On 8/18/22 15:32, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 5:23 PM Tom Stellard wrote:
I'm working on the 14.0.5 update for F36 right now. The 14.0.6 release
is going to have to wait until after 15.0.0 lands in F37 and rawhide,
because I don't think it's worth doing the 14.0.6 update
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119903
Bug ID: 2119903
Summary: Please branch and build perl-Net-Patricia for EPEL 9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Net-Patricia
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119901
Bug ID: 2119901
Summary: perl-Business-CreditCard-0.39 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Business-CreditCard
Keywords:
I've corrected the license of python-ntlm-auth from LGPLv3+ to MIT. It
was relicensed upstream 5 years ago, but the previous maintainer never
updated the License field.
--
Thanks,
Maxwell G (@gotmax23)
Pronouns: He/Him/His
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Action summary
Accepted blockers
-
1. kde-settings — KDE needs to pick up F37 backgrounds — ON_QA
ACTION: None
2. sddm — Logout from KDE session on Rawhide goes to console, not SDDM — POST
ACTION: Maintainers to build package with X11 by default
Proposed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119882
Bug ID: 2119882
Summary: perl-Socket-2.036 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Socket
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 10:47 AM P J P wrote:
> * Interesting numbers there.
(see below on another number)
> * While I get that such pruning from time to time is generally good.
> What happens to the packages orphaned by removing inactive packagers?
>
> * Removing orphaned packages may not
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 04:50:07PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Stephen Smoogen:
>
> > On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 at 05:44, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >
> > * Kevin Fenzi:
> >
> > > Greetings everyone.
> > >
> > > Many years ago mock introduced and then made default it's isolation to
> > > use
On 18. 08. 22 23:01, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Greetings everyone.
Many years ago mock introduced and then made default it's isolation to
use systemd-nspawn instead of chroot. Shortly after the nspawn isolation
was added, it was used in fedoraproject koji builds, but there were
issues and since then
On 8/19/22 6:08 AM, Alexander Sosedkin wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 1:45 PM Yann Droneaud wrote:
I've noticed ca-certificates package was updated recently, and went looking
at the changes, and I have some questions.
Not Bob Relyea, but I'll try to answer to the best of my knowledge:
Il 19/08/22 14:07, Ben Cotton ha scritto:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 2:46 AM Merlin Cooper
> wrote:
>> I like this policy, but it strikes me as odd that the packagers' email
>> addresses are posted publicly on the Pagure tickets... Wouldn't that
>> make it easier for spammers to get more email
* Stephen Smoogen:
> On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 at 05:44, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> * Kevin Fenzi:
>
> > Greetings everyone.
> >
> > Many years ago mock introduced and then made default it's isolation to
> > use systemd-nspawn instead of chroot. Shortly after the nspawn isolation
> > was added,
Hi again,
thanks for all the suggestions! I'm taking the AVR approach so far;
if you want to play with my drafts, I have a experimental COPR:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jstanek/wasi-libc/
I plan to open a proper Fedora Review request on Monday;
right now, I'm a bit too tired to go
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 at 08:42, Ian McInerney via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 1:08 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 2:46 AM Merlin Cooper
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > I like this policy, but it strikes me as odd that the packagers' email
>> >
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 5:30 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> Why F39? Shouldn't the deprecation (and the work on porting) be already
> happening for F38?
I'm going to wait to process the proposal until we have an answer to
this question. (I believe Lukas is out of the office, so it
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 at 05:44, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Kevin Fenzi:
>
> > Greetings everyone.
> >
> > Many years ago mock introduced and then made default it's isolation to
> > use systemd-nspawn instead of chroot. Shortly after the nspawn isolation
> > was added, it was used in fedoraproject
On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 at 21:52, Kevin Kofler via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> > I should have been clearer. I was talking about the changes between
> > XP->7->8->8.1->10->11 versus 10. -> 10.. I was thinking
> of
> > it more since for the most part they
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 1:45 PM Yann Droneaud wrote:
> I've noticed ca-certificates package was updated recently, and went looking
> at the changes, and I have some questions.
Not Bob Relyea, but I'll try to answer to the best of my knowledge:
> The first issue is what certdata.txt was used ?
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220817.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220819.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 145
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 105.22 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 1:08 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 2:46 AM Merlin Cooper
> wrote:
> >
> > I like this policy, but it strikes me as odd that the packagers' email
> > addresses are posted publicly on the Pagure tickets... Wouldn't that
> > make it easier for spammers to
Hi everyone,
This is a weekly report from the CPE (Community Platform Engineering)
Team. If you have any questions or feedback, please respond to this
report or contact us on #redhat-cpe channel on libera.chat
(https://libera.chat/).
Week: 15th August - 19th August 2022
If you wish to read
OLD: Fedora-37-20220818.n.0
NEW: Fedora-37-20220819.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:9
Upgraded packages: 113
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:97.02 MiB
Size
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 2:46 AM Merlin Cooper
wrote:
>
> I like this policy, but it strikes me as odd that the packagers' email
> addresses are posted publicly on the Pagure tickets... Wouldn't that
> make it easier for spammers to get more email addresses?
The script has a flag I can use in the
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 1:18 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> Can we handle that? Can you manually flag those cases to continue
> through the process, or something?
It's like 10,000 spoons, when all you need is removal from the
packager group. But yes, I'm manually handling those cases. Right now,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119302
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105085
--- Comment #11 from Michal Josef Spacek ---
Upstream has not released a new version of distribution with fixes, because
there are some failing tests related to the issue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
Hi,
On Friday, 19 August, 2022, 03:05:03 am IST, Ben Cotton
wrote:
>I just completed the first run of FESCo's newly approved Inactive
>Packager Policy[1]. Packagers that have been identified as inactive
>have a ticket in the find-inactive-packagers repo[2]. One week after
>the F37 final
* Kevin Fenzi:
> Greetings everyone.
>
> Many years ago mock introduced and then made default it's isolation to
> use systemd-nspawn instead of chroot. Shortly after the nspawn isolation
> was added, it was used in fedoraproject koji builds, but there were
> issues and since then the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2096953
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-HTTP-Message-6.37-1.fc
Thanks for your hint.
The developer of the program released a patch for this a few minutes ago.
https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~vincent-vandevyvre/qarte/qarte-5/diff/82?context=3
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
> Hi,
>
> I want to start qarte-5.1 on Fedora 37, but the startup aborts
> with the following error message:
>
> $ qarte -d
> 16:06:00: INFO - qarte Qarte-5.1.0
> 16:06:00: INFO - qarte Python 3.11.0rc1 on
> Linux-5.19.1-300.fc37.x86_64-x86_64-with-glibc2.36
> 16:06:00: INFO - qarte File system
Hi,
I want to start qarte-5.1 on Fedora 37, but the startup aborts
with the following error message:
$ qarte -d
16:06:00: INFO - qarte Qarte-5.1.0
16:06:00: INFO - qarte Python 3.11.0rc1 on
Linux-5.19.1-300.fc37.x86_64-x86_64-with-glibc2.36
16:06:00: INFO - qarte File system encoding: utf-8
On 19/08/2022 08:45, Merlin Cooper wrote:
I like this policy, but it strikes me as odd that the packagers' email
addresses are posted publicly on the Pagure tickets... Wouldn't that
make it easier for spammers to get more email addresses?
Spammers can easily get email addresses from all Git
I like this policy, but it strikes me as odd that the packagers' email
addresses are posted publicly on the Pagure tickets... Wouldn't that
make it easier for spammers to get more email addresses?
On Thu, 2022-08-18 at 17:28 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> Hello everyone!
>
> I just completed the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116641
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Il 19/08/22 07:17, Adam Williamson ha scritto:
> On Thu, 2022-08-18 at 17:28 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
>> Hello everyone!
>>
>> I just completed the first run of FESCo's newly approved Inactive
>> Packager Policy[1]. Packagers that have been identified as inactive
>> have a ticket in the
36 matches
Mail list logo
