As a quick and dirty thing I took the f37-needs-rebuild list and the
f37-failed to build list and found things that were only on the
needs-rebuild list.
I then filtered out the ones we don't try and mass rebuild (shim,
kernel, grub2, etc) and the silly ones we have like Fedora-Live-Xfce
On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 4:03 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Yeah, fixed. I retagged all the things in the signing pending tag.
>
> However, this might cause some really old updates to land...
> so keep an eye out for that.
Will do, thank you!
> Yeah, this the old 'if koji can't rebuild the src.rpm, it
On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 02:49:53PM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 2:35 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > The packages were signed and the sidetag is through to f37.
> >
> > Also, the signing queue is all caught up.
>
> Can you take a look at gap-4.11.1-5.fc37? It's been in
>
Stewart Smith via devel wrote:
> cppcheck can be built without HAVE_RULES which will avoid pcre at the
> expense of functionality.
I do not think that it makes sense to build stuff with reduced functionality
just to avoid a pcre dependency.
We just need to accept that we need to maintain pcre
On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 10:43:38PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> Can confirm, looks all good now, thanks!
>
> BTW, I'd like to know whatever magic you did to fedora notifications.
> Because it apparently kept chugging on right through the mass rebuild,
> and is now caught up again. :)
Yeah,
On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 2:35 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> The packages were signed and the sidetag is through to f37.
>
> Also, the signing queue is all caught up.
Can you take a look at gap-4.11.1-5.fc37? It's been in
f37-signing-pending for over 2 days now.
> The only things left for the mass
On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 10:35 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 10:09:50AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 10:37:39AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> ...snip...
> >
> > So, as long as that sidetag update goes out all should be fine.
>
> The packages were
On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 10:09:50AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 10:37:39AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
...snip...
>
> So, as long as that sidetag update goes out all should be fine.
The packages were signed and the sidetag is through to f37.
Also, the signing queue is
Lukas Javorsky writes:
> Hi,
>
> As from the pcre-8.45, the upstream stopped supporting this
> library. The recommended procedure is to switch onto the new pcre2
> library that has full upstream support. [1]
I was looking into doing this as much as possible for AL2022 and managed
to dig a bit on
On 23. 07. 22 0:22, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
(It seems my previous message didn't send properly...)
On 22/07/22 10:24PM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
the script that determines leaf packages in the Rust SIG
Can you provide a link to this?
$ (dnf repoquery --whatrequires pcre ; dnf repoquery
On Sat, 2022-07-23 at 11:09 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> > qemu-2:7.0.0-6.fc37.src
>
> I looked at the qemu sources and I can't see where they need pcre (or
> pcre2 for that matter) ... So I've no idea why the spec file
> BuildRequires pcre-static.
Behold, the glory of git:
On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 10:37:39AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 10:30 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > We have had several issues in the last few days sadly.
> > I think your build ran into systemd-oomd running on some builders after
> > I had disabled it and thought I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2110094
Bug ID: 2110094
Summary: perl-Catalyst-Runtime-5.90129 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Catalyst-Runtime
Keywords:
Oh, I wasn't aware of that, is there somewhere I can read up on that?
On 23.07.22 01:37, Peter Oliver wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jul 2022, Marcus Müller wrote:
Since the pgtk toolkit supports both X and wayland under the hood, I'd very much
propose that we do not only package an emacs-pgtk binary, but
Thank you Vitaly.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
On 23/07/2022 14:46, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
First, do I need to wait for the FTBFS bugs to be filed before I fix
the packages or can I submit updated builds to the f37-rebuild side
tag myself?
You can build directly to Rawhide without waiting. Mass rebuild will
automatically pick build
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220721.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220723.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 158
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 384.48 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Hello,
Two of my packages failed to build due to a trailing "." after the
%cmake macro in the spec file. I have a couple of questions:
First, do I need to wait for the FTBFS bugs to be filed before I fix
the packages or can I submit updated builds to the f37-rebuild side
tag myself?
Second, I
On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 3:28 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 02:24:00PM +0200, Lukas Javorsky wrote:
> > perl
>
> Wait what, Perl _depends_ on PCRE ...?!
>
Uhh?
I don't see any direct PCRE dependency in the package spec or
generated packages...?
But yeah, that one
On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 10:24:08PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> -> pcre or any of its subpackages are BuildRequired by:
>
[...]
> ocaml-pcre-0:7.5.0-6.fc37.src
So two OCaml packages need this:
coccinelle
-> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/cocci/2022-07/msg00026.html
(scroll down a
On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 10:30 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> We have had several issues in the last few days sadly.
> I think your build ran into systemd-oomd running on some builders after
> I had disabled it and thought I stopped it, but didn't. ;(
>
> Anyhow, the thing to do here if it builds is
Hello maintainers!
I'm glad I can announce that we have a new release of Mock v3.1. This is
a small release with several minor fixes. Most of the work has been done
in mock-core-configs package (mock configuration). See full release notes:
On 22/07/2022 14:24, Lukas Javorsky wrote:
As from the pcre-8.45, the upstream stopped supporting this library. The
recommended procedure is to switch onto the new pcre2 library that has
full upstream support. [1]
Feel free to transfer this package to me. FAS: xvitaly
I will continue
23 matches
Mail list logo
