On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 09:08:23PM -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> No, it's a demonstration of applications that aren't being properly
> maintained when they're still using functions that have been deprecated for
> 6 releases which is also that many years. Python core is very stable.
So... you're
On 8/25/23 20:51, Solomon Peachy via devel wrote:
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 06:55:17PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
It's a lot of output, but not *so* many problems when you boil it down.
Yeah, it's ultimately another example (or four) of how Python is utterly
worthless as a "stable"
Only this errors, none of them look like real problems:
Erro:
Problema 1: problema com o pacote instalado
telegram-desktop-4.8.4-3.fc38.x86_64
- telegram-desktop-4.8.4-3.fc38.x86_64 from @System does not belong to a
distupgrade repository
- nothing provides qt6-qtbase(x86-64) = 6.5.1 needed by
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 06:55:17PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> It's a lot of output, but not *so* many problems when you boil it down.
Yeah, it's ultimately another example (or four) of how Python is utterly
worthless as a "stable" application platform.
> I suppose we could just vendor
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-5120258393
ImageMagick-6.9.12.93-1.el8
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing
sasl-xoauth2-0.24-1.el8
Details about builds:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2234803
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183997
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA
Fixed In
On Fri, 2023-08-25 at 20:32 -0400, Solomon Peachy via devel wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 08:22:42PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > Do you want to make Fedora 39 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
> > and try to run:
>
> I ran this on a bunch of my fleet, lots of problems, and they
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 08:22:42PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 39 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run:
I ran this on a bunch of my fleet, lots of problems, and they all seem
to be related to the Python 3.12 bump.
F38 Workstation #1:
# F39 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2023-08-28
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.libera.chat
Hi folks! We have a huge list of proposals (8 proposed blockers, 22
proposed FEs) to review, so let's have a meeting on Monday. It would be
**REALLY APPRECIATED** if folks can
Hi,
On 8/25/23 22:05, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 7:27 PM Hans de Goede wrote:
>>
>> If there is a /etc/kernel/cmdline file then that will be used
>> for the generated /boot/loader/entries/*.conf files.
>>
>> (I was recently bitten by this myself)
>
> Yes, there is and
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 7:27 PM Hans de Goede wrote:
>
> If there is a /etc/kernel/cmdline file then that will be used
> for the generated /boot/loader/entries/*.conf files.
>
> (I was recently bitten by this myself)
Yes, there is and its contents are those of the problematic
On 8/25/23 20:24, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 at 16:00, Benson Muite wrote:
>> Better as optional rather than default-enabled. It would likely be
>> helpful for computers in an institutional setting where the LAN is well
>> controlled.
>
> So that's the thing; if it's default
That sounds very good, and having a libs package desirable anyway should more
consumers pop up
On 25.08.23 20:43, Richard Hughes wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 at 19:34, Richard Hughes wrote:
Yes, that's what I have right now. I do need to split out a
passim-libs so that you can remove the
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 at 19:34, Richard Hughes wrote:
> Yes, that's what I have right now. I do need to split out a
> passim-libs so that you can remove the daemon and just leave the tiny
> client library.
Something like this perhaps?
diff --git a/passim.spec b/passim.spec
index bc51e57..3ad7ccc
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 at 19:26, Marcus Müller wrote:
> I fully agree with that assessment. "Here's a knob you turn that has the
> potential to make
> your firmware update 2s faster and is generally good for the ecosystem, but
> you will have
> set it on every machine you set up" will not lead to
Hi Richard,
On 25.08.23 19:24, Richard Hughes wrote:
So that's the thing; if it's default disabled then I can say with
certainty that almost nobody will use it and we won't see any
reduction in network traffic at all.
I fully agree with that assessment. "Here's a knob you turn that has the
Move mailman to newer release of Fedora or CentOS
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8455
https://gitlab.com/mailman/hyperkitty
It looks like a good amount of work is already done on this. Nice job!
___
devel mailing list --
In one week, 2023-09-01, I plan to update the usd package (OpenUSD) from
23.05 to 23.08 [1][2] in Rawhide/F40 and in F39. There are only very
minor API changes, but the ABI is incompatible and the SONAME version is
bumped.
I will rebuild the sole dependent package, blender, in a side tag for
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 at 15:59, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Is this something where you could enable it on one specific device and
> have a systemd time to pull the metadata and it advertises it to the
> network so you can designate a single device to run the service?
Yes, not a bad idea at all. Can
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 at 16:27, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> It depends on the scanning from ports open to unknown shared files to 'why
> did our network costs go up so much?'
Surely if you're on a local network with bandwidth costs you'd turn
off avahi or lock down the firewall? Lots of stuff blasts
Hi,
On 8/25/23 17:53, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On one of my computers, for the last couple of kernel updates I'm not
> getting the proper options in the corresponding *.conf files in
> /boot/loader/entries. Some of the options specified in
> /etc/default/grub are there, but
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 at 16:00, Benson Muite wrote:
> Better as optional rather than default-enabled. It would likely be
> helpful for computers in an institutional setting where the LAN is well
> controlled.
So that's the thing; if it's default disabled then I can say with
certainty that almost
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2234803
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-46db0ae756 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-46db0ae756
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2234803
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-IO-Interactive-1.025-1
On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 11:08:14PM +0200, Sandro wrote:
...snip...
>
> I see. Could some sysadmin with supercow powers insert a tag globally? Or
> would that be treading on a great many toes?
We looked at adding some 'standard' tags, but they would need to be
added to each package seperately.
Hello,
On one of my computers, for the last couple of kernel updates I'm not
getting the proper options in the corresponding *.conf files in
/boot/loader/entries. Some of the options specified in
/etc/default/grub are there, but anything related to the root
partition and some other options are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2234803
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 at 10:31, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 at 13:19, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> > My understanding was that Microsoft found their own 'share updates' not
> working as much as expected
>
> Hmm, I heard the opposite; can you give any more info? They have way
>
No, I
On 8/25/23 14:42, Richard Hughes wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was thinking of adding Passim as a default-installed and
> default-enabled dep of fwupd in the Fedora 40 release. Before I create
> lots of unnecessary drama, is there any early feedback on what's
> described in
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 12:43 PM Richard Hughes wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I was thinking of adding Passim as a default-installed and
> default-enabled dep of fwupd in the Fedora 40 release. Before I create
> lots of unnecessary drama, is there any early feedback on what's
> described in
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 at 13:19, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> My understanding was that Microsoft found their own 'share updates' not
> working as much as expected
Hmm, I heard the opposite; can you give any more info? They have way
more telemetry than we do, and I was told it would not "be feasible"
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023, at 7:42 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was thinking of adding Passim as a default-installed and
> default-enabled dep of fwupd in the Fedora 40 release. Before I create
> lots of unnecessary drama, is there any early feedback on what's
> described in
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 at 13:50, Petr Pisar wrote:
> I see you wrote "metadata". It's not the firmware itself .Sill my concert is
> the same: what's a license of the metada? Can I redistribute them?
The metadata is explicitly CC0-1.0 -- but even if we later did
firmware one of the things I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2234803
Bug ID: 2234803
Summary: Broken dependency for perl-IO-Interactive-tests
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel7
Status: NEW
Component: perl-IO-Interactive
Assignee:
OLD: Fedora-39-20230824.n.0
NEW: Fedora-39-20230825.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
V Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 12:42:34PM +0100, Richard Hughes napsal(a):
> The tl;dr: is I want to add a mDNS server that reshares the public
> firmware update metadata from the LVFS on your LAN.
I see you wrote "metadata". It's not the firmware itself .Sill my concert is
the same: what's a license of
On Sun, 2023-08-20 at 12:19 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Over the time we had several workshops about SPDX. Some people did
> the SPDX migrations for others (me included).
From file
https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/packages-without-spdx-final-maintainers.txt
I retrieve
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 at 07:44, Richard Hughes wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was thinking of adding Passim as a default-installed and
> default-enabled dep of fwupd in the Fedora 40 release. Before I create
> lots of unnecessary drama, is there any early feedback on what's
> described in
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 1:28 PM Leigh Scott wrote:
> > Hi Leigh,
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 10:03 AM Leigh Scott
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> > As I'm on my laptop again, I was able to try to run the rebase again and
> > for Philip it was about rpmfusion-nonfree-updates, but I'm hitting:
> >
> >
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230824.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230825.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 70
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 3.61 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Hi all,
I was thinking of adding Passim as a default-installed and
default-enabled dep of fwupd in the Fedora 40 release. Before I create
lots of unnecessary drama, is there any early feedback on what's
described in https://github.com/hughsie/passim/blob/main/README.md
please.
The tl;dr: is I
> Hi Leigh,
>
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 10:03 AM Leigh Scott wrote:
>
>
> As I'm on my laptop again, I was able to try to run the rebase again and
> for Philip it was about rpmfusion-nonfree-updates, but I'm hitting:
>
> error: Updating rpm-md repo 'rpmfusion-free-updates': cannot update repo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2229718
--- Comment #8 from Michal Josef Spacek ---
Changes:
20230821
- Update from Mozilla repository to 2023-08-21
- Added certificates:
- Atos TrustedRoot Root CA ECC TLS 2021
sha256:
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Mozilla-CA` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
20230821 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Mozilla-CA/pull-request/5
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Mozilla-CA` that
you are following:
``
20230821 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Mozilla-CA/pull-request/5
___
perl-devel mailing list --
Hi Leigh,
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 10:03 AM Leigh Scott
wrote:
> Those warnings should disappear once the 39 release rpm's are installed.
> I have fixed the missing repodata for the unused updates repo's.
>
As I'm on my laptop again, I was able to try to run the rebase again and
for Philip it
Hello Robert, Cześć Dominik!
Now I am overwhelmed - it was indeed an absolute pleasure to meet you in person
at Flock '23 (Cork). Looking forward to the next one :)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Mozilla-CA` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
20230807 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Mozilla-CA/pull-request/4
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Mozilla-CA` that
you are following:
``
20230807 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Mozilla-CA/pull-request/4
___
perl-devel mailing list --
Cześć, Adam!
On Thursday, 24 August 2023 at 15:48, Adam Piasecki wrote:
[...]
> Here's to many fruitful discussions!
Welcome to Fedora! It was an excellent opportunity to meet you in person
at Flock.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora https://fedoraproject.org
There should be a science of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2234337
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2234337
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
Those warnings should disappear once the 39 release rpm's are installed.
I have fixed the missing repodata for the unused updates repo's.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Am Fr., 25. Aug. 2023 um 08:21 Uhr schrieb Adam Williamson
:
>
> On Thu, 2023-08-24 at 21:23 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 07:39:07PM +0200, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Just a heads-up: for the upgrade to DNF5 in F39, we unprotected the DNF
> > >
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 7:59 PM Michael Catanzaro
>
> It looks like these fdo / non-GNOME projects would need new homes /
> maintainers:
>
> - power-profiles-daemon
> - switcheroo-control
> - iio-sensor-proxy
> - low-memory-monitor
>
> Looks like they are *all* installed by default in
On Thu, 2023-08-24 at 21:23 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 07:39:07PM +0200, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Just a heads-up: for the upgrade to DNF5 in F39, we unprotected the DNF
> > package, which leaves all of our users vulnerable to a removal of DNF.
> >
Hi Leigh,
On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 7:26 PM Leigh Scott wrote:
> > just a note rpmfusion free and nofree not ready
> >
> >
>
> What do you mean?
> I branched rpmfusion two week ago, the repo deps look fine to me.
>
See the reply from Philip Rhoades - I've hit the same on Silverblue when
58 matches
Mail list logo
