On 6/4/22 14:17, Ian Laurie wrote:
Is anyone else seeing crashes and other strange events in VirtualBox
6.1.34 (from RPMFusion) with Linux guests when the Linux host is
running Fedora 36 with kernel-5.17.12?
When I first started to see problems on my first host I blamed my SSD
drive, memory
Is anyone else seeing crashes and other strange events in VirtualBox
6.1.34 (from RPMFusion) with Linux guests when the Linux host is running
Fedora 36 with kernel-5.17.12?
When I first started to see problems on my first host I blamed my SSD
drive, memory etc until I noticed the same
Do we have any list of significant applications, which use
/etc/resolv.conf only? It is used by most of DNS related tools I manage.
dig and host use dns only. Sure, they would not be able to report
split-DNS required hosts correctly. But browsers tend to use
getaddrinfo() glibc calls AFAIK.
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing
cppad-2022.4-1.el8
powerline-2.8.3-3.el8
Details about builds:
cppad-2022.4-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-d0ffa65802)
C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091187
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing
czmq-4.2.1-1.el9
eccodes-2.26.0-1.el9
lua-bitop-1.0.2-10.el9
ncview-2.1.8-15.el9
perl-File-Tail-1.3-24.el9
powerline-2.8.3-3.el9
Details about builds:
On Sat, 2022-06-04 at 00:45 +0200, Petr Menšík wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We reported issues with DNSSEC tools stopped working with resolved were
> enabled shortly before f33 release. I admit I have not noticed soon
> enough, because I haven't noticed how it behaves. We were promised a
> quick fix
Hi,
This would break split DNS for applications that read /etc/resolv.conf
directly. For desktop systems, that's generally way more important than
DNSSEC. For split DNS to work, /etc/resolv.conf needs to be managed by
either systemd-resolved or dnsmasq. We would go back to dark ages DNS
Otto Urpelainen wrote:
> This is unexpected, because one would expect that installing any variant
> of ffmpeg would improve video support, not degrade it. My hypothesis is
> that Firefox prefers ffmpeg over openh264, but is not careful enough to
> check if the ffmpeg it detects actually supports
On Fri, Jun 3 2022 at 04:35:41 PM -0700, Adam Williamson
wrote:
Using the default network configuration tools for the console and for
release-blocking desktops, it must be possible to establish a working
connection to common OpenVPN, openconnect-supported and vpnc-supported
VPN servers with
Hi folks!
Some time ago I proposed some specific networking release criteria. I
revived the thread back in February, and meeting discussion suggested
we should be more intentional and specific about wifi requirements. So,
looking at it again, I suggest adding an additional footnote:
Footnote
Petr Menšík writes:
If systemd-resolved ever becomes capable as a good DNS cache, we can return
it back to domain port. I don't think it is ready for that.
Search the archives of the users list for systemd-resolved complaints. I've
done my share. Perhaps a bunch of them coming from
Welcome (again) Yizheng!
On Fri, 2022-06-03 at 21:56 +, Yizheng Xie via devel wrote:
> Hello, Fedora developer community!
>
> My name is Yizheng Xie (Fedora Project Username: yizhengxie).
> Currently I am a Production Engineer Intern in Meta Kernel Team,
> specifically in Linux Userspace
Hello,
We reported issues with DNSSEC tools stopped working with resolved were
enabled shortly before f33 release. I admit I have not noticed soon
enough, because I haven't noticed how it behaves. We were promised a
quick fix back then. Since f33 systemd-resolved is installed by default
on
Ben Cotton kirjoitti 2.6.2022 klo 22.27:
* Policies and guidelines:
** The Fedora packaging policy will be updated to require that new
flags added to redhat-rpm-config come with their own RPM macro.
By the proposal owners, I presume? The guidelines should also be updated
to present the new
> Am 03.06.2022 um 07:17 schrieb Neal Gompa :
>
>
> It's not *that* typical in my experience. Most of the SME server
> environments I know of don't have that. It's more common in larger
> server environments, but they also typically use hardware RAID there
> instead of software RAID.
We don’t
I have discovered that installing the ffmpeg-free package degrades
Firefox video support. Without any kind of ffmpeg installed, Firefox is
able to play all the videos I want to watch. Installing RPM Fusion's
ffmpeg package does not change this. But, installing ffmpeg-free from
Fedora
Hello, Fedora developer community!
My name is Yizheng Xie (Fedora Project Username: yizhengxie).
Currently I am a Production Engineer Intern in Meta Kernel Team,
specifically in Linux Userspace projects. I am a first-year master
student in Boston University in Computer Science. My software
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Erlang_25
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Erlang_25
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091187
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
Dear all,
I'm looking to package task (https://taskfile.dev/) for Fedora and would
like to offer to swap reviews:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2078117
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2078118
Hi, see: https://pagure.io/fedora-comps/pull-request/729
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Hi Mark,
Hau idatzi du Mark E. Fuller (ful...@fedoraproject.org) erabiltzaileak
(2022 eka. 3, or. (17:52)):
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm fairly new to go and am looking to make a spec file and build
> jsonnet (https://github.com/google/go-jsonnet/, https://jsonnet.org/).
go-jsonnet is already packaged:
Thank you for that COPR repository.
I think using SNAPs on Fedora is wrong. I don't like what snaps do with
mounted filesystems and consider flatpak more appropriate replacement.
But flatpak wants to isolate application from the system. Those apps
require to integrate into the system on the
Hi all,
I'm fairly new to go and am looking to make a spec file and build
jsonnet (https://github.com/google/go-jsonnet/, https://jsonnet.org/).
The go2rpm utility has proven very helpful, but there appear to be two
irregularities with building this package that I don't know offhand how
to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091743
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Sessio
On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 6:19 PM Peter Boy wrote:
>
>
>
> > Am 02.06.2022 um 22:42 schrieb Neal Gompa :
> >
> >
> > It's not standard at all. We don't even test for this setup regularly.
> > It's not a test case, and it's not even supposed to work right now.
>
> It’s standard as it is a typical use
On 6/3/22 02:24, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi Tom,
Since you are looking into this and I like this proposal, have you considered
to look alto into `%extension_*flags`:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/blob/rawhide/f/macros#_120-123
I have not considered this. Do you think
On 6/3/22 03:43, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 11:25 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
BTW isn't the `_flag_` prefix too generic? And also, the initial
underscore implies that this is internal macro which should ideally not
be used. So should it be rather removed or not?
I agree that
On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 3:27 PM Peter Boy wrote:
>
>
>
> > Am 02.06.2022 um 19:20 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > :
> >
> > On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 09:18:27AM +0200, Peter Boy wrote:
> >>
> >> ...
> >>
> >> And even those who can continue to use Fedora Server via update are under
> >>
Voting in the Fedora Linux 36 elections is now open. Go to the
Elections app[1] to cast your vote. Voting closes at 23:59 UTC on
Thursday 16 June. Don't forget to claim your "I Voted" badge when you
cast your ballot. Links to candidate interviews are in the Elections
app and on the Community
Voting in the Fedora Linux 36 elections is now open. Go to the
Elections app[1] to cast your vote. Voting closes at 23:59 UTC on
Thursday 16 June. Don't forget to claim your "I Voted" badge when you
cast your ballot. Links to candidate interviews are in the Elections
app and on the Community
Hi everyone,
This is a weekly report from the CPE (Community Platform Engineering) Team.
If you have any questions or feedback, please respond to this report or
contact us on #redhat-cpe channel on libera.chat (https://libera.chat/).
Week: May 30st to June 3rd 2022
If you wish to read this in
On Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 11:25 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> BTW isn't the `_flag_` prefix too generic? And also, the initial
> underscore implies that this is internal macro which should ideally not
> be used. So should it be rather removed or not?
I agree that the "_flag_" prefix might be a little
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220602.0):
ID: 1288571 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
Hi Tom,
Since you are looking into this and I like this proposal, have you
considered to look alto into `%extension_*flags`:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/blob/rawhide/f/macros#_120-123
This is longstanding issue:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1284684
Where we have
Hey All,
I would like to invite all of you to participate in the Kernel 5.18
Test week is happening from 2022-06-05 to 2022-06-11. It's
fairly simple, head over to the wiki [0] and read in detail about the
test week and simply run the test case mentioned in[1] and enter your
results.
As usual,
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-36-20220602.0):
ID: 1288262 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
39 matches
Mail list logo
