jplesnik commented on the pull-request: `Update Makefile.PL to not use
Module::Install::DSL` that you are following:
``
Module::Install::Metadata - provides subroutines all_from, requires_from,
test_requires
Module::Install::WriteAll - provides subroutine WriteAll
All these subroutines are
On Wed, 2023-05-10 at 09:30 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> Does that sound workable? Are there better ways we could do it?
Hi,
if I recall correctly, using the custom D-Bus prefix is there to match
application's D-Bus prefix defined for the flatpak, thus:
a) the services run independently
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing
argparse-manpage-4.2-1.el7
chromium-113.0.5672.92-1.el7
Details about builds:
argparse-manpage-4.2-1.el7
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
59 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1e00c3d01e
cutter-re-2.2.0-1.el8 rizin-0.5.1-1.el8
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1f39b04ca0
kitty-0.26.5-7.el8
2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2203047
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Text-Tabs+Wrap-2023.05 |perl-Text-Tabs+Wrap-2023.05
On 5/14/23 07:33, André verwijs via devel wrote:
Fedora 38 EPEL 9 python3-pydot-1.4.2-6.el9.noarch
python3-soupsieve-2.4.1-1.el9.noarch missing depedecies ...
Issue 1: Unable to install the best update candidate for package
python3-pydot-1.4.2-5.fc38.noarch
- nothing offers python(abi)
Kevin, oclock was not updated, and Beson's email made me realize that I could
go an do it myself. I did that by the time you check. slim's was updated and
both packages are now in testing.
Best,
Ranjan
On Sunday, May 14, 2023 at 10:49:44 AM CDT, Kevin Fenzi
wrote:
On Sun, May 14,
On Sun, May 14, 2023 at 12:17:09AM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> Hi Zbigniew,
>
>
> On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 11:55 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > I have a bunch of nice python packages looking for a reviewer:
> >
> > #2121902 pyinstrument - Python profiler with colorful
On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 09:04:40PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> > So, why having all those "Fedora Containers" releases in Bodhi which
> > follow Fedora branches? Isn't just one Fedora Containers release enough?
[...]
> The "F38 Flatpaks" release in Bodhi represents Flatpaks built with the F38
>
On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 07:33:56PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> I'm concerned that this is just like Software Collections with a
> different path, which I believe where previously banned in Fedora (and
> are generally a huge hassle on the releng side, I think).
The main sticking point with
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2023-05-15
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat
Greetings testers!
It's meeting time again!
If anyone has any other items for the agenda, please reply to this
email
On Sun, May 14, 2023 at 02:04:57PM +0300, Benson Muite wrote:
> Ranjan,
>
> On 5/14/23 13:46, Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
> > Thanks! The package was cleared on BZ some time ago. Is there some
> > additional review that is needed?
> >
> Sorry, that is correct. Usually state is set to post.
Fedora 38 EPEL 9 python3-pydot-1.4.2-6.el9.noarch
python3-soupsieve-2.4.1-1.el9.noarch missing depedecies ...
Issue 1: Unable to install the best update candidate for package
python3-pydot-1.4.2-5.fc38.noarch
- nothing offers python(abi) = 3.9 which is needed for
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230513.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230514.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:4
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 15
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 2.38 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Ranjan,
On 5/14/23 13:46, Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
> Thanks! The package was cleared on BZ some time ago. Is there some
> additional review that is needed?
>
Sorry, that is correct. Usually state is set to post. It seems to have
been unretired:
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11417
On 14-05-2023 12:40, Benson Muite wrote:
It seems it is just the review that is needed:
The re-review is done:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2025138
Releng unretiring the package is the next step, really.
-- Sandro
___
devel mailing
Benson,
Thanks! The package was cleared on BZ some time ago. Is there some additional
review that is needed?
Best wishes,
Ranjan
On Sunday, May 14, 2023 at 05:41:35 AM CDT, Benson Muite
wrote:
Hi Ranjan,
Thanks for contributing to Fedora and maintaining packages.
On 5/14/23 03:27,
On 14-05-2023 00:45, Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
Thanks, Sandro! How does one ping in the ticket on paguire?
The easiest way is to just leave a comment in the ticket. If you need
info from a specific person you would tag that person (@fas_user). That
ensures people watching the ticket
Hi Ranjan,
Thanks for contributing to Fedora and maintaining packages.
On 5/14/23 03:27, Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
> Thanks, Kevin! No problem, no rush, I did not quite know what to expect,
> hence the questions. Thanks again!
>
>
It seems it is just the review that is needed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2196755
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2203040
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
21 matches
Mail list logo
