The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
8 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-18a0e3fa23
apptainer-1.1.8-1.el7
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-342b96903b
zarafa-7.1.14-6.el7
0
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
49 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1e00c3d01e
cutter-re-2.2.0-1.el8 rizin-0.5.1-1.el8
9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-44ff2475c4
apptainer-1.1.8-1.el8
2
The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
8 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-b31211e2ce
apptainer-1.1.8-1.el9
1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-b59aa78f7e
vtk-9.1.0-18.el9
0
On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 11:44:33PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 04. 05. 23 23:40, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 04:03:49PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > Hello folks,
> > ...snip...
> > >
> > > Would that be possible?
> >
> > I don't think it currently is... but sounds like
On 04. 05. 23 23:40, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 04:03:49PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello folks,
...snip...
Would that be possible?
I don't think it currently is... but sounds like a reasonable RFE to
koji to me.
The way koji handles noarch packages is that it builds
On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 07:28:29AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> I assume that this proposal will be accepted; the following is not
> about blocking this proposal. But I wanted to ask a wider question:
> is there some way to avoid having a separate immutable spin for each
> and
On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 04:03:49PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello folks,
...snip...
>
> Would that be possible?
I don't think it currently is... but sounds like a reasonable RFE to
koji to me.
The way koji handles noarch packages is that it builds them on all
arches, checks to make sure
Hi,
I have a bugzilla opened about a CenOS Stream package missing during EPEL9
builds
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182460, for over a month with no
response.
Can something be done about this, apart from trying to reach the maintainers on
their corporate emails?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189187
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Image-ExifTool-12.60-1 |perl-Image-ExifTool-12.60-1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189187
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Image-ExifTool-12.60-1 |perl-Image-ExifTool-12.60-1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189800
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-PAR-Packer-1.057-3.fc3
On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 5:40 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 5:27 AM Sandro Mani wrote:
>
> > AFAICS nodejs is generally broken in rawhide (both nodejs20 and nodejs18),
> > i.e. just
> >
> > $ node
> > >
> > Segmentation fault (core dumped)
> >
> > gdb:
> >
> > Thread 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189187
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Image-ExifTool-12.60-1 |perl-Image-ExifTool-12.60-1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189187
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Image-ExifTool-12.60-1 |perl-Image-ExifTool-12.60-1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189187
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
DT,
I am not all arguing that CVE-2022-1184 impact score was incorrect. I can't
imagine why you think that.
By itself, CVE-2022-1184 is not a privilege escalation, because it can normally
only be exploited by someone with write access to the filesystem boots, that
is, root. Only with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2193163
Bug ID: 2193163
Summary: perl-Locale-Msgfmt: FTBFS: No package found for:
perl(inc::Module::Install::DSL) >= 0.92
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2193162
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2192622
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192622
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2193162
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2193162
Bug ID: 2193162
Summary: perl-File-Find-Rule-PPI: FTBFS: No package found for:
perl(inc::Module::Install::DSL) >= 1.00
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL:
Hello folks,
Couple months ago, we discussed with @psimovec if it's possible to ExcludeArch
i686 from scipy.
This Python discussion brought the topic back:
https://discuss.python.org/t/dropping-32-bit-packages/5476/9
I've tried to see how many packages would be affected and the short answer
Hello folks,
Couple months ago, we discussed with @psimovec if it's possible to ExcludeArch
i686 from scipy.
This Python discussion brought the topic back:
https://discuss.python.org/t/dropping-32-bit-packages/5476/9
I've tried to see how many packages would be affected and the short answer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2193159
Bug ID: 2193159
Summary: perl-Devel-Dumpvar: FTBFS: No package found for:
perl(inc::Module::Install::DSL) >= 0.91
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL:
On Wed, May 3, 2023, at 10:38 PM, Dave Dykstra via epel-devel wrote:
> On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 02:48:05PM -0500, Carl George wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 9:42 AM Dave Dykstra via epel-devel
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > We believe that it is important to apply this change to all EPEL releases,
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063919
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from
Dave,
On Wed, May 3, 2023, at 10:31 PM, Dave Dykstra via epel-devel wrote:
> On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 02:59:42PM -0500, Carl George wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 10:20 AM Dave Dykstra via epel-devel
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 02:11:46AM -0500, Carl George wrote:
> ...
> >
Aurelien Bompard wrote:
> do you mind opening a ticket on FMN's tracker please?
Done: https://github.com/fedora-infra/fmn/issues/901
Björn Persson
pgpwJ54yOnOQ8.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signatur
___
devel mailing list --
> Am 04.05.2023 um 14:11 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones :
>
> On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 10:01:51PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
>> Kind of a random thing, but... I would like to write up how to use GRUB2
>> to do BIOS-PXE+UEFI-PXE+UEFI-HTTP boot. I asked for the Fedora packages
>> to include the needed
On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 10:01:51PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> Kind of a random thing, but... I would like to write up how to use GRUB2
> to do BIOS-PXE+UEFI-PXE+UEFI-HTTP boot. I asked for the Fedora packages
> to include the needed PXE bit, and it does now (thanks!), so I feel I
> owe a good
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
ELN SIG on 2023-05-05 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
The meeting will be about:
Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/10449/
___
devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192870
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-PDL-2.83.0-1.fc39
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731700
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2180842
Referenced
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230503.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230504.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 95
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 194.28 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
V Thu, May 04, 2023 at 11:05:21AM -, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki napsal(a):
> > "dnf repoquery --srpm --whatrequires kiss-fft-static" returns nothing,
> That's because there's no "kiss-fft-static" package, only "kiss-fft-devel".
>
kiss-fft-static is provided by kiss-fft-devel.
> Running "dnf
> "dnf repoquery --srpm --whatrequires kiss-fft-static" returns nothing,
That's because there's no "kiss-fft-static" package, only "kiss-fft-devel".
Running "dnf repoquery --releasever=39 --disablerepo='*'
--enablerepo='*-source' --whatrequires kiss-fft-devel" gives me:
-
V Thu, May 04, 2023 at 12:30:15PM +0200, Guido Aulisi napsal(a):
> I could not find which packages requires this static library for
> building, it's only a BR dependency.
>
"dnf repoquery --srpm --whatrequires kiss-fft-static" returns nothing, so
there is no package which build-require kiss-fft
Hi,
kiss-fft library was a static only library, but recently added the
possibility to build shared versions too. The current version is
131.1.0
The shared versions are multiple, because they are compiled with
different number types.
We are upgrading this library adding the shared vwersions, but
On Wed, 2023-05-03 at 22:01 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> Kind of a random thing, but... I would like to write up how to use
> GRUB2
> to do BIOS-PXE+UEFI-PXE+UEFI-HTTP boot. I asked for the Fedora
> packages
> to include the needed PXE bit, and it does now (thanks!), so I feel I
> owe a good
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 39 Rawhide 20230504.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 3:29 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 03:31:00PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Fedora_Onyx
> > == Detailed Description ==
> > Fedora Onyx is an immutable desktop operating system, featuring the
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192865
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Fixed In Version|
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-common-sense` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-common-sense/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Spiffy` that you are
following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Spiffy/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Spellunker` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Spellunker/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-common-sense` that
you are following:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-common-sense/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-SUPER` that you are
following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-SUPER/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Spiffy` that you
are following:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Spiffy/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Spellunker` that
you are following:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Spellunker/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-SUPER` that you
are following:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-SUPER/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 03:31:00PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Fedora_Onyx
> == Detailed Description ==
> Fedora Onyx is an immutable desktop operating system, featuring the
> Budgie Desktop environment. Fedora Onyx leverages the same
> foundational
On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 10:30:01AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 08:56:57AM -, Aurelien Bompard wrote:
> > > So… I understand why this default was chosen, but I think that it'd be
> > > better
> > > to change the default to something narrow-but-reasonable, especially for
51 matches
Mail list logo
