The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-226639904e
netcdf-4.7.0-3.el8
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing
cscppc-2.2.4-1.el8
csdiff-3.0.3-1.el8
> On Jul 7, 2023, at 7:09 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 6 2023 at 09:27:47 PM +0200, Florian Weimer
> wrote:
>> What about packages which already collect metrics and report them
>> somewhere (not necessarily to Red Hat)? Would these packages need to
>> change under this
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-62c97d6572
zabbix50-5.0.36-1.el7
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing
cscppc-2.2.4-1.el7
csdiff-3.0.3-1.el7
The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-eaff7ffae1
kitty-0.26.5-6.el9
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing
cscppc-2.2.4-1.el9
csdiff-3.0.3-1.el9
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 4:31 PM Michel Alexandre Salim
wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I just put up a PR to update Django in Rawhide to 4.2.3:
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-django/pull-request/33
>
> Also - Fedora 37 and 38 are on Django 4.0.x, which is no longer supported -
> should we
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 4:31 PM Michel Alexandre Salim
wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I just put up a PR to update Django in Rawhide to 4.2.3:
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-django/pull-request/33
>
> Also - Fedora 37 and 38 are on Django 4.0.x, which is no longer supported -
> should we
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 7:29 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 02:20:59AM +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> > As I understand it, this function is included in the public (at least, it is
> > declared EXT, so it should not be hidden) PL_check array (several times, the
> >
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 01:08:32AM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 8:49 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > switcheroo-controlorphan 2 weeks
> > ago
>
> Has anyone from the Workstation WG noticed this? Won't losing
>
Dear all,
I just put up a PR to update Django in Rawhide to 4.2.3:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-django/pull-request/33
Also - Fedora 37 and 38 are on Django 4.0.x, which is no longer supported -
should we just update them to 4.2.x as well?
Any version before 4.1.10 and 4.2.3 are
Dear all,
I just put up a PR to update Django in Rawhide to 4.2.3:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-django/pull-request/33
Also - Fedora 37 and 38 are on Django 4.0.x, which is no longer supported -
should we just update them to 4.2.x as well?
Any version before 4.1.10 and 4.2.3 are
Hello all,
What is the situation of nvml and twincam?
Which one is still orphan? I use both... I can maintain them easily.
I would like to do it for one of them if there is no objection.
Regards,
--
Julio Faracco
___
devel mailing list --
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EnableFwupdRefreshByDefault
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EnableFwupdRefreshByDefault
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering
On Fri, 2023-07-21 at 08:59 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> To be fully transparent, the reason I said that at all was to mitigate
> potential "FESCo voting rules are changing in the next big step
> towards IBM's destruction of all things community" FUD. It's been a
> silly enough time to be online
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Haskell_GHC_9.4_and_Stackage_21
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Haskell_GHC_9.4_and_Stackage_21
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibreOffice_7.6
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibreOffice_7.6
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering
Kevin Kofler via devel venit, vidit, dixit 2023-07-21 15:52:23:
> Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > When I make SPDX statistics I have git checkout of all dist-gits and do
> > git-pull every two week there. This morning I found that two times I got
> > an error:
> >
> > hint: Diverging branches can't be
Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> When I make SPDX statistics I have git checkout of all dist-gits and do
> git-pull every two week there. This morning I found that two times I got
> an error:
>
> hint: Diverging branches can't be fast-forwarded, you need to either:
> hint:
> hint: git merge --no-ff
>
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 2:41 AM Otto Liljalaakso
wrote:
> Recently, I adopted the orphaned Zim package for Fedora. The previous
> maintainer had added the package to EPEL, while I am not involved with
> EPEL at all. Consequently, I will not maintain the EPEL branches anymore.
>
> From going
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 2:03 AM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> Ben Cotton wrote:
> > This will be helpful to people who aren't regularly involved in FESCo
> > votes. If that's you: the proposal presented here is largely
> > clarification. There's not much in the way of substance change.
>
>
Hi Wei,
I'm trying to follow the instructions for installing your Fedora image
on the Lichee Pi 4A. I'm stuck at this step:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/RISC-V/T-Head#Flash_u-boot_for_the_specific_board_into_the_EMMC
Firstly which boot partition does this refer to? Neither the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224551
Bug ID: 2224551
Summary: Upgrade perl-Net-OpenSSH to 0.84
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Net-OpenSSH
Status: NEW
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224550
Bug ID: 2224550
Summary: Upgrade perl-Net-CLI-Interact to 2.35
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Net-CLI-Interact
Status: NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224548
Bug ID: 2224548
Summary: Upgrade perl-Mail-Box to 3.010
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Mail-Box
Status: NEW
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224547
Bug ID: 2224547
Summary: Upgrade perl-Lingua-EN-Sentence to 0.34
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Lingua-EN-Sentence
Status: NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224383
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224541
Bug ID: 2224541
Summary: Upgrade perl-DBIx-SearchBuilder to 1.78
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://metacpan.org/release/DBIx-SearchBuilder
Status: NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224383
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224540
Bug ID: 2224540
Summary: Upgrade perl-Config-Model to 2.153
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Config-Model
Status: NEW
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224450
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-c396b9b911 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-c396b9b911
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224450
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-401ddad84a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-401ddad84a
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224450
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2
* Chris Murphy:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2023, at 11:55 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Demi Marie Obenour:
>>
>>> From this thread, it appears that non-LFS 32-bit software is fundamentally
>>> unsupportable in the long run, just like software with 32-bit time_t is
>>> unsupportable. That leaves two
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224450
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224451
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224451
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-652d1c7134 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-652d1c7134
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224451
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-65509a2a81 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-65509a2a81
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224451
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230720.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230721.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 30
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.12 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
> Am 15.07.2023 um 21:03 schrieb Matthew Miller :
>
> On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 05:22:15PM +0200, Dan Čermák wrote:
>>> For a long time the Fedora default shell prompt has been monochrome,
>>> which makes it difficult to find shell prompt commands between long
>>> command outputs when scrolling
Two weeks ago we had:
* 23090 spec files in Fedora
* 29509license tags in all spec files
* 17680 tags have not been converted to SPDX yet
* 6607tags can be trivially converted using `license-fedora2spdx`
* Progress: 40.09% ██ 100%
ELN subset:
1467 out of 3764 packages are not
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 10:28:04AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> When I make SPDX statistics I have git checkout of all dist-gits and do
> git-pull every two week there. This morning I found that two times I got an
> error:
>
> hint: Diverging branches can't be fast-forwarded, you need to
Dne 21. 07. 23 v 6:32 Chris Murphy napsal(a):
It should be straightforward to have mock create a subvolume for each chroot
instead of a directory. Subvolumes have their own inode pool.
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/issues/1146
PR is welcome.
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 08:02:53AM +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Ben Cotton wrote:
> > This will be helpful to people who aren't regularly involved in FESCo
> > votes. If that's you: the proposal presented here is largely
> > clarification. There's not much in the way of substance change.
When I make SPDX statistics I have git checkout of all dist-gits and do git-pull every two week there. This morning I
found that two times I got an error:
hint: Diverging branches can't be fast-forwarded, you need to either:
hint:
hint: git merge --no-ff
hint:
hint: or:
hint:
hint: git rebase
Hi Andrea,
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 07:40:08AM -0700, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> since the libvirt-daemon-proxy package is a completely new one as far
> as RPM is concerned, all its systemd units will get presets applied
> during %post. In at least two completely valid deployment scenarios,
> this
Ben Cotton wrote:
> This will be helpful to people who aren't regularly involved in FESCo
> votes. If that's you: the proposal presented here is largely
> clarification. There's not much in the way of substance change.
Actually, it changes existing practice in that it changes the meaning of the
49 matches
Mail list logo
