The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-1b4c7ee66c
knot-resolver-5.5.3-1.el7
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing
nordugrid-arc6-6.16.1-1.el7
I've really been enjoying using the dashboard, it's pointed out things that
I quite frankly forgot about.
For python-pyside2 though it's showing FTBFS at the source level due to
qt5-qtwebengine not being built for ppc64le and s390x, but I have a
%ifnarch conditional removing it from the build
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2127069
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Log-Report-1.34-1.fc38 |perl-Log-Report-1.34-1.fc38
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2127069
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Log-Report-1.34-1.fc38 |perl-Log-Report-1.34-1.fc38
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126978
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Regexp-Grammars-1.058- |perl-Regexp-Grammars-1.058-
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220921.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220923.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 14
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 286
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 51.59 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2127738
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Time-Warp-0.55-1.fc38 |perl-Time-Warp-0.55-1.fc38
On Fri, 2022-09-23 at 22:39 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-09-19 at 09:08 +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Sep 2022 13:42:42 +
> > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 03:35:29PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > > * Zbigniew
On Mon, 2022-09-19 at 09:08 +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Sep 2022 13:42:42 +
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 03:35:29PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > * Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
> > >
> > > > So… we certainly don't want people having to
On Fri, 23 Sept 2022 at 16:28, Nick Jahn wrote:
> Just deleted the files, and retried it, and now I'm getting this.
>
>
# dnf remove epel-release
then
# dnf install
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/epel-release-latest-9.noarch.rpm -y
> [root@*hiden* yum.repos.d]# dnf install
>
El El vie, 23 de septiembre de 2022 a la(s) 3:30 p.m., Stephen Smoogen <
ssmoo...@redhat.com> escribió:
>
>
> On Fri, 23 Sept 2022 at 16:23, Nick Jahn wrote:
>
>> Yep that is the one, it gave me the repo file that resulted in this.
>>
>>
> OK something is wrong with what you got. I just did it
On Fri, 23 Sept 2022 at 16:23, Nick Jahn wrote:
> Yep that is the one, it gave me the repo file that resulted in this.
>
>
OK something is wrong with what you got. I just did it and the file should
look like the following after it was installed:
```
[epel]
name=Extra Packages for Enterprise
Just deleted the files, and retried it, and now I'm getting this.
[root@*hiden* yum.repos.d]# dnf install
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/epel-release-latest-9.noarch.rpm -y
Updating Subscription Management repositories.
created by dnf config-manager from
Yep that is the one, it gave me the repo file that resulted in this.
Nicholas Jahn
IT professional
A.S. Network Specialist (www.madisoncollege.edu)
From: Stephen Smoogen
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2022 2:38 PM
To: EPEL Development List
Subject: [EPEL-devel] Re:
On Fri, 23 Sept 2022 at 15:09, Nick Jahn wrote:
> Brand new server, followed guide from EPEL setting it up, first added repo
> to server.
>
>
Hmmm, which guide to setting EPEL up has this? The one that should be used
is at https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/#_el9 and I will sort of
copy
On September 23, 2022 10:00:49 PM GMT+03:00, Nick Jahn
wrote:
>Brand new server, followed guide from EPEL setting it up, first added repo to
>server.
>
>Tried your suggestion, and I get this.
>
>bash: cd: /etc/yum/repos.d/: No such file or directory
>
Troy said "yum.repos.d"
wolfy
--
Brand new server, followed guide from EPEL setting it up, first added repo to
server.
Tried your suggestion, and I get this.
bash: cd: /etc/yum/repos.d/: No such file or directory
Nicholas Jahn
IT professional
A.S. Network Specialist (www.madisoncollege.edu)
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 10:37 AM Nick Jahn wrote:
> Errors during downloading metadata for repository
> 'dl.fedoraproject.org_pub_epel_9_x86_64_':
> - Status code: 404 for
> https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/9/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml (IP:
> 38.145.60.24)
> Error: Failed to download
Errors during downloading metadata for repository
'dl.fedoraproject.org_pub_epel_9_x86_64_':
- Status code: 404 for
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/9/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml (IP:
38.145.60.24)
Error: Failed to download metadata for repo
'dl.fedoraproject.org_pub_epel_9_x86_64_':
Hi
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 9:50 AM Jaroslav Mracek wrote:
> Correct, the modular filtering is not yet implemented and this is the last
> blocker for rawhide release.
>
Quick notes from what I am seeing with limiting testing using the copr repo
* Performance is much better
* Search seems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129398
Bug ID: 2129398
Summary: perl-DateTimeX-Easy-0.091 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-DateTimeX-Easy
Keywords: FutureFeature,
Fabio Valentini writes:
> - obs-build-0:20220812-393.9.1.fc36 > obs-build-0:20211125-376.1.3.fc37
Whoops, my bad… Build is running right now.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Hi all,
Yup, it's that time of the semi-year again. Included below is the list
of package downgrades from Fedora 36 -> Fedora 37 as of today (split
into two lists: one only considering the package's Version tag, and
one looking at the entire NEVR).
There's a lot of golang and python downgrades,
On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 11:27 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 4:13 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
> >
> > We are working on this and hope to have an update soon.
> >
>
> Well, we just released the Beta and people have noticed that this is
> still broken. Do we have an ETA on a fix?
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 8:00 AM wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>ELN SIG on 2022-09-23 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern
>At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
>
> The meeting will be about:
We don't currently have an agenda, so I think we'll skip this
Correct, the modular filtering is not yet implemented and this is the last
blocker for rawhide release.
Jaroslav Mracek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora
> Ben Cotton kirjoitti 6.9.2022 klo 21.28:
>
>
> These two are the only mentions of dnf-automatic in this change. What
> does "replace" mean here? How does DNF5 cover dnf-automatic's use case?
This is a good question. We will replace the functionality, but it is still on
our TODO list,
Hi all,
I plan to retire rust-ffsend (a "Firefox Send" client) from Fedora 37+
before the start of the Final Freeze. I recently discovered that the
official Firefox Send servers have been offline since 2020 and that
ffsend has been using "unofficial" third-party servers since then,
which is not
OLD: Fedora-37-20220922.n.2
NEW: Fedora-37-20220923.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
Hi everyone,
This is a weekly report from the CPE (Community Platform Engineering) Team.
The report could be found at
https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/cpe-weekly-update---week-38-2022/.
If you want to receive weekly reports by emails in the future, please
subscribe to either
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129091
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
31 matches
Mail list logo
