On 5/25/23 21:28, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Orion Poplawski said:
I can't find any discussion of this - but is it expected that dnf5
does not handle file level provides outside of specific directories?
Packages are not supposed to depend on files/directories outside
/usr/bin,
Once upon a time, Orion Poplawski said:
> I can't find any discussion of this - but is it expected that dnf5
> does not handle file level provides outside of specific directories?
Packages are not supposed to depend on files/directories outside
/usr/bin, /usr/sbin, and /etc (or paths in explicit
I can't find any discussion of this - but is it expected that dnf5 does
not handle file level provides outside of specific directories?
$ dnf5 repoquery --whatprovides /usr/share/dict/words
Updating and loading repositories:
Repositories loaded.
$ dnf repoquery --whatprovides
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1388277bf4
chromium-113.0.5672.126-1.el7
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-2455ae47ae
godot-3.1.2-2.el7
The following builds have
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209937
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
70 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1e00c3d01e
cutter-re-2.2.0-1.el8 rizin-0.5.1-1.el8
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-2694488870
chromium-113.0.5672.126-1.el8
1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2210154
Bug ID: 2210154
Summary: perl-Number-Format-1.76 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Number-Format
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 5:54 PM Gary Buhrmaster
wrote:
> On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 8:58 PM Justin W. Flory (he/him)
> wrote:
> >
> > The elections are now scheduled to start on Monday, 29 May and end on
> Sunday, 11 June. Documentation and schedules are being updated.
> >
> > On Thu, May 25, 2023
On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 8:58 PM Justin W. Flory (he/him)
wrote:
>
> The elections are now scheduled to start on Monday, 29 May and end on Sunday,
> 11 June. Documentation and schedules are being updated.
>
> On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 6:55 AM Josh Boyer wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 9:34
The elections are now scheduled to start on Monday, 29 May and end on
Sunday, 11 June. Documentation and schedules are being updated.
On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 6:55 AM Josh Boyer
wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 9:34 PM Gary Buhrmaster
> wrote:
> >
> > I do understand why RedHat itself will not
Hello everyone,
I have attended recently csnog.eu conference [1], where some interesting
presentations took place. They were usually in Czech, so it is not
something I am going to share more. But what took my interest were ipv6
readiness with some exceptions. Fedora is ready to be run on
On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 09:43:30PM +0200, Michal Domonkos wrote:
> It did show up on my original list, I just omitted it from the email because I
> was going to ask my team to do the rebuild (as I thought we owned it).
We also completely forgot about it (that, and scl-utils) before pushing the
I wrote:
> I may attempt to resolve some of the issues, but if there's
> some documentation on the changes it would make it a lot
> easier. :)
I filed an upstream PR with a couple of commits:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpmlint/pull/1066
This fixes the test suite and works in
On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 10:18:25AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I've no idea why it didn't show up in either version of the list, but
> deltarpm should have been on there:
It did show up on my original list, I just omitted it from the email because I
was going to ask my team to do the rebuild
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041430
Ludek Smid changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |EOL
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1975700
Ludek Smid changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |EOL
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064174
Bug 2064174 depends on bug 2064175, which changed state.
Bug 2064175 Summary: CVE-2021-44962 slic3r: specially crafted stl file could
lead to information disclosure [fedora-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064175
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064175
Ludek Smid changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |EOL
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046366
Bug 2046366 depends on bug 2046367, which changed state.
Bug 2046367 Summary: CVE-2021-45846 slic3r: NULL pointer dereference in AMF XML
parser via a crafted AMF document [fedora-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046367
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046367
Ludek Smid changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 01:50:21PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
>
> What if we made the Toolbox container image just one more base image and
> built it with ImageFactory?
>
> - Integrated into the compose process
> - Across all architectures
> - No OSBS dependency
>
> The main disadvantage is
Hi,
Michal Domonkos wrote:
> We're currently preparing an update to RPM 4.19 ALPHA for Rawhide in a
> side-tag. The new version features a soname bump:
Is there a porting guide for rpm python users? The rpmlint
package has a number of test failures and quite likely other
breakages which may
On Fri, 2023-05-19 at 22:59 +0200, Michal Domonkos wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 05:37:06PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > Nevertheless I do believe if the librpm changed its API then every
> > package which _BuildRequires_ rpm-devel should be rebuilt, just to
> > check the change doesn't
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053165
Bug 2053165 depends on bug 2053166, which changed state.
Bug 2053166 Summary: perl-XML-LibXML: Validation succeeds even though the DTD
could not be loaded [fedora-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053166
What
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053166
Ludek Smid changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 6:57 AM Petr Pisar wrote:
> V Thu, May 25, 2023 at 06:04:51AM -0400, Owen Taylor napsal(a):
> > * We need to rebuild files that can contain data from both parts
> > (/etc/ld.so.conf, /usr/lib/fontconfig/cache, etc.)
>
> How does splitting files from /usr to /app helps
On Wed, 24 May 2023 15:05:07 -0400
"Chris Murphy" wrote:
> Green is an efficient color choice. It tends to appear to the
> brightest. Part of this relates to the luminosity function of human
> vision which has a peak wavelength that happens to be the same as the
> medium wavelength photo
Hi all,
I try to create rpma source package on fedora by fedpkg --release rawhide
mockbuild.
The permissions of original rpma.spec is 0644:
$ ll rpma.spec
-rw-r--r--. 1 mockbuild mock 2107 May 25 17:31 rpma.spec
The permissions of rpma.spec in the generated rpma source package is changed to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2026907
Ludek Smid changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |EOL
Status|NEW
On 5/25/23 03:02, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 5/24/23 18:26, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Minor comment:
%(c=%{commit}; echo ${c:0:7})
is a bit nicer because it doesn't require 'cut', it just uses 'echo',
which is a shell builtin.
Or in rpm >= 4.19 (just landed in rawhide), you can
Dne 25. 05. 23 v 1:47 Demi Marie Obenour napsal(a):
On 5/24/23 08:44, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
Dne 20. 05. 23 v 22:43 Demi Marie Obenour napsal(a):
I noticed that by default, Qubes OS has voluntary kernel preemption
as opposed to full preemption. I found that enabling full preemption
On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 7:58 AM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> Joe Doss wrote:
> > On 5/24/23 4:49 PM, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> >> Wait, what?? Someone at RH wakes up in the morning and decides to cut
> >> one of the key roles (or better, THE) of Fedora community and this goes
> >>
Joe Doss wrote:
> On 5/24/23 4:49 PM, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
>> Wait, what?? Someone at RH wakes up in the morning and decides to cut
>> one of the key roles (or better, THE) of Fedora community and this goes
>> completely unannounced, unnoticed and without any backup plan?
>>
>> I have
V Thu, May 25, 2023 at 06:04:51AM -0400, Owen Taylor napsal(a):
> * We need to rebuild files that can contain data from both parts
> (/etc/ld.so.conf, /usr/lib/fontconfig/cache, etc.)
How does splitting files from /usr to /app helps with this item? Or is it
that application flatpaks are not
On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 9:34 PM Gary Buhrmaster
wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 9:50 PM Mattia Verga via devel
> wrote:
>
> > Wait, what?? Someone at RH wakes up in the morning and decides to cut
> > one of the key roles (or better, THE) of Fedora community and this goes
> > completely
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230524.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230525.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:4
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 111
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 3.91 MiB
Size of dropped packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184385
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184385
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #8 from
On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 4:02 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Owen Taylor:
>
> > On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 1:34 PM Florian Weimer
> wrote:
>
> > Do you have a pointer where I can read up on the current approach?
> >
> > Some references that I found quickly:
> >
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209937
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209937
Steve Traylen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209937
Bug ID: 2209937
Summary: [EPEL9] Please build and EPEL9 build for
perl-Term-Shell
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Term-Shell
* Owen Taylor:
> On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 1:34 PM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> * Owen Taylor:
>
> > On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 9:48 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
> >
> > * Aoife Moloney:
> >
> > > There are two types of Flatpak containers -
> > > runtimes - which contain unmodified Fedora
On 5/24/23 18:26, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 11:13:15AM -0400, Ben Beasley wrote:
In your example, the forge macros simplify the spec file only because a
snapshot is involved; but the forge macros put the snapshot info in the Release
field, which is still
44 matches
Mail list logo
