https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162651
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Sub-Quote-2.006008-1.f
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Sub-Quote` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
2.006008 bump; Package tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Sub-Quote/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162841
--- Comment #5 from David ---
I grabbed the rpm's and installed them:
perl-DateTime-Event-Recurrence-0.19-19.el9
perl-DateTime-Set-0.3900-20.el9
perl-Set-Infinite-0.65-37.el9
Issues solved and the scheduling software now runs perfectly.
On 1/24/23 15:52, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
Had I seen cstdint I like to think that I would have
tried a rebuild with gcc 13 earlier to see what
(if any) upstream(s) needed some encouragement
for support gcc 13.
I actually did stuff like this in the past -- build all of Fedora with
the new
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162841
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160110
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158290
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In Version|
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 7:29 AM Jeff Law wrote:
> On 1/24/23 00:16, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > See
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-13/porting_to.html#header-dep-changes
> > Some libstdc++ headers included in older versions
> > as an implementation detail but no longer do.
> >
> > Including stdint.h
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 03:36:41PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 3:00 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 07:54:29PM +0100, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
> > >
> > > I initially thought about:
> > > release bump
> > > $ koji edit-tag SIDETAG -x %_with_bootstrap=1
Hi,
Development of Bottles is moving fast and we have been struggling to
keep up with upstream releases, especially since the introduction of
Rust components.
Upstream has approached the maintainers [1,2] and asked us to retire the
package in favor of the Flatpak packages provided by
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164242
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build failed. Details below:
GenericError: File upload failed:
cli-build/1674596402.536418.iBSNaYxa/perl-Text-BibTeX-0.89-1.fc36.src.rpm
Traceback:
File
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164242
Bug ID: 2164242
Summary: perl-Text-BibTeX-0.89 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Text-BibTeX
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
> Thanks for the info, we will try it. It would be great to have it
> documented somewhere in the guidelines
Yes it would. This looks like a good place:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#bootstrapping
"koji edit-tag --help" calls it "Set tag
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 9:37 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 3:00 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 07:54:29PM +0100, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
> > >
> > > I initially thought about:
> > > release bump
> > > $ koji edit-tag SIDETAG -x %_with_bootstrap=1
> > >
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 3:00 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 07:54:29PM +0100, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
> >
> > I initially thought about:
> > release bump
> > $ koji edit-tag SIDETAG -x %_with_bootstrap=1
> > build
> > handle circular dep
> > $ koji edit-tag SIDETAG -r
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 02:01:39PM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 7:20 AM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> > hobbes1069 (9):
> > cqrlog - Fails for some weird lazbuild issue I don't understand
> > flnet - Spec conditional oops. Fixed.
> > flrig - Needed cstdint. Fixed
> > freecad -
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 7:20 AM Richard Shaw wrote:
> hobbes1069 (9):
> cqrlog - Fails for some weird lazbuild issue I don't understand
> flnet - Spec conditional oops. Fixed.
> flrig - Needed cstdint. Fixed
> freecad - Needs cstdint. Working on it.
> gmsh - Needed cstdint. Fixed.
> openCOLLADA
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 07:54:29PM +0100, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
>
> I initially thought about:
> release bump
> $ koji edit-tag SIDETAG -x %_with_bootstrap=1
> build
> handle circular dep
> $ koji edit-tag SIDETAG -r %_with_bootstrap
> build
>
> But I haven't tried it yet because I didn't
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Sub-Quote` that
you are following:
``
2.006008 bump; Package tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Sub-Quote/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing
FYI debuginfo generation failed on several packages. I've had to
disable it on a few to get around this. For example:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=96625872
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/5943/96625943/build.log
I'm not clear exactly why this is
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 7:42 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 1:39 PM Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I need to bootstrap package which has bootstrap support written
> > according to the [1]. I am able to bootstrap it locally (rpmbuild,
> > mock, ...) with the
On 24. 01. 23 18:57, Neal Gompa wrote:
Also, isn't this basically going to break the pythondistdeps
generator, since it was switched to use packaging a while ago?
Break? No. It will only handle some invalid requirements or provided version as
errors. The affected packages are listed in the
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 1:39 PM Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I need to bootstrap package which has bootstrap support written
> according to the [1]. I am able to bootstrap it locally (rpmbuild,
> mock, ...) with the "--with bootstrap" or "-D '_with_bootstrap 1'". Is
> there support for it
Hi,
I need to bootstrap package which has bootstrap support written
according to the [1]. I am able to bootstrap it locally (rpmbuild,
mock, ...) with the "--with bootstrap" or "-D '_with_bootstrap 1'". Is
there support for it in koji? E.g. something like:
koji build SIDE-TAG PACKAGE --bootstrap?
Il 24/01/23 08:16, Jakub Jelinek ha scritto:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 10:00:47AM +0300, Vascom wrote:
>> I have some packages failed.
>> One of them libtins. Problem is that:
>>
>> error: 'uint32_t' is not a member of 'std';
>>
>> Is it normal? Is it GCC 13 change?
> See
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164150
Guilherme de Almeida Suckevicz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2164147
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164149
Guilherme de Almeida Suckevicz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2164147
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164149
Bug ID: 2164149
Summary: CVE-2023-24038 perl-HTML-StripScripts: Handler for
style attribute is vulnerable to ReDoS [epel-all]
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164148
--- Comment #1 from Guilherme de Almeida Suckevicz ---
Use the following template to for the 'fedpkg update' request to submit an
update for this issue as it contains the top-level parent bug(s) as well as
this tracking bug. This will ensure
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164151
--- Comment #1 from Guilherme de Almeida Suckevicz ---
Use the following template to for the 'fedpkg update' request to submit an
update for this issue as it contains the top-level parent bug(s) as well as
this tracking bug. This will ensure
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164149
--- Comment #1 from Guilherme de Almeida Suckevicz ---
Use the following template to for the 'fedpkg update' request to submit an
update for this issue as it contains the top-level parent bug(s) as well as
this tracking bug. This will ensure
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164151
Bug ID: 2164151
Summary: CVE-2023-24038 perl-HTML-StripScripts-Parser:
perl-HTML-StripScripts: Handler for style attribute is
vulnerable to ReDoS [epel-all]
Product:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164150
--- Comment #1 from Guilherme de Almeida Suckevicz ---
Use the following template to for the 'fedpkg update' request to submit an
update for this issue as it contains the top-level parent bug(s) as well as
this tracking bug. This will ensure
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164151
Guilherme de Almeida Suckevicz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2164147
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164150
Bug ID: 2164150
Summary: CVE-2023-24038 perl-HTML-StripScripts-Parser:
perl-HTML-StripScripts: Handler for style attribute is
vulnerable to ReDoS [fedora-all]
Product:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164148
Guilherme de Almeida Suckevicz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2164147
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164148
Bug ID: 2164148
Summary: CVE-2023-24038 perl-HTML-StripScripts: Handler for
style attribute is vulnerable to ReDoS [fedora-all]
Product: Fedora
Version: 37
Status: NEW
Il 24/01/23 18:02, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki ha scritto:
> fpc has a Requires: on the units package, so it should always be installed.
>
> The build failures for packages using FPC, as far as I can see, are all
> packages
> using Lazarus. As far as I can tell, this is because Lazarus seems to quite
NOTE: As explained by the owners in the Feedback section below, this
proposal was submitted after the deadline because the impact of the
package update proved to be broader than anticipated.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Packaging_22%2B
This document represents a proposed Change. As
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 12:50 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> NOTE: As explained by the owners in the Feedback section below, this
> proposal was submitted after the deadline because the impact of the
> package update proved to be broader than anticipated.
>
>
NOTE: As explained by the owners in the Feedback section below, this
proposal was submitted after the deadline because the impact of the
package update proved to be broader than anticipated.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Packaging_22%2B
This document represents a proposed Change. As
Meeting summary
---
* init process (zbyszek, 17:00:06)
* Meeting is cancelled because of lack of quorum. (zbyszek, 17:04:36)
* ACTION: zbyszek will chair the next meeting. (zbyszek, 17:04:45)
* Open Floor (zbyszek, 17:04:49)
Meeting ended at 17:05:14 UTC.
Minutes:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 9:49 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 08:11:03PM -0500, Rafael Aquini wrote:
> > FYI:
> >
> > memkind failure (aarch64) seems to be koji/mock related:
> >
> > This package was updated and sucessfully built in rawhide and f37 a week
> > ago (01/13)
> >
> >
On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 at 07:29, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/24/23 00:16, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 10:00:47AM +0300, Vascom wrote:
> >> I have some packages failed.
> >> One of them libtins. Problem is that:
> >>
> >> error: 'uint32_t' is not a member of 'std';
> >>
> >> Is
fpc has a Requires: on the units package, so it should always be installed.
The build failures for packages using FPC, as far as I can see, are all packages
using Lazarus. As far as I can tell, this is because Lazarus seems to quite
tightly
depend on specific FPC versions, and historically,
The recent update of gtest to 1.13.0 in Rawhide bumped the .so version.
I reminded the maintainers of the Updates Policy for Rawhide and asked
them to please announce and coordinate similar updates in the future[1].
The following packages depend on a specific .so version of gtest/gmock
at
Notification time stamped 2023-01-24 16:24:21 UTC
From 7ab188b5c779ec958555b85546f486505a6d7f33 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Jan 24 2023 16:24:09 +
Subject: Use SPDX-format license tag
---
diff --git a/perl-Specio.spec b/perl-Specio.spec
index 0fbc6c4..824720a 100644
On Mon, Jan 23 2023 at 09:27:08 PM -0800, Gordon Messmer
wrote:
Time will tell if that's credit or blame. LOL.
Sincerely, though, I know I'm not the first person to work on tackling
this, and I can't take all of the credit.
Good, since I fear it's going to be blame. :D I have
On 24. 01. 23 16:20, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 23. 01. 23 15:39, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
F36: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-d823c8dfb8
F37: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-8362bcf475
One package which is known to depend on the exact version of xz is
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Committee on 2023-01-25 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting.
A general agenda is the following:
#topic aloha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162301
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Net-Pcap-0.21-1.fc38
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Net-Pcap` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
0.21 bump; Package tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-Pcap/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2163999
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2163998
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Fixed In Version|
On 23. 01. 23 15:39, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
F36: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-d823c8dfb8
F37: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-8362bcf475
One package which is known to depend on the exact version of xz is
perl-Compress-Raw-Lzma. The updates above
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
should be retired from Fedora 38 approximately one week before branching.
5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen
approximately in 2 weeks, i.e. around 2023-02-08.
Since
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
should be retired from Fedora 38 approximately one week before branching.
5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen
approximately in 2 weeks, i.e. around 2023-02-08.
Since
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 9:26 AM Troy Dawson wrote:
>
> Just so people don't need to go to the bug.
> This has already been reported for RHEL 9.
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2140266
>
> If I understand "Approved Release" correctly, the fix will come out in RHEL
> 9.2
Most people
Just so people don't need to go to the bug.
This has already been reported for RHEL 9.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2140266
If I understand "Approved Release" correctly, the fix will come out in RHEL
9.2
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 3:57 AM Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2163998
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2161072
Fedora Fails To Install changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2163999
Bug ID: 2163999
Summary: F38FailsToInstall: perl-SQL-Interp-tests
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-SQL-Interp
Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2163998
Bug ID: 2163998
Summary: F38FailsToInstall: perl-LDAP-tests
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-LDAP
Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
> cqrlog - Fails for some weird lazbuild issue I don't understand
This is most likely my fault, since Lazarus seems to be quite tightly coupled
to specific FPC versions.
Historically, whenever we updated/rebuilt FPC, we'd also rebuilt Lazarus. This
time, when I rebuilt
FPC as part of the
Need help with rebuilding doublecmd.
вт, 24 янв. 2023 г. в 16:21, Richard Shaw :
>
> hobbes1069 (9):
> cqrlog - Fails for some weird lazbuild issue I don't understand
> flnet - Spec conditional oops. Fixed.
> flrig - Needed cstdint. Fixed
> freecad - Needs cstdint. Working on it.
> gmsh - Needed
hobbes1069 (9):
cqrlog - Fails for some weird lazbuild issue I don't understand
flnet - Spec conditional oops. Fixed.
flrig - Needed cstdint. Fixed
freecad - Needs cstdint. Working on it.
gmsh - Needed cstdint. Fixed.
openCOLLADA - error: possibly dangling reference to a temporary. Don't know
how
On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 12:07:10 +
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=96612861
>
> The build has completed already on other arches, but on ppc64le it has
> been stuck for ~ 45 minutes. What's especially odd is that it has
> apparently picked a
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 12:22 AM Jerry James wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 9:52 PM Jerry James wrote:
> > > maven-scm mizdebsk, trawets
> >
> > For those affected by this, I've made a COPR with a possible
> > resolution:
> >
Hi,
we are going to introduce new Ghostscript 10.0.0 with bumped soname into
the rawhide.
Rebuilds will be done in the tag 'f38-build-side-62054'.
Affected packages: xcircuit, libspectre, texlive-base, gimp, graphviz,
doxygen, ImageMagick
Maintainers were notified.
Best regards
--
Richard
On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 at 07:11, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 7:01 AM Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > Sorry, now subject is correct, the gcc have one patch for the error
> > above, that is seen on rhel 9
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996330#c14
>
> If you
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 7:01 AM Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Sorry, now subject is correct, the gcc have one patch for the error
> above, that is seen on rhel 9
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996330#c14
If you believe this is present in RHEL 9, please clone the bug to the
Red
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162191
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=96612861
The build has completed already on other arches, but on ppc64le it has
been stuck for ~ 45 minutes. What's especially odd is that it has
apparently picked a builder (so it's not stuck waiting for a free
machine) but the builder isn't
Hi,
Sorry, now subject is correct, the gcc have one patch for the error
above, that is seen on rhel 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996330#c14
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996330#c14
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
done.
$ koji list-tagged eln libunistring
Build
libunistring-1.0-2.eln120
libunistring-1.0-2.fc37
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 11:59 AM Tomáš Popela wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 8:56 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 01:36:10PM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162651
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jples...@redhat.com,|
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Net-Pcap` that
you are following:
``
0.21 bump; Package tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-Pcap/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 8:56 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 01:36:10PM -0600, Jonathan Wright via devel wrote:
> > I'm seeing the same errors on rawhide buildroot right now.
>
> The problem was libunistring-1.1-3.fc38 (again).
>
> We untagged it in december, but looks like no
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 08:13:56AM +, Tom Hughes via devel wrote:
> On 24/01/2023 07:28, Jeff Law wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 1/24/23 00:16, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 10:00:47AM +0300, Vascom wrote:
> > > > I have some packages failed.
> > > > One of them libtins. Problem
On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 at 07:01, Vascom wrote:
>
> I have some packages failed.
> One of them libtins. Problem is that:
>
> error: 'uint32_t' is not a member of 'std';
>
> Is it normal? Is it GCC 13 change?
>
> I must patch sources now?
> sed -i 's|stdint.h|cstdint|' include/tins/ip_address.h
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.libera.chat.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2023-01-24 17:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Dist-Zilla` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
6.030 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Dist-Zilla/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list --
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 06:52:30PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:26:18PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> > I found more 5 with
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?owner=releng=active=tree=all=-id
> >
> > 96481236 build (f38-rebuild,
> >
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Dist-Zilla` that
you are following:
``
6.030 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Dist-Zilla/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162191
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160057
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|MODIFIED
Thank you, Tomas,
Great investigation.
Your suggested hack really fixed my issue.
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 3:46 PM Tomas Korbar wrote:
> Hello,
> since i encountered this in the past and postponed it, I did a bit of a
> digging and found this:
> As you probably found out by now it is caused by
This is running now:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?inherited=0=62208=-build_id=1
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
libguestfs lets you edit virtual
On 24/01/2023 07:28, Jeff Law wrote:
On 1/24/23 00:16, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 10:00:47AM +0300, Vascom wrote:
I have some packages failed.
One of them libtins. Problem is that:
error: 'uint32_t' is not a member of 'std';
Is it normal? Is it GCC 13 change?
See
90 matches
Mail list logo
