[Bug 2173731] perl-RT-Client-REST-0.72 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173731 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 2173731] perl-RT-Client-REST-0.72 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173731 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-RT-Client-REST-0.72-1. |perl-RT-Client-REST-0.72-1.

[Bug 2175914] perl-Locale-Codes-3.73 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175914 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-336a79fcf3 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-336a79fcf3 See also

[Bug 2174484] perl-Date-Manip-6.91 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174484 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-268cba0ab0 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-268cba0ab0 See also

[Bug 2175914] perl-Locale-Codes-3.73 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175914 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-baabfe4275 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing

[Bug 2174484] perl-Date-Manip-6.91 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174484 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-13926bf4ee has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing

Re: ATTENTION: Package updates missing from F38 (and sometimes F39)

On Thu, 2023-03-09 at 01:30 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > - gh-0:2.23.0-1.fc37 > gh-0:2.22.1-1.fc38 > > Looks like v2.22.1 was tagged into f38 *after* v2.23.0 was tagged, so > the older version took precedence ... gotta love koji not knowing how > to sort RPM versions :) It's not that it

[Bug 2175914] perl-Locale-Codes-3.73 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175914 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from

[Bug 2174484] perl-Date-Manip-6.91 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174484 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

ATTENTION: Package updates missing from F38 (and sometimes F39)

Hello fellow packagers, Yep, it's that time of the release cycle again. What should be do about all the packages that are stuck at older versions in f38 than what's available on f37? If you see your package in the list below (with my description of what seems to be wrong with it), please ensure

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On 06-03-2023 23:19, Miro Hrončok wrote: python-managesieveorphan 0 weeks ago I've taken managesieve. -- Sandro ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Fedora CoreOS Meeting Minutes 2023-03-08

Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2023-03-08/fedora_coreos_meeting.2023-03-08-16.31.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2023-03-08/fedora_coreos_meeting.2023-03-08-16.31.txt Log:

F39 proposal: FontAwesome6 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FontAwesome6 This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

F39 proposal: FontAwesome6 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FontAwesome6 This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.

[Bug 2176557] perltidy-20230309 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176557 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of perltidy-20230309-1.fc36.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=98455531 -- You are

[Bug 2176557] perltidy-20230309 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176557 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1949113 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1949113=edit Update to 20230309 (#2176557) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 2176557] New: perltidy-20230309 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176557 Bug ID: 2176557 Summary: perltidy-20230309 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perltidy Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: Degradated modules support

On Wed, Mar 8 2023 at 04:10:15 PM +0100, Petr Pisar wrote: That could also affect seemingly unrelated parts of Fedora like Flatpaks whose build process is based on modularity. I can address this. We intend to stop depending on modularity so that we can reliably build Flatpaks even when

[EPEL-devel] Re: Timeframe for EPEL retirement vs RHEL new package releases

On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 6:31 AM Troy Dawson wrote: > On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 7:16 PM Carl George wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 2:18 PM Troy Dawson wrote >> > >> > RHEL has been very good (lately) about their NVR's being higher than >> EPEL's. >> > If that is so, the EPEL packages don't take

[Bug 2175807] perl-Git-Repository-1.325-7.fc39 FTBFS: t/20-simple.t fails EDITOR tests

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175807 Jan Pazdziora changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

Re: Release rpkg-1.66 and fedpkg-1.44

On 08. 03. 23 15:40, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 08. 03. 23 9:29, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 08:13:57AM +0100, Ondrej Nosek wrote: Hi all, a new version rpkg-1.66 together with fedpkg-1.44 are released containing both features and bugfixes. Currently, only Fedora 37

Degradated modules support

For module maintainers, module users, and flatpak maintainers: Fedora infrustructure has long-standing problems with supporting modules. Namely, MBS is unable to build modules with deep dependencies and Bodhi is unable to accept multicontext modules

Re: Release rpkg-1.66 and fedpkg-1.44

On 08. 03. 23 9:29, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 08:13:57AM +0100, Ondrej Nosek wrote: Hi all, a new version rpkg-1.66 together with fedpkg-1.44 are released containing both features and bugfixes. Currently, only Fedora 37 (and Rawhide) packages are present in

Re: Release rpkg-1.66 and fedpkg-1.44

On 3/8/23 00:29, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 08:13:57AM +0100, Ondrej Nosek wrote: Hi all, a new version rpkg-1.66 together with fedpkg-1.44 are released containing both features and bugfixes. Currently, only Fedora 37 (and Rawhide) packages are present in stable

[EPEL-devel] Re: Timeframe for EPEL retirement vs RHEL new package releases

On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 7:16 PM Carl George wrote: > On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 2:18 PM Troy Dawson wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 11:38 AM Carl George wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 8:52 AM Troy Dawson wrote: > >> > > >> > On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 8:48 PM Carl George wrote:

[Bug 2175914] perl-Locale-Codes-3.73 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175914 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-baabfe4275 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-baabfe4275 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 2175914] perl-Locale-Codes-3.73 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175914 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-18f666384e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-18f666384e -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

Re: Release rpkg-1.66 and fedpkg-1.44

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek kirjoitti 8.3.2023 klo 10.29: On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 08:13:57AM +0100, Ondrej Nosek wrote: Hi all, a new version rpkg-1.66 together with fedpkg-1.44 are released containing both features and bugfixes. Currently, only Fedora 37 (and Rawhide) packages are present in

[Bug 2174484] perl-Date-Manip-6.91 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174484 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-13926bf4ee has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-13926bf4ee -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 2175914] perl-Locale-Codes-3.73 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175914 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 2174484] perl-Date-Manip-6.91 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174484 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from

Re: How to depend on a .so.X in RPM specs?

On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 02:27:46PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 06. 03. 23 v 12:49 Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden napsal(a): While rubygem-openscap is retired in Fedora, the Foreman project still packages it. For context: rubygem-openscap can load libopenscap.so.8 and libopenscap.so.25 through

[Bug 2176450] New: Build CGI::FormBuilder for EPEL9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176450 Bug ID: 2176450 Summary: Build CGI::FormBuilder for EPEL9 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Status: NEW Component: perl-CGI-FormBuilder Assignee: ktdre...@ktdreyer.com

[Bug 2176449] New: Build CGI::FormBuilder for EPEL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176449 Bug ID: 2176449 Summary: Build CGI::FormBuilder for EPEL8 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel8 Status: NEW Component: perl-CGI-FormBuilder Assignee: ktdre...@ktdreyer.com

[rpms/perl-Locale-Codes] PR #24: 3.73 bump

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Locale-Codes` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` 3.73 bump `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Locale-Codes/pull-request/24 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

Fedora 38 compose report: 20230308.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-38-20230306.n.0 NEW: Fedora-38-20230308.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:6 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 16 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 6.93 MiB Size of dropped packages:283.83 KiB

[rpms/perl-Locale-Codes] PR #24: 3.73 bump

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Locale-Codes` that you are following: `` 3.73 bump `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Locale-Codes/pull-request/24 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

Let's deprecate the %{pyproject_build_lib} macro... ?

Hello. The %{pyproject_build_lib} macro is a *provisional* macro from pyproject-rpm-macros. It was added to solve the problem of out-of-tree pip builds. From the pyproject-rpm-macros README: """ Sometimes, it is desired to be able to import the just-built extension modules in the %build

[rpms/perl-Locale-Codes] PR #23: 3.73 bump

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Locale-Codes` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` 3.73 bump `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Locale-Codes/pull-request/23 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[rpms/perl-Locale-Codes] PR #23: 3.73 bump

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Locale-Codes` that you are following: `` 3.73 bump `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Locale-Codes/pull-request/23 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[rpms/perl-Archive-Zip] PR #1: Package tests

jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Archive-Zip` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Package tests `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Archive-Zip/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[rpms/perl-Archive-Zip] PR #1: Package tests

jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Archive-Zip` that you are following: `` Package tests `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Archive-Zip/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230308.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230307.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230308.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:6 Dropped images: 4 Added packages: 4 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 174 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 4.80 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 38 Candidate Beta-1.3 Available Now!

Tested server dvd and work fine on bare metal, but was greeted with: … … Reached target basic.target dracut-initqueue Unknown device:"/dev/run/install/repo//images/install.img": No such device dracut-initqueue: 'Unknown device "/sys/":No such device No problems. but I think it's a bit

Re: Assess impact of package changes with the mass prebuilder

Hello Fedora community, I'm pleased to announce that we released v1.0.0 of the tool, which marks completion of the features expected to be implemented for the COPR back-end. A detailed changelog is available here: https://gitlab.com/fedora/packager-tools/mass-prebuild/-/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md

Re: Release rpkg-1.66 and fedpkg-1.44

On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 08:13:57AM +0100, Ondrej Nosek wrote: > Hi all, > a new version rpkg-1.66 together with fedpkg-1.44 are released containing > both features and bugfixes. > Currently, only Fedora 37 (and Rawhide) packages are present in stable > repositories. > Other supported packages are

Re: fedpkg: Failed to get repository name from Git url or pushurl -> %build

Kenneth Goldman wrote: > Let's see if I have this right ... > > %build > %configure > %make_build > > are not three separate steps. %build is the overall step, and the next two > lines > are the build steps. The blank line terminates the %build. Correct? A blank line has no special meaning.