[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-0454ca80fd clamav-0.103.9-1.el7 3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-254992a2ef chromium-116.0.5845.96-1.el7 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing csdiff-3.0.4-1.el7 Details about builds: csdiff-3.0.4-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-4d3a2d67ed) Non-interactive tools for processing code scan results in plain-text Update Information: - update to latest upstream release ChangeLog: * Mon Aug 21 2023 Kamil Dudka 3.0.4-1 - update to latest upstream release ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-9a26de25cf GitPython-3.1.18-2.el8 3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-37fa993c81 clamav-0.103.9-1.el8 3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-db0eac64fb chromium-116.0.5845.96-1.el8 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing csdiff-3.0.4-1.el8 Details about builds: csdiff-3.0.4-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-0d61e63464) Non-interactive tools for processing code scan results in plain-text Update Information: - update to latest upstream release ChangeLog: * Mon Aug 21 2023 Kamil Dudka 3.0.4-1 - update to latest upstream release ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2232990] perl-BibTeX-Parser-1.04 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232990 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-903bd708be has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-903bd708be` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-903bd708be See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232990 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202232990%23c6 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2232990] perl-BibTeX-Parser-1.04 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232990 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-83b10b142b has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-83b10b142b` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-83b10b142b See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232990 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202232990%23c5 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: SPDX Statistics - Voyager 2 edition
On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 9:11 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > New projection when we will be finished is 2025-01-11 (we are slowing down. > Again. :( ). Pure linear approximation. It might not be as bad as you think! All rust-* packages had been excluded from tracking since the start, so the progress I have been making hasn't been tracked, either. I'm happy to say that as of now, all packages for Rust crates (~2300 packages) have been updated to use SPDX license expressions (except those that have been FTBFS for a long time, which is about 2-3 packages). Over the past few months I've been regenerating packaging for Rust crates with rust2rpm v24, which also included switching all crates that had been generated with rust2rpm < v22 to SPDX (also involved some license fixes / clarifications / problems with missing license files that are now fixed / etc., often working with upstream projects). Fabio ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2222637] F39FailsToInstall: perl-Syntax-Feature-Loop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637 Adam Williamson changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||2203264 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2203264 [Bug 2203264] Perl 5.38 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: RFC: PR to update exiv2 in Rawhide
On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 7:02 PM Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > > Dear all, > > exiv2 has had a new release for a few months now - 0.28.0 - which causes > an soname bump. > > I've put up a PR for the update - > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/exiv2/pull-request/3 - would > appreciate people taking a close look at this; I'll also prepare a COPR > with the dependent packages rebuilt > > In the meantime, there's a 0.27.7 bugfix release, any objection to > getting that packaged for stable releases? Per https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1979565#c12 there appears to still be a pending legal review issue and you may need to scrub the sources of the BMFF parts before uploading to dist-git. I believe legal was pinged recently as to the status of the BMFF question. I have CC: the legal mailing list in case they have any input. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Rawhide build failures
I think it is actually because of a change proposal, there was a recent email about the webkit2gtk4.0 package changing: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/IFRPWZNEFEGXGQFRNTH4LTFFLTJ5DOCL/, so it is actually a problem I think. -Ian On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 7:48 PM Steven A. Falco wrote: > Looks like it is a mirror issue. Adding --enablerepo=local corrects it. > > Please disregard my previous email. > > Steve > > On 8/21/23 02:41 PM, Steven A. Falco wrote: > > Not sure if this is a known problem, but I'm getting build failures from > mock on rawhide. F37, F38, and F39 are ok. > > > > Steve > > > > Error: > > Problem: package wxGTK-devel-3.2.2.1-5.fc39.x86_64 from fedora > requires libwx_gtk3u_webview-3.2.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers > can be installed > >- cannot install the best candidate for the job > >- nothing provides libwebkit2gtk-4.0.so.37()(64bit) needed by > wxGTK-webview-3.2.2.1-5.fc39.x86_64 from fedora > >- nothing provides libjavascriptcoregtk-4.0.so.18()(64bit) needed by > wxGTK-webview-3.2.2.1-5.fc39.x86_64 from fedora > > (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' > to use not only best candidate packages) > > Finish: build setup for kicad-7.0.7-1000.20230821git45963a3.fc40.src.rpm > > Finish: build phase for kicad-7.0.7-1000.20230821git45963a3.fc40.src.rpm > > ERROR: Exception(kicad-7.0.7-1000.20230821git45963a3.fc40.src.rpm) > Config(fedora-rawhide-x86_64) 1 minutes 6 seconds > > INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result > > ERROR: Command failed: > > # /usr/bin/dnf-3 builddep --installroot > /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ --releasever 40 > --setopt=deltarpm=False --setopt=allow_vendor_change=yes --allowerasing > --disableplugin=local --disableplugin=spacewalk --disableplugin=versionlock > /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root//builddir/build/SRPMS/kicad-7.0.7-1000.20230821git45963a3.fc40.src.rpm > > No matches found for the following disable plugin patterns: local, > spacewalk, versionlock > > fedora 121 kB/s | 20 kB > 00:00 > > Error: > > Problem: package wxGTK-devel-3.2.2.1-5.fc39.x86_64 from fedora > requires libwx_gtk3u_webview-3.2.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers > can be installed > >- cannot install the best candidate for the job > >- nothing provides libwebkit2gtk-4.0.so.37()(64bit) needed by > wxGTK-webview-3.2.2.1-5.fc39.x86_64 from fedora > >- nothing provides libjavascriptcoregtk-4.0.so.18()(64bit) needed by > wxGTK-webview-3.2.2.1-5.fc39.x86_64 from fedora > > (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' > to use not only best candidate packages) > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: RFC: PR to update exiv2 in Rawhide
On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 02:01:37PM -0500, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > Dear all, > > exiv2 has had a new release for a few months now - 0.28.0 - which causes > an soname bump. > > I've put up a PR for the update - > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/exiv2/pull-request/3 - would > appreciate people taking a close look at this; I'll also prepare a COPR > with the dependent packages rebuilt > > In the meantime, there's a 0.27.7 bugfix release, any objection to > getting that packaged for stable releases? > > https://exiv2.org/whatsnew.html > https://github.com/Exiv2/exiv2/pull/2567#issuecomment-1546701495 > Here's the PR for updating Fedora 38 to 0.27.7 - looks like this one is straightforward, no soname bump or any change needed apart from modifying the source URL (exiv2 stops hosting release tarballs on their site) Best, -- Michel Alexandre Salim identities: https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2 signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
RFC: PR to update exiv2 in Rawhide
Dear all, exiv2 has had a new release for a few months now - 0.28.0 - which causes an soname bump. I've put up a PR for the update - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/exiv2/pull-request/3 - would appreciate people taking a close look at this; I'll also prepare a COPR with the dependent packages rebuilt In the meantime, there's a 0.27.7 bugfix release, any objection to getting that packaged for stable releases? https://exiv2.org/whatsnew.html https://github.com/Exiv2/exiv2/pull/2567#issuecomment-1546701495 $ rpmdistro-repoquery fedora rawhide --enablerepo=fedora-source --whatrequires exiv2-devel berry-0:1.0.0-19.fc39.src calligra-0:3.2.1-25.fc39.src darktable-0:4.4.2-1.fc40.src digikam-0:8.1.0-3.fc39.src geeqie-0:2.0.1-6.fc39.src gegl04-0:0.4.44-3.fc39.src gerbera-0:1.12.1-7.fc39.src gimp-lensfun-0:0.2.4-22.fc39.src gnome-commander-4:1.16.1-2.fc39.src gpscorrelate-0:2.0-8.fc39.src gthumb-1:3.12.2-9.fc39.src gwenview-1:23.04.3-2.fc39.src hugin-0:2022.0.0-4.fc39.src immix-0:1.3.2-44.fc39.src kde-runtime-0:17.08.3-28.fc39.src kf5-kfilemetadata-0:5.109.0-1.fc39.src kf5-libkexiv2-0:23.04.3-2.fc39.src kio-extras-0:23.04.3-2.fc39.src kphotoalbum-0:5.9.1-3.fc39.src krename-1:5.0.2-4.fc40.src krita-0:5.1.5-5.fc39.src libextractor-0:1.10-11.fc39.src libgexiv2-0:0.14.2-1.fc39.src libgexiv2-devel-0:0.14.2-1.fc39.i686 libgexiv2-devel-0:0.14.2-1.fc39.x86_64 luminance-hdr-0:2.6.1.1-59.fc39.src merkaartor-0:0.18.4-20.fc39.src nomacs-0:3.16-17.fc39.src pcmanfm-qt-0:1.3.0-1.fc39.src pdf2djvu-0:0.9.19-5.fc39.src photoqt-0:3.3-3.fc39.src phototonic-0:2.1.12-20190930gitd2176fe.fc39.src python3-exiv2-0:0.9.3-11.fc39.src qgis-0:3.32.1-2.fc40.src qimgv-0:1.0.3-10.fc39.src rawstudio-0:2.1-0.33.20210527.git58a8959.fc39.src rawtherapee-0:5.9-5.fc39.src siril-0:1.0.6-8.fc39.src taglib-sharp-0:2.1.0.0-21.fc39.src ufraw-0:0.23-0.17.20210425.fc39.src viewnior-0:1.8-7.fc39.src Best regards, -- Michel Alexandre Salim identities: https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2 signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Rawhide build failures
Looks like it is a mirror issue. Adding --enablerepo=local corrects it. Please disregard my previous email. Steve On 8/21/23 02:41 PM, Steven A. Falco wrote: Not sure if this is a known problem, but I'm getting build failures from mock on rawhide. F37, F38, and F39 are ok. Steve Error: Problem: package wxGTK-devel-3.2.2.1-5.fc39.x86_64 from fedora requires libwx_gtk3u_webview-3.2.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install the best candidate for the job - nothing provides libwebkit2gtk-4.0.so.37()(64bit) needed by wxGTK-webview-3.2.2.1-5.fc39.x86_64 from fedora - nothing provides libjavascriptcoregtk-4.0.so.18()(64bit) needed by wxGTK-webview-3.2.2.1-5.fc39.x86_64 from fedora (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages) Finish: build setup for kicad-7.0.7-1000.20230821git45963a3.fc40.src.rpm Finish: build phase for kicad-7.0.7-1000.20230821git45963a3.fc40.src.rpm ERROR: Exception(kicad-7.0.7-1000.20230821git45963a3.fc40.src.rpm) Config(fedora-rawhide-x86_64) 1 minutes 6 seconds INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result ERROR: Command failed: # /usr/bin/dnf-3 builddep --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ --releasever 40 --setopt=deltarpm=False --setopt=allow_vendor_change=yes --allowerasing --disableplugin=local --disableplugin=spacewalk --disableplugin=versionlock /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root//builddir/build/SRPMS/kicad-7.0.7-1000.20230821git45963a3.fc40.src.rpm No matches found for the following disable plugin patterns: local, spacewalk, versionlock fedora 121 kB/s | 20 kB 00:00 Error: Problem: package wxGTK-devel-3.2.2.1-5.fc39.x86_64 from fedora requires libwx_gtk3u_webview-3.2.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install the best candidate for the job - nothing provides libwebkit2gtk-4.0.so.37()(64bit) needed by wxGTK-webview-3.2.2.1-5.fc39.x86_64 from fedora - nothing provides libjavascriptcoregtk-4.0.so.18()(64bit) needed by wxGTK-webview-3.2.2.1-5.fc39.x86_64 from fedora (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Rawhide build failures
Not sure if this is a known problem, but I'm getting build failures from mock on rawhide. F37, F38, and F39 are ok. Steve Error: Problem: package wxGTK-devel-3.2.2.1-5.fc39.x86_64 from fedora requires libwx_gtk3u_webview-3.2.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install the best candidate for the job - nothing provides libwebkit2gtk-4.0.so.37()(64bit) needed by wxGTK-webview-3.2.2.1-5.fc39.x86_64 from fedora - nothing provides libjavascriptcoregtk-4.0.so.18()(64bit) needed by wxGTK-webview-3.2.2.1-5.fc39.x86_64 from fedora (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages) Finish: build setup for kicad-7.0.7-1000.20230821git45963a3.fc40.src.rpm Finish: build phase for kicad-7.0.7-1000.20230821git45963a3.fc40.src.rpm ERROR: Exception(kicad-7.0.7-1000.20230821git45963a3.fc40.src.rpm) Config(fedora-rawhide-x86_64) 1 minutes 6 seconds INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result ERROR: Command failed: # /usr/bin/dnf-3 builddep --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ --releasever 40 --setopt=deltarpm=False --setopt=allow_vendor_change=yes --allowerasing --disableplugin=local --disableplugin=spacewalk --disableplugin=versionlock /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root//builddir/build/SRPMS/kicad-7.0.7-1000.20230821git45963a3.fc40.src.rpm No matches found for the following disable plugin patterns: local, spacewalk, versionlock fedora 121 kB/s | 20 kB 00:00 Error: Problem: package wxGTK-devel-3.2.2.1-5.fc39.x86_64 from fedora requires libwx_gtk3u_webview-3.2.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install the best candidate for the job - nothing provides libwebkit2gtk-4.0.so.37()(64bit) needed by wxGTK-webview-3.2.2.1-5.fc39.x86_64 from fedora - nothing provides libjavascriptcoregtk-4.0.so.18()(64bit) needed by wxGTK-webview-3.2.2.1-5.fc39.x86_64 from fedora (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2229718] perl-Mozilla-CA-20230821 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2229718 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-Mozilla-CA-20230807 is |perl-Mozilla-CA-20230821 is |available |available --- Comment #5 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Releases retrieved: 20230821 Upstream release that is considered latest: 20230821 Current version/release in rawhide: 20230801-1.fc39 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Mozilla-CA/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/3136/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Mozilla-CA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2229718 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202229718%23c5 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2229718] perl-Mozilla-CA-20230821 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2229718 --- Comment #7 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1984435 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1984435=edit Update to 20230821 (#2229718) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2229718 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202229718%23c7 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2229718] perl-Mozilla-CA-20230821 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2229718 --- Comment #6 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Scratch build failed. Details below: BuilderException: Build failed: Command '['rpmbuild', '-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .', '-bs', '/var/tmp/thn-gls_jnbk/perl-Mozilla-CA.spec']' returned non-zero exit status 1. StdOut: setting SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=1692576000 error: Bad file: ./Mozilla-CA-20230821.tar.gz: No such file or directory RPM build errors: Bad file: ./Mozilla-CA-20230821.tar.gz: No such file or directory Traceback: File "/usr/local/lib/python3.11/site-packages/hotness/use_cases/package_scratch_build_use_case.py", line 56, in build result = self.builder.build(request.package, request.opts) ^ File "/usr/local/lib/python3.11/site-packages/hotness/builders/koji.py", line 229, in build raise BuilderException( If you think this issue is caused by some bug in the-new-hotness, please report it on the-new-hotness issue tracker: https://github.com/fedora-infra/the-new-hotness/issues -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2229718 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202229718%23c6 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: %pyproject_save_files license handlers
On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 4:58 PM Maxwell G wrote: > > On Sat Aug 19, 2023 at 22:13 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 19. 08. 23 19:44, Maxwell G wrote: > > > Hi Pythonistas, > > > > > > %pyproject_save_files automatically handles marking license files > > > with %license when a build backend installs them into a package's > > > dist-info directory and the License-File header is specified in the > > > METADATA file. Currently, only setuptools and hatchling meet this > > > criteria. Notably, poetry and flit do not support this. They will > > > install license texts into the dist-info directory, but they do not add > > > the License-File metadata. The License-File tag is not standardized, and > > > discussion on PEP 639 which defines this standard has stalled. I believe > > > relying on this feature is a problem, as if a project changes build > > > systems or some other config and a packager doesn't realize, suddenly > > > the license file won't be marked with %license or even worse, not > > > installed at all. Since the pyproject macros read the build backend from > > > pyproject.toml without packagers having to manually specify anything > > > (which is generally great!), this situation seems likely to occur. > > > > > > Until these issues are resolved, I propose banning this in Fedora and > > > requiring packagers to manually mark files with %license or at least > > > adding a large warning to the Packaging Guidelines. It can be similar to > > > the `'*' +auto` flags which are used by pyp2spec for automatic PyPI > > > builds in Copr but not allowed in Fedora proper. > > > What do y'all think? Am I missing something? > > > > Hey. Alternatively to banning this: what if we make %pyproject_save_files > > fail > > without a license? Obviously, that would be a breaking change, so it could > > be > > opt-in first. > > > >%pyproject_save_files -l ... > > > > When used like this, no License-File header would result in an error. > > > > > We could introduce a reverse flag -L (don't fail without a license), and > > have a > > discussion about changing the default later. > > > > The guidelines could than say something like: If there is a license file you > > MUST do one of the following when using %pyproject_save_files: > > > > 1) use -l and don't list it in %files explicitly > > 2) use -L and list it in %files explicitly > > > > That way, we ensure the license is packaged (and marked as %license) while > > not > > reducing automation. > > > > I like -l flag idea, but I don't think we can make it fail by default > for the foreseeable future, given the status of PEP 639 and build system > adoption. > We could use a heuristic (such as a hardcoded list of globs) to match > license files in dist-info directories if License-File doesn't exist, > but I'm not sure that's the best idea. > I'm hesitant about adding a noop -L flag until we actually have a > plan/criteria on when to start enforcing -l, but I don't feel strongly. > > > > -- > Maxwell G (@gotmax23) > Pronouns: He/They > ___ > python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue I like this plan overall. The only part I would adjust is the guidelines having a MUST requirement to use one flag or the other. Fewer required flags is better, which is why we would have a default at all. I'm totally fine with a transition to making the default behavior to fail if a license isn't found. The guidelines can say that packages should use `%pyproject_save_files -L` if it is known that it won't detect a license and it will be specified manually with %license in %files, which will be a noop now but will prevent packages from FTBFS when we make the switch. -- Carl George ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the affected packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the affected package or retire your depending package to avoid broken dependencies, otherwise your package will fail to install and/or build when the affected package gets retired. Request package ownership via the *Take* button in he left column on https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ Full report available at: https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2023-08-21.txt grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain. For human readable dependency chains, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/ For all orphaned packages, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan Package (co)maintainers Status Change cacti orphan 3 weeks ago cacti-spine orphan 3 weeks ago cockpit-file-sharing orphan 1 weeks ago dlrn epel-packagers-sig, jpena, 5 weeks ago openstack-sig, orphan fontdump orphan 4 weeks ago golang-github-apache-arrowgo-sig, orphan 3 weeks ago golang-github-caddyserver-go-sig, orphan 3 weeks ago caddy-1 golang-github-cmd go-sig, orphan 1 weeks ago golang-github-google-slothfs go-sig, orphan 2 weeks ago golang-github-timewasted-linode go-sig, orphan 1 weeks ago golang-github-vultr-govultr go-sig, orphan 1 weeks ago iso8859-2-fonts orphan 4 weeks ago java-diff-utils jvanek, orphan 1 weeks ago jol orphan 1 weeks ago juniversalchardet orphan 1 weeks ago libdmapsharingepel-packagers-sig, orphan 4 weeks ago libdnf-plugin-swidtagsorphan 5 weeks ago librealsense1 orphan 1 weeks ago material-icons-fonts ersen, orphan1 weeks ago maven-clean-pluginmizdebsk, mkulik, orphan 2 weeks ago mona orphan 5 weeks ago ocaml-ancient orphan 5 weeks ago ocaml-charinfo-width orphan 5 weeks ago ocaml-cil orphan 5 weeks ago ocaml-lwt-log orphan 5 weeks ago ocaml-mmaporphan 5 weeks ago ocaml-seq orphan 5 weeks ago ocaml-tplib orphan 5 weeks ago pcsxr orphan 1 weeks ago perl-LMDB_Fileorphan 3 weeks ago php-doctrine-doctrine-bundle2 orphan 3 weeks ago php-nrk-Predisorphan 3 weeks ago php-phpdocumentor-reflection orphan 3 weeks ago php-phpmyadmin- orphan 3 weeks ago twig-i18n-extension php-pragmarx-google2fa-qrcode orphan 3 weeks ago php-swiftmailer orphan 3 weeks ago php-twig2 orphan 3 weeks ago php-twig3 orphan 3 weeks ago procdump orphan 1 weeks ago pvs-sbcl orphan 5 weeks ago python-QtAwesome jonathanspw, orphan 0 weeks ago python-Rtree cottsay, music, orphan 0 weeks ago python-actdiagorphan 5 weeks ago python-apply-defaults orphan 0 weeks ago python-azure-eventhub orphan, python-packagers-sig 3 weeks ago python-azure-mgmt-automanage orphan, python-packagers-sig 3 weeks ago python-azure-mgmt-azurestackhci orphan, python-packagers-sig 3 weeks ago
Heads-up: abseil-cpp 20230802.0 coming to F40/Rawhide and F39/Branched
In one week, 2023-08-28, I plan to update abseil-cpp from 20230125.3 to 20230802.0 (Abseil LTS branch, Aug 2023)[1] in side tags for F40/Rawhide and F39/Branched. Like all new calendar versions of abseil-cpp, this breaks ABI compatibility and bumps the SONAME version. There are no intentional breaking API changes[2]. Testing in COPR[3] indicates all directly-dependent packages are compatible. (A change was required in mozc and fcitx5-mozc, which were using internal/non-API symbols[4]; the necessary change has already been discussed with upstream and committed to dist-git.) Besides abseil-cpp, I will rebuild the following dependent packages as maintainer or co-maintainer: bear, fastnetmon, grpc, libarrow (Rawhide only, using collaborator privileges) I should be able to build existing commits of the following packages even though I do not have privileges on the dist-git projects: fcitx5-mozc, mozc The following were tested in COPR but do not need to be rebuilt, because they are header-only and do not link dynamically against abseil-cpp: parlaylib I will ask the maintainers of the following to rebuild into the side tags, asking a provenpackager to help if the maintainers are not able to follow up within a few days: bloaty, credentials-fetcher, frr, ilbc, libarrow (F39 only), libphonenumber, plasma-dialer, qmlkonsole, syslog-ng If you maintain a package on this final list, please expect another direct email once the side tags are ready and I have built at least abseil-cpp and grpc. If you want me to handle rebuilds like this in the future, you can add me as a co-maintainer (FAS music) with commit privileges, or at minimum collaborator privileges on the rawhide branch since these updates will usually happen before branching. Maintainers of all affected packages should have received this email directly (by BCC rather than CC, to keep the message from being held for moderation due to a long CC list). Finally, those working on the eventual upgrade of protobuf from 3.x to v4 (22.x/23.x/24.x) should be aware that it looks like we will need to package a 24.x release for compatibility with this abseil-cpp release[5][6]. This shouldn’t be a problem; we are nowhere close to working out all the issues in dependent packages for protobuf v4, which will certainly not happen in F39, and another rebase of the working PR[7] will be a trivial effort compared to the other necessary work. [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/abseil-cpp/pull-request/14 [2] https://github.com/abseil/abseil-cpp/releases/tag/20230802.0 [3] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/music/abseil-cpp/packages/ [4] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231905 [5] https://github.com/google/mozc/issues/790#issuecomment-1679915315 [6] https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/pull/13534/files [7] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/protobuf/pull-request/25 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2232990] perl-BibTeX-Parser-1.04 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232990 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-83b10b142b has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-83b10b142b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232990 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202232990%23c4 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2232990] perl-BibTeX-Parser-1.04 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232990 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-903bd708be has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-903bd708be -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232990 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202232990%23c3 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2232990] perl-BibTeX-Parser-1.04 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232990 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-BibTeX-Parser-1.04-1.f ||c39 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232990 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2229845] perl-Convert-ASN1-0.34 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2229845 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Fixed In Version||perl-Convert-ASN1-0.34-1.fc ||40 ||perl-Convert-ASN1-0.34-1.fc ||39 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Last Closed||2023-08-21 15:56:24 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2229845 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2230299] perl-Mail-Box-IMAP4-3.008 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2230299 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Fixed In Version||perl-Mail-Box-IMAP4-3.008-1 ||.fc40 ||perl-Mail-Box-IMAP4-3.008-1 ||.fc39 Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Status|NEW |CLOSED Last Closed||2023-08-21 15:54:39 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2230299 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2232993] perl-LaTeX-ToUnicode-0.53 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232993 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Last Closed||2023-08-21 15:49:40 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232993 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2232990] perl-BibTeX-Parser-1.04 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232990 Bug 2232990 depends on bug 2232993, which changed state. Bug 2232993 Summary: perl-LaTeX-ToUnicode-0.53 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232993 What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232990 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the affected packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the affected package or retire your depending package to avoid broken dependencies, otherwise your package will fail to install and/or build when the affected package gets retired. Request package ownership via the *Take* button in he left column on https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ Full report available at: https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2023-08-21.txt grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain. For human readable dependency chains, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/ For all orphaned packages, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan Package (co)maintainers Status Change cacti orphan 3 weeks ago cacti-spine orphan 3 weeks ago cockpit-file-sharing orphan 1 weeks ago dlrn epel-packagers-sig, jpena, 5 weeks ago openstack-sig, orphan fontdump orphan 4 weeks ago golang-github-apache-arrowgo-sig, orphan 3 weeks ago golang-github-caddyserver-go-sig, orphan 3 weeks ago caddy-1 golang-github-cmd go-sig, orphan 1 weeks ago golang-github-google-slothfs go-sig, orphan 2 weeks ago golang-github-timewasted-linode go-sig, orphan 1 weeks ago golang-github-vultr-govultr go-sig, orphan 1 weeks ago iso8859-2-fonts orphan 4 weeks ago java-diff-utils jvanek, orphan 1 weeks ago jol orphan 1 weeks ago juniversalchardet orphan 1 weeks ago libdmapsharingepel-packagers-sig, orphan 4 weeks ago libdnf-plugin-swidtagsorphan 5 weeks ago librealsense1 orphan 1 weeks ago material-icons-fonts ersen, orphan1 weeks ago maven-clean-pluginmizdebsk, mkulik, orphan 2 weeks ago mona orphan 5 weeks ago ocaml-ancient orphan 5 weeks ago ocaml-charinfo-width orphan 5 weeks ago ocaml-cil orphan 5 weeks ago ocaml-lwt-log orphan 5 weeks ago ocaml-mmaporphan 5 weeks ago ocaml-seq orphan 5 weeks ago ocaml-tplib orphan 5 weeks ago pcsxr orphan 1 weeks ago perl-LMDB_Fileorphan 3 weeks ago php-doctrine-doctrine-bundle2 orphan 3 weeks ago php-nrk-Predisorphan 3 weeks ago php-phpdocumentor-reflection orphan 3 weeks ago php-phpmyadmin- orphan 3 weeks ago twig-i18n-extension php-pragmarx-google2fa-qrcode orphan 3 weeks ago php-swiftmailer orphan 3 weeks ago php-twig2 orphan 3 weeks ago php-twig3 orphan 3 weeks ago procdump orphan 1 weeks ago pvs-sbcl orphan 5 weeks ago python-QtAwesome jonathanspw, orphan 0 weeks ago python-Rtree cottsay, music, orphan 0 weeks ago python-actdiagorphan 5 weeks ago python-apply-defaults orphan 0 weeks ago python-azure-eventhub orphan, python-packagers-sig 3 weeks ago python-azure-mgmt-automanage orphan, python-packagers-sig 3 weeks ago python-azure-mgmt-azurestackhci orphan, python-packagers-sig 3 weeks ago
[Bug 2232990] perl-BibTeX-Parser-1.04 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232990 --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar --- The minimal version seems arbitrary. I will retain the old value and push this into all Fedora releases. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232990 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202232990%23c2 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2232993] perl-LaTeX-ToUnicode-0.53 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232993 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version||perl-LaTeX-ToUnicode-0.53-1 ||.fc40 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232993 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2229845] perl-Convert-ASN1-0.34 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2229845 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added CC|jples...@redhat.com,| |ka...@ucw.cz, | |mspa...@redhat.com, | |rhug...@redhat.com, | |rstr...@redhat.com | Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2229845 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Request to review a MinGW subpackges in libsodium
On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 03:17:21PM +0200, Marián Konček wrote: > I opened a PR adding mingw subpackages to libsodium according to my best > knowledge (which is not too large related to mingw packaging): > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libsodium/pull-request/3 > > I talked with the maintainer and it could be accepted, but I would like > someone more experienced from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW to take a > look and tell me if i missed some simplifications. The main item I see missing is conditionalization of the sub-packages, which is important for anyone wanting to rebuild the same spec on RHEL/EPEL where most of mingw is not present. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/MinGW/#_disabling_mingw_packages With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o-https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o-https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org-o-https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Request to review a MinGW subpackges in libsodium
Hi
Please check out [1] for a sample unified native/mingw spec with
autotools build. Specific remarks:
- Add %{?mingw_debug_package}
- Explicit BR on mingw-binutils probably unnecessary
- Try %global _configure ../configure instead of cloning the entire
source tree
- Add %mingw_debug_install_post
Sandro
[1]
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gtkspell3/blob/rawhide/f/gtkspell3.spec
On 21.08.23 15:17, Marián Konček wrote:
I opened a PR adding mingw subpackages to libsodium according to my
best knowledge (which is not too large related to mingw packaging):
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libsodium/pull-request/3
I talked with the maintainer and it could be accepted, but I would
like someone more experienced from
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW to take a look and tell me if i
missed some simplifications.
Thanks.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Request to review a MinGW subpackges in libsodium
I opened a PR adding mingw subpackages to libsodium according to my best knowledge (which is not too large related to mingw packaging): https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libsodium/pull-request/3 I talked with the maintainer and it could be accepted, but I would like someone more experienced from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW to take a look and tell me if i missed some simplifications. Thanks. -- Marián Konček ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2232993] perl-LaTeX-ToUnicode-0.53 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232993 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- Many new code. Safer for Rawhide only. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232993 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202232993%23c1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Dropping of sshd.socket unit
Sounds good! Leslie Satenstein On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 05:08:06 a.m. GMT-4, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Do, 17.08.23 08:25, Chris Adams (li...@cmadams.net) wrote: > Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering said: > > Yes, and if this is not what you want, then disable the > > ratelimit. That's what I am saying? > > It would be useful for systemd to have "cooldown periods" for things, > similar to inetd and classic init, where misbehaving things (whether > services or sockets) were paused for a time (configurable even) and then > returned to service. AFAIK this is a flaw in general in systemd's > limits; if something exceeds them, it takes manual intervention to reset > them. There's a TODO list item for that upstream already. https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/main/TODO#L153 Definitely makes sense, and should be very easy to add, the underlying concepts are all implemented, it's just a matter of exposing this under new options. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Berlin ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2232993] perl-LaTeX-ToUnicode-0.53 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232993 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|ppi...@redhat.com | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232993 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2232993] perl-LaTeX-ToUnicode-0.53 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232993 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||2232990 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232990 [Bug 2232990] perl-BibTeX-Parser-1.04 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232993 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2232990] perl-BibTeX-Parser-1.04 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232990 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||2232993 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- A bug-fix release. Bumps a minimal version of a LaTeX-ToUnicode dependency to 0.52. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232993 [Bug 2232993] perl-LaTeX-ToUnicode-0.53 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232990 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202232990%23c1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2232990] perl-BibTeX-Parser-1.04 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232990 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|ppi...@redhat.com | Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232990 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2232889] perl-ORLite-2.00 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232889 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-ORLite-2.00-1.fc39 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- A bug-fix release suitable for all Fedoras. A push to stable Fedoras waits on stabilizing a previous build. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232889 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202232889%23c1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2232294] perl-Wx needs a rebuild with perl(Alien::wxWidgets::Config::gtk_3_2_2_uni_gcc_3_4)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232294 Miro Hrončok changed: What|Removed |Added Component|perl-Wx-GLCanvas|perl-Wx Blocks|2168842 (F39FTBFS), 2231791 | |(F40FTBFS,RAWHIDEFTBFS) | Summary|perl-Wx-GLCanvas-0.09-36.fc |perl-Wx needs a rebuild |40 FTBFS: Makefile.PL fails |with ||perl(Alien::wxWidgets::Conf ||ig::gtk_3_2_2_uni_gcc_3_4) Assignee|mhron...@redhat.com |spo...@gmail.com CC||spo...@gmail.com --- Comment #9 from Miro Hrončok --- perl-Alien-wxWidgets-0.69-24.fc39 was built with wxGTK-3.2.2.1-3.fc39 it provides perl(Alien::wxWidgets::Config::gtk_3_2_2_uni_gcc_3_4) perl-Alien-wxWidgets-0.69-23.fc38 was built with wxGTK--3.2.1-5.fc38 it provides perl(Alien::wxWidgets::Config::gtk_3_2_1_uni_gcc_3_4) perl-Wx-0.9932-29.fc39 was built with perl-Alien-wxWidgets-0.69-23.fc38 and apparently no longer functions with perl-Alien-wxWidgets-0.69-24.fc39 Hence I suppose we need to rebuild perl-Wx once more to fix this now and add the requirement on perl(Alien::wxWidgets::Config::gtk_XXX) to prevent this in the future as Scott says. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168842 [Bug 2168842] Fedora 39 FTBFS Tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231791 [Bug 2231791] Fedora 40 FTBFS Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232294 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202232294%23c9 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Looking for a new (possibly better) python-argcomplete maintainer
Hello.
I am the main admin of python-argcomplete in Fedora. The package is severely
outdated but works.
I don't want to maintain it, but pytest uses it for tests, so I don't want to
be retired. Is there somebody else who would take better care of it than I do?
$ repoquery -q --repo=rawhide{,-source} --whatrequires python3-argcomplete
389-ds-base-0:2.4.3-1.fc39.src
abrt-0:2.17.1-3.fc39.src
abrt-tui-0:2.17.1-3.fc39.noarch
ansible-core-0:2.15.3-1.fc40.noarch
ansible-core-0:2.15.3-1.fc40.src
azure-cli-0:2.51.0-1.fc39.src
barman-0:3.7.0-1.fc39.noarch
diffoscope-0:245-2.fc39.src
fedpkg-0:1.44-6.fc39.noarch
fedrq-0:0.10.0-2.fc39.src
nox-0:2023.04.22-3.fc39.noarch
nox-0:2023.04.22-3.fc39.src
pepc-0:1.4.25-3.fc39.src
pipx-0:1.2.0-5.fc39.noarch
pipx-0:1.2.0-5.fc39.src
pmbootstrap-0:1.53.0-3.fc39.src
pytest-0:7.3.2-4.fc39.src
python-knack-1:0.11.0-1.fc39.src
python3-azure-cli-core-0:2.51.0-1.fc39.noarch
python3-barman-0:3.7.0-1.fc39.noarch
python3-colcon-argcomplete-0:0.3.3-16.fc39.noarch
python3-knack-1:0.11.0-1.fc39.noarch
python3-lib389-0:2.4.3-1.fc39.noarch
python3-pepc-0:1.4.25-3.fc39.noarch
python3-rpkg-0:1.66-10.fc39.noarch
rpkg-0:1.66-10.fc39.src
rpmdevtools-0:9.6-4.fc39.noarch
rpmspectool-0:1.99.7-12.fc39.noarch
virt-manager-common-0:4.1.0-3.fc39.noarch
Thanks,
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2232889] perl-ORLite-2.00 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232889 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value CC|jples...@redhat.com,|ppi...@redhat.com |mmasl...@redhat.com | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|jples...@redhat.com |ppi...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232889 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2233072] New: perl-DB_File-1.859 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2233072 Bug ID: 2233072 Summary: perl-DB_File-1.859 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-DB_File Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: jples...@redhat.com, mspa...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 1.859 Upstream release that is considered latest: 1.859 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.858-501.fc39 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/DB_File/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/2803/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-DB_File -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2233072 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202233072%23c0 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Dropping of sshd.socket unit
On Do, 17.08.23 08:25, Chris Adams (li...@cmadams.net) wrote: > Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering said: > > Yes, and if this is not what you want, then disable the > > ratelimit. That's what I am saying? > > It would be useful for systemd to have "cooldown periods" for things, > similar to inetd and classic init, where misbehaving things (whether > services or sockets) were paused for a time (configurable even) and then > returned to service. AFAIK this is a flaw in general in systemd's > limits; if something exceeds them, it takes manual intervention to reset > them. There's a TODO list item for that upstream already. https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/main/TODO#L153 Definitely makes sense, and should be very easy to add, the underlying concepts are all implemented, it's just a matter of exposing this under new options. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Berlin ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Heads up: merging SPDX related PRs
Dne 21. 08. 23 v 10:32 Florian Weimer napsal(a): Over the time we had several workshops about SPDX. Some people did the SPDX migrations for others (me included). Some of the PR are not merged yet. E.g. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/pull-request/251 The License: field is incomplete, it needs to pick up the autoconf exception. Fixed. Nice catch. Thank you. In past I waited until it is merged. Now I plan to be more progressive and I plan in these individual cases to: 1) create PR 2) wait 14 days 3) if there will be no response, the I will merge it as a proven packager. I assume you plan to translate just the License: field and not look at the actual license references in the source code for this. If that approach is acceptable, package maintainers could do the same thing. It would significantly speed up the conversion (e.g., no need to run fossology). No. I on these workshops we have done the full work. Not just plain translation of License field. But as you saw above - nobody is perfect. -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCA Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Heads up: merging SPDX related PRs
* Miroslav Suchý: > Over the time we had several workshops about SPDX. Some people did the SPDX > migrations for others (me included). > > Some of the PR are not merged yet. E.g. > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/pull-request/251 The License: field is incomplete, it needs to pick up the autoconf exception. > In past I waited until it is merged. Now I plan to be more progressive > and I plan in these individual cases to: > > 1) create PR > > 2) wait 14 days > > 3) if there will be no response, the I will merge it as a proven packager. I assume you plan to translate just the License: field and not look at the actual license references in the source code for this. If that approach is acceptable, package maintainers could do the same thing. It would significantly speed up the conversion (e.g., no need to run fossology). Thanks, Florian ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2232294] perl-Wx-GLCanvas-0.09-36.fc40 FTBFS: Makefile.PL fails
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232294 --- Comment #8 from Michal Josef Spacek --- (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #6) > However, perl-Wx-0.9932-29.fc39 was built with wxGTK 3.2.2.1-3.fc39 > > See https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2248887 There is 'gtk_3_2_1_uni_gcc_3_4' still in /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/Wx/build/Opt.pm in this package -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232294 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202232294%23c8 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
