WebKitGTK package naming

2022-09-11 Thread Kevin Kofler via devel
Hi, the latest webkitgtk package now uses the following subpackage names: * webkit2gtk4.0 and webkit2gtk4.1 are for GTK 3, * webkit2gtk5.0 are for GTK 4. As you can see, the WebKitGTK soversion ends up appended to "gtk", making it look like the package targets a different (higher) GTK version

[Bug 2124631] perl-JSON-Path-1.0.2 is available

2022-09-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124631 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Doc Type|---

[Bug 2122095] perl-DBIx-Connector-0.58 is available

2022-09-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2122095 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

Re: I made a new Fedora Apps page, do you want it?

2022-09-11 Thread Jakub Kadlcik
Thank you for the feedback Stan, > I use a dark theme, and I prefer the gray text only approach of the > current page to the bright white circles with black text of your > approach. I think that is partly to do with the text size difference > (your text is smaller). I use light themes so this

Re: SSL CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED?

2022-09-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, Sep 11, 2022 at 12:31:34PM -0500, Ron Olson wrote: > Hey all- > > When trying to do a `fedpkg update`, I got this response: > > ``` > Could not execute update: Could not generate update request: {"status": > "error", "errors": [{"location": "body", "name": "builds", "description": >

SSL CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED?

2022-09-11 Thread Ron Olson
Hey all- When trying to do a `fedpkg update`, I got this response: ``` Could not execute update: Could not generate update request: {"status": "error", "errors": [{"location": "body", "name": "builds", "description": "Unable to create update. [SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] certificate

Re: Bump f38 .so for libid3tag

2022-09-11 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Wednesday, 31 August 2022 at 17:06, Leigh Scott wrote: > I have patched to add the unversioned .so > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libid3tag/c/607d7abf709add3e39690adfd3aef871c50d37c2?branch=rawhide > > I don't think there is a need to rebuild dependant packages. > > > [leigh@mpd

Fedora 37 compose report: 20220911.n.0 changes

2022-09-11 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-37-20220910.n.0 NEW: Fedora-37-20220911.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Re: Troubleshooting EPEL 8 build

2022-09-11 Thread Otto Liljalaakso
9. syyskuuta 2022 15.58.26 GMT+03:00 Ron Olson kirjoitti: > >Also, on a related note, what is the protocol for having one platform >fail to build, while the others do? Is it okay to submit the >Fedora/EPEL-9 builds to production, or is it more of a all-or-nothing >kind of thing? I’ve been taking

[Bug 2122095] perl-DBIx-Connector-0.58 is available

2022-09-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2122095 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from