Re: [side tags] Undesired automatic side-tag removal happened - how to deal with it in the future?

2022-10-10 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Oh, also I forgot to mention... If your sidetag is deleted, you can just request a new one, tag the old builds back into it and be back in business. I realize that that could be anoying if you told people a specific one and then had to make a new one, but it's not like those builds are lost.

Re: [side tags] Undesired automatic side-tag removal happened - how to deal with it in the future?

2022-10-10 Thread Kevin Fenzi
So, just to add some data... sidetags are cleaned up via a cron job that calls: /usr/sbin/koji-sidetag-cleanup --empty-delay=14 --old-delay=30 So, it should have only deleted it if it was empty after 14 days, but it looks like it deleted it with things tagged into it. ;( Would you be willing

[Bug 2133562] New: perl-URI-5.14 is available

2022-10-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133562 Bug ID: 2133562 Summary: perl-URI-5.14 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-URI Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2022-10-10 Thread Sandro
On 10-10-2022 10:31, Miro Hrončok wrote: brewtargetorphan Taken. "Open source and home-brewed beer...two great things that go great together!" [linux.com] What could possibly go wrong... Co-brewers welcome! New brew for rawhide coming soon. Cheers!

[Bug 2133140] perl-Term-ProgressBar-2.23 is available

2022-10-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133140 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-0602c5ab84 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-0602c5ab84 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 2133140] perl-Term-ProgressBar-2.23 is available

2022-10-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133140 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[rpms/perl-Term-ProgressBar] PR #1: Tests

2022-10-10 Thread Jitka Plesnikova
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Term-ProgressBar` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Tests `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Term-ProgressBar/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2022-10-10 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 10. 10. 22 21:05, Lyes Saadi wrote: Does anyone know what happened to python-yapsy? https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2866 -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

[rpms/perl-Term-ProgressBar] PR #1: Tests

2022-10-10 Thread Jitka Plesnikova
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Term-ProgressBar` that you are following: `` Tests `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Term-ProgressBar/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2022-10-10 Thread Lyes Saadi
Does anyone know what happened to python-yapsy? I'm considering taking it if no one else wants to, since I have a package in COPR depending on it. Regards, Lyes Saadi Le 10/10/2022 à 10:31, Miro Hrončok a écrit : The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned

Re: Capstone (was: Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers)

2022-10-10 Thread Jonathan Wright via devel
I have some packages that rely on this so I'm happy to jump on as a co-maintainer. Giving someone else a chance to take lead but if no one else does I'll pick it up. On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 1:57 PM drago01 wrote: > On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 11:11 AM Richard W.M. Jones > wrote: > > > > On Mon,

Re: Capstone (was: Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers)

2022-10-10 Thread drago01
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 11:11 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 10:31:24AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > capstone orphan, rebus, ret2libc 1 weeks > > ago > > [Affecting lots of packages] > > This is a disassembly library / framework used

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL 8 Modules get the axe on Halloween 2022

2022-10-10 Thread Carl George
On Fri, Oct 7, 2022 at 10:54 AM Petr Pisar wrote: > > V Fri, Oct 07, 2022 at 08:56:41AM -0400, Stephen Smoogen napsal(a): > > On Fri, 7 Oct 2022 at 03:34, Petr Pisar wrote: > > > > > V Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 03:09:32PM -0700, Troy Dawson napsal(a): > > > > - epel-release will be updated. > > > >

Re: F38 proposal: RPM Sequoia (System-Wide Change proposal)

2022-10-10 Thread Clemens Lang
Hi Ben, Ben Cotton wrote: Within Fedora package set, this has no impact as everything is already using sufficiently strong crypto. Third party repositories / packages could be signed with insecure crypto, and those may require working around with --nosignature. However this incidentally

Re: rpm pulls in a dependency on perl in a noarch subpackage

2022-10-10 Thread Mattia Verga via devel
Il 10/10/22 15:46, Petr Pisar ha scritto: > I'm now facing a build failure on EPEL, which I can't figure out: >> /usr/bin/ld: lilxml.o (symbol from plugin): undefined reference to >> symbol 'xmlMalloc@@LIBXML2_2.4.30' >> /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib64/libxml2.so.2: error adding symbols: DSO missing >>

Unschedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2022-10-11)

2022-10-10 Thread Miro Hrončok
There are no topic to be discussed in the FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat. Hence I decided to cancel it. I will chair the next meeting. = Discussed and Voted in the Ticket = Nonresponsive maintainer: Pete Travis immanetize

Update on libsoup 3 migration

2022-10-10 Thread Michael Catanzaro
Hi developers, An update on the libsoup 3 migration change proposal. I had previously proposed: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/libsoup_3:_Part_Two This proposal was rejected by FESCo, and I've decided not to put forth any alternate proposal. Accordingly, we're done with downstream

F38 proposal: RPM Sequoia (System-Wide Change proposal)

2022-10-10 Thread Ben Cotton
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RpmSequoia This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.

F38 proposal: RPM Sequoia (System-Wide Change proposal)

2022-10-10 Thread Ben Cotton
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RpmSequoia This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.

[Bug 2133462] New: perl-No-Worries-1.7-4.fc38 FTBFS: t/1syslog.t crashes with: uri_escape: Invalid [] range "0-\x1f" in regex

2022-10-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133462 Bug ID: 2133462 Summary: perl-No-Worries-1.7-4.fc38 FTBFS: t/1syslog.t crashes with: uri_escape: Invalid [] range "0-\x1f" in regex Product: Fedora Version: rawhide

Re: rpm pulls in a dependency on perl in a noarch subpackage

2022-10-10 Thread Petr Pisar
V Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 09:41:52AM +, Mattia Verga via devel napsal(a): > Indeed, you're right. I thought those were support files not directly > consumed by the main program itself. I'll add an explicit perl dependency. > You don't need to add an explicit run-time dependency on perl. It

Re: Grub menu with 3 kernels by default

2022-10-10 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
Hi, > > Thus any attempt to validate the the grub.conf PCR eventlog, as it > > exists in typical distro deployments today, is going to be both > > complex and fragile, which is a bad combination. > > But this is only a problem if you're assuming grub2-mkconfig is > nondeterministic, which just

** s390x builders Outage **

2022-10-10 Thread Tomas Hrcka
There is an ongoing BOS power outage impacting s390x builders. Reason for outage: Power outage in the DC -- Tomas Hrcka role: CPE Team - Senior Software Engineer fas: humaton freenode: jednorozec ___ devel-announce mailing list --

** s390x builders Outage **

2022-10-10 Thread Tomas Hrcka
There is an ongoing BOS power outage impacting s390x builders. Reason for outage: Power outage in the DC -- Tomas Hrcka role: CPE Team - Senior Software Engineer fas: humaton freenode: jednorozec ___ devel-announce mailing list --

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2022-10-10 Thread Miro Hrončok
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Re: [side tags] Undesired automatic side-tag removal happened - how to deal with it in the future?

2022-10-10 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2022-10-10 at 21:02 +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > Zdenek Dohnal wrote on 2022/10/10 17:17: > > Hi all, > > > > I maintain qpdf in Fedora, which recently got a new major release version, > > which breaks compatibility with other packages, so I created a side tag for > > other maintainers

[Bug 2133410] perl-MCE-1.880 is available

2022-10-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133410 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 2133410] perl-MCE-1.880 is available

2022-10-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133410 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from

Re: [side tags] Undesired automatic side-tag removal happened - how to deal with it in the future?

2022-10-10 Thread Mamoru TASAKA
Zdenek Dohnal wrote on 2022/10/10 17:17: Hi all, I maintain qpdf in Fedora, which recently got a new major release version, which breaks compatibility with other packages, so I created a side tag for other maintainers to use for building, and then releasing it altogether in rawhide. However

[Bug 2133215] perl-Finance-Quote-1.53 is available

2022-10-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133215 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-0d956e603a has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing

[Bug 2133215] perl-Finance-Quote-1.53 is available

2022-10-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133215 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-1e8ddf3408 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing

Handle sysroot.readyonly=true migration in other rpm-ostree Fedora(s)

2022-10-10 Thread Antonio Murdaca
Hi folks, in rpm-ostree based systems like fedora iot I would love to handle the migration process similar to what happens today in silverblue et all wrt sysroot.readonly https://pagure.io/workstation-ostree-config/blob/main/f/postprocess.sh - unfortunately that systemd service and script

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2022-10-10 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2022-10-10 at 10:31 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > python-cached_property    adamwill, orphan 0 weeks ago I'll take this, I've effectively been the maintainer for years anyway. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha https://www.happyassassin.net

[Bug 2133215] perl-Finance-Quote-1.53 is available

2022-10-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133215 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2022-3c799a2c5a has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here:

Re: [side tags] Undesired automatic side-tag removal happened - how to deal with it in the future?

2022-10-10 Thread Dan Čermák
Hi, On October 10, 2022 8:17:15 AM UTC, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: >Hi all, > >I maintain qpdf in Fedora, which recently got a new major release version, >which breaks compatibility with other packages, so I created a side tag for >other maintainers to use for building, and then releasing it

[Bug 2133215] perl-Finance-Quote-1.53 is available

2022-10-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133215 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-a5707af904 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing

[Bug 2133410] New: perl-MCE-1.880 is available

2022-10-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133410 Bug ID: 2133410 Summary: perl-MCE-1.880 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-MCE Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: rpm pulls in a dependency on perl in a noarch subpackage

2022-10-10 Thread Mattia Verga via devel
Il 10/10/22 10:57, Petr Pisar ha scritto: > V Fri, Oct 07, 2022 at 11:56:51AM -0500, Chris Adams napsal(a): >> Once upon a time, Mattia Verga said: >>> Il 07/10/22 17:28, Chris Adams ha scritto: Once upon a time, Mattia Verga said: > I don't understand, why RPM automatically adds a

Re: openshadinglanguage failure on non x86_64

2022-10-10 Thread Mamoru TASAKA
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2022/10/10 10:09: Luya Tshimbalanga wrote on 2022/10/10 2:46: Hello team, openshadinglanguage 1.12.6.2 only successfully built on x86_64 architecture but failed on others due to the following errors: In file included from

Capstone (was: Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers)

2022-10-10 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 10:31:24AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > capstone orphan, rebus, ret2libc 1 weeks ago [Affecting lots of packages] This is a disassembly library / framework used by qemu. It seems like it has two maintainers so I guess it's not really an

Re: openshadinglanguage failure on non x86_64

2022-10-10 Thread Dan Horák
On Mon, 10 Oct 2022 10:46:20 +0200 Dan Horák wrote: > On Mon, 10 Oct 2022 10:09:32 +0900 > Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > > > Luya Tshimbalanga wrote on 2022/10/10 2:46: > > > Hello team, > > > > > > openshadinglanguage 1.12.6.2 only successfully built on x86_64 > > > architecture but failed on

Next Open NeuroFedora Meeting: 1300 UTC on Monday, 10 October September (Today)

2022-10-10 Thread Ankur Sinha
Hello everyone, Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday 10th October(today!) at 1300UTC in #fedora-neuro on Matrix or IRC (Libera.chat). The meeting is a public meeting, and open for everyone to attend. You can join us over: Matrix:

Re: rpm pulls in a dependency on perl in a noarch subpackage

2022-10-10 Thread Petr Pisar
V Fri, Oct 07, 2022 at 11:56:51AM -0500, Chris Adams napsal(a): > Once upon a time, Mattia Verga said: > > Il 07/10/22 17:28, Chris Adams ha scritto: > > > Once upon a time, Mattia Verga said: > > >> I don't understand, why RPM automatically adds a dependency on a noarch > > >> subpackage which

Re: rpm pulls in a dependency on perl in a noarch subpackage

2022-10-10 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 10. 10. 22 10:46, Petr Pisar wrote: Thanks, I'll try to unset the exec bit on those two scripts. If you want to demote the file from a script level, you should also remove the first line (#!/usr/bin/perl). Otherwise, rpmbuild (or rpmlint?) will complain. rpmlint -- Miro Hrončok --

Re: rpm pulls in a dependency on perl in a noarch subpackage

2022-10-10 Thread Petr Pisar
V Fri, Oct 07, 2022 at 04:09:01PM +, Mattia Verga via devel napsal(a): > Il 07/10/22 17:28, Chris Adams ha scritto: > > Once upon a time, Mattia Verga said: > >> I don't understand, why RPM automatically adds a dependency on a noarch > >> subpackage which consists only of data files? > >> >

Re: openshadinglanguage failure on non x86_64

2022-10-10 Thread Dan Horák
On Mon, 10 Oct 2022 10:09:32 +0900 Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > Luya Tshimbalanga wrote on 2022/10/10 2:46: > > Hello team, > > > > openshadinglanguage 1.12.6.2 only successfully built on x86_64 architecture > > but failed on others due to the following errors: > > > > In file included from > >

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2022-10-10 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 10:31:24AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: >

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2022-10-10 Thread Miro Hrončok
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

[side tags] Undesired automatic side-tag removal happened - how to deal with it in the future?

2022-10-10 Thread Zdenek Dohnal
Hi all, I maintain qpdf in Fedora, which recently got a new major release version, which breaks compatibility with other packages, so I created a side tag for other maintainers to use for building, and then releasing it altogether in rawhide. However the side tag: f38-build-side-58658 got

Re: [INPUT REQUESTED] Re: F38 proposal: Node.js Repackaging (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2022-10-10 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 07. 10. 22 v 20:54 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a): On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 2:29 PM Ben Cotton wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NodejsRepackaging This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive

Re: fedpkg new-sources errors

2022-10-10 Thread Petr Pisar
V Fri, Oct 07, 2022 at 02:35:51PM +, Mattia Verga via devel napsal(a): > Il 07/10/22 13:50, Petr Pisar ha scritto: > > V Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 08:17:15PM -0500, Richard Shaw napsal(a): > >> I'm still getting this on occasion and have no idea what the issue is: > >> > >> $ fedpkg new-sources

Re: DNF5 Blockers

2022-10-10 Thread Jaroslav Mracek
Please can you be more specific which kind of functionality is required for particular command? Why is it important to know what user case you want to resolve it? Commands has multiple options and some of them could be unused. Specially repoquery has tons of options. Knowing critical usercase

Re: [INPUT REQUESTED] Re: F38 proposal: Node.js Repackaging (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2022-10-10 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sun, Oct 09, 2022 at 10:58:58PM +0200, Dan Čermák wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > Stephen Gallagher writes: > > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 2:29 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > > *snip* > > > When a Node.js release goes out of support, we have a question to > > answer: do we Obsolete it with a newer