https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2099988
--- Comment #1 from Ralf Brunckhorst ---
Any updates on this?
/Ralf
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2099988
Paul Wouters kirjoitti 23.8.2022 klo 3.07:
Hi,
I looked at fixing percona-xtrabackup and noticed it is staticly linking
to a bunch of libraries. These .a files are then removed in %install so
they are not shipped. It bundles a bunch of this stuff from its extra/ dir:
duktape googletest icu
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
34 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-89ad385971
chromium-103.0.5060.114-1.el8
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing
fastfetch-1.6.4-3.el8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119903
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120004
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-8812197fab has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119901
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-7cb6b062ff has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120008
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-1ba6349ff3 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120008
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119882
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119994
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-8cc1dd31a1 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120004
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119901
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 09:23:51AM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote on 2022/08/23 5:54:
> > On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 12:08 PM Susi Lehtola
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > >
> > > gsl will be updated from version 2.6 to 2.7.1 which changes the
> > > soversion
Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote on 2022/08/23 5:54:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 12:08 PM Susi Lehtola
wrote:
Hello,
gsl will be updated from version 2.6 to 2.7.1 which changes the
soversion from .25 to .27 in one week. List of dependent packages
$ for rpm in $(repoquery --disablerepo=*
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing
java-latest-openjdk-18.0.2.0.9-1.rolling.el7
python-colcon-rerun-0.0.1-1.el7
Details about builds:
Hi,
I looked at fixing percona-xtrabackup and noticed it is staticly linking
to a bunch of libraries. These .a files are then removed in %install so
they are not shipped. It bundles a bunch of this stuff from its extra/ dir:
duktape googletest icu libcbor libedit libevent libfido2
Welcome to Fedora :)
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 5:53 PM Aaron Stern via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Greetings all.
>
> My name is Aaron, I contribute packages for openSUSE (
> https://build.opensuse.org/users/ukbeast89) and am looking to help bring
> updates to wine and FAudio.
Greetings all.
My name is Aaron, I contribute packages for openSUSE
(https://build.opensuse.org/users/ukbeast89) and am looking to help bring
updates to wine and FAudio.
I have already created a PR for FAudio
(https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/FAudio/pull-request/2) as a way to get my
feet
That would be a bit hard since a large number of the SPDX ids are the same as
the Fedora short names. That being said, some of the more commonly found
licenses are not the same.
It might be interesting to see how many packages have had a license update
since this change, which could indicate
looks good!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
The updates policy requires that you notify this list and the
maintainers whose packages depend on poco a week in advance.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#_rawhide
I found out about this due to the mumble FailsToInstall bugs that were
filed earlier today.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120427
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
perl-Astro-FITS-CFITSIO-1.16-1.fc36.src.rpm for rawhide failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=91154013
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120427
Bug ID: 2120427
Summary: perl-Astro-FITS-CFITSIO-1.16 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Astro-FITS-CFITSIO
Keywords:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120427
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1907023
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1907023=edit
Update to 1.16 (#2120427)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119903
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
Hey all,
I have two packages which have been sitting in review for some time now:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2095732
daniel-wikholm-segment16-fonts - collection of 3 font families.
Bit problematic because of missing license text, not having an official source
website, nor a
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 12:08 PM Susi Lehtola
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
> gsl will be updated from version 2.6 to 2.7.1 which changes the
> soversion from .25 to .27 in one week. List of dependent packages
>
> $ for rpm in $(repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide
> --whatrequires
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120413
Bug ID: 2120413
Summary: perl-Locale-Maketext-1.32 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Locale-Maketext
Keywords: FutureFeature,
I just edited the f38 tag at Mon Aug 22 08:29:51 PM UTC 2022 to switch
to nspawn.
If you have detected a issue that seems like it might be related to this
change, please file a releng ticket and we will dig into it.
Thanks,
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
We are getting this on many servers and so I was asked to report. Any ideas
Thank you
Update notice CEEA-2019:2270 (from epel7-centos7-x86_64) is broken, or a bad
duplicate, skipping.
You should report this problem to the owner of the epel7-centos7-x86_64
repository.
yum updateinfo
On 8/22/22 5:35 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Jan Staněk:
>
>> Hi list,
>> in order to be able to compile WASM natively on Fedora,
>> I'm trying to package wasi-libc[1] to provide the Web Assembly System
>> Interface.
>>
>> [1]: https://github.com/WebAssembly/wasi-libc
>>
>> My trouble is that
> Am 22.08.2022 um 18:03 schrieb Neal Gompa :
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 11:57 AM Peter Boy wrote:
>>
> …..
> libvirt supports UEFI VMs just fine too. That said, you probably would
> want to make it a hybrid boot system to support both.
>
> You can see how it's done in Fedora Cloud.
>
> Am 22.08.2022 um 18:12 schrieb Daniel P. Berrangé :
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 12:03:21PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 11:57 AM Peter Boy wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Does anyone know how I can configure ImageFactory / OZ to use a BIOS VM
>>> for image generation?
Dne 22. 08. 22 v 19:03 Michel Alexandre Salim napsal(a):
rubygem-asciidoctor-pdfabradshaw, ckyriakidou, evgeni, 0 weeks ago
fale, orphan, snecker
rubygem-chunky_png mmorsi, orphan, snecker 0 weeks ago
rubygem-css_parser
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 01:07:26PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120022
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-GraphViz-2.25-1.fc38
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-GraphViz` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-GraphViz/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120008
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-b0b60a5adc has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-b0b60a5adc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120008
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-1ba6349ff3 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-1ba6349ff3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-GraphViz` that
you are following:
``
Tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-GraphViz/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 12:03:21PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 11:57 AM Peter Boy wrote:
> >
> >
> > Does anyone know how I can configure ImageFactory / OZ to use a BIOS VM
> > for image generation? Unfortunately I haven't found any documentation on
> > this.
> >
> >
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119963
--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ---
exampels/menu.pl crashes when clicking on Window menu label.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119963
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119963
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ---
It moves from default Gtk2 to Gtk3. Some modules renamed. Also many changes.
Suitable for Rawhide only.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 11:57 AM Peter Boy wrote:
>
>
> Does anyone know how I can configure ImageFactory / OZ to use a BIOS VM for
> image generation? Unfortunately I haven't found any documentation on this.
>
>
> For explanation:
>
> ImageFactory uses a temporary VM to create a virtual
Does anyone know how I can configure ImageFactory / OZ to use a BIOS VM for
image generation? Unfortunately I haven't found any documentation on this.
For explanation:
ImageFactory uses a temporary VM to create a virtual machine disk image.
At least since F36 it uses UEFI for this. If you
Attending the meeting today
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 8:51 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> Action summary
>
>
> Accepted blockers
> -
>
> 1. kde-settings — KDE needs to pick up F37 backgrounds — ON_QA
> ACTION: None
>
> 2. sddm — Logout from KDE session on Rawhide goes
On Fri, 2022-08-19 at 10:37 -0400, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 at 08:42, Ian McInerney via devel
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 1:08 PM Ben Cotton
> > wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 2:46 AM Merlin Cooper
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I like this policy, but it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120022
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120008
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Module-CoreList-5.2022
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120004
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120004
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-8812197fab has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-8812197fab
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120004
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119994
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-8cc1dd31a1 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-8cc1dd31a1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119994
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-DateTime-Locale` that
you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
1.36 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-DateTime-Locale/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120004
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-DateTime-Locale`
that you are following:
``
1.36 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-DateTime-Locale/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list --
On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 5:21 PM Philip Prindeville <
philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com> wrote:
> Since July 6, I've been seeing a lot of AVC's though I've not changed
> anything in my policies. Any ideas why?
>
> The majority seem to be device_t:sock_file write which implies to me that
> it's
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119963
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
I just wonder if are we able to detect that the package is using SPDX
tags already? Can we have some progress page or regular status update?
Vít
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119994
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119901
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-7cb6b062ff has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-7cb6b062ff
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119901
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-95464637b9 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-95464637b9
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119901
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Business-CreditCard-0. |perl-Business-CreditCard-0.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119901
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Business-CreditCard-0.
* Jan Staněk:
> Hi list,
> in order to be able to compile WASM natively on Fedora,
> I'm trying to package wasi-libc[1] to provide the Web Assembly System
> Interface.
>
> [1]: https://github.com/WebAssembly/wasi-libc
>
> My trouble is that this is in essence a cross-compilation environment,
>
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119901
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|ppi...@redhat.com |
Doc Type|---
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 1:13 PM Jan K wrote:
>
> Do I get removed, while waiting for packages to be approved ? Have been
> waiting for a year, may take another ...
Waiting for a package review for that long is definitely not something
we want to happen.
Have you tried posting on the devel
Do I get removed, while waiting for packages to be approved ? Have been
waiting for a year, may take another ...
Jan
FAS copperi
From: Ben Cotton
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2022 2:59 PM
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
Subject: Re: Inactive
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
On Mon, 2022-08-22 at 08:43 +0200, Christoph Erhardt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Sunday, 21 August 2022 17:29:56 CEST Neal Gompa wrote:
> > I don't disagree that glibc should respect what distros set, I'm
> > just
> > asking us to build glibc with a DT_HASH table added until a formal
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119882
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119882
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Socket-2.036-1.fc38
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 10:01 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 09:51:42AM -0700, John Reiser wrote:
> > > it's clear there's a documentation problem [with DT_GNU_HASH]
> > Partly due to lack of documentation, already I have seen "abuses"
>
> So what is
>
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 10:27:30AM +0200, LuK1337 wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I recently updated to prerelease F37 and to my surprise I noticed
> that ncurses-compat-libs has been removed in this change:
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ncurses/c/e9317e9.
This compat package was enabled 7 years ago.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116641
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116641
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
Hello,
I recently updated to prerelease F37 and to my surprise I noticed
that ncurses-compat-libs has been removed in this change:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ncurses/c/e9317e9.
Is there any chance that we could bring this package back? AOSP prebuilt
LLVM toolchains still depend on
On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 09:51:42AM -0700, John Reiser wrote:
> > it's clear there's a documentation problem [with DT_GNU_HASH]
> Partly due to lack of documentation, already I have seen "abuses"
So what is
https://akkadia.org/drepper/dsohowto.pdf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119882
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jples...@redhat.com,|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116641
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
At some point, we do need to wrap up the TCMS conversation. If not this week
then hopefully next week or the week after.
Tim
On 8/22/22 00:25, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting today/tomrrow. I
don't have anything much for the agenda again. There will be
Hi all,
On Sunday, 21 August 2022 17:29:56 CEST Neal Gompa wrote:
> I don't disagree that glibc should respect what distros set, I'm just
> asking us to build glibc with a DT_HASH table added until a formal
> deprecation/retirement cycle is done with all stakeholders aware of
> the change and
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting today/tomrrow. I
don't have anything much for the agenda again. There will be a
blocker review meeting, though.
If you're aware of anything it would be useful to discuss this week,
please do reply to this mail and we can run the meeting.
Thanks
85 matches
Mail list logo
