The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing
libopenmpt-0.6.5-1.el7
Details about builds:
libopenmpt-0.6.5-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-746c40ab19)
C/C++ library to decode tracker music
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
60 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-89ad385971
chromium-103.0.5060.114-1.el8
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-cd091ab1b1
libconfuse-3.3-7.el8
4
Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
> IMHO it is much better to find out earlier that your printer does not
> work/is missing some options when printing via printer application and
> report it, than later just cry in beer that there wasn't enough time to
> test.
There will be complaints either way, even with
Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> Starting from 3.3.0 and only for Rawhide, initial Wayland support is
> enabled for testing purpose using libdecor for window decoration
> (currently generic) [2] and running on EGL.
>
> [https://developer.blender.org/rB29755e1df82e34061a0b0586234a5aaac5177d35
Looking at
The release monitoring project for libXft
(https://release-monitoring.org/project/1777/)
doesn't appear to have noticed the release of 2.3.6 a week ago.
Any clues on how to fix this?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
Linux Fedora 5.17.5-300.fc36.x86_64 ...
btrfs-progs v5.16.2
Label: 'fedora-LIVE' uuid: ...
Total device 1 FS size 5.1 GB
devid 1 39GB used 6.52 GB path /dev/sda2
unable to mount device to get output
Any help would be appreciated to recover the data.
Use /usr/bin/nc to copy
On 9/17/22 15:17, Brian Clark wrote:
About a 2 weeks ago using VirtualBox I started up a Fedora 36
Workstation, then start making a ruby on rails web app. This evening
when I started up the project file I only got to emergency mode
because the filesystem is not mountable. I did a quick google
Hello,
About a 2 weeks ago using VirtualBox I started up a Fedora 36
Workstation, then start making a ruby on rails web app. This evening
when I started up the project file I only got to emergency mode
because the filesystem is not mountable. I did a quick google search
on the error and found
On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 11:15:40AM +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
> OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220916.n.0
> NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220917.n.0
On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 12:51:42PM +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
> OLD: Fedora-37-20220916.n.0
> NEW: Fedora-37-20220917.n.0
I'd
R-lifecycle license changed from GPLv3 to MIT
--
Ali Erdinc Koroglu
Linux OS Systems Engineering
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
OLD: Fedora-37-20220916.n.0
NEW: Fedora-37-20220917.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 63
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 417.44 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220916.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220917.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 180
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 13.02 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
Hello Pythonistas,
after almost exactly 6 years, the FAS groups for Python SIG have changed.
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/5478
The @python-packagers-sig group is now used to track permissions in dist-git.
Treat this as you treated @python-sig until now.
5 years ago, we
mkdocs and python-mkdocs-redirects are now retired for rawhide and f37.
Sandro
On 16.09.22 01:56, Ben Beasley wrote:
I support this plan, and I will retire mkdocs-markdownextradata-plugin as well.
– Ben Beasley (FAS music)
On Thu, Sep 15, 2022, at 4:14 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
I'm
Tommy Nguyen kirjoitti 17.9.2022 klo 10.44:
On Sat, 2022-09-17 at 10:40 +0300, Otto Liljalaakso wrote:
Leigh Scott kirjoitti 17.9.2022 klo 10.27:
On Thu, 2022-09-15 at 22:42 +0300, Otto Liljalaakso wrote:
I found this:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6410#c1
Again, not a very
On Sat, 2022-09-17 at 10:40 +0300, Otto Liljalaakso wrote:
> Leigh Scott kirjoitti 17.9.2022 klo 10.27:
> > > On Thu, 2022-09-15 at 22:42 +0300, Otto Liljalaakso wrote:
> > >
> > > I found this:
> > > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6410#c1
> > >
> > > Again, not a very friendly
Leigh Scott kirjoitti 17.9.2022 klo 10.27:
On Thu, 2022-09-15 at 22:42 +0300, Otto Liljalaakso wrote:
I found this: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6410#c1
Again, not a very friendly response. The short is that they are
currently in freeze so no action can be taken ATM.
I did
Ben Cotton kirjoitti 6.9.2022 klo 21.28:
== Summary ==
Make DNF5 the new default packaging tool. The change will replace DNF,
LIBDNF, and DNF-AUTOMATIC with the new DNF5 and new Libdnf5 library.
== Upgrade/compatibility impact ==
The new DNF5 will obsolete `dnf`, `yum`, `dnf-automatic`,
> On Thu, 2022-09-15 at 22:42 +0300, Otto Liljalaakso wrote:
>
> I found this: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6410#c1
>
> Again, not a very friendly response. The short is that they are
> currently in freeze so no action can be taken ATM.
The rpmfusion f36 release repo isn't
Tommy Nguyen kirjoitti 16.9.2022 klo 6.51:
On Thu, 2022-09-15 at 22:42 +0300, Otto Liljalaakso wrote:
RPM Fusion Fedora 37 repository seems to be all SHA256 already.
Thanks for doing the research. I plan on upgrading to the F37 beta
soon. Have you done so already and what are your results?
20 matches
Mail list logo
