[Bug 2124507] Please branch and build perl-X11-Protocol in epel9.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124507 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 2124460] Pleadse branch and build perl-Crypt-SSLeay in epel9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124460 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from

Re: Inactive packagers to be removed after the F37 release

On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 04:14:52PM -0500, Jonathan Wright via devel wrote: > On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 3:52 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel < > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > On 06/09/2022 19:49, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > > Of course, hardware authenticators would be even more secure,

Re: Inactive packagers to be removed after the F37 release

On Tuesday, September 6, 2022 Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > mobile device > > Requires proprietary Google services. As has already been said, that's not true. Google Authenticator is far from the only software that supports the TOTP standard. -- Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns:

Re: Inactive packagers to be removed after the F37 release

On Tuesday, September 6, 2022 Michael Catanzaro wrote: > Currently I do not have any 2FA enabled > on my Fedora account I have 2FA set up on my account and it works okay. You'd use `fkinit` instead of `kinit` that requires special setup[1] to work with 2FA. It doesn't work with the GOA kerberos

Re: Inactive packagers to be removed after the F37 release

On Tuesday, September 6, 2022 Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > If > you want to enforce such a policy, find sponsors and buy devices for all > Fedora contributors. I kind of agree with this. See what PyPi is doing[1]. I don't think anyone who maintains one package should get one, but perhaps

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL: packaging multiple versions and compat packages

On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 2:22 PM Mark E. Fuller wrote: > > Hi all, > > Can someone point me to a good resource on how (if permitted) I can make > appropriate compat(?) packages to allow for two major versions of the > same package to be available? > Is this allowed for EPEL? > > Thanks > > -- >

Re: EPEL: packaging multiple versions and compat packages

On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 2:22 PM Mark E. Fuller wrote: > > Hi all, > > Can someone point me to a good resource on how (if permitted) I can make > appropriate compat(?) packages to allow for two major versions of the > same package to be available? > Is this allowed for EPEL? > > Thanks > > -- >

[Test-Announce] Fedora 37 Candidate Beta-1.5 Available Now!

According to the schedule [1], Fedora 37 Candidate Beta-1.5 is now available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation testing! For more information on release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan Test coverage information for the

Re: F38 proposal: Node.js Repackaging (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 02:28:39PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: == Benefit to Fedora == === Packager Benefits === * No more modules to maintain. * Availability of multiple Node.js versions in the buildroot means that other `nodejs-*` packages can test against multiple supported options. == Scope ==

Re: Inactive packagers to be removed after the F37 release

Jonathan, Your perspective on costs seems extremely developed-country-centric, and I'd like to suggest you check your (financial) privilege. I don't know where you're from; I'm from the US, but I am well aware of the reality of many open source contributors from countries where the exchange rate

Re: F39 proposal: Replace DNF with DNF5 (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Tue, 2022-09-06 at 14:28 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > > == Scope == > * Proposal owners: > > DNF5 is still in the development and some of the features or options > are not yet available. We still have to finish the implementation of > Modularity, storing internal data related to History and

Re: Inactive packagers to be removed after the F37 release

On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 3:52 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On 06/09/2022 19:49, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > Of course, hardware authenticators would be even more secure, and it > > sure seems pretty reasonable to expect that people with commit access to > >

Re: Inactive packagers to be removed after the F37 release

On 06/09/2022 19:49, Michael Catanzaro wrote: Of course, hardware authenticators would be even more secure, and it sure seems pretty reasonable to expect that people with commit access to Fedora packages are able to purchase a $25 or 30€ security key [1][2]. Having to pay even $25 for a hobby

Re: F39 proposal: Replace DNF with DNF5 (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 06/09/2022 20:28, Ben Cotton wrote: The new DNF5 will provide a symlink to `/usr/bin/dnf` therefore users will see the replacement as an upgrade of DNF with limited but documented syntax changes. The DNF5 will provide some compatible aliases of commands and options to improve adoption of the

[Bug 2115214] perl-Database-DumpTruck-1.2-24.fc37 FTBFS: Failed test 'Proper data was retrieved from the database' with JSON::PP 4.11

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115214 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

Re: rpm with sequoia pgp

On Tue, 2022-09-06 at 11:09 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote: > On 9/2/22 17:31, Neal H. Walfield wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > rpm 4.18 is on the horizon and includes a new OpenPGP backend based on > > Sequoia PGP. > > > >https://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.18.0 > >https://sequoia-pgp.org/ > > >

Re: Inactive packagers to be removed after the F37 release

On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 07:37:19PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 06/09/2022 18:36, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > For an OTP generating app? I don't see why it would... > > No, for FIDO2 authentication. https://github.com/ellerh/softfido But not sure how usable it is. ;) Also:

F39 proposal: Replace DNF with DNF5 (System-Wide Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReplaceDnfWithDnf5 This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved by the Fedora Engineering Steering

F38 proposal: Node.js Repackaging (Self-Contained Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NodejsRepackaging This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved by the Fedora Engineering Steering

F39 proposal: Replace DNF with DNF5 (System-Wide Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReplaceDnfWithDnf5 This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved by the Fedora Engineering Steering

F38 proposal: Node.js Repackaging (Self-Contained Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NodejsRepackaging This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved by the Fedora Engineering Steering

Re: Inactive packagers to be removed after the F37 release

On ti, 06 syys 2022, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2022-09-06 at 16:47 +, Tommy Nguyen wrote: On Tue, 2022-09-06 at 18:18 +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 06/09/2022 17:00, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > > mobile device > > Requires proprietary Google services. > > > computer > >

Re: Inactive packagers to be removed after the F37 release

On Tue, Sep 6 2022 at 10:11:54 AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: i.e. it was specifically about moving away from allowing "simple TOTP/HOTP" 2FA, as it is phishable, and requiring webauthn, of which Vitaly's points are I believe accurate. Yes indeed. That said, I *think* it could be done

Re: Thunderbird 102 pushed to F36 stable

Il 03/09/22 02:56, l...@fedoraproject.org ha scritto: > > On 2022-09-02 10:49 a.m., Mattia Verga via devel > wrote: >> Here we go again: thunderbird 102 update was submitted to F36. >> >> This new version was known to bring incompatible changes to several >> addons, yet it has been submitted to

Re: Inactive packagers to be removed after the F37 release

On 06/09/2022 18:36, Kevin Fenzi wrote: For an OTP generating app? I don't see why it would... No, for FIDO2 authentication. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: Help needed with Python fc36 build failing

On 06. 09. 22 16:52, Michael J Gruber wrote: On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 2:01 PM Sandro The current py packaging guidelines recommend the opt-in dependency generator (which uses pyproject.toml) unless EPEL 8 or non-current Fedoras are used. Should this caveat be extended to F36 and EPEL 9, or am

Re: Conditional Patch line

On 06. 09. 22 19:06, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2022-09-06 at 09:04 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: Unrelated to your question, but FWIW PatchNNN is not required, all patches can be merely "Patch: filename" and they'll get applied in the order they are listed in the spec. 勞勞勞 See

Re: Inactive packagers to be removed after the F37 release

On Tue, 2022-09-06 at 16:47 +, Tommy Nguyen wrote: > On Tue, 2022-09-06 at 18:18 +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 06/09/2022 17:00, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > > > mobile device > > > > Requires proprietary Google services. > > > > > computer > > > > Requires proprietary TPM 2.0

Re: Conditional Patch line

On Tue, 2022-09-06 at 09:04 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > Unrelated to your question, but FWIW PatchNNN is not required, all > patches can be merely "Patch: filename" and they'll get applied > in the order they are listed in the spec. 勞勞勞 -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA IRC: adamw |

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

I can take package `colm` FAS id: lorbus ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/

Re: Inactive packagers to be removed after the F37 release

On Tue, 2022-09-06 at 18:18 +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 06/09/2022 17:00, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > > mobile device > > Requires proprietary Google services. > > > computer > > Requires proprietary TPM 2.0 chip. Hi, Neither of this is true. For example, I use Raivo on my iOS

Re: Inactive packagers to be removed after the F37 release

On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 06:18:17PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 06/09/2022 17:00, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > > mobile device > > Requires proprietary Google services. For an OTP generating app? I don't see why it would... https://search.f-droid.org/?q=otp=en are all open source,

[Bug 2124631] New: perl-JSON-Path-1.0.2 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124631 Bug ID: 2124631 Summary: perl-JSON-Path-1.0.2 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-JSON-Path Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: Inactive packagers to be removed after the F37 release

On 06/09/2022 17:00, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: mobile device Requires proprietary Google services. computer Requires proprietary TPM 2.0 chip. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

I'm happy to help maintain the python packages. FAS: jonathanspw On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 11:00 AM Ankur Sinha wrote: > I've taken a few more (a few for the neuro-sig): > > > Depending on: mcpanel (1), status change: 2022-08-30 (0 weeks ago) > > eegview (maintained by: aekoroglu,

[Bug 2124508] Please branch and build perl-X11-Protocol-Other in epel9.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124508 Jonathan Wright changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||2107786 Referenced Bugs:

[Bug 2124507] Please branch and build perl-X11-Protocol in epel9.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124507 Jonathan Wright changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||2107786 Referenced Bugs:

Re: Inactive packagers to be removed after the F37 release

On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 8:40 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 06/09/2022 10:26, Ondrej Mosnáček wrote: > > This is just not true. Anyone with an Android or iOS device can set up > > a software token via FreeOTP [1]. > > I'm OK with software 2FA authenticators, but they want to force

Re: Help needed with Python fc36 build failing

> On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 2:01 PM Sandro > > pyproject does not work well, and is not backwards compatible. This is > particularly a problem for EPEL ports from Fedora. Personally, I'd > like to see it fixed for EPEL before relying on it for anything in > Fedora. The current py packaging

Fedora 37 compose report: 20220906.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-37-20220905.n.0 NEW: Fedora-37-20220906.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:27 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:82.59 MiB Size

Re: hardened memory allocate port to linux-fedora system for secutiry

On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 9:14 AM Carlos O'Donell wrote: > (2) Switching the default vs. improving the default. > A third option (or maybe it's an improvement to the default?), since the choice of allocators seems to come up consistently, could be to consider seriously (and is likely not a trivial

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

[Bug 2124543] perl-SOAP-WSDL-3.004-11.fc38 FTBFS: Can't locate CGI.pm in @INC at t/SOAP/WSDL/Server/Simple.t line 6

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124543 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Bauer --- Thanks for the heads up. I am travelling for work this week and will look into this later, as time allows. Thank you. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 2124543] perl-SOAP-WSDL-3.004-11.fc38 FTBFS: Can't locate CGI.pm in @INC at t/SOAP/WSDL/Server/Simple.t line 6

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124543 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- > It looks that some dependency stopped pulling perl-CGI It was an upstream change in perl-Template-Toolkit-3.101-1.fc38 :

[Bug 2124543] New: perl-SOAP-WSDL-3.004-11.fc38 FTBFS: Can't locate CGI.pm in @INC at t/SOAP/WSDL/Server/Simple.t line 6

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124543 Bug ID: 2124543 Summary: perl-SOAP-WSDL-3.004-11.fc38 FTBFS: Can't locate CGI.pm in @INC at t/SOAP/WSDL/Server/Simple.t line 6 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide URL:

[Bug 2124508] Please branch and build perl-X11-Protocol-Other in epel9.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124508 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added CC|jples...@redhat.com,|

[Bug 2124507] Please branch and build perl-X11-Protocol in epel9.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124507 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||2124508 Referenced Bugs:

[Bug 2124537] perl-HTML-FormFu-Element-reCAPTCHA-1.00-25.fc38 FTBFS: t/recaptcha.t fails with perl-HTML-Tiny-1.07-1.fc38

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124537 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Link ID||Red Hat Bugzilla 2124499 --- Comment #1

[Bug 2124537] New: perl-HTML-FormFu-Element-reCAPTCHA-1.00-25.fc38 FTBFS: t/recaptcha.t fails with perl-HTML-Tiny-1.07-1.fc38

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124537 Bug ID: 2124537 Summary: perl-HTML-FormFu-Element-reCAPTCHA-1.00-25.fc38 FTBFS: t/recaptcha.t fails with perl-HTML-Tiny-1.07-1.fc38 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide

[Bug 2124507] Please branch and build perl-X11-Protocol in epel9.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124507 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value

[Bug 2124499] perl-Captcha-reCAPTCHA-0.99-6.fc38 FTBFS: t/10.get_html.t fails with perl-HTML-Tiny-1.07-1.fc38

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124499 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|---

Re: Thunderbird 102 pushed to F36 stable

W dniu 3.09.2022 o 10:47, Demi Marie Obenour pisze: On 9/3/22 04:42, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: W dniu 3.09.2022 o 02:56, l...@fedoraproject.org pisze: Which addons are incompatible? Additionally, use "Addon Compatibility Check" for the purpose. The best practice is to contact these addons

[Bug 2124499] perl-Captcha-reCAPTCHA-0.99-6.fc38 FTBFS: t/10.get_html.t fails with perl-HTML-Tiny-1.07-1.fc38

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124499 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-Captcha-reCAPTCHA-0.99

[Bug 2115214] perl-Database-DumpTruck-1.2-24.fc37 FTBFS: Failed test 'Proper data was retrieved from the database' with JSON::PP 4.11

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115214 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 2124499] perl-Captcha-reCAPTCHA-0.99-6.fc38 FTBFS: t/10.get_html.t fails with perl-HTML-Tiny-1.07-1.fc38

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124499 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Link ID||CPAN 144224 Status|NEW

[Bug 2124508] New: Please branch and build perl-X11-Protocol-Other in epel9.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124508 Bug ID: 2124508 Summary: Please branch and build perl-X11-Protocol-Other in epel9. Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Status: NEW Component:

[Bug 2124507] New: Please branch and build perl-X11-Protocol in epel9.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124507 Bug ID: 2124507 Summary: Please branch and build perl-X11-Protocol in epel9. Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Status: NEW Component: perl-X11-Protocol Assignee:

Re: Orphaned various packages (GNOME / GObject libraries)

Fabio Valentini wrote on 2022/09/06 18:45: Hi all, Since the Pantheon desktop will not be available on Fedora 37+ for the foreseeable future (libsoup3pocalypse etc.), I am no longer interested in maintaining some of its dependencies or "shared" components that are still used by existing

[Bug 2102597] Add perl-DBIx-Class to EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102597 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 2102581] Add perl-SQL-Abstract to EPEL9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102581 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from

[rpms/perl-Database-DumpTruck] PR #2: Fix JSON comparison in tests

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Database-DumpTruck` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Fix JSON comparison in tests `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Database-DumpTruck/pull-request/2 ___ perl-devel

[Bug 2124499] New: perl-Captcha-reCAPTCHA-0.99-6.fc38 FTBFS: t/10.get_html.t fails with perl-HTML-Tiny-1.07-1.fc38

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124499 Bug ID: 2124499 Summary: perl-Captcha-reCAPTCHA-0.99-6.fc38 FTBFS: t/10.get_html.t fails with perl-HTML-Tiny-1.07-1.fc38 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide URL:

Re: Orphaned various packages (GNOME / GObject libraries)

On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 11:47 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > I expect that editorconfig, graphite2, libcloudproviders to be picked > up by GNOME package maintainers, since they're dependencies of core > GNOME or Fedora Workstation components (CC @kalev). > Thanks! I picked up those 3. -- Kalev

Orphaned various packages (GNOME / GObject libraries)

Hi all, Since the Pantheon desktop will not be available on Fedora 37+ for the foreseeable future (libsoup3pocalypse etc.), I am no longer interested in maintaining some of its dependencies or "shared" components that are still used by existing applications and some other GObject libraries, and

Re: F38 proposal: Minizip renaming (Self-Contained Change proposal)

Hi guys, Thank you so much for the feedback. Let's wrap it up... 1) We will not rename the current "minizip-compat" to "minizip". 2) The Obsolete in the "minizip-ng" package will look like this: "Obsoletes: minizip < 3.0.3" It shouldn't affect the "minizip-compat" because we won't rename that

Re: Conditional Patch line

On 05. 09. 22 21:58, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 09:56:58PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: On Monday, 05 September 2022 at 21:42, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: I have a downstream patch[0] which -- I don't really understand why -- breaks riscv64 builds but is

Re: Conditional Patch line

> On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 09:56:58PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > wrote: > > There are 26 patches so that's a bit of a PITA. Is there not an > easier way? > > Rich. Try using autopatch. # Apply patches up to #1000 from this spec. %autopatch -M1000 -p1

[rpms/perl-Database-DumpTruck] PR #2: Fix JSON comparison in tests

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Database-DumpTruck` that you are following: `` Fix JSON comparison in tests `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Database-DumpTruck/pull-request/2 ___

[Bug 2124460] Pleadse branch and build perl-Crypt-SSLeay in epel9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124460 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 2123834] perl-Log-Log4perl-1.56 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123834 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 2124241] perl-PAR-Packer-1.056 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124241 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 2124002] perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.84 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124002 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-6f0397b5b9 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing

[Bug 2123496] perl-Verilog-Perl-3.480 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123496 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from

[rpms/perl-Database-DumpTruck] PR #1: Fix JSON comparison in tests

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Database-DumpTruck` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Fix JSON comparison in tests `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Database-DumpTruck/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel

Re: Inactive packagers to be removed after the F37 release

On 06/09/2022 10:26, Ondrej Mosnáček wrote: This is just not true. Anyone with an Android or iOS device can set up a software token via FreeOTP [1]. I'm OK with software 2FA authenticators, but they want to force everyone to use Fido2 compatible hardware tokens. $50/each. -- Sincerely,

[Bug 2115214] perl-Database-DumpTruck-1.2-24.fc37 FTBFS: Failed test 'Proper data was retrieved from the database' with JSON::PP 4.11

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115214 Michal Josef Spacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from

Re: Inactive packagers to be removed after the F37 release

On Sun, Sep 4, 2022 at 7:30 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote: > And anybody who isn't > willing to buy a security key wouldn't be able to contribute to Fedora > at all. This is just not true. Anyone with an Android or iOS device can set up a software token via FreeOTP [1]. Sure, security-wise it's not

[rpms/perl-Database-DumpTruck] PR #1: Fix JSON comparison in tests

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Database-DumpTruck` that you are following: `` Fix JSON comparison in tests `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Database-DumpTruck/pull-request/1 ___

[Bug 2124460] New: Pleadse branch and build perl-Crypt-SSLeay in epel9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124460 Bug ID: 2124460 Summary: Pleadse branch and build perl-Crypt-SSLeay in epel9 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Status: NEW Component: perl-Crypt-SSLeay Assignee:

[Bug 2124459] New: Please branch and build perl-Net-OpenSSH in epel9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124459 Bug ID: 2124459 Summary: Please branch and build perl-Net-OpenSSH in epel9 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Status: NEW Component: perl-Net-OpenSSH Assignee:

Re: rpm with sequoia pgp

On 9/2/22 17:31, Neal H. Walfield wrote: Hi all, rpm 4.18 is on the horizon and includes a new OpenPGP backend based on Sequoia PGP. https://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.18.0 https://sequoia-pgp.org/ Thanks to Fabio Valentini (decathorpe) for packaging not only rpm-sequoia, but all of the

Re: Conditional Patch line

On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 08:42:34PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > I have a downstream patch[0] which -- I don't really understand why -- > breaks riscv64 builds but is necessary for primary Fedora arches. Is > it correct to do: > > %ifnarch riscv64 > Patch123: downstream.patch > %endif

Re: Users with commit rights in src.fp.o but no more in packager group

Dne 06. 09. 22 v 9:20 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): Dne 06. 09. 22 v 0:25 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 12:13:26PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 05. 09. 22 11:07, Vít Ondruch wrote: Apart from that, I don't think that the pseudo-users or group ownership would work. I saw a good

Re: Users with commit rights in src.fp.o but no more in packager group

Dne 06. 09. 22 v 0:25 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 12:13:26PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 05. 09. 22 11:07, Vít Ondruch wrote: Apart from that, I don't think that the pseudo-users or group ownership would work. I saw a good amount of people giving the packages to some

[Bug 2124241] perl-PAR-Packer-1.056 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124241 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-17d08918fc has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-17d08918fc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 2124241] perl-PAR-Packer-1.056 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124241 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

Re: hardened malloc is big and slow

On Mon, 2022-09-05 at 22:45 -0400, Daniel Micay via devel wrote: > The comparison is being done incorrectly. Since hardened_malloc > builds > both a lightweight and heavyweight library by default, and since I > already explained this and that the lightweight library still has > optional security

[Bug 2123834] perl-Log-Log4perl-1.56 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123834 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-06a3d23d80 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-06a3d23d80 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list