On Thursday, June 23, 2022 6:25:00 AM CDT Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> Whoever is working with that right now is welcome to my notes and
> tools, at https://github.com/nkadel/ansiblerepo/
I have glanced at it before. @kevin and I maintain ansible, ansible-core, and
many of the standalone
On Thursday, June 16, 2022 6:40:04 AM CDT Miro Hrončok wrote:
> python-ntlm-auth orphan 0 weeks
> ago
I have picked this up, as it's a transitive dependency of ansible-core. I
would welcome co-maintainers :).
--
Thanks,
Maxwell G (@gotmax23)
On Thursday, June 23, 2022 1:50:09 PM CDT Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Not sure what github has to do with things here?
Lumír said:
> With quay.io, we are able to produce new container images directly from
> Github CI and rebuild them regularly without complicated update process
> and without any need
On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 09:53:40AM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
> I just took over the maintership of nfs4-acl-tools
> and it appears the command has not been part
> of Fedora since f32.
>
> Granted there has not been any upstream activity
> until now, but is there a way to get back into,
> at
On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 09:53:40AM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just took over the maintership of nfs4-acl-tools
> and it appears the command has not been part
> of Fedora since f32.
How do you mean 'part of fedora'? The package isn't retired or blocked,
it's available in the repos
On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 6:09 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> That's complicated. .
And, while I am sure it could be derived,
it seems to me, as previously stated,
that the python's turn into the most
significant dependency chain.
I am all for deprecating openssl 1.1,
and for package reviews
On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 09:11:13AM -0400, Blaise Pabon wrote:
> I wonder if, rather than Github, we should consider a more "open source"
> toolchain, eg opendev.org, gitlab, etc. to be more consistent with
> Fedora's "free" vision?
Not sure what github has to do with things here?
quay is open
I thought so too and I will try the following command:
sed -i -e 's|DESTINATION lib|DESTINATION ${LIB_INSTALL_DIR}|'g
CuteLogger/CMakeLists.txt
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On 23. 06. 22 19:58, Maxwell G wrote:
Jun 23, 2022 12:14:26 PM Miro Hrončok :
Alrighty, in that case:
$ comm -23 <(repoquery -q --repo=rawhide{,-source} --whatrequires openssl1.1-devel
| grep src$ | sort) <(repoquery -q --repo=rawhide{,-source} --whatrequires
openssl-devel | grep src$ |
Jun 23, 2022 12:14:26 PM Miro Hrončok :
> Alrighty, in that case:
>
> $ comm -23 <(repoquery -q --repo=rawhide{,-source} --whatrequires
> openssl1.1-devel | grep src$ | sort) <(repoquery -q --repo=rawhide{,-source}
> --whatrequires openssl-devel | grep src$ | sort)
>
I have set the option, see cmake command, but unfortunately it does not change
the error message.
+ /usr/bin/cmake -S . -B redhat-linux-build
-DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE:STRING=-DNDEBUG
-DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE:STRING=-DNDEBUG
-DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE:STRING=-DNDEBUG
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Stratis_3.1.0
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Stratis_3.1.0
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering
On 23. 06. 22 16:37, Jerry James wrote:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 6:52 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
Not quite the right incantation, because it leaves out anything that does not
BuildRequire explicitly the string openssl1.1-devel but rather some of its
virtual provides. Here you go:
$ repoquery -q
Am 23.06.22 um 18:59 schrieb Martin Gansser:
Hi,
I have changed the rpm spec file for shotcut [1] from qmake to cmake.
Now the program compiles to the end and fails when packaging it with the
following error message:
Processing files: shotcut-debuginfo-22.06.07-1.fc36.x86_64
Provides:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2022 16:59:29 -
"Martin Gansser" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have changed the rpm spec file for shotcut [1] from qmake to cmake.
> Now the program compiles to the end and fails when packaging it with the
> following error message:
>
> Processing files:
Hi,
I have changed the rpm spec file for shotcut [1] from qmake to cmake.
Now the program compiles to the end and fails when packaging it with the
following error message:
Processing files: shotcut-debuginfo-22.06.07-1.fc36.x86_64
Provides: debuginfo(build-id) =
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 15/161 (aarch64), 15/231 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220621.n.3):
ID: 1305350 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso
On 6/22/22 17:36, Michal Konecny wrote:
Hi everyone,
today was deployed 1.4.0 version of https://release-monitoring.org.
Here is a highlight of some of the changes:
*Features*
* Add link to AlmaLinux package to distribution mapping
* Add sourceforge (git) backend to retrieve git tags
* Add
On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 6:52 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Not quite the right incantation, because it leaves out anything that does not
> BuildRequire explicitly the string openssl1.1-devel but rather some of its
> virtual provides. Here you go:
>
> $ repoquery -q --repo=rawhide{,-source}
Hello,
I just took over the maintership of nfs4-acl-tools
and it appears the command has not been part
of Fedora since f32.
Granted there has not been any upstream activity
until now, but is there a way to get back into,
at least, rawhide?
tia,
steved.
On 6/20/22 13:08, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
Hello everyone,
I am planning a soname bump of various media codecs I take care of. In order to minimize the
rebuilds, all are going through in a single update.
The codecs I plan to bump are the following:
- AOM
- libavif
- dav1d
- rav1e
I wonder if, rather than Github, we should consider a more "open source"
toolchain, eg opendev.org, gitlab, etc. to be more consistent with
Fedora's "free" vision?
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 11:57 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 03:41:47PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Mon,
On 23. 06. 22 14:24, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote:
3) If every Fedora packager can rebuild anything without a commit, what do we
do prevent accidental builds?
I think each rebuild should be treated as a new package, thus it would
require a new bodhi update, testing, and signing. Which means it
Dne 23. 06. 22 v 14:24 Aleksandra Fedorova napsal(a):
1) An user rebuilds a package from Fedora dist-git in local mock, what will be
the value of the build tag? How will the local build sort over the official
Fedora builds?
Afaik currently, if you do a local build, you need to bump an NVR to
On 23. 06. 22 14:24, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote:
2) A packager rebuilds packages from Fedora dist-git in a Copr repo, what will
be the value of the build tag? How will the Copr build sort over the official
Fedora builds? (This is essentially the same question but the answer might
differ.)
On 23. 06. 22 11:43, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I think this is the correct incantation ...
# dnf repoquery --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=rawhide-source --arch=src
--whatrequires openssl1.1-devel
Last metadata expiration check: 0:01:31 ago on Thu 23 Jun 2022 10:37:46 BST.
On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 8:25 AM Aleksandra Fedorova wrote:
>
> Hi, Miro,
>
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 12:15 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > On 18. 06. 22 13:05, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote:
> > > Hi, all,
> > >
> > > I'd like to discuss how we can add Build tag in the RPM.
> > >
> > > As one of the
Hi, Miro,
On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 12:15 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 18. 06. 22 13:05, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote:
> > Hi, all,
> >
> > I'd like to discuss how we can add Build tag in the RPM.
> >
> > As one of the key points is to turn it into a common standard for rpm
> > packages across the
On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 12:22 AM Maxwell G via devel
wrote:
>
> On Monday, May 9, 2022 10:20:25 PM CDT Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> > The license of `ansible` 2.9.x has been corrected from `GPLv3+` to `GPLv3+
> > and BSD and Python and MIT and ASL 2.0`. The previous `License:` tag did
> > not
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220621.n.3
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220623.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 137
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 2.33 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Hi Michal,
Just wanted to thank you to keep working on this service. It proves
useful every day and I hope it stays like this.
Vít
Dne 22. 06. 22 v 17:36 Michal Konecny napsal(a):
Hi everyone,
today was deployed 1.4.0 version of https://release-monitoring.org.
Here is a highlight of some
On 18. 06. 22 13:05, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote:
Hi, all,
I'd like to discuss how we can add Build tag in the RPM.
As one of the key points is to turn it into a common standard for rpm
packages across the ecosystem, the conversation is currently opened
upstream [1] and in RHEL Engineering. And
On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 09:28:47AM +0200, Kamil Dudka wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 22, 2022 7:45:09 PM CEST Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 11:09:13AM -, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> > > > I also think that every package change (including rebuild) must be
> > > > tracked in
On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 08:17:10AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> Is removing the -devel package the right approach ? It will
> certainly stop new packages using it, but when we come to do the
> next mass rebuild, it will break any existing usage too. What
> existing packages in the distro
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220622.0):
ID: 1305106 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-36-20220622.0):
ID: 1304977 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
On Wednesday, June 22, 2022 7:45:09 PM CEST Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 11:09:13AM -, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> > > I also think that every package change (including rebuild) must be
> > > tracked in changelog.
> >
> > I think that convolution is at the very heart of the
On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 12:35:28AM +0530, Vipul Siddharth wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DeprecateOpensslCompat
>
> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
> community feedback. This
39 matches
Mail list logo
