  872 B
Changelog:
  * Mon May 30 2022 Maxwell G  - 5.0.1-1
  - Update to 5.0.1.


Package:  ansible-lint-1:6.2.2-1.fc37
Old package:  ansible-lint-1:6.0.2-1.fc37
Summary:  Best practices checker for Ansible
RPMs: python3-ansible-lint
Size: 268.48 KiB
Size change:  40.18 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri May 13 2022 Parag Nemade  - 1:6.1.0-1
  - Update to 6.1.0 version (#2083644)
  - Requires: /usr/bin/ansible (#1949362)

  * Tue May 31 2022 Parag Nemade  - 1:6.2.2-1
  - Update to 6.2.2 version (#2091576)


Package:  ballerburg-1.2.1-1.fc37
Old package:  ballerburg-1.2.0-19.fc36
Summary:  Two players, two castles, and a hill in between
RPMs: ballerburg
Size: 420.50 KiB
Size change:  1.61 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sat May 28 2022 Andrea Musuruane  - 1.2.1-1
  - Updated to new upstream release


Package:  bcm283x-firmware-20220527-1.f145afc.fc37
Old package:  bcm283x-firmware-20220425-1.1210acf.fc37
Summary:  Firmware for the Broadcom bcm283x/bcm2711 used in the Raspberry Pi
RPMs: bcm2711-firmware bcm2835-firmware bcm283x-firmware 
bcm283x-overlays
Size: 6.89 MiB
Size change:  9.44 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri May 27 2022 Peter Robinson  - 
20220527-1.f145afc
  - Update to latest firmware


Package:  console-setup-1.208-1.fc37
Old package:  console-setup-1.207-2.fc36
Summary:  Tools for configuring the console using X Window System key maps
RPMs: bdf2psf console-setup
Size: 1.98 MiB
Size change:  29.64 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon May 30 2022 Vitezslav Crhonek  - 1.208-1
  - Update to latest upstream version
Resolves: #2090948


Package:  containernetworking-plugins-1.1.1-2.fc37
Old package:  containernetworking-plugins-1.1.1-1.fc37
Summary:  Libraries for writing CNI plugin
RPMs: containernetworking-plugins
Size: 29.02 MiB
Size change:  -27.24 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon May 30 2022 RH Container Bot  1.1.1-2
  - auto bump to v1.1.1


Package:  containers-common-4:1-60.fc37
Old package:  containers-common-4:1-58.fc37
Summary:  Common configuration and documentation for containers
RPMs: containers-common
Size: 81.00 KiB
Size change:  493 B
Changelog:
  * Fri May 27 2022 Lokesh Mandvekar  4:1-59
  - build deb packages using debbuild

  * Tue May 31 2022 Daniel J Walsh  4:1-60
  - local build


Package:  dialog-1.3-43.20220526.fc37
Old package:  dialog-1.3-42.20220414.fc37
Summary:  A utility for creating TTY dialog boxes
RPMs: dialog dialog-devel
Size: 1.44 MiB
Size change:  4.24 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon May 30 2022 Miroslav Lichvar  - 1.3-43.20220526
  - update to 1.3-20220526


Package:  distrobox-1.3.0-2.fc37
Old package:  distrobox-1.2.15-1.fc37
Summary:  Another

jplesnik pushed to perl-Module-Extract-Use (rawhide). "Perl 5.36 rebuild"

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-05-31 20:13:39 UTC

From ffb0619f9c845c21dafc9f122265a0c1dcf35d82 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova 
Date: May 31 2022 20:13:33 +
Subject: Perl 5.36 rebuild


---

diff --git a/perl-Module-Extract-Use.spec b/perl-Module-Extract-Use.spec
index 1efea4d..d5e0e26 100644
--- a/perl-Module-Extract-Use.spec
+++ b/perl-Module-Extract-Use.spec
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 Summary:   Pull out the modules a module explicitly uses
 Name:  perl-Module-Extract-Use
 Version:   1.051
-Release:   2%{?dist}
+Release:   3%{?dist}
 License:   Artistic 2.0
 URL:   https://metacpan.org/release/Module-Extract-Use
 Source0:   
https://cpan.metacpan.org/modules/by-module/Module/Module-Extract-Use-%{version}.tar.gz
@@ -60,6 +60,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/Module::Extract::Use.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Tue May 31 2022 Jitka Plesnikova  - 1.051-3
+- Perl 5.36 rebuild
+
 * Fri Jan 21 2022 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.051-2
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_36_Mass_Rebuild
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Module-Extract-Use/c/ffb0619f9c845c21dafc9f122265a0c1dcf35d82?branch=rawhide
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

jplesnik pushed to perl-List-MoreUtils-XS (rawhide). "Perl 5.36 rebuild"

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-05-31 20:08:11 UTC

From cdad0794250ee821f72fab536c9c9eb2d01caed1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova 
Date: May 31 2022 20:08:07 +
Subject: Perl 5.36 rebuild


---

diff --git a/perl-List-MoreUtils-XS.spec b/perl-List-MoreUtils-XS.spec
index 2c1197d..7413c54 100644
--- a/perl-List-MoreUtils-XS.spec
+++ b/perl-List-MoreUtils-XS.spec
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 
 Name:  perl-List-MoreUtils-XS
 Version:   0.430
-Release:   5%{?dist}
+Release:   6%{?dist}
 Summary:   Provide compiled List::MoreUtils functions
 # Code from List-MoreUtils < 0.417 is GPL+ or Artistic
 # Anything after that is ASL 2.0
@@ -84,6 +84,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/List::MoreUtils::XS.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Tue May 31 2022 Jitka Plesnikova  - 0.430-6
+- Perl 5.36 rebuild
+
 * Fri Jan 21 2022 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.430-5
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_36_Mass_Rebuild
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-List-MoreUtils-XS/c/cdad0794250ee821f72fab536c9c9eb2d01caed1?branch=rawhide
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

F40 proposal: Retire python3.7 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

[Ben Cotton]

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RetirePython3.7

This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.

== Summary ==
The {{package|python3.7}} package will be retired without replacement
from [[Releases/40|Fedora Linux 40]]. Python 3.7 will be End of Life
in June 2023 and it will be kept around only to test software
targeting Debian 10 “Buster” LTS. The removal is more or less aligned
with [https://wiki.debian.org/LTS Debian 10 TLS EOL] (June 2024) --
Fedora 39 (the last one to include Python 3.7) will likely EOL on
2024-11-12.

== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Churchyard|Miro Hrončok]]
* Email: mhron...@redhat.com


== Detailed Description ==
The {{package|python3.7}} package with the Python interpreter in
version 3.7 will be kept in Fedora after upstream EOL
([https://devguide.python.org/#status-of-python-branches 2023-06-27])
only to make it possible for Fedora users to test their software
against the Python version shipped in Debian 10 “Buster” LTS.

[https://wiki.debian.org/LTS Debian 10 “Buster” LTS is End of Life in
2024-06]. This happens couple months after the planned release of
Fedora 40. Hence, we decided to retire (completely remove)
{{package|python3.7}} from Fedora 40, before it gets released. Users
who target Debian 10 can use Fedora 39 until it EOLs.

Note that {{package|python3.6}} will remain available for the
foreseeable future to support developers who target RHEL 8.

== Feedback ==
This was discussed on the Python list prior to submitting the change
proposal: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/W74WYEVGYAE57KVLCG73I75LZYKKUMXS/

There was no pushback.

== Benefit to Fedora ==
There is no direct benefit here, except that we don't want to maintain
it anymore and we don't think it's a good idea either.

Consider this change proposal a louder orphaning, except that we will
continue to maintain the package in older released and supported
Fedoras (38 and 39). If you wish to continue maintaining Python 3.7 in
Fedora past Fedora Linux 40, please [[SIGs/Python|speak to us]] first.

== Scope ==
* Proposal owners: Retire {{package|python3.7}} from rawhide just
before Fedora 40 is branched . Obsolete it from
{{package|fedora-obsolete-packages}} if it causes troubles on
upgrades. Make sure no Fedora package depends on it in any way (incl.
weak dependencies).
* Other developers: N/A (not needed for this Change)
* Release engineering: N/A (not needed for this Change)
* Policies and guidelines: N/A (not needed for this Change)
* Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change)
* Alignment with Objectives: N/A (not needed for this Change)


== Upgrade/compatibility impact ==
The package will no longer be available from the repositories, but it
may remain on existing installations. If it causes troubles on
upgrade, it needs to be obsoleted.

== How To Test ==
Install Fedora 40. Try to install Python 3.7 via dnf or similar means.
It should not be found.

== User Experience ==
No more Python 3.7 to test user software on.

== Dependencies ==
None.

== Contingency Plan ==
* Contingency mechanism: (What to do?  Who will do it?) N/A (not a
System Wide Change)
* Contingency deadline: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
* Blocks release? N/A (not a System Wide Change), Yes/No


== Documentation ==
N/A (not a System Wide Change)



-- 
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
___
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

F40 proposal: Retire python3.7 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

[Ben Cotton]

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RetirePython3.7

This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.

== Summary ==
The {{package|python3.7}} package will be retired without replacement
from [[Releases/40|Fedora Linux 40]]. Python 3.7 will be End of Life
in June 2023 and it will be kept around only to test software
targeting Debian 10 “Buster” LTS. The removal is more or less aligned
with [https://wiki.debian.org/LTS Debian 10 TLS EOL] (June 2024) --
Fedora 39 (the last one to include Python 3.7) will likely EOL on
2024-11-12.

== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Churchyard|Miro Hrončok]]
* Email: mhron...@redhat.com


== Detailed Description ==
The {{package|python3.7}} package with the Python interpreter in
version 3.7 will be kept in Fedora after upstream EOL
([https://devguide.python.org/#status-of-python-branches 2023-06-27])
only to make it possible for Fedora users to test their software
against the Python version shipped in Debian 10 “Buster” LTS.

[https://wiki.debian.org/LTS Debian 10 “Buster” LTS is End of Life in
2024-06]. This happens couple months after the planned release of
Fedora 40. Hence, we decided to retire (completely remove)
{{package|python3.7}} from Fedora 40, before it gets released. Users
who target Debian 10 can use Fedora 39 until it EOLs.

Note that {{package|python3.6}} will remain available for the
foreseeable future to support developers who target RHEL 8.

== Feedback ==
This was discussed on the Python list prior to submitting the change
proposal: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/W74WYEVGYAE57KVLCG73I75LZYKKUMXS/

There was no pushback.

== Benefit to Fedora ==
There is no direct benefit here, except that we don't want to maintain
it anymore and we don't think it's a good idea either.

Consider this change proposal a louder orphaning, except that we will
continue to maintain the package in older released and supported
Fedoras (38 and 39). If you wish to continue maintaining Python 3.7 in
Fedora past Fedora Linux 40, please [[SIGs/Python|speak to us]] first.

== Scope ==
* Proposal owners: Retire {{package|python3.7}} from rawhide just
before Fedora 40 is branched . Obsolete it from
{{package|fedora-obsolete-packages}} if it causes troubles on
upgrades. Make sure no Fedora package depends on it in any way (incl.
weak dependencies).
* Other developers: N/A (not needed for this Change)
* Release engineering: N/A (not needed for this Change)
* Policies and guidelines: N/A (not needed for this Change)
* Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change)
* Alignment with Objectives: N/A (not needed for this Change)


== Upgrade/compatibility impact ==
The package will no longer be available from the repositories, but it
may remain on existing installations. If it causes troubles on
upgrade, it needs to be obsoleted.

== How To Test ==
Install Fedora 40. Try to install Python 3.7 via dnf or similar means.
It should not be found.

== User Experience ==
No more Python 3.7 to test user software on.

== Dependencies ==
None.

== Contingency Plan ==
* Contingency mechanism: (What to do?  Who will do it?) N/A (not a
System Wide Change)
* Contingency deadline: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
* Blocks release? N/A (not a System Wide Change), Yes/No


== Documentation ==
N/A (not a System Wide Change)



-- 
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

jplesnik pushed to perl-IO-FDPass (rawhide). "Perl 5.36 rebuild"

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-05-31 07:06:12 UTC

From f2181b5044b08228ec43de74e7f9ebefcde0776f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova 
Date: May 31 2022 07:06:06 +
Subject: Perl 5.36 rebuild


---

diff --git a/perl-IO-FDPass.spec b/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
index 1d592b9..3ef3b61 100644
--- a/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
+++ b/perl-IO-FDPass.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:  perl-IO-FDPass
 Version:   1.3
-Release:   5%{?dist}
+Release:   6%{?dist}
 Summary:   Pass a file descriptor over a socket
 License:   GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:   https://metacpan.org/release/IO-FDPass
@@ -58,6 +58,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/IO::FDPass.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Tue May 31 2022 Jitka Plesnikova  - 1.3-6
+- Perl 5.36 rebuild
+
 * Fri Jan 21 2022 Fedora Release Engineering  - 1.3-5
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_36_Mass_Rebuild
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-IO-FDPass/c/f2181b5044b08228ec43de74e7f9ebefcde0776f?branch=rawhide
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

jplesnik pushed to perl-Sub-Infix (rawhide). "Perl 5.36 rebuild"

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-05-31 06:58:03 UTC

From c41008c5ab1c6bd07a640c6d185632979115505e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova 
Date: May 31 2022 06:57:57 +
Subject: Perl 5.36 rebuild


---

diff --git a/perl-Sub-Infix.spec b/perl-Sub-Infix.spec
index 3ce84d8..cd6c406 100644
--- a/perl-Sub-Infix.spec
+++ b/perl-Sub-Infix.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-Sub-Infix
 Version:0.004
-Release:16%{?dist}
+Release:17%{?dist}
 Summary:Create a fake infix operator
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:https://metacpan.org/release/Sub-Infix
@@ -54,6 +54,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Tue May 31 2022 Jitka Plesnikova  - 0.004-17
+- Perl 5.36 rebuild
+
 * Fri Jan 21 2022 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.004-16
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_36_Mass_Rebuild
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Sub-Infix/c/c41008c5ab1c6bd07a640c6d185632979115505e?branch=rawhide
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

jplesnik pushed to perl-Class-Std-Fast (rawhide). "Perl 5.36 rebuild"

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-05-31 06:26:37 UTC

From f036c4a63f6aac24a3bc30ab40b48d57f8b2e74a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova 
Date: May 31 2022 06:26:31 +
Subject: Perl 5.36 rebuild


---

diff --git a/perl-Class-Std-Fast.spec b/perl-Class-Std-Fast.spec
index 687dbe1..e44f933 100644
--- a/perl-Class-Std-Fast.spec
+++ b/perl-Class-Std-Fast.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-Class-Std-Fast
 Version:0.0.8
-Release:19%{?dist}
+Release:20%{?dist}
 Summary:Faster but less secure replacement for Class::Std
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:https://metacpan.org/release/Class-Std-Fast
@@ -68,6 +68,9 @@ make test
 
 
 %changelog
+* Tue May 31 2022 Jitka Plesnikova  - 0.0.8-20
+- Perl 5.36 rebuild
+
 * Fri Jan 21 2022 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.0.8-19
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_36_Mass_Rebuild
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Class-Std-Fast/c/f036c4a63f6aac24a3bc30ab40b48d57f8b2e74a?branch=rawhide
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

jplesnik pushed to perl-WWW-Form-UrlEncoded (rawhide). "Perl 5.36 rebuild"

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-05-31 06:05:54 UTC

From 3198d8f348107eb1cf569cc84422dbbe57a5fee3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova 
Date: May 31 2022 06:05:48 +
Subject: Perl 5.36 rebuild


---

diff --git a/perl-WWW-Form-UrlEncoded.spec b/perl-WWW-Form-UrlEncoded.spec
index 9c5be6a..090ebde 100644
--- a/perl-WWW-Form-UrlEncoded.spec
+++ b/perl-WWW-Form-UrlEncoded.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-WWW-Form-UrlEncoded
 Version:0.26
-Release:9%{?dist}
+Release:10%{?dist}
 Summary:Parser and builder for application/x-www-form-urlencoded
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:https://metacpan.org/release/WWW-Form-UrlEncoded
@@ -56,6 +56,9 @@ BREAK_BACKWARD_COMPAT=1 ./Build test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Tue May 31 2022 Jitka Plesnikova  - 0.26-10
+- Perl 5.36 rebuild
+
 * Fri Jan 21 2022 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.26-9
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_36_Mass_Rebuild
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-WWW-Form-UrlEncoded/c/3198d8f348107eb1cf569cc84422dbbe57a5fee3?branch=rawhide
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: exploded git tree for kernel-5.17.4-200.fc35

[Justin Forbes]

On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 3:12 AM Laszlo Ersek  wrote:
>
> On 05/31/22 08:58, Dan Horák wrote:
> > On Tue, 31 May 2022 08:39:28 +0200
> > Laszlo Ersek  wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> where can I find the exploded git tree for "kernel-5.17.4-200.fc35"?
> >>
> >> The tree at
> >>  is
> >> no good; it does not have tags beyond .fc33.
> >
> > Fedora kernels now live in the https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark
> > project, the particular one should be in
> > https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/tree/kernel-5.17.4-0
>
> Thanks!
>
> This is a very strange practice -- the RPM NVR is "5.17.4-200.fc35", but
> the exploded git tag does not have "200.fc35" in the name anywhere.
> Additionally, dist-git commit c8aa1cc125eb ("kernel-5.17.4-0",
> 2022-04-20) on the "f35" branch does not imply "200" by any means
> either, I need to look into the spec file (in both git repos -- exploded
> and dist-git) to see "%define pkgrelease 200". I'd say that's a pretty
> cumbersome way for anyone to associate an actual kernel RPM and/or
> "uname -r" output with a particular git checkout.
>

It actually makes sense pretty well because the dist-git are generated
by "make dist-git' with some options. In particular, Fedora 34/35/and
36 are all built from the exact same dist-git commit. Typically there
is no difference between them at all other than the "release"  which
is currently 100 for F34, 200 for F35, and 300 for F36.  The -0
represents the last digit, so if I did a 5.17.4-201.fc35, it would map
to a 5.17.4-1 release tag.  In your case here, kernel-5.17.4-0 was the
commit used to build kernel-5.17.4-100.fc34, kernel-5.17.4-200.fc35,
and kernel-5.17.4-300.fc36.  The redhat/release_targets file will say
which releases are currently supported by the branch.

Now, we are in a slightly odd setup where Fedora 36 has some
differences, though they are all in the config. In this case,
redhat/patches/0001-Revert-SimpleDRM-changes.patch is applied before
generating dist-git for F34 and F35.  I should add the script used to
convert to dist-git to the tree (and will do so after this response as
redhat/fedora-stable-release.sh) It just iterates over
redhat/release_targets and runs 'make IS_FEDORA=1 DIST=".fc$release"
BUILDID="" BUILD=$build RHDISTGIT_BRANCH=f$release dist-git;' for each
one. The build to release mapping happens in script.

Justin
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

jplesnik pushed to perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7 (rawhide). "Perl 5.36 rebuild"

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-05-31 06:03:30 UTC

From a39fe2aa59836bc45e4247d5a69821b81ce2c743 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova 
Date: May 31 2022 06:03:23 +
Subject: Perl 5.36 rebuild


---

diff --git a/perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7.spec b/perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7.spec
index 5518a4c..a39d3c5 100644
--- a/perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7.spec
+++ b/perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7.spec
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 Name:   perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7
 Version:1.05
-Release:18%{?dist}
+Release:19%{?dist}
 Summary:Process the special UTF-7 variant required by IMAP
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:https://metacpan.org/release/Encode-IMAPUTF7
@@ -42,6 +42,9 @@ make test
 %_mandir/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Tue May 31 2022 Jitka Plesnikova  - 1.05-19
+- Perl 5.36 rebuild
+
 * Fri Jan 21 2022 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.05-18
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_36_Mass_Rebuild
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7/c/a39fe2aa59836bc45e4247d5a69821b81ce2c743?branch=rawhide
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

jplesnik pushed to perl-Net-LDAP-SID (rawhide). "Perl 5.36 rebuild"

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-05-30 18:07:32 UTC

From c4c61bd7e2709f926946a701c522790b6ae3fbf7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova 
Date: May 30 2022 18:07:26 +
Subject: Perl 5.36 rebuild


---

diff --git a/perl-Net-LDAP-SID.spec b/perl-Net-LDAP-SID.spec
index a08e338..bde9501 100644
--- a/perl-Net-LDAP-SID.spec
+++ b/perl-Net-LDAP-SID.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-Net-LDAP-SID
 Version:0.001
-Release:17%{?dist}
+Release:18%{?dist}
 Summary:Net::LDAP::SID Perl module
 License:Artistic 2.0
 URL:https://metacpan.org/release/Net-LDAP-SID
@@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ Active Directory Security Identifier manipulation
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Mon May 30 2022 Jitka Plesnikova  - 0.001-18
+- Perl 5.36 rebuild
+
 * Fri Jan 21 2022 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.001-17
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_36_Mass_Rebuild
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-LDAP-SID/c/c4c61bd7e2709f926946a701c522790b6ae3fbf7?branch=rawhide
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

jplesnik pushed to perl-Mock-Config (rawhide). "Perl 5.36 rebuild"

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-05-30 17:57:49 UTC

From 4851f7346040d344b1f56b79b227522d289bf628 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova 
Date: May 30 2022 17:57:43 +
Subject: Perl 5.36 rebuild


---

diff --git a/perl-Mock-Config.spec b/perl-Mock-Config.spec
index 6035254..d7b8e10 100644
--- a/perl-Mock-Config.spec
+++ b/perl-Mock-Config.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-Mock-Config
 Version:0.03
-Release:16%{?dist}
+Release:17%{?dist}
 Summary:Temporarily set Config or XSConfig values
 License:Artistic 2.0
 URL:https://metacpan.org/release/Mock-Config
@@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Mon May 30 2022 Jitka Plesnikova  - 0.03-17
+- Perl 5.36 rebuild
+
 * Fri Jan 21 2022 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.03-16
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_36_Mass_Rebuild
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Mock-Config/c/4851f7346040d344b1f56b79b227522d289bf628?branch=rawhide
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

jplesnik pushed to perl-Crypt-IDEA (rawhide). "Perl 5.36 rebuild"

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-05-30 17:50:51 UTC

From f57e1b40d5d4ef986f07bebcb28a281606237f6b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova 
Date: May 30 2022 17:50:45 +
Subject: Perl 5.36 rebuild


---

diff --git a/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec b/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
index 46ed3ed..aab2906 100644
--- a/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
+++ b/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 Summary:   Perl interface to IDEA block cipher
 Name:  perl-Crypt-IDEA
 Version:   1.10
-Release:   23%{?dist}
+Release:   24%{?dist}
 License:   BSD with advertising
 URL:   https://metacpan.org/release/Crypt-IDEA
 Source0:   
https://cpan.metacpan.org/modules/by-module/Crypt/Crypt-IDEA-%{version}.tar.gz
@@ -65,6 +65,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/Crypt::IDEA.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Mon May 30 2022 Jitka Plesnikova  - 1.10-24
+- Perl 5.36 rebuild
+
 * Fri Jan 21 2022 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.10-23
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_36_Mass_Rebuild
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-IDEA/c/f57e1b40d5d4ef986f07bebcb28a281606237f6b?branch=rawhide
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2088917] perl-SVN-Look-0.43 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088917

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
   Fixed In Version|perl-SVN-Look-0.43-1.fc37   |perl-SVN-Look-0.43-1.fc37
   ||perl-SVN-Look-0.43-1.fc36
Last Closed||2022-05-31 15:45:19



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-e6bef780e2 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088917
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2088923] perl-Pod-Checker-1.75 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088923

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|perl-Pod-Checker-1.75-1.fc3 |perl-Pod-Checker-1.75-1.fc3
   |7   |7
   ||perl-Pod-Checker-1.75-1.fc3
   ||6
Last Closed||2022-05-31 15:45:23



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-50ad9d19ae has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088923
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2080452] perl-WWW-Mechanize-2.07 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080452

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-WWW-Mechanize-2.07-1.f |perl-WWW-Mechanize-2.07-1.f
   |c37 |c37
   |perl-WWW-Mechanize-2.07-1.f |perl-WWW-Mechanize-2.07-1.f
   |c35 |c35
   |perl-WWW-Mechanize-2.07-1.f |perl-WWW-Mechanize-2.07-1.f
   |c34 |c34
   ||perl-WWW-Mechanize-2.07-1.f
   ||c36



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-98fc5307f3 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080452
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F37 Proposal: Strong crypto settings: phase 3, forewarning 1/2 (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Petr Pisar]

V Tue, May 31, 2022 at 04:25:28PM +0200, Alexander Sosedkin napsal(a):
> On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 4:09 PM Petr Pisar  wrote:
> >
> > V Tue, May 31, 2022 at 03:51:26PM +0200, Alexander Sosedkin napsal(a):
> > > On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 3:45 PM Petr Pisar  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > V Tue, May 31, 2022 at 02:56:56PM +0200, Alexander Sosedkin napsal(a):
> > > > > On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 12:28 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> > > > >  wrote:
> > > > > > On 31/05/2022 10:21, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > > > > > > Not in current F37 FUTURE policy the user tested.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yes. If the new F37 cryptographic policy considers RSA-2048 to be 
> > > > > > weak,
> > > > > > it should be reverted.
> > > > >
> > > > > The actual proposal is in the OP.
> > > > >
> > > > > Not only there's no such thing as "new F37 policy" happening,
> > > > > the F39 DEFAULT does allow RSA-2048,
> > > > > and this is spelled out upfront in the proposal text in the OP.
> > > > > RSA-3072 is only the minimum for the opt-in FUTURE policy,
> > > > > which has been the case since at least F28.
> > > > >
> > > > I'm sorry. You are right that the key length limit won't change.
> > > >
> > > > Probably what confused us is this sentence:
> > > >
> > > > Test your setup with FUTURE today and file bugs so you won't get 
> > > > bit by
> > > > Fedora 38-39.
> > > >
> > > > That's obviously incorect because current FUTURE is not equvialent to 
> > > > the
> > > > proposed DEFAULT. I recommend you to reword the testing procedure so 
> > > > that
> > > > people are not bitten by this discrepancy.
> > > >
> > > > Maybe you should prepare a policy DEFAULT-F39, package it into current 
> > > > Fedora,
> > > > and ask people to test DEFAULT-F39 instead of FUTURE or FUTURE:SHA1.
> > >
> > > That'd be TEST-FEDORA39, mentioned as an alternative in the same sentence:
> > >
> > > > Install crypto-policies-scripts package and switch to a more 
> > > > restrictive policy
> > > > with either update-crypto-policies --set FUTURE or 
> > > > update-crypto-policies --set TEST-FEDORA39.
> > >
> > > I chose to suggest them in this particular order
> > > in hopes of bringing the world a tad closer to the FUTURE and not just
> > > F39 DEFAULT.
> > >
> > > Should I drop it?
> >
> > That would be great. If this change is about SHA-1, I would only keep
> > TEST-FEDORA39 in the Change page.
> >
> > If you want to promote FUTURE, you can keep a small notice at the end of How
> > To Test section that people who want to sense security of far future, can 
> > try
> > FUTURE policy. But make sure that it's written in an obvious way that FUTURE
> > is out of scope of this Change.
> 
> Fair.
> Deprioritized testing FUTURE, warned that it's not gonna become defaults
> and made TEST-FEDORA39 more prominent:
> https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Changes%2FStrongCryptoSettings3Forewarning1=revision=646390=646384
> https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Changes%2FStrongCryptoSettings3Forewarning2=revision=646391=646385

Great.

-- Petr



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: ROCm-OpenCL package

[Jeremy Newton]

Thanks Felix,

An open concern that I have been discussing with the ROCm guys is that HIP 
(used for things like pytorch) requires rocm-opencl source code to compile.

It seems they want to go with the llvm-project approach in the longterm, having 
opencl, hip, and the common static lib "ROCclr" as one source tree. I was going 
to just package rocm-opencl as-is for now and add hip as a subpackage later.

Let me know if anyone has any concerns with this idea, or if there's a better 
way to handle it.

Thanks
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F37 Proposal: Strong crypto settings: phase 3, forewarning 1/2 (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Alexander Sosedkin]

On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 4:09 PM Petr Pisar  wrote:
>
> V Tue, May 31, 2022 at 03:51:26PM +0200, Alexander Sosedkin napsal(a):
> > On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 3:45 PM Petr Pisar  wrote:
> > >
> > > V Tue, May 31, 2022 at 02:56:56PM +0200, Alexander Sosedkin napsal(a):
> > > > On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 12:28 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> > > >  wrote:
> > > > > On 31/05/2022 10:21, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > > > > > Not in current F37 FUTURE policy the user tested.
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes. If the new F37 cryptographic policy considers RSA-2048 to be 
> > > > > weak,
> > > > > it should be reverted.
> > > >
> > > > The actual proposal is in the OP.
> > > >
> > > > Not only there's no such thing as "new F37 policy" happening,
> > > > the F39 DEFAULT does allow RSA-2048,
> > > > and this is spelled out upfront in the proposal text in the OP.
> > > > RSA-3072 is only the minimum for the opt-in FUTURE policy,
> > > > which has been the case since at least F28.
> > > >
> > > I'm sorry. You are right that the key length limit won't change.
> > >
> > > Probably what confused us is this sentence:
> > >
> > > Test your setup with FUTURE today and file bugs so you won't get bit 
> > > by
> > > Fedora 38-39.
> > >
> > > That's obviously incorect because current FUTURE is not equvialent to the
> > > proposed DEFAULT. I recommend you to reword the testing procedure so that
> > > people are not bitten by this discrepancy.
> > >
> > > Maybe you should prepare a policy DEFAULT-F39, package it into current 
> > > Fedora,
> > > and ask people to test DEFAULT-F39 instead of FUTURE or FUTURE:SHA1.
> >
> > That'd be TEST-FEDORA39, mentioned as an alternative in the same sentence:
> >
> > > Install crypto-policies-scripts package and switch to a more restrictive 
> > > policy
> > > with either update-crypto-policies --set FUTURE or update-crypto-policies 
> > > --set TEST-FEDORA39.
> >
> > I chose to suggest them in this particular order
> > in hopes of bringing the world a tad closer to the FUTURE and not just
> > F39 DEFAULT.
> >
> > Should I drop it?
>
> That would be great. If this change is about SHA-1, I would only keep
> TEST-FEDORA39 in the Change page.
>
> If you want to promote FUTURE, you can keep a small notice at the end of How
> To Test section that people who want to sense security of far future, can try
> FUTURE policy. But make sure that it's written in an obvious way that FUTURE
> is out of scope of this Change.

Fair.
Deprioritized testing FUTURE, warned that it's not gonna become defaults
and made TEST-FEDORA39 more prominent:
https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Changes%2FStrongCryptoSettings3Forewarning1=revision=646390=646384
https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Changes%2FStrongCryptoSettings3Forewarning2=revision=646391=646385
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F37 Proposal: Strong crypto settings: phase 3, forewarning 1/2 (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Petr Pisar]

V Tue, May 31, 2022 at 03:51:26PM +0200, Alexander Sosedkin napsal(a):
> On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 3:45 PM Petr Pisar  wrote:
> >
> > V Tue, May 31, 2022 at 02:56:56PM +0200, Alexander Sosedkin napsal(a):
> > > On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 12:28 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> > >  wrote:
> > > > On 31/05/2022 10:21, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > > > > Not in current F37 FUTURE policy the user tested.
> > > >
> > > > Yes. If the new F37 cryptographic policy considers RSA-2048 to be weak,
> > > > it should be reverted.
> > >
> > > The actual proposal is in the OP.
> > >
> > > Not only there's no such thing as "new F37 policy" happening,
> > > the F39 DEFAULT does allow RSA-2048,
> > > and this is spelled out upfront in the proposal text in the OP.
> > > RSA-3072 is only the minimum for the opt-in FUTURE policy,
> > > which has been the case since at least F28.
> > >
> > I'm sorry. You are right that the key length limit won't change.
> >
> > Probably what confused us is this sentence:
> >
> > Test your setup with FUTURE today and file bugs so you won't get bit by
> > Fedora 38-39.
> >
> > That's obviously incorect because current FUTURE is not equvialent to the
> > proposed DEFAULT. I recommend you to reword the testing procedure so that
> > people are not bitten by this discrepancy.
> >
> > Maybe you should prepare a policy DEFAULT-F39, package it into current 
> > Fedora,
> > and ask people to test DEFAULT-F39 instead of FUTURE or FUTURE:SHA1.
> 
> That'd be TEST-FEDORA39, mentioned as an alternative in the same sentence:
> 
> > Install crypto-policies-scripts package and switch to a more restrictive 
> > policy
> > with either update-crypto-policies --set FUTURE or update-crypto-policies 
> > --set TEST-FEDORA39.
> 
> I chose to suggest them in this particular order
> in hopes of bringing the world a tad closer to the FUTURE and not just
> F39 DEFAULT.
> 
> Should I drop it?

That would be great. If this change is about SHA-1, I would only keep
TEST-FEDORA39 in the Change page.

If you want to promote FUTURE, you can keep a small notice at the end of How
To Test section that people who want to sense security of far future, can try
FUTURE policy. But make sure that it's written in an obvious way that FUTURE
is out of scope of this Change.

-- Petr


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F37 Proposal: Strong crypto settings: phase 3, forewarning 1/2 (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Alexander Sosedkin]

On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 3:45 PM Petr Pisar  wrote:
>
> V Tue, May 31, 2022 at 02:56:56PM +0200, Alexander Sosedkin napsal(a):
> > On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 12:28 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> >  wrote:
> > > On 31/05/2022 10:21, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > > > Not in current F37 FUTURE policy the user tested.
> > >
> > > Yes. If the new F37 cryptographic policy considers RSA-2048 to be weak,
> > > it should be reverted.
> >
> > The actual proposal is in the OP.
> >
> > Not only there's no such thing as "new F37 policy" happening,
> > the F39 DEFAULT does allow RSA-2048,
> > and this is spelled out upfront in the proposal text in the OP.
> > RSA-3072 is only the minimum for the opt-in FUTURE policy,
> > which has been the case since at least F28.
> >
> I'm sorry. You are right that the key length limit won't change.
>
> Probably what confused us is this sentence:
>
> Test your setup with FUTURE today and file bugs so you won't get bit by
> Fedora 38-39.
>
> That's obviously incorect because current FUTURE is not equvialent to the
> proposed DEFAULT. I recommend you to reword the testing procedure so that
> people are not bitten by this discrepancy.
>
> Maybe you should prepare a policy DEFAULT-F39, package it into current Fedora,
> and ask people to test DEFAULT-F39 instead of FUTURE or FUTURE:SHA1.

That'd be TEST-FEDORA39, mentioned as an alternative in the same sentence:

> Install crypto-policies-scripts package and switch to a more restrictive 
> policy
> with either update-crypto-policies --set FUTURE or update-crypto-policies 
> --set TEST-FEDORA39.

I chose to suggest them in this particular order
in hopes of bringing the world a tad closer to the FUTURE and not just
F39 DEFAULT.

Should I drop it?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F37 Proposal: Strong crypto settings: phase 3, forewarning 1/2 (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Petr Pisar]

V Tue, May 31, 2022 at 02:56:56PM +0200, Alexander Sosedkin napsal(a):
> On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 12:28 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
>  wrote:
> > On 31/05/2022 10:21, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > > Not in current F37 FUTURE policy the user tested.
> >
> > Yes. If the new F37 cryptographic policy considers RSA-2048 to be weak,
> > it should be reverted.
> 
> The actual proposal is in the OP.
> 
> Not only there's no such thing as "new F37 policy" happening,
> the F39 DEFAULT does allow RSA-2048,
> and this is spelled out upfront in the proposal text in the OP.
> RSA-3072 is only the minimum for the opt-in FUTURE policy,
> which has been the case since at least F28.
> 
I'm sorry. You are right that the key length limit won't change.

Probably what confused us is this sentence:

Test your setup with FUTURE today and file bugs so you won't get bit by
Fedora 38-39.

That's obviously incorect because current FUTURE is not equvialent to the
proposed DEFAULT. I recommend you to reword the testing procedure so that
people are not bitten by this discrepancy.

Maybe you should prepare a policy DEFAULT-F39, package it into current Fedora,
and ask people to test DEFAULT-F39 instead of FUTURE or FUTURE:SHA1.

-- Petr



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F37 Proposal: Strong crypto settings: phase 3, forewarning 1/2 (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Alexander Sosedkin]

On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 12:28 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
 wrote:
> On 31/05/2022 10:21, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > Not in current F37 FUTURE policy the user tested.
>
> Yes. If the new F37 cryptographic policy considers RSA-2048 to be weak,
> it should be reverted.

The actual proposal is in the OP.

Not only there's no such thing as "new F37 policy" happening,
the F39 DEFAULT does allow RSA-2048,
and this is spelled out upfront in the proposal text in the OP.
RSA-3072 is only the minimum for the opt-in FUTURE policy,
which has been the case since at least F28.

> Many servers still use RSA-2048 (the default in Let's Encrypt).

And that's why it is going to be accepted in DEFAULT even in F39+.

Please tone down the FUD,
your signal/noise ratio has been record low over the last few weeks,
with statements being technically true and most of the time agreeable,
yet inexplicably resulting in a net negative benefit to the discussion.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

unpaper-7.0.0 license change

[Petr Pisar]

unpaper-7.0.0 changed a license from (GPLv2) to (GPLv2 and 0BSD and MIT).

-- Petr


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Call for review: Borg Backup (crypto & python)

[Christopher Klooz]

Hi all,

Borg Backup (https://www.borgbackup.org/), which is also part of the 
Fedora repository, is a widespread open source incremental backup tool 
with authenticated encryption. Quite sure many of you know & use it.


The crypto was completely redesigned for the upcoming version 1.3. 
Therefore, new crypto design and new code.


Thomas, the major maintainer of Borg, asked for some review of the new 
crypto. Yet, not much has happened so far.


If you have some experience with crypto and/or python, feel free to 
verify the new approach, and leave a comment so that Thomas and other 
users can see to what extent / how much review has taken place:


https://github.com/borgbackup/borg/pull/6463

I will also put this in the devel mailing list.

Regards & stay safe,
Chris
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: exploded git tree for kernel-5.17.4-200.fc35

[Josh Boyer]

On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 2:39 AM Laszlo Ersek  wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> where can I find the exploded git tree for "kernel-5.17.4-200.fc35"?
>
> The tree at
>  is
> no good; it does not have tags beyond .fc33.

I'm going to delete this tree next month.  It's been dead for a long
time and it's causing more confusion than it is helping.

josh
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: intend to orphan python-cairosvg

[Miro Hrončok]

On 31. 05. 22 12:44, Felix Schwarz wrote:

Hi *,

I'd like to orphan python-cairosvg. This package was required by older 
WeasyPrint releases but WeasyPrint v53 (Fedora 35+) stopped using cairo so I 
don't use this package anymore.


The package should be ok however I expect very little upstream maintainance as 
the code was maintained by the WeasyPrint. The most pressing problem is likely 
an FTBFS bug for python-cairocffi.


If you need cairosvg, this is the time to step forward :-)


Ack, will check out how printrun uses this.

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

intend to orphan python-cairosvg

[Felix Schwarz]

Hi *,

I'd like to orphan python-cairosvg. This package was required by older 
WeasyPrint releases but WeasyPrint v53 (Fedora 35+) stopped using cairo so I 
don't use this package anymore.


The package should be ok however I expect very little upstream maintainance as 
the code was maintained by the WeasyPrint. The most pressing problem is likely 
an FTBFS bug for python-cairocffi.


If you need cairosvg, this is the time to step forward :-)

Felix
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

intend to orphan python-cairocffi

[Felix Schwarz]

Hi *,

I'd like to orphan python-cairocffi. This package was required by older 
WeasyPrint releases but WeasyPrint v53 (Fedora 35+) stopped using cairo so I 
don't use this package anymore.


On top of this cairocffi was developed by the WeasyPrint developers and they 
stopped maintaining it once WeasyPrint v53 got rid of this dependency. So right 
now cairocffi's test suite fails in rawhide:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082558

If you need cairocffi, this is the time to step forward :-)
Otherwise the package will likely be removed from Fedora due to the FTBFS 
policy.

Felix

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F37 Proposal: Strong crypto settings: phase 3, forewarning 1/2 (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Vitaly Zaitsev via devel]

On 31/05/2022 10:21, Petr Pisar wrote:

Not in current F37 FUTURE policy the user tested.


Yes. If the new F37 cryptographic policy considers RSA-2048 to be weak, 
it should be reverted. Many servers still use RSA-2048 (the default in 
Let's Encrypt).


--
Sincerely,
  Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Initiated non-responsive maintainer process for terrycloth

[Linus Walleij]

The  gnome-shell-extension-freon isn't getting updated, see:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009382

So as a result, nonresponsive maintainer process is initiated:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091906

If you have a way to notify Audrey please help. It's better if
I can just become co-maintainer instead.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora-Cloud-34-20220531.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

No missing expected images.

Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220530.0):

ID: 1285073 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1285073
ID: 1285081 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1285081

Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64), 7/8 (aarch64)
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Looking for pam_radius maintainer

[Iker Pedrosa]

Hi Jason,

I can take over it. I'm already the maintainer of the pam package and it
feels natural that I also take care of pam_radius.

On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 2:39 AM Jason Taylor  wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I am looking for someone to take over the pam_radius packaging as I no
> longer have time to do so.
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> JT
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>


-- 

Iker Pedrosa

Software Engineer, Identity Management team

Red Hat 

Txapela (gorria) buruan eta ibili munduan

(Red) hat on his head and walk the world

Basque proverb

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F37 Proposal: Strong crypto settings: phase 3, forewarning 1/2 (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Petr Pisar]

V Tue, May 31, 2022 at 10:20:10AM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel napsal(a):
> On 31/05/2022 08:59, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > It's a 2048-bit RSA key of an intermediate certificate.
> 
> RSA-2048 is still okay. It should work without errors.
> 
Not in current F37 FUTURE policy the user tested.

-- Petr


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F37 Proposal: Strong crypto settings: phase 3, forewarning 1/2 (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Vitaly Zaitsev via devel]

On 31/05/2022 08:59, Petr Pisar wrote:

It's a 2048-bit RSA key of an intermediate certificate.


RSA-2048 is still okay. It should work without errors.

--
Sincerely,
  Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: exploded git tree for kernel-5.17.4-200.fc35

[Laszlo Ersek]

On 05/31/22 08:58, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Tue, 31 May 2022 08:39:28 +0200
> Laszlo Ersek  wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> where can I find the exploded git tree for "kernel-5.17.4-200.fc35"?
>>
>> The tree at
>>  is
>> no good; it does not have tags beyond .fc33.
> 
> Fedora kernels now live in the https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark
> project, the particular one should be in
> https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/tree/kernel-5.17.4-0

Thanks!

This is a very strange practice -- the RPM NVR is "5.17.4-200.fc35", but
the exploded git tag does not have "200.fc35" in the name anywhere.
Additionally, dist-git commit c8aa1cc125eb ("kernel-5.17.4-0",
2022-04-20) on the "f35" branch does not imply "200" by any means
either, I need to look into the spec file (in both git repos -- exploded
and dist-git) to see "%define pkgrelease 200". I'd say that's a pretty
cumbersome way for anyone to associate an actual kernel RPM and/or
"uname -r" output with a particular git checkout.

Thanks,
Laszlo
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora-Cloud-36-20220531.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

No missing expected images.

Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-36-20220530.0):

ID: 1284882 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1284882
ID: 1284890 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1284890

Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64), 7/8 (aarch64)
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: ROCm-OpenCL package

[Felix Schwarz]

Hi Jeremy,

just wanted to thank you for your contributions to ROCm on Fedora + your 
upstream work to make the stack more distro-friendly.


I'm pretty much swamped right now. Maybe I find some time to chime in but I hope 
someone else could review this.


Debian has a pretty active ROCm packaging team so a potential reviewer could 
also double-check with Debian to verify the packaging. Really, upstream is in a 
much better shape than it was 3 years ago with hcc so don't be afraid to take 
this review.
If anyone is concerned due to the lack of hardware I can offer to do some 
functional testing.


Felix
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F37 Proposal: Strong crypto settings: phase 3, forewarning 1/2 (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Petr Pisar]

V Tue, May 31, 2022 at 08:07:57AM +0200, Alexander Sosedkin napsal(a):
> On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 10:34 PM Garry T. Williams  
> wrote:
> > On Friday, April 29, 2022 5:49:05 PM EDT Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > Cryptographic policies will be tightened in Fedora 38-39,
> > > SHA-1 signatures will no longer be trusted by default.
> > > Fedora 37 specifically doesn't come with any change of defaults,
> > > and this Fedora Change is an advance warning filed for extra visibility.
> > > Test your setup with FUTURE today and file bugs so you won't get bit
> > > by Fedora 38-39.
> > >
> > After looking in
> > /usr/share/crypto-policies/policies/modules, I tried again with:
> >
> > $ sudo update-crypto-policies --set FUTURE:SHA1
> > Setting system policy to FUTURE:SHA1
> >
> > But that didn't get me back.  I got the same error doing dnf upgrade.
> >
> > I had to do:
> >
> > $ sudo update-crypto-policies --set DEFAULT
> >
> > to get back to dnf working again.
> >
> > > file bug reports against the affected components if not filed already.
> >
> > I really don't know what "component" to use filing a bug.
> 
> Yeah, that seems like a case when
> the service administrator is the one to be notified.

Reported to . The real
cause is not SHA-1. It's a 2048-bit RSA key of an intermediate certificate.

-- Petr


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: exploded git tree for kernel-5.17.4-200.fc35

[Dan Horák]

On Tue, 31 May 2022 08:39:28 +0200
Laszlo Ersek  wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> where can I find the exploded git tree for "kernel-5.17.4-200.fc35"?
> 
> The tree at
>  is
> no good; it does not have tags beyond .fc33.

Fedora kernels now live in the https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark
project, the particular one should be in
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/tree/kernel-5.17.4-0


Dan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

exploded git tree for kernel-5.17.4-200.fc35

[Laszlo Ersek]

Hi,

where can I find the exploded git tree for "kernel-5.17.4-200.fc35"?

The tree at
 is
no good; it does not have tags beyond .fc33.

Thanks
Laszlo
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F37 Proposal: Strong crypto settings: phase 3, forewarning 1/2 (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Alexander Sosedkin]

On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 10:34 PM Garry T. Williams  wrote:
>
> On Friday, April 29, 2022 5:49:05 PM EDT Ben Cotton wrote:
> > Cryptographic policies will be tightened in Fedora 38-39,
> > SHA-1 signatures will no longer be trusted by default.
> > Fedora 37 specifically doesn't come with any change of defaults,
> > and this Fedora Change is an advance warning filed for extra visibility.
> > Test your setup with FUTURE today and file bugs so you won't get bit
> > by Fedora 38-39.
>
> [snip]
>
> In case you want some feedback,

Thank you for taking time to do that.

> > Install crypto-policies-scripts package and switch to a more restrictive 
> > policy
> > with either `update-crypto-policies --set FUTURE`
> > or `update-crypto-policies --set TEST-FEDORA39`.
> >
> > Proceed to use the system as usual,
> > identify the workflows which are broken by this change.
>
> I did that and several days later I did:
>
> $ sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
> Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'fedora':
>   - Curl error (60): SSL peer certificate or SSH remote key was not OK 
> for 
> https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=fedora-36=x86_64=3
>  [SSL certificate problem: CA certificate key too weak]
>   - Curl error (60): SSL peer certificate or SSH remote key was not OK 
> for https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=fedora-36=x86_64 
> [SSL certificate problem: CA certificate key too weak]
> Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'fedora': Cannot prepare 
> internal mirrorlist: Curl error (60): SSL peer certificate or SSH remote key 
> was not OK for 
> https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=fedora-36=x86_64 [SSL 
> certificate problem: CA certificate key too weak]
>
> > Verify that the broken functionality works again
> > if you the policy is relaxed back
> > with, e.g., `update-crypto-policies --set FUTURE:SHA-1`,
>
> This was a problem:
>
> $ sudo update-crypto-policies --set FUTURE:SHA-1
> Unknown policy `SHA-1`: file `SHA-1.pmod` not found in (., 
> policies/modules, /etc/crypto-policies/policies/modules, 
> /usr/share/crypto-policies/policies/modules)
>
> That seems like a typo.

Indeed, thanks for spotting. Fixed in two places.

> After looking in
> /usr/share/crypto-policies/policies/modules, I tried again with:
>
> $ sudo update-crypto-policies --set FUTURE:SHA1
> Setting system policy to FUTURE:SHA1
>
> But that didn't get me back.  I got the same error doing dnf upgrade.
>
> I had to do:
>
> $ sudo update-crypto-policies --set DEFAULT
>
> to get back to dnf working again.
>
> > file bug reports against the affected components if not filed already.
>
> I really don't know what "component" to use filing a bug.

Yeah, that seems like a case when
the service administrator is the one to be notified.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure