[Bug 2237037] New: perl-CPAN-Mini-1.111017 is available

2023-09-02 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237037

Bug ID: 2237037
   Summary: perl-CPAN-Mini-1.111017 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-CPAN-Mini
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Releases retrieved: 1.111017
Upstream release that is considered latest: 1.111017
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.111016-27.fc39
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/CPAN-Mini/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/2731/


To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-CPAN-Mini


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237037

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202237037%23c0
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2237034] New: perl-Email-MIME-Kit-3.000008 is available

2023-09-02 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237034

Bug ID: 2237034
   Summary: perl-Email-MIME-Kit-3.08 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Email-MIME-Kit
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Releases retrieved: 3.08
Upstream release that is considered latest: 3.08
Current version/release in rawhide: 3.07-3.fc39
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Email-MIME-Kit/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/12953/


To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Email-MIME-Kit


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237034

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202237034%23c0
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

2023-09-02 Thread updates 
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
   3  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-3067977cb5   
indent-2.2.13-4.el8
   1  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-50480e7e18   
clamav-0.103.10-1.el8
   0  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-6770a3482d   
xrdp-0.9.23-1.el8


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing

libtommath-1.1.0-4.el8

Details about builds:



 libtommath-1.1.0-4.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-2c5ac6a8d7)
 A portable number theoretic multiple-precision integer library

Update Information:

Security fix for CVE-2023-36328

ChangeLog:

* Sat Sep  2 2023 Frantisek Sumsal  - 1.1.0-4
- Fix CVE-2023-36328 (#2236877,#2236878)

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #2236877 - CVE-2023-36328 libtommath: Integer Overflow 
vulnerability in mp_grow in libtom
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2236877


___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing report

2023-09-02 Thread updates 
The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
   3  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-b305ec138e   
indent-2.2.13-4.el9
   1  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-c2aea8a27e   
xrdp-0.9.23-1.el9


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing

libtommath-1.2.0-10.el9

Details about builds:



 libtommath-1.2.0-10.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1e3b2a7b2f)
 A portable number theoretic multiple-precision integer library

Update Information:

Security fix for CVE-2023-36328

ChangeLog:

* Sat Sep  2 2023 Frantisek Sumsal  - 1.2.0-10
- Fix CVE-2023-36328 (#2236877,#2236878)

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #2236877 - CVE-2023-36328 libtommath: Integer Overflow 
vulnerability in mp_grow in libtom
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2236877


___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2237032] New: perl-Log-Dispatchouli-3.007 is available

2023-09-02 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237032

Bug ID: 2237032
   Summary: perl-Log-Dispatchouli-3.007 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Log-Dispatchouli
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: iarn...@gmail.com, jples...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Releases retrieved: 3.007
Upstream release that is considered latest: 3.007
Current version/release in rawhide: 3.006-1.fc40
URL: https://metacpan.org/dist/Log-Dispatchouli

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/7173/


To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Log-Dispatchouli


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237032

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202237032%23c0
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230902.n.1 changes

2023-09-02 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report 
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230901.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230902.n.1

= SUMMARY =
Added images:9
Dropped images:  1
Added packages:  6
Dropped packages:24
Upgraded packages:   224
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  18.25 MiB
Size of dropped packages:101.64 MiB
Size of upgraded packages:   1.97 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   5.87 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =
Image: i3 live aarch64
Path: Spins/aarch64/iso/Fedora-i3-Live-aarch64-Rawhide-20230902.n.1.iso
Image: Container_Minimal_Base docker ppc64le
Path: 
Container/ppc64le/images/Fedora-Container-Minimal-Base-Rawhide-20230902.n.1.ppc64le.tar.xz
Image: Kinoite dvd-ostree aarch64
Path: Kinoite/aarch64/iso/Fedora-Kinoite-ostree-aarch64-Rawhide-20230902.n.1.iso
Image: Kinoite dvd-ostree ppc64le
Path: Kinoite/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-Kinoite-ostree-ppc64le-Rawhide-20230902.n.1.iso
Image: Sericea dvd-ostree x86_64
Path: Sericea/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Sericea-ostree-x86_64-Rawhide-20230902.n.1.iso
Image: Kinoite dvd-ostree x86_64
Path: Kinoite/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Kinoite-ostree-x86_64-Rawhide-20230902.n.1.iso
Image: Silverblue dvd-ostree aarch64
Path: 
Silverblue/aarch64/iso/Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-aarch64-Rawhide-20230902.n.1.iso
Image: Silverblue dvd-ostree x86_64
Path: 
Silverblue/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-x86_64-Rawhide-20230902.n.1.iso
Image: Onyx dvd-ostree x86_64
Path: Onyx/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Onyx-ostree-x86_64-Rawhide-20230902.n.1.iso

= DROPPED IMAGES =
Image: KDE live aarch64
Path: Spins/aarch64/iso/Fedora-KDE-Live-aarch64-Rawhide-20230901.n.0.iso

= ADDED PACKAGES =
Package: f39-backgrounds-39.0.1-1.fc40
Summary: Fedora 39 default desktop background
RPMs:f39-backgrounds f39-backgrounds-base f39-backgrounds-budgie 
f39-backgrounds-extras-base f39-backgrounds-extras-gnome 
f39-backgrounds-extras-kde f39-backgrounds-extras-mate 
f39-backgrounds-extras-xfce f39-backgrounds-gnome f39-backgrounds-kde 
f39-backgrounds-mate f39-backgrounds-xfce
Size:6.70 MiB

Package: golang-github-containerd-cgroups-3-3.0.2-1.fc40
Summary: Cgroups package for Go
RPMs:golang-github-containerd-cgroups-3 
golang-github-containerd-cgroups-3-devel
Size:9.04 MiB

Package: golang-github-google-renameio-2-2.0.0-4.fc40
Summary: Package renameio provides a way to atomically create or replace a file 
or symbolic link
RPMs:golang-github-google-renameio-2-devel
Size:28.03 KiB

Package: rust-listenfd-1.0.1-1.fc40
Summary: Simple library to work with listenfds passed from the outside
RPMs:rust-listenfd+default-devel rust-listenfd-devel
Size:25.88 KiB

Package: sdubby-1.0-2.fc40
Summary: Set of systemd-boot shims that don't fit anywhere else in the distro
RPMs:sdubby
Size:17.46 KiB

Package: wxsvg-1.5.24-4.fc40
Summary: C++ library to create, manipulate and render SVG files
RPMs:wxsvg wxsvg-devel
Size:2.44 MiB


= DROPPED PACKAGES =
Package: dlrn-0.14.0-15.fc40
Summary: Build and maintain yum repositories following upstream commits
RPMs:dlrn dlrn-doc python3-dlrn
Size:457.28 KiB

Package: libdmapsharing-2.9.42-1.fc39
Summary: A DMAP client and server library
RPMs:libdmapsharing libdmapsharing-devel
Size:1005.77 KiB

Package: libdnf-plugin-swidtags-0.8.8-9.fc39
Summary: Keeping SWID tags in sync with rpms installed via libdnf-based tools
RPMs:libdnf-plugin-swidtags
Size:113.77 KiB

Package: mona-1.4r18-9.fc39
Summary: A decision procedure for the WS1S and WS2S logics
RPMs:mona mona-devel mona-emacs mona-examples mona-libs
Size:3.71 MiB

Package: munge-maven-plugin-1.0-27.fc39
Summary: Munge Maven Plugin
RPMs:munge-maven-plugin munge-maven-plugin-javadoc
Size:123.99 KiB

Package: ocaml-ancient-0.9.0-68.fc39
Summary: OCaml library for large memory structures and sharing
RPMs:ocaml-ancient ocaml-ancient-devel
Size:313.88 KiB

Package: ocaml-charinfo-width-1.1.0-25.fc38
Summary: Determine column width for a character
RPMs:ocaml-charinfo-width ocaml-charinfo-width-devel
Size:1.07 MiB

Package: ocaml-cil-1.7.3-78.fc39
Summary: CIL - Infrastructure for C Program Analysis and Transformation
RPMs:ocaml-cil ocaml-cil-cilly ocaml-cil-devel ocaml-cil-doc
Size:36.22 MiB

Package: ocaml-lwt-log-1.1.1-26.fc38
Summary: Lwt logging library
RPMs:ocaml-lwt-log ocaml-lwt-log-devel
Size:1.62 MiB

Package: ocaml-mmap-1.1.0-24.fc38
Summary: File mapping functionality
RPMs:ocaml-mmap ocaml-mmap-devel
Size:157.56 KiB

Package: ocaml-seq-0.3.1-2.20230123gitv0.3.1.fc38
Summary: Compatibility package for OCaml's standard iterator type
RPMs:ocaml-seq ocaml-seq-devel
Size:293.81 KiB

Package: ocaml-tplib-1.3-72.fc38
Summary: Tropical Polyhedra Library
RPMs:ocaml-tplib ocaml-tplib-devel ocaml-tplib-tools
Size:20.30 MiB

Package: pvs-sbcl-7.1-9.fc38
Summary: Interactive theorem prover from SRI
RPMs:pvs-sbcl
Size:29.17 MiB

[Bug 2237016] perl-SNMP-Info-3.95 is available

2023-09-02 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237016



--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
perl-SNMP-Info-3.95-1.fc38.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=105671644


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237016

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202237016%23c2
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2237016] perl-SNMP-Info-3.95 is available

2023-09-02 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237016



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Created attachment 1986757
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1986757=edit
Update to 3.95 (#2237016)


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237016

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202237016%23c1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2237016] New: perl-SNMP-Info-3.95 is available

2023-09-02 Thread bugzilla 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237016

Bug ID: 2237016
   Summary: perl-SNMP-Info-3.95 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-SNMP-Info
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com, ktdre...@ktdreyer.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
w...@gouldfamily.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Releases retrieved: 3.95
Upstream release that is considered latest: 3.95
Current version/release in rawhide: 3.94-1.fc39
URL: https://metacpan.org/dist/SNMP-Info/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/3318/


To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-SNMP-Info


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237016

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202237016%23c0
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: rawhide buildroot seems weird state, Child return code was: 255

2023-09-02 Thread Kevin Fenzi 
On Sat, Sep 02, 2023 at 05:00:37PM +0200, Sandro wrote:
> On 02-09-2023 14:07, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> > Then:
> > 
> > DEBUG util.py:444:  Running transaction check
> > DEBUG util.py:444:  Transaction check succeeded.
> > DEBUG util.py:444:  Running transaction test
> > DEBUG util.py:444:  Transaction test succeeded.
> > DEBUG util.py:444:  Running transaction
> > DEBUG util.py:595:  Child return code was: 255
> > 
> > This does not look like BuildRequires dependency resolution failure, but
> > some
> > other "generic" issue.
> 
> Here's what I saw in about a quarter of my builds in the last hour:
> 
> DEBUG util.py:444:  Creating group 'input' with GID 104.
> DEBUG util.py:444:  Creating group 'kvm' with GID 36.
> DEBUG util.py:444:  Creating group 'render' with GID 105.
> DEBUG util.py:444:  Creating group 'sgx' with GID 106.
> DEBUG util.py:444:  Creating group 'systemd-journal' with GID 190.
> DEBUG util.py:444:  Creating group 'systemd-oom' with GID 999.
> DEBUG util.py:444:  Creating user 'systemd-oom' (systemd Userspace OOM
> Killer) with UID 999 and GID 999.
> DEBUG util.py:595:  Child return code was: 255
> DEBUG util.py:167:  kill orphans
> 
> It happened across different archs.

I think it's this change in dnf:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/pull/1854

I filed:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2236997

on it.
I'm not 100% sure this is the cause, but it's the only thing that looked
likely to me. 

I've untagged those dnf updates, so if anyone sees this after now, we
know that I was wrong and it's something else. ;) 

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: rawhide buildroot seems weird state, Child return code was: 255

2023-09-02 Thread Sandro 

On 02-09-2023 14:07, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:

Then:

DEBUG util.py:444:  Running transaction check
DEBUG util.py:444:  Transaction check succeeded.
DEBUG util.py:444:  Running transaction test
DEBUG util.py:444:  Transaction test succeeded.
DEBUG util.py:444:  Running transaction
DEBUG util.py:595:  Child return code was: 255

This does not look like BuildRequires dependency resolution failure, but 
some

other "generic" issue.


Here's what I saw in about a quarter of my builds in the last hour:

DEBUG util.py:444:  Creating group 'input' with GID 104.
DEBUG util.py:444:  Creating group 'kvm' with GID 36.
DEBUG util.py:444:  Creating group 'render' with GID 105.
DEBUG util.py:444:  Creating group 'sgx' with GID 106.
DEBUG util.py:444:  Creating group 'systemd-journal' with GID 190.
DEBUG util.py:444:  Creating group 'systemd-oom' with GID 999.
DEBUG util.py:444:  Creating user 'systemd-oom' (systemd Userspace OOM 
Killer) with UID 999 and GID 999.

DEBUG util.py:595:  Child return code was: 255
DEBUG util.py:167:  kill orphans

It happened across different archs.

-- Sandro


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Lastpass-cli license correction

2023-09-02 Thread Leslie Satenstein via devel 
When you are back with Fedora 38,39,40, I will register and do a contribution 
payment.


Leslie Satenstein
 

On Friday, September 1, 2023 at 01:15:14 p.m. EDT, Robert-André Mauchin 
 wrote:  
 
 Hello Fedoreans an others,

Lastpass-cli license will be corrected from GPL-2.0-only to:

GPL-2.0-only WITH cryptsetup-OpenSSL-exception AND OpenSSL

In the next 1.3.5 update. Which will hopefully makes the program functional 
again.

Best regards,

Robert-André
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
  ___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: zlib-ng as a compat replacement for zlib

2023-09-02 Thread Leslie Satenstein via devel 
Thank you. 


Leslie Satenstein
 

On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 09:29:36 a.m. EDT, Daniel Alley 
 wrote:  
 
 Yeah, the Zstd default of 3 is tuned to be roughly on par with alternatives 
but much faster.  To get better compression than gzip you generally need to go 
to higher levels.  
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
  ___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: zlib-ng as a compat replacement for zlib

2023-09-02 Thread Daniel Alley 
Yeah, the Zstd default of 3 is tuned to be roughly on par with alternatives but 
much faster.  To get better compression than gzip you generally need to go to 
higher levels.  
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Fedora 39 compose report: 20230902.n.0 changes

2023-09-02 Thread Fedora Branched Report 
OLD: Fedora-39-20230901.n.0
NEW: Fedora-39-20230902.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images:  3
Added packages:  0
Dropped packages:9
Upgraded packages:   0
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  0 B
Size of dropped packages:5.25 MiB
Size of upgraded packages:   0 B
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   0 B
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =
Image: i3 live aarch64
Path: Spins/aarch64/iso/Fedora-i3-Live-aarch64-39-20230902.n.0.iso

= DROPPED IMAGES =
Image: Kinoite dvd-ostree ppc64le
Path: Kinoite/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-Kinoite-ostree-ppc64le-39-20230901.n.0.iso
Image: Sericea dvd-ostree x86_64
Path: Sericea/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Sericea-ostree-x86_64-39-20230901.n.0.iso
Image: Silverblue dvd-ostree x86_64
Path: Silverblue/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-x86_64-39-20230901.n.0.iso

= ADDED PACKAGES =

= DROPPED PACKAGES =
Package: python-actdiag-3.0.0-5.fc38
Summary: Generate activity-diagram images from text
RPMs:actdiag python3-actdiag
Size:68.99 KiB

Package: python-blockdiag-3.0.0-6.fc38
Summary: Generate block-diagram images from text
RPMs:blockdiag python3-blockdiag
Size:2.45 MiB

Package: python-bluepy-1.3.0^20210503git7ad56523-1.fc38
Summary: Python interface to Bluetooth LE
RPMs:python-bluepy-doc python3-bluepy
Size:1.91 MiB

Package: python-nwdiag-3.0.0-5.fc38
Summary: Generate network-diagram images from text
RPMs:nwdiag python3-nwdiag
Size:123.47 KiB

Package: python-rosinstall-0.7.8-17.fc38
Summary: ROS installation utilities
RPMs:python3-rosinstall
Size:72.37 KiB

Package: python-seqdiag-3.0.0-5.fc38
Summary: Generate sequence-diagram images from text
RPMs:python3-seqdiag seqdiag
Size:82.35 KiB

Package: python-vcstools-0.1.42-13.fc38
Summary: Version Control System tools for Python
RPMs:python3-vcstools
Size:269.52 KiB

Package: python-zuul-client-0.0.4-9.fc38
Summary: The zuulclient Python module
RPMs:python-zuul-client-doc python3-zuul-client
Size:214.31 KiB

Package: swid-tools-0.8.20-1.fc39
Summary: Tools for producing SWID tags for rpm packages and inspecting the SWID 
tags
RPMs:dnf-plugin-swidtags swid-tools
Size:89.17 KiB


= UPGRADED PACKAGES =

= DOWNGRADED PACKAGES =
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[EPEL-devel] intent to upgrade eccodes for epel8 and epel9

2023-09-02 Thread Jos de Kloe 

Dear all,

as pointed out in bz2236797 it would be useful for our users to upgrade 
the eccodes package.
I am not aware of any significant compatibility issues, so if there are 
no objections I plan to upgrade this package next week.


best regards,

Jos


On 9/1/23 16:20, bugzi...@redhat.com wrote:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2236797

 Bug ID: 2236797
Summary: request to upgrade to upstream version 2.31.0
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
 Status: NEW
  Component: eccodes
   Assignee: josdek...@gmail.com
   Reporter: dbranch...@arpae.it
 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
 CC: josdek...@gmail.com
   Target Milestone: ---
 Classification: Fedora



Hi,
would it be possible to upgrade eccodes to the last upstream version (2.31.0)
for epel8 and epel9?
The current version (2.30.0) has some bugs that have been fixed (see
https://confluence.ecmwf.int/display/ECC/ecCodes+version+2.31.0+released) and I
see that it has already been packaged for F39.

Thanks a lot for your work.



___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: rawhide buildroot seems weird state, Child return code was: 255

2023-09-02 Thread Dan Horák 
On Sat, 2 Sep 2023 21:07:07 +0900
Mamoru TASAKA  wrote:

> Hello, all:
> 
> Looks like currently rawhide buildroot seems weird state, mainly
> on ppc64le, but sometimes also on other arches:
> 
> e.g.
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=105650426

^^^ nothing suspicious in the journal on the builder AFAICT ...


Dan

> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=105642860
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=105653203
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=105626199
> 
> task result says:
> mock exited with status 30;
> 
> root.log says something like:
> 
> DEBUG util.py:539:  Executing command: ['/usr/bin/systemd-nspawn', '-q', 
> '-M', 'f0f2c583a3dc478b9a6fa5bc92ca54b5', '-D', 
> '/var/lib/mock/f40-build-45240825-5393892-bootstrap/root', '-a', 
> '--capability=cap_ipc_lock', 
> '--bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.4xyubvar:/etc/resolv.conf', '--console=pipe', 
> '--setenv=TERM=vt100', '--setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash', 
> '--setenv=HOME=/var/lib/mock/f40-build-45240825-5393892/root/installation-homedir',
>  '--setenv=HOSTNAME=mock', '--setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin', 
> '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\\033]0;\\007"', 
> '--setenv=PS1= \\s-\\v\\$ ', '--setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8', 
> '--setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8', '--resolv-conf=off', '/usr/bin/dnf-3', 
> 'builddep', '--installroot', 
> '/var/lib/mock/f40-build-45240825-5393892/root/', 
> '--setopt=install_weak_deps=0', '--disableplugin=local', 
> '--disableplugin=spacewalk', '--disableplugin=versionlock', 
> '/var/lib/mock/f40-build-45240825-5393892/root//builddir/build/SRPMS/powerdevil-5.27.7-3.fc40.src
 .rpm', '--setopt=tsflags=nocontexts'] with env {'TERM': 'vt100', 'SHELL': 
'/bin/bash', 'HOME': 
'/var/lib/mock/f40-build-45240825-5393892/root/installation-homedir', 
'HOSTNAME': 'mock', 'PATH': '/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin', 'PROMPT_COMMAND': 
'printf "\\033]0;\\007"', 'PS1': ' \\s-\\v\\$ ', 
'LANG': 'C.UTF-8', 'LC_MESSAGES': 'C.UTF-8', 'SYSTEMD_NSPAWN_TMPFS_TMP': '0', 
'SYSTEMD_SECCOMP': '0'} and shell False
> 
> Then:
> 
> DEBUG util.py:444:  Running transaction check
> DEBUG util.py:444:  Transaction check succeeded.
> DEBUG util.py:444:  Running transaction test
> DEBUG util.py:444:  Transaction test succeeded.
> DEBUG util.py:444:  Running transaction
> DEBUG util.py:595:  Child return code was: 255
> 
> This does not look like BuildRequires dependency resolution failure, but some
> other "generic" issue.
> 
> Is this phenomenon being tracked on?
> 
> Regards,
> Mamoru
>   
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

rawhide buildroot seems weird state, Child return code was: 255

2023-09-02 Thread Mamoru TASAKA 

Hello, all:

Looks like currently rawhide buildroot seems weird state, mainly
on ppc64le, but sometimes also on other arches:

e.g.
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=105650426
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=105642860
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=105653203
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=105626199

task result says:
mock exited with status 30;

root.log says something like:

DEBUG util.py:539:  Executing command: ['/usr/bin/systemd-nspawn', '-q', '-M', 'f0f2c583a3dc478b9a6fa5bc92ca54b5', '-D', 
'/var/lib/mock/f40-build-45240825-5393892-bootstrap/root', '-a', '--capability=cap_ipc_lock', 
'--bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.4xyubvar:/etc/resolv.conf', '--console=pipe', '--setenv=TERM=vt100', '--setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash', 
'--setenv=HOME=/var/lib/mock/f40-build-45240825-5393892/root/installation-homedir', '--setenv=HOSTNAME=mock', 
'--setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin', '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf 
"\\033]0;\\007"', '--setenv=PS1= \\s-\\v\\$ ', '--setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8', 
'--setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8', '--resolv-conf=off', '/usr/bin/dnf-3', 'builddep', '--installroot', 
'/var/lib/mock/f40-build-45240825-5393892/root/', '--setopt=install_weak_deps=0', '--disableplugin=local', 
'--disableplugin=spacewalk', '--disableplugin=versionlock', 
'/var/lib/mock/f40-build-45240825-5393892/root//builddir/build/SRPMS/powerdevil-5.27.7-3.fc40.src.rpm', 
'--setopt=tsflags=nocontexts'] with env {'TERM': 'vt100', 'SHELL': '/bin/bash', 'HOME': 
'/var/lib/mock/f40-build-45240825-5393892/root/installation-homedir', 'HOSTNAME': 'mock', 'PATH': 
'/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin', 'PROMPT_COMMAND': 'printf "\\033]0;\\007"', 'PS1': 
' \\s-\\v\\$ ', 'LANG': 'C.UTF-8', 'LC_MESSAGES': 'C.UTF-8', 'SYSTEMD_NSPAWN_TMPFS_TMP': '0', 
'SYSTEMD_SECCOMP': '0'} and shell False

Then:

DEBUG util.py:444:  Running transaction check
DEBUG util.py:444:  Transaction check succeeded.
DEBUG util.py:444:  Running transaction test
DEBUG util.py:444:  Transaction test succeeded.
DEBUG util.py:444:  Running transaction
DEBUG util.py:595:  Child return code was: 255

This does not look like BuildRequires dependency resolution failure, but some
other "generic" issue.

Is this phenomenon being tracked on?

Regards,
Mamoru
 
___

devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: SPDX Statistics - Passenger pigeon edition

2023-09-02 Thread Miroslav Suchý 

Dne 02. 09. 23 v 13:07 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):

"python-lit warning: valid as old and new and no changelong entry, please check"

The License string is valid as both the old-style Fedora license and a SPDX
expression, and the tooling did not match anything in the changelog that would
indicate the license was converted to SPDX.


Typical example is

MIT

this is valid string in old system. And also in the SPDX format. But the old MIT represented whole family. It can be 
actually anything from


$ license-fedora2spdx'MIT'
Warning: more options on how to interpret MIT. Possible options: ['mpich2', 'libtiff', 'Xfig', 'UnixCrypt', 'SMLNJ', 
'SGI-B-2.0', 'NTP', 'MIT', 'MIT-open-group', 'MIT-feh', 'MIT-enna', 'MIT-Modern-Variant', 'MIT-F

estival', 'MIT-CMU', 'ICU', 'HPND', 'HPND-sell-variant', 'HP-1986', 'Boehm-GC', 
'BSL-1.0', 'Adobe-Glyph']
{{pick MIT choice}}

It can be converted to MIT, but also to ICU or HPND... and without any indication in the changelog there is no way to 
know if you check it or not.



--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: SPDX Statistics - Passenger pigeon edition

2023-09-02 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 
On Sat, Sep 02, 2023 at 02:39:14AM -0700, Tom Stellard wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> What does this message mean:
> 
> "python-lit warning: valid as old and new and no changelong entry, please 
> check"

The License string is valid as both the old-style Fedora license and a SPDX
expression, and the tooling did not match anything in the changelog that would
indicate the license was converted to SPDX.

Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[EPEL-devel] Re: Take the EPEL user and contributor survey 2023!

2023-09-02 Thread Michael J Gruber 
Am Fr., 1. Sept. 2023 um 22:09 Uhr schrieb Stephen Smoogen
:
>
>
>
> On Fri, 1 Sept 2023 at 16:03, Diego Herrera  wrote:
>>
>> Hello, everyone
>>
>> The Fedora EPEL SIG is asking for feedback to improve EPEL via this survey!
>>
>> * https://fedoraproject.limequery.com/2023
>>
>
> The link is incorrect and should be 
> https://fedoraproject.limequery.com/epelsurvey2023
>
None of them is available, it seems.

Cheers
Michael
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: SPDX Statistics - Passenger pigeon edition

2023-09-02 Thread Tom Stellard 

Hi,

What does this message mean:

"python-lit warning: valid as old and new and no changelong entry, please check"

-Tom

On 9/1/23 01:33, Miroslav Suchý wrote:

Two weeks ago we had:


* 23030 spec files in Fedora

* 29469license tags in all spec files

* 16716 tags have not been converted to SPDX yet

* 6149tags can be trivially converted using `license-fedora2spdx`

* Progress: 43.28% ██ 100%

ELN subset:

895 out of 2492 packages are not converted yet



Today we have:

* 23128 spec files in Fedora

* 29572license tags in all spec files

* 16519 tags have not been converted to SPDX yet

* 6059tags can be trivially converted using `license-fedora2spdx`

* Progress: 44.14% ██ 100%

ELN subset:

825 out of 2479 packages are not converted yet

Graph with the burndown chart:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QVMEzXWML-6_Mrlln02axFAaRKCQ8zE807rpCjus-8s/edit?usp=sharing

The list of packages needed to be converted is here:

https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/packages-without-spdx-final.txt

List by package maintainers is here

https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/packages-without-spdx-final-maintainers.txt

List of packages from ELN subset that needs to be converted:

https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/eln-not-migrated.txt

New version of fedora-license-data has been released. With 9 new licenses. 33 
licenses have been submitted to SPDX.org and are waiting to be review (and then 
added to fedora-license-data).

Legal docs and especially

https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/allowed-licenses/

was updated too.


New projection when we will be finished is 2025-01-22 (we are slowing down. 
Again. :( ). Pure linear approximation.

If your package does not have neither git-log entry nor spec-changelog entry 
mentioning SPDX and you know your license tag matches SPDX formula, you can put 
your package on ignore list

https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/ignore-packages.txt

Either pull-request or direct email to me is fine.

Tip of the day:

     You can use Chrome or Firefox plugin to find what is the license and how 
much it differ from nearest SPDX match.
https://github.com/spdx/spdx-license-diff#installation


Why Passenger pigeon edition? Passenger pigeon is extinct species. On today's 
date at 1914, last known one died at Cincinnati Zoo.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passenger_pigeon

Do you hesitate how to proceed with the migration? Please follow

https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/update-existing-packages/

Miroslav




___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Traveling to Israel to work

2023-09-02 Thread Reza Bojnordi 
Hi I am Iranian can I work this company

On Sat, Sep 2, 2023 at 12:33 AM Ryan Bach via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:

> Is it that hard for someone from the US to work there. Any thoughts,
> suggestions? Do I need a passport?
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>


-- 

reza bojnordi
about.me/rbojnordi

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue