Hi,
the latest webkitgtk package now uses the following subpackage names:
* webkit2gtk4.0 and webkit2gtk4.1 are for GTK 3,
* webkit2gtk5.0 are for GTK 4.
As you can see, the WebKitGTK soversion ends up appended to "gtk", making it
look like the package targets a different (higher) GTK version
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124631
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2122095
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
Thank you for the feedback Stan,
> I use a dark theme, and I prefer the gray text only approach of the
> current page to the bright white circles with black text of your
> approach. I think that is partly to do with the text size difference
> (your text is smaller).
I use light themes so this
On Sun, Sep 11, 2022 at 12:31:34PM -0500, Ron Olson wrote:
> Hey all-
>
> When trying to do a `fedpkg update`, I got this response:
>
> ```
> Could not execute update: Could not generate update request: {"status":
> "error", "errors": [{"location": "body", "name": "builds", "description":
>
Hey all-
When trying to do a `fedpkg update`, I got this response:
```
Could not execute update: Could not generate update request: {"status":
"error", "errors": [{"location": "body", "name": "builds",
"description": "Unable to create update. [SSL:
CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] certificate
On Wednesday, 31 August 2022 at 17:06, Leigh Scott wrote:
> I have patched to add the unversioned .so
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libid3tag/c/607d7abf709add3e39690adfd3aef871c50d37c2?branch=rawhide
>
> I don't think there is a need to rebuild dependant packages.
>
>
> [leigh@mpd
OLD: Fedora-37-20220910.n.0
NEW: Fedora-37-20220911.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
9. syyskuuta 2022 15.58.26 GMT+03:00 Ron Olson
kirjoitti:
>
>Also, on a related note, what is the protocol for having one platform
>fail to build, while the others do? Is it okay to submit the
>Fedora/EPEL-9 builds to production, or is it more of a all-or-nothing
>kind of thing? I’ve been taking
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2122095
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
10 matches
Mail list logo