On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 3:43 AM Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 01:42:19PM +0800, Kate Hsuan wrote:
> > Currently, I'm working on integration with fwupd, gnome-shell, and
> > gnome settings. They can be used to show the firmware security details
> > and warnings to the user to
Am 21.06.22 um 23:57 schrieb Scott Talbert:
Look at the timestamps in the body of the notification emails. Are they
far in the past?
Unfortunately, the Fedora notification system seems to be suffering from
massive delays (e.g, several days) lately.
Throughout this week, I've received
On Monday, May 9, 2022 10:20:25 PM CDT Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> The license of `ansible` 2.9.x has been corrected from `GPLv3+` to `GPLv3+
> and BSD and Python and MIT and ASL 2.0`. The previous `License:` tag did
> not properly account for the multi-licensing.
>
> Please note that this only
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 06:18:08PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-06-09 at 12:48 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Hi folks!
> ...
> > I think doing this could really help us keep Rawhide solid and avoid
> > introducing major compose-breaking bugs, at minimal cost. But it's a
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2095515
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Crypt-RandPasswd-0.07-
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing
chromium-102.0.5005.115-1.el7
scitokens-cpp-0.7.1-1.el7
tio-1.40-1.el7
Details about builds:
chromium-102.0.5005.115-1.el7
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-8d638fabd8
restic-0.13.1-1.el8
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing
chromium-102.0.5005.115-1.el8
glances-3.2.5-1.el8
On Thu, 2022-06-09 at 12:48 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi folks!
...
> I think doing this could really help us keep Rawhide solid and avoid
> introducing major compose-breaking bugs, at minimal cost. But it's a
> significant change and I wanted to see what folks think. In particular,
> if you
On 22. 06. 22 21:05, Vipul Siddharth wrote:
We are going to deprecate openssl1.1 package, stop shipping the
corresponding devel package, and stop respecting crypto policies in
openssl1.1 package itself.
+1 to deprecating it
-1 to stop shipping the devel package, this would mean we cannot
Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> On 6/22/22 15:05, Vipul Siddharth wrote:
>> == Benefit to Fedora ==
>> This proposal ensures than no new packages in Fedora will rely on the
>> deprecated OpenSSL version that will cause an overall increase of
>> security/stability, and will reduce the amount of old
On 6/22/22 15:05, Vipul Siddharth wrote:
== Benefit to Fedora ==
This proposal ensures than no new packages in Fedora will rely on the
deprecated OpenSSL version that will cause an overall increase of
security/stability, and will reduce the amount of old packages relying
on OpenSSL 1.1 series.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DeprecateOpensslCompat
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DeprecateOpensslCompat
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering
On 22/06/2022 17:09, Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote:
I can't login into Fedora Wiki. I get an error
"You have made too many recent login attempts. Please wait 2 days before
trying again."
Me too.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 11:09:13AM -, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> >
> > I also think that every package change (including rebuild) must be
> > tracked in changelog.
>
> I think that convolution is at the very heart of the problem:
>
> As it is, dist-git tracks "packaging sources", i.e. spec
I had that issue as well, I thought it was only just me.
On Wed, 22 Jun 2022 at 16:18, Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 11:10 AM Dmitry Belyavskiy
> wrote:
> >
> > I can't login into Fedora Wiki. I get an error
> > "You have made too many recent login attempts. Please wait 2 days
Hello all.
libkiwix 11.0.0 will include a soversion bump from .10 to .11.
I will take care of all dependent packages.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 03:41:47PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 08:21:48AM +0200, Lumír Balhar wrote:
> > Because we had a lot of troubles with Fedora infra for container
> > images (I can provide more details, if you want), we have decided to
> > move our containers to
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 01:47:33PM -0500, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> On Monday, June 20, 2022 10:02:00 AM CDT Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > Is is possible include builds of one side-tag into other side-tag ?
>
> It is also possible to `koji tag-build [dest side tag] [NEVR(s) from other
> side tag]`,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2100151
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2100167
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar
Hi everyone,
today was deployed 1.4.0 version of https://release-monitoring.org.
Here is a highlight of some of the changes:
*Features*
* Add link to AlmaLinux package to distribution mapping
* Add sourceforge (git) backend to retrieve git tags
* Add Python (PEP 440) versioning scheme
*Bug
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 11:10 AM Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote:
>
> I can't login into Fedora Wiki. I get an error
> "You have made too many recent login attempts. Please wait 2 days before
> trying again."
I hit this last night for a little bit, but it eventually worked. I
filed an issue with the
Dear colleagues,
I can't login into Fedora Wiki. I get an error
"You have made too many recent login attempts. Please wait 2 days before
trying again."
First, I didn't.
Second, is there any relevant person who could reset this timer taking into
account the perspective of Fedora System-wide
On 6/22/22 10:04, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 08:21:48AM +0200, Lumír Balhar wrote:
Hello.
Because we had a lot of troubles with Fedora infra for container images (I
can provide more details, if you want), we have decided to move our
containers to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2100151
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|ppi...@redhat.com |
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2100151
Bug ID: 2100151
Summary: biber-2.18 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: biber
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
Hi Fedora friends!
In case you missed it, Fedora Project has granted some funding to
organize the Fedora Hatch event in Pune, India. It is going to take
place on Thursday, July 07th, 2022, and Friday, July 08th, 2022 - very
exciting! For more details on how to attend, some terms and
conditions,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2099889
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Fixed In Version|
On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 08:21:48AM +0200, Lumír Balhar wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Because we had a lot of troubles with Fedora infra for container images (I
> can provide more details, if you want), we have decided to move our
> containers to https://quay.io/organization/fedora.
So are you saying that
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 01:10:57PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> I have probably shocking news for you: Pull requests do not live in a parallel
This seems like it's getting a little heated and going towards
personally-directed rhetoric. Can we please not do that? Thank you.
--
Matthew Miller
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 3:42 PM Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 08:21:48AM +0200, Lumír Balhar wrote:
> > Because we had a lot of troubles with Fedora infra for container
> > images (I can provide more details, if you want), we have decided to
> > move our containers to
churchyard opened a new pull-request against the project: `slic3r` that you are
following:
``
Do not BuildRequire non-existing boost-nowide-devel
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/slic3r/pull-request/10
___
V Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 12:23:21PM +0200, Fabio Valentini napsal(a):
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 11:08 AM Hunor Csomortáni wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 1:46 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On 20/06/2022 10:47, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > > > I think Aleksandra wants to
>
> I also think that every package change (including rebuild) must be
> tracked in changelog.
I think that convolution is at the very heart of the problem:
As it is, dist-git tracks "packaging sources", i.e. spec and source hashes or
files, and this determines the content of the src.rpm and
On 22/06/2022 11:07, Hunor Csomortáni wrote:
I actually think it's a good idea.
Scratch builds always sounded like a strange idea, mainly b/c it's
forcing us to decide if the output of a build is going to be released
*before* the build is triggered, when it's impossible to tell whether
that
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 11:08 AM Hunor Csomortáni wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 1:46 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> wrote:
> >
> > On 20/06/2022 10:47, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > > I think Aleksandra wants to (non-scratch) build all pull requestes before
> > > merging.
> >
> > Official
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
4 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 26/161 (aarch64), 26/231 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed
On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 1:46 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 20/06/2022 10:47, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > I think Aleksandra wants to (non-scratch) build all pull requestes before
> > merging.
>
> Official non-scratch builds for non-merged pull requests? Looks very
> dangerous.
I actually
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220621.0):
ID: 1304534 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
V Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 03:50:31PM -0400, Matthew Miller napsal(a):
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 09:47:27PM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > Official non-scratch builds for non-merged pull requests? Looks very
> > > dangerous.
> >
> > Yeah. I think we should think about scratch and
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-36-20220621.0):
ID: 1304518 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
On 21/06/2022 22:05, David Cantrell wrote:
5) Also go all in on automating (or removing) the spec file changelog. I
don't understand what the "build reason" is for above, but isn't every
changelog entry in a spec file technically the build reason?
I also think that every package change
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2099988
Bug ID: 2099988
Summary: Please branch and build perl-Parallel-ForkManager in
epel9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2099976
Bug ID: 2099976
Summary: Please branch and build perl-DBIx-Simple in epel9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-DBIx-Simple
Assignee:
44 matches
Mail list logo
