On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 4:56 PM Göran Uddeborg wrote:
> That brought up a question: what should Emacs add-on packages do when
> it comes to native compilation? Should they build and bundle native
> code? If I understand it correctly, that would mean a new patch build
> of Emacs itself would also
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2117117
Bug ID: 2117117
Summary: perl-XML-Atom-SimpleFeed-0.905 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-XML-Atom-SimpleFeed
Keywords:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2117116
Bug ID: 2117116
Summary: perl-Test-File-Contents-0.241 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Test-File-Contents
Keywords:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116569
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-892c34c9c8 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-55ddc1978f
rubygem-tzinfo-1.2.10-1.el7
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing
ntfs-3g-2022.5.17-1.el7
Details about builds:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2117100
Bug ID: 2117100
Summary: perl-Proc-Fork-0.807 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Proc-Fork
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116568
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
20 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-89ad385971
chromium-103.0.5060.114-1.el8
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing
gsi-openssh-8.0p1-10.el8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116569
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116538
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2112642
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
On 8/9/22 06:00 PM, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 8/9/22 05:06 PM, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 8/9/22 02:25 PM, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 8/9/22 01:09 PM, Scott Talbert wrote:
Hi,
Upstream wxPython has finally
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2117083
Bug ID: 2117083
Summary: perl-Parallel-Iterator-1.002 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Parallel-Iterator
Keywords:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2117075
Bug ID: 2117075
Summary: perl-XML-XPath-1.48 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-XML-XPath
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 8/9/22 05:06 PM, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 8/9/22 02:25 PM, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 8/9/22 01:09 PM, Scott Talbert wrote:
Hi,
Upstream wxPython has finally made a new release and this involves
On 8/9/22 05:06 PM, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 8/9/22 02:25 PM, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 8/9/22 01:09 PM, Scott Talbert wrote:
Hi,
Upstream wxPython has finally made a new release and this involves migrating to
wxWidgets 3.2.0 at the same time. I'm
On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 5:30 PM Mattia Verga via devel
wrote:
>
> Il 09/08/22 13:21, Miro Hrončok ha scritto:
> > On 09. 08. 22 13:06, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >> You can't retire package with provenpackager powers. If that was possible,
> >> I'd
> >> probably do that.
> > Actually, you can.
> >
>
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 8/9/22 02:25 PM, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 8/9/22 01:09 PM, Scott Talbert wrote:
Hi,
Upstream wxPython has finally made a new release and this involves
migrating to wxWidgets 3.2.0 at the same time. I'm planning to build the
new wxPython in
Dne 09. 08. 22 v 12:20 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
However, if I really wanted to do this, I'd need to ask Mo, possibly use unresponsive maintainer policy. But that is
too much hassle, so I'll probably leave it alone.
Seems to me like similar process to what you suggests. The timeout will be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2117024
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|bugzilla|Reporting/Charting
A rather important scheduling conflict has arisen, so there will be no
prioritized bugs meeting this week.
--
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
___
devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2117021
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Product|Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2117021
George R. Goffe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|change component after |change component after
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2075768
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||grgo...@yahoo.com
--- Comment #4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2117024
Bug ID: 2117024
Summary: List of components above seems to be out of sync with
"current" components
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2117021
Bug ID: 2117021
Summary: change component after adding other data erased all
previously entered data
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component:
On 09/08/2022 20:17, Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote:
+ export CCFLAGS=-O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g
-grecord-gcc-switches
Export must be quoted. GCC compiler options - must not.
Try removing optim='%{optflags}' from your SPEC. It should automatically
pick flags from
--- Original Message ---
On Tuesday, August 9th, 2022 at 1:31 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 04:51:03PM +, Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote:
>
> > Good morning!
> >
> > zfs-fuse is FTBFS starting with f36.
> >
> >
On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 09:14:17AM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
>
>
> On 8/7/22 3:49 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Or just wait... I have been checking them a few times a day and
> > rebooting any that are locked up.
> How long do we have to wait? [1] has been stuck since
> Mon, 08 Aug 2022 14:17:44
On 8/9/22 02:25 PM, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 8/9/22 01:09 PM, Scott Talbert wrote:
Hi,
Upstream wxPython has finally made a new release and this involves migrating to
wxWidgets 3.2.0 at the same time. I'm planning to build the new wxPython in
Rawhide after F37 branch (although could put it
On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 04:51:03PM +, Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote:
> Good morning!
>
> zfs-fuse is FTBFS starting with f36.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2047144
>
> I've been banging my head on it for a long time, to no avail. I can get
> around the SConstruct failure by
On Tue, 2022-08-09 at 18:17 +, Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote:
>
>
> > gcc -o cmd/mount_zfs/mount_zfs.o -c "-O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-
> > objects
> > -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall
> > -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
> > -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS
On 8/9/22 01:09 PM, Scott Talbert wrote:
Hi,
Upstream wxPython has finally made a new release and this involves migrating to
wxWidgets 3.2.0 at the same time. I'm planning to build the new wxPython in
Rawhide after F37 branch (although could put it in F37 later).
For those packages that use
--- Original Message ---
On Tuesday, August 9th, 2022 at 12:06 PM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
> On 09/08/2022 18:51, Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote:
>
> > zfs-fuse is FTBFS starting with f36.
>
>
> gcc -o cmd/mount_zfs/mount_zfs.o -c "-O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects
>
Hi,
Upstream wxPython has finally made a new release and this involves
migrating to wxWidgets 3.2.0 at the same time. I'm planning to build the
new wxPython in Rawhide after F37 branch (although could put it in F37
later).
For those packages that use both wxPython and wxWidgets (I *think*
On 09/08/2022 18:51, Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote:
zfs-fuse is FTBFS starting with f36.
gcc -o cmd/mount_zfs/mount_zfs.o -c "-O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects
-fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall
-Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
-Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS
On Mon, 25 Jul 2022, Scott Talbert wrote:
At long last wxWidgets 3.2.0 has been released and I'm getting it into
Rawhide. This comes with an soname bump (but this should be the last one as
3.2.x should now be ABI stable).
NOTE: users of wxWidgets 3.0 (wxGTK3 package) are now strongly
Good morning!
zfs-fuse is FTBFS starting with f36.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2047144
I've been banging my head on it for a long time, to no avail. I can get around
the SConstruct failure by removing some environment variables, and then I hit a
linking issue I can't get past.
Nearly exactly a year ago, mtasaka pointed this out:
"Hello, all:
samba is upgraded from samba-4.14.6-1.fc34 to samba-4.15.0-0.0.rc1.fc35,
Its subpackage (samba-client-libs) contains libndr.so, which did soname bump:
libndr.so.1()(64bit) -> libndr.so.2()(64bit)"
Sadly, almost the exact same
On 09. 08. 22 16:45, Martin Gansser wrote:
Hi,
how do i get %pytest on the python-m3u8 package to work ?
I have already made several attempts which fail.
%check
#%%{pytest} -vv --cov-report term-missing --cov m3u8 tests/
#%%{__python3} -m pytest tests/m3u8server.py
Hi Martin,
It would
Il 09/08/22 13:21, Miro Hrončok ha scritto:
> On 09. 08. 22 13:06, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> You can't retire package with provenpackager powers. If that was possible,
>> I'd
>> probably do that.
> Actually, you can.
>
Yep, you can, but then the package will be in a "weird" state. I've
actually
On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 03:34:56AM +, Davide Cavalca via devel wrote:
> On Sun, 2022-08-07 at 20:27 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > I'm working on a package review for libphidget22 (rename of
> > libphidget), but after typing in my bugzilla credentials I get the
> > following:
> >
> > >
Hi,
how do i get %pytest on the python-m3u8 package to work ?
I have already made several attempts which fail.
%check
#%%{pytest} -vv --cov-report term-missing --cov m3u8 tests/
#%%{__python3} -m pytest tests/m3u8server.py
[1]
@Artur
Thanks, that was the solution
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116568
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-04ed85fdf4 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-04ed85fdf4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116568
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Digest-SHA3` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Digest-SHA3/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
On 8/7/22 3:49 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Or just wait... I have been checking them a few times a day and
rebooting any that are locked up.
How long do we have to wait? [1] has been stuck since
Mon, 08 Aug 2022 14:17:44 UTC
steved.
[1]
I'm working on updating the FreeCAD package which is quite large. It
doesn't provide libraries for other packages so is there ANY reason to
continue to build it for ANY release of Fedora at this point?
Seems like a complete waste of resources.
Thanks,
RIchard
rhel 9 ideally.
i was starting with the fedora spec file as i didn't know about needing
the match. it isnt clear why some of these are not included in the rhel
package but most are. i tried to search on the fence-agents github and
bugzilla. does the pve one for instance need something too new
In the spec, you have this:
> %setup -n %{module_name}-%{version}
The error message looks like this:
> /usr/lib/rpm/rpmuncompress -x -v/builddir/build/SOURCES/m3u8-3.1.0.tar.gz
> rpmuncompress: -v/builddir/build/SOURCES/m3u8-3.1.0.tar.gz: unknown option
On first glance, this looks like a bug in
On 8/9/22 15:37, Martin Gansser wrote:
Hi,
fedora-review of m3u8 fails with the following error message:
Building target platforms: x86_64
Building for target x86_64
setting SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=1659916800
Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.g2rRRB
+ umask 022
+ cd /builddir/build/BUILD
Hau idatzi du Martin Gansser (martin.gans...@gmail.com) erabiltzaileak
(2022 abu. 9, ar. (14:37)):
>
> Hi,
>
> fedora-review of m3u8 fails with the following error message:
>
> Building target platforms: x86_64
> Building for target x86_64
> setting SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=1659916800
> Executing(%prep):
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Digest-SHA3` that
you are following:
``
Tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Digest-SHA3/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
Hi,
fedora-review of m3u8 fails with the following error message:
Building target platforms: x86_64
Building for target x86_64
setting SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=1659916800
Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.g2rRRB
+ umask 022
+ cd /builddir/build/BUILD
+ cd /builddir/build/BUILD
+ rm -rf
On 09. 08. 22 13:06, Vít Ondruch wrote:
You can't retire package with provenpackager powers. If that was possible, I'd
probably do that.
Actually, you can.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list --
Dne 09. 08. 22 v 12:29 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
On 09. 08. 22 12:20, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi,
I have removed last use of rubygem-memcache-client package in Fedora
minutes ago:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-rack/c/7490abe4066b965d222764acf0ae164788cf1721
and I think that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116569
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-4dd5aa4cdb has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-4dd5aa4cdb
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116568
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jples...@redhat.com |
Status|NEW
On 09. 08. 22 12:20, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi,
I have removed last use of rubygem-memcache-client package in Fedora minutes
ago:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-rack/c/7490abe4066b965d222764acf0ae164788cf1721
and I think that rubygem-memcache-client would deserve to be retired
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116569
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-892c34c9c8 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-892c34c9c8
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
Hi,
I have removed last use of rubygem-memcache-client package in Fedora
minutes ago:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-rack/c/7490abe4066b965d222764acf0ae164788cf1721
and I think that rubygem-memcache-client would deserve to be retired
from Fedora, because it is deprecated
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116569
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Digest-SHA` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Digest-SHA/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list --
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Digest-SHA` that
you are following:
``
Tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Digest-SHA/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list --
Hello,
My package (emacs-vm) was one of the ones that broke with the upgrade
to Emacs 28 in F36. I'm trying to get it to work again.
One of the issues is that it shows up a large number of warnings.
After some time I've now understood this is because of the new native
compilation feature. Since
On 03/08/2022 22:47, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2022-07-24 at 10:28 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
The current Fedora Rawhide kernels are too slow to run libguestfs
tests when doing Koji builds. These run in a qemu VM, running the
Rawhide kernel, emulated using software virtualization
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116569
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|p...@city-fan.org |jples...@redhat.com
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116569
--- Comment #2 from Jitka Plesnikova ---
Yes, I did.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116569
___
perl-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116569
--- Comment #1 from Paul Howarth ---
Hi Jitka, I noticed that the sources for this were already uploaded - did you
start working on this already?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116569
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116538
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-9745012975 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-9745012975
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116641
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
perl-MIME-Charset-1.013-1.fc36.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=90635780
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116641
Bug ID: 2116641
Summary: perl-MIME-Charset-1.013 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-MIME-Charset
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116641
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1904423
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1904423=edit
Update to 1.013 (#2116641)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116538
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-DBD-Pg-3.16.0-1.fc37
76 matches
Mail list logo
