Re: F37 Change: Drop i686 builds of jdk8,11,17 and latest (18) rpms from f37 onwards (System-Wide Change)

On 4/19/22 09:54, Kevin Fenzi wrote: This change has been reworked... https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Drop_i686_JDKs If folks could take a fresh look and see if this addresses their concerns, that would be great. kevin It mentions dropping i686 Java in March. We're past that :) Bugs

RE: proposal idea: EOL notifications

Adam Williamson writes: > On Thu, 2022-07-07 at 10:49 -0700, Stewart Smith via devel wrote: >> We actually have a skeleton design for such a thing (it says what >> updates and upgrades are available), but we've lagged on >> both posting to devel@ that it's something we've been working on, and I

RE: proposal idea: EOL notifications

Josh Boyer writes: > I really don't think encoding lifecycle information in the > installation itself is the right approach, but it's perhaps the most > tenable one for Fedora. However, until Fedora definitively moves to > using independent lifecycles for their releases, this is a game of >

[Bug 2103763] perl-Text-Bidi-2.18 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103763 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-c36997f342 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing

[Bug 2102191] Issue with build because "BuildRequires: %{_libdir}/libfbclient.so" in spec file

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102191 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2022-02eb71031a has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here:

[Bug 2104311] Please build perl-Test-CheckDeps for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2104311 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 2068801] Please build perl-Text-CSV for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2068801 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 2101943] perl-Text-Bidi-2.17 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2101943 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Text-Bidi-2.17-1.fc37 |perl-Text-Bidi-2.17-1.fc37

[Bug 2101943] perl-Text-Bidi-2.17 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2101943 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 2103763] perl-Text-Bidi-2.18 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103763 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

Re: F37 proposal: Officially Support Raspberry Pi 4 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

Fist of all, thank you for the big amazing news for Fedora. I have some questions about the new support of V3D in Fedora, is that support goes to upstream mainline Linux kernel? If yes, which release of Kernel has that included? If the that supports goes to upstream kernel, does that mean all

[Bug 2105100] New: perl-Chart-2.403.0 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105100 Bug ID: 2105100 Summary: perl-Chart-2.403.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Chart Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 2105085] perl-HTTP-Daemon: HTTP::Daemon allows request smuggling

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105085 amcta...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||2105086 -- You are receiving

Re: Suggestion: Use a unified kernel image by default in the future.

On 7/7/22 14:09, Sharpened Blade via devel wrote: > Also, whats stops the owner of the machine to run the vm in a normal > hypervisor, then modify it so any attempts to check if it is "trusted" will > always look real. They cannot fake the attestation without somehow extracting the needed

[Bug 2105070] dovecot: Privilege escalation possible in dovecot when similar master and non-master passdbs are used

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105070 amcta...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||2105072 -- You are receiving

[Bug 2105085] perl-HTTP-Daemon: HTTP::Daemon allows request smuggling

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105085 amcta...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hho...@redhat.com,

Re: F37 proposal: Add -fno-omit-frame-pointer to default compilation flags (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 7/7/22 10:46, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > > ngompa13 wrote: > >> [...] >> I agree, this is a completely unacceptable statement to make. The >> problem isn't sysprof, the problem is that profiling is garbage on >> Linux by default. > > That's an overstatement. > >> And while maybe most

Re: F37 proposal: Add -fno-omit-frame-pointer to default compilation flags (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Tue, Jul 5 2022 at 01:42:05 PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: No - I think the problem is that adding those flags to the default build configuration will affect the whole system - all executables and shared libraries, not only "leaf" binaries. And that makes your benchmarks (and those run by

[Bug 2105070] dovecot: Privilege escalation possible in dovecot when similar master and non-master passdbs are used

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105070 amcta...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||j...@grosjo.net,

Re: F37 proposal: Add -fno-omit-frame-pointer to default compilation flags (System-Wide Change proposal)

Sysprof has modular data collection backends, and not everything requires linking against libunwind. For those not familiar with Sysprof, or profiling the desktop at large, generally a single program is not the problem. The performance problems often exist across a number of processes. That

Re: proposal idea: EOL notifications

On Thu, 2022-07-07 at 10:49 -0700, Stewart Smith via devel wrote: > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes: > > In https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2803 Artem asked for a user-visible > > notification when a Fedora stops being supported. Various proposals > > for online checks were discussed in the bug,

Re: Suggestion: Use a unified kernel image by default in the future.

That attack is a real thing, its called a mitm, but things use https now, so you would need a malicious CA. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of

Re: Suggestion: Use a unified kernel image by default in the future.

If it is really compromised, then you have to assume anything the vm sends you is fake. As far as the owner of guest knows, there could not even a a real vm, only a ssh shell that looks like it. In a real situation, the guest owner would send the host owner a "starting disk" or ISO. Then the

Fedora-IoT-36-20220707.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20220629.0): ID: 1318684 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1318684 Passed openQA tests: 15/15 (x86_64), 14/15 (aarch64)

Re: Suggestion: Use a unified kernel image by default in the future.

Also, whats stops the owner of the machine to run the vm in a normal hypervisor, then modify it so any attempts to check if it is "trusted" will always look real. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: F37 proposal: Officially Support Raspberry Pi 4 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

Hi, On 07/07/2022 17:36, Onuralp SEZER wrote: For example can you run wayland, or usage of fully supported GPU usage, Rs-pi's Camera usage, SPI , I2C , GPIO usages (PWM,Analog and others) Indeed. Also, the installation process has room for some improvements... Cheers! --alec PS: Please

RE: proposal idea: EOL notifications

Kevin Kofler via devel writes: > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >> In https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2803 Artem asked for a user-visible >> notification when a Fedora stops being supported. Various proposals >> for online checks were discussed in the bug, but I think we might make >> do with

Re: proposal idea: EOL notifications

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes: > In https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2803 Artem asked for a user-visible > notification when a Fedora stops being supported. Various proposals > for online checks were discussed in the bug, but I think we might make > do with something much simpler. We've been

Re: Review swaps

On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 3:31 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > I took this one, it's a core package needed all over the place. Thank you! > > ocaml-ppx-import: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2104693 > > Do you know which other package(s) need this? The latest version of frama-c needs

Re: F37 proposal: Officially Support Raspberry Pi 4 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

For example can you run wayland, or usage of fully supported GPU usage, Rs-pi's Camera usage, SPI , I2C , GPIO usages (PWM,Analog and others) For SBCs running just the OS itself won't be enough. It is a good start of course but it also should support SBCs perks as well for (like access hardware

Re: Bugzilla: You can't ask Lennart Poettering because that account is disabled.

https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item=Systemd-Creator-Microsoft https://linuxactionnews.com/248 On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 10:08 AM Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Sa, 02.07.22 00:15, Marius Schwarz (fedora...@cloud-foo.de) wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I have some bug reports for PA opening

Re: F37 proposal: Officially Support Raspberry Pi 4 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

Was in this weeks LAN: https://linuxactionnews.com/248 On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 3:37 PM Ron Olson wrote: > I have a Pi 4 that runs Fedora just fine; I use it to build Swift (takes > almost 24 hours, but ¯\_(ツ)_/¯) so what doesn’t work? What podcast was this > mentioned on? > > On 6 Jul 2022, at

Fedora-Rawhide-20220707.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Minimal raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 2 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 20/236 (x86_64), 18/165 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed

Re: Replacing pytest -n auto with pytest -n %{_smp_build_ncpus}

On 7/7/22 05:38, Miro Hrončok wrote: In the spirit of other packaging guidelines, I believe we should use this instead:   %pytest -n %{_smp_build_ncpus} I agree that this is more strictly correct. Should I do this in a mass change? Not so many packages use pytest -n auto in the spec: I

Re: Python 3.11 final release might be delayed to December

On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 4:16 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > What do you mean by "delay further progress of the F37 release process"? I meant: Delay the upcoming F37 tasks by a week or two. But apparently that won't be necessary, so maybe I misunderstood the problem. > I assume that we will know more

Re: F37 proposal: Add -fno-omit-frame-pointer to default compilation flags (System-Wide Change proposal)

ngompa13 wrote: > [...] > I agree, this is a completely unacceptable statement to make. The > problem isn't sysprof, the problem is that profiling is garbage on > Linux by default. That's an overstatement. > And while maybe most developers may not bother to do profiling right > now, we don't

Re: Python 3.11 final release might be delayed to December

On 07. 07. 22 15:56, Fabio Valentini wrote: Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 3:38 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: On 05. 07. 22 13:17, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello, forwarding this message to Fedora. Will know more by the end of this week -- we might need to consider reverting back to Python 3.10 if we don't want

Re: Python 3.11 final release might be delayed to December

Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 3:38 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 05. 07. 22 13:17, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Hello, > > forwarding this message to Fedora. > > > > Will know more by the end of this week -- we might need to consider > > reverting > > back to Python 3.10 if we don't want to ship Fedora 37 GA

Re: Python 3.11 final release might be delayed to December

On 05. 07. 22 13:17, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello, forwarding this  message to Fedora. Will know more by the end of this week -- we might need to consider reverting back to Python 3.10 if we don't want to ship Fedora 37 GA with a beta version of Python :( Fedora 37 mass rebuild is planned for

Re: Python 3.11 final release might be delayed to December

On 05. 07. 22 13:17, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello, forwarding this  message to Fedora. Will know more by the end of this week -- we might need to consider reverting back to Python 3.10 if we don't want to ship Fedora 37 GA with a beta version of Python :( Fedora 37 mass rebuild is planned for

Re: F37 proposal: Officially Support Raspberry Pi 4 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

I have a Pi 4 that runs Fedora just fine; I use it to build Swift (takes almost 24 hours, but ¯\_(ツ)_/¯) so what doesn’t work? What podcast was this mentioned on? On 6 Jul 2022, at 4:55, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 2:49 AM Peter Boy wrote: >> >> I very much appreciate the work

Re: Replacing pytest -n auto with pytest -n %{_smp_build_ncpus}

On 7/7/22 04:38, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Should I do this in a mass change? Not so many packages use pytest -n > auto in the spec: > >   $ rg -l -- '(-n|--numprocesses)(\s*|=)auto(\s|$)' >   azure-cli.spec As the azure-cli maintainer, I'm okay with that change. > (Other packages have that in

Re: Python 3.11 final release might be delayed to December

On 05. 07. 22 15:54, Richard Shaw wrote: On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 8:07 AM Richard W.M. Jones > wrote: On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 01:17:39PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello, > forwarding this  message to Fedora. > > Will know more by the end of

Re: Replacing pytest -n auto with pytest -n %{_smp_build_ncpus}

On 07. 07. 22 14:00, Petr Viktorin wrote: On 07. 07. 22 11:38, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello Pythonistats, packagers, A handful of Fedora Python packages uses pytest-xdist to run tests in parallel like this:    %pytest -n auto -n auto means pytest will spawn a number of workers processes equal

Re: libgphoto2 .so name bump announcement

Hi Peter, thanks for the comparison, I have mis-interpreted the content of the build.log file and compared file names instead of the Provides section. In that case, I will update the libgphoto2 package in Fedora and no side-tag or package rebuild will be needed. Best regards Josef Ridky Senior

Re: Python 3.11 final release might be delayed to December

On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 4:33 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 05. 07. 22 16:22, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 9:45 AM Miro Hrončok > > wrote: > > > > On 05. 07. 22 15:20, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at

Re: libgphoto2 .so name bump announcement

V Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 01:10:56PM +0200, Josef Řídký napsal(a): > Hi, > > upstream has released a new libgphoto2 with version number 2.5.30. > As part of this update, .so name has bumped to version 12.1.0. > I cannot see any of that soname in libgphoto2-2.5.30-1.fc37

Re: Replacing pytest -n auto with pytest -n %{_smp_build_ncpus}

On 07. 07. 22 11:38, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello Pythonistats, packagers, A handful of Fedora Python packages uses pytest-xdist to run tests in parallel like this:   %pytest -n auto -n auto means pytest will spawn a number of workers processes equal to the number of available CPUs. In the

Re: F37 proposal: Add -fno-omit-frame-pointer to default compilation flags (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 7:43 AM Matthias Clasen wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 3:06 PM Florian Weimer wrote: > >> >> If the GNOME's sysprof does not >> work with Fedora, fix it or use something else. Do not change how >> Fedora is built. > > > The result of that attitude is that

Re: F37 proposal: Add -fno-omit-frame-pointer to default compilation flags (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 3:06 PM Florian Weimer wrote: > If the GNOME's sysprof does not > work with Fedora, fix it or use something else. Do not change how > Fedora is built. > The result of that attitude is that performance work in the desktop space is happening on GNOME OS images, or in

Re: planning to orphan python-django (and a couple of dependent packages) + potentially more

On 06/07/2022 13:55, Ali Erdinc Koroglu wrote: Hello, I can take the rest thank you. FAS: aekoroglu Thank you! I did not hand all packages over, such as python-django-nose, or python-django-piston because they should already be retired, but it still looks somewhat existing in pkgdb.

libgphoto2 .so name bump announcement

Hi, upstream has released a new libgphoto2 with version number 2.5.30. As part of this update, .so name has bumped to version 12.1.0. I've requested a side-tag for smooth update of all dependent packages. Side tag is 'f37-build-side-54858'. Unfortunately, I am not able to update dependent

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20220707.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220706.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220707.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:9 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 7 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 156 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 600.81 KiB Size of dropped packages

[Bug 2104259] adapt perl to removal of java on i686

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2104259 --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar --- More importantly the five subchains identify a cut at a build-only dependency which will remain available on all architectures even without openjdk. Perl packages beyond that cut are not affected in any way.

[Bug 2104259] adapt perl to removal of java on i686

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2104259 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||2103921, 2104038, 2104257,

Re: Suggestion: Use a unified kernel image by default in the future.

On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 05:12:20PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mi, 06.07.22 16:13, Gerd Hoffmann (kra...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > grub2 doesn't find it. Support not implemented? > > afics grub2 upstream has no native support for boot loader spec > stuff. (or has that changed?) Nope.

Re: proposal idea: EOL notifications

On Mi, 06.07.22 21:05, Gary Buhrmaster (gary.buhrmas...@gmail.com) wrote: > On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 3:45 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/23924 proposes adding > > SUPPORT_END=-MM-DD to /usr/lib/os-release. > > I like the concept, but >

Replacing pytest -n auto with pytest -n %{_smp_build_ncpus}

Hello Pythonistats, packagers, A handful of Fedora Python packages uses pytest-xdist to run tests in parallel like this: %pytest -n auto -n auto means pytest will spawn a number of workers processes equal to the number of available CPUs. In the spirit of other packaging guidelines, I

Re: Review swaps

On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 08:43:43PM -0600, Jerry James wrote: > I need 2 OCaml package reviews in order to update existing packages to > the most recent versions. > > ocaml-camlp-streams: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2104283 I took this one, it's a core package needed all over the

Fedora-Cloud-35-20220707.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220706.0): ID: 1317739 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

Re: With F36 systemd-nspawn test environment not usable, no login possible

V Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 09:29:14AM +0200, Lennart Poettering napsal(a): > On Di, 05.07.22 14:38, Dominique Martinet (asmad...@codewreck.org) wrote: > > you'll see it complain that there is no /bin/login: you just need to > > install util-linux (or possibly busybox) and you'll get a prompt, > >

[Bug 2103763] perl-Text-Bidi-2.18 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103763 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-88b9abd432 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-88b9abd432 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 2103763] perl-Text-Bidi-2.18 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103763 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-c36997f342 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-c36997f342 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 2103763] perl-Text-Bidi-2.18 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103763 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

Fedora-Cloud-36-20220707.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-36-20220706.0): ID: 1317550 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

[Bug 2103763] perl-Text-Bidi-2.18 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103763 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 2104311] Please build perl-Test-CheckDeps for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2104311 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from