https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129547
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-8f231fe62c has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129398
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-ffbf76cc4b has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129741
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-5391913e70 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129537
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-88b38b58ef has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129132
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-db22cc7e05 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129398
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-05fe5e5848 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-1b4c7ee66c
knot-resolver-5.5.3-1.el7
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing
perl-DateTimeX-Easy-0.091-1.el7
Details about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129398
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-b7678961ff has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
12 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-9d8794e452
ImageMagick-6.9.12.63-1.el8
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-6a12c208cf
snakeyaml-1.32-1.el8
3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129857
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129132
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129741
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129398
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129547
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2128614
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-538c152734 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
Sorry for the delay in my reply here. ;(
Some questions:
> * Release engineering: [https://pagure.io/releng/issues #Releng issue number]
no releng ticket? :(
releng depends on dnf4 for a LOT of scripts.
We will need a lot of help moving those to dnf5 I am sure.
A porting guide for the
Hi Pythonians,
I have a favor to ask. I'm trying to package scikit-misc as a dependency
for plotnine (for neuro-sig).
The build fails with:
fatal error: longintrepr.h: No such file or directory
I'm aware of the fact that the file has been moved in Python 3.11, but
was under the impression
On 26-09-2022 20:52, Robby Callicotte via devel wrote:
I will also closehttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129584
since this is already in ruby. I simply did a search in
src.fedoraproject.org and did not see this package. Sorry bout
that.
Searching on
OLD: Fedora-37-20220925.n.0
NEW: Fedora-37-20220926.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:3
Upgraded packages: 103
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 36.96 KiB
Size of dropped packages:45.67 MiB
On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 9:12 PM Rich Mattes wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm planning on upgrading tinyxml2 to version 9 in rawhide in the coming
> week, which will include a soname bump. Affected packages are:
>
> Macaulay2-0:1.19.1-2.fc37.src
> bullet-0:3.08-3.fc36.src
> cppcheck-0:2.7.4-1.fc37.src
>
As a reminder to the community, we've reached the point in the year
where jurisdictions around the world begin or end summer time. Be sure
to check your recurring meetings on Fedocal[1] to make sure you know
when you're meeting. Some meetings are set to a fixed time UTC and
others are set to a
Robby Callicotte via devel kirjoitti 26.9.2022 klo 21.52:
I will also close https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129584 since
this is already in ruby. I simply did a search in src.fedoraproject.org and
did not see this package. Sorry bout that.
Querying the repositories can be a
On Monday, September 26, 2022 2:41:14 AM CDT Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Hi Robby,
>
> Do you by a chance have repository, e.g. in Copr, of all the things you
> eventually want import into Fedora? Or bugzilla tracker for kitchen-salt
> / test-kitchen which all the reviews would be blocked against? I
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora-IoT 37 RC 20220926.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
On the security topic, just figured I would share here, as it does go into the
whole, "make sure your code is signed, and end users don't bypass the security
checks".
https://www.darkreading.com/attacks-breaches/cisa-zoho-manageengine-rce-bug-under-active-exploit
That is a very good point.
I think the following are better steps
rpm --import https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/RPM-GPG-KEY-EPEL-9
dnf install
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/epel-release-latest-9.noarch.rpm
Troy
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 10:28 AM Nick Jahn wrote:
> Wouldn't it be
Wouldn't it be a better option to show in the documentation how to download and
install the GPG key first, so you don't have to use the nogpgcheck option?
Security people like secure options better. ?
Nicholas Jahn
IT professional
A.S. Network Specialist (www.madisoncollege.edu)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129857
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
I was able to reproduce the error.
If you do a RHEL install, and select a security profile, it will
automatically turn on gpg checking for everything.[1]
You then get the error you were showing.
To get around this you need to add the --nogpgcheck option
dnf install --nogpgcheck
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129857
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
I will wipe out this VM, and re-install RHEL 9 and see if it happens again. I
already know it isn't security based issues, as none of my systems caught
anything (I'm a Security Architect), and I was able to download the GPG key
using WGET, and install it using RPM --import.
I'm fairly certain
On Mon, 26 Sept 2022 at 09:31, Nick Jahn wrote:
> Tried that, still getting GPG check FAILED. It seems that the security key
> is not getting deployed correctly.
>
> I manually went to the EPEL repo path
> https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/ and found the EPEL 9 Key,
> downloaded it and
Tried that, still getting GPG check FAILED. It seems that the security key is
not getting deployed correctly.
I manually went to the EPEL repo path https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/
and found the EPEL 9 Key, downloaded it and installed the key, and now the
connection is working. The
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129857
Bug ID: 2129857
Summary: Please provide perl-Text-Format for EPEL-9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Text-Format
Assignee:
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129741
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-b1b30e818d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-b1b30e818d
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
On Monday, September 26, 2022 4:27:47 AM CDT Miro Hrončok wrote:
> python-w3lib orphan 2 weeks
> ago
I have taken this package.
--
Robby Callicotte
He/His
Timezone: US/Central
___
devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129741
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-00fc32f686 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-00fc32f686
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129741
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-5391913e70 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-5391913e70
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129741
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-RT-Client-REST-0.70-1.
Hello everyone,
Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday 26th
September(today!) at 1300UTC in #fedora-neuro on Matrix or IRC (Libera.chat).
The meeting is a public meeting, and open for everyone to attend. You
can join us over:
Matrix:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129547
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-5cfa1a5b38 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-5cfa1a5b38
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129547
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-8f231fe62c has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-8f231fe62c
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129547
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-8f231fe62c has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-8f231fe62c
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220925.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220926.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 49
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 8.21 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129547
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.54
ufo2ft, pt-astra-sans-font and pt-astra-serif-font were created in
error, the repositories have incorrect names. It seems empty/replicated
repositories cannot be deleted.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
Hello,
I plan to retire PyPy 3.7 (pypy3.7) from Fedora 37+. The latest/last release of
it happened in March and I'd like to avoid the need to backport security fixes
to it for more 14ish months.
If there is a high demand (unlikely) it can always be added back after GA, but
it cannot be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129537
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-88b38b58ef has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-88b38b58ef
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129537
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Test-Most-0.38-1.fc38
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129547
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|iarn...@gmail.com, |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129537
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129741
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129398
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-05fe5e5848 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-05fe5e5848
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129398
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-b7678961ff has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-b7678961ff
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129398
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-1a381d5003 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-1a381d5003
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129398
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-b5a83114ee has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-b5a83114ee
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129398
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-ffbf76cc4b has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-ffbf76cc4b
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129537
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|jples...@redhat.com |p...@city-fan.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129398
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-DateTimeX-Easy-0.091-1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129398
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|ppi...@redhat.com |
Status|NEW
Hau idatzi du Miro Hrončok (mhron...@redhat.com) erabiltzaileak (2022
ira. 26, al. (11:28)):
>
> golang-github-gofrs-flock go-sig, orphan 0 weeks ago
I took this one and also added eclipseo as co-admin.
Mikel
___
devel mailing
* Miro Hrončok [26/09/2022 11:27] :
>
> perl-PatchReader orphan 1 weeks ago
I have taken this since Bugzilla requires it, last time I checked.
Emmanuel
___
perl-devel mailing list --
* Miro Hrončok [26/09/2022 11:27] :
>
> perl-PatchReader orphan 1 weeks ago
I have taken this since Bugzilla requires it, last time I checked.
Emmanuel
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129741
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
perl-RT-Client-REST-0.70-1.fc36.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=92345636
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129741
Bug ID: 2129741
Summary: perl-RT-Client-REST-0.70 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-RT-Client-REST
Keywords: FutureFeature,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129741
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1914317
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1914317=edit
Update to 0.70 (#2129741)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
Hi Robby,
Do you by a chance have repository, e.g. in Copr, of all the things you
eventually want import into Fedora? Or bugzilla tracker for kitchen-salt
/ test-kitchen which all the reviews would be blocked against? I am
asking, because introducing bigger component into Fedora might be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129132
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-db22cc7e05 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-db22cc7e05
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129132
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-f526a1b8b6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-f526a1b8b6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129132
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129132
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|iarn...@gmail.com, |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2128850
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
74 matches
Mail list logo
