[Bug 2237353] New: perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20230904.001 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237353

Bug ID: 2237353
   Summary: perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20230904.001 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Business-ISBN-Data
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com, ka...@ucw.cz, mspa...@redhat.com,
p...@city-fan.org, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Releases retrieved: 20230904.001
Upstream release that is considered latest: 20230904.001
Current version/release in rawhide: 20230830.001-1.fc40
URL: https://metacpan.org/dist/Business-ISBN-Data/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/2674/


To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Business-ISBN-Data


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237353

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202237353%23c0
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Christiano Anderson]

--- Original Message ---
On Monday, September 4th, 2023 at 22:51, Sandro  wrote:

> It looks like you also took python-autopep8.
> 
> Could you add neuro-sig group with commit rights for python-autopep8
> please? This package is in the dependency stack for Spyder. I've already
> adopted other recently orphaned packages needed by Spyder and intent to
> fix and update them as needed in order to keep Spyder around.
> 
> Btw, you'll find a PR for python-autopep8, which will fix the FTBFS/FTI
> bugs and allow me to fix a dependent package.

Sure, the neuro-sig group has been added with commit rights and the PR has been 
merged! 

If you need any help with the Spyder package, please let me know. 


> The change looks fine. Since you have been playing around with adding
> changelog entries the old fashioned way [1], may I recommend to convert
> the package to autospec with `rpmautospec convert`? That way you will no
> longer have to worry about Release: and %changelog entries. The first
> will be calculated and for the second the git commit message is parsed.
> 
> [1] usually done with rpmdev-bumpspec
> 
> Let me know if you need help.

I really appreciate your feedback and recommendation :-) 

I'll take a look into rpmautospec
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Ben Beasley]

Interested parties have been grappling with the problem of getting protobuf 
updated to v4 (22.x, 23.x, etc.), but the number of impacted packages is 
tremendous and there are not enough people with time to work on it, so progress 
has been slow. The following PR represents the state of that work[1]. Note that 
I’m not a co-maintainer of protobuf, but I’ve been collaborating on it because 
it is an important dependency for grpc, and I can’t update grpc any more 
(including for security fixes) until we have protobuf v4.

There was some sentiment that we should focus on working toward the protobuf v4 
transition rather than on updating to newer 3.x branches during the F39 
development cycle. However, I’m not sure if everyone really understood the full 
scope of that transition.

At this point, and given the amount of work remaining to make protobuf v4 
possible, it’s probably a good idea for protobuf to be updated to a current v3 
release, ideally 3.24.2. Given the number of potentially impacted packages, and 
the huge list of packages that need to be rebuilt (minor version updates break 
ABI), it’s probably too late to land that in F39, but it should be possible for 
F40, and it would be a good hedge against the possibility that the v4 work 
drags on for another release cycle (or more?!).

Input is welcome. Even more welcome is assistance working through unresolved 
protobuf v4 incompatibilities in dependent packages.

[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/protobuf/pull-request/25

On Mon, Sep 4, 2023, at 2:39 PM, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
> Am 04.09.23 um 17:10 schrieb Miro Hrončok:
>
>> electrum  js, orphan   0 
>> weeks ago
>
> Electrum isn't orphaned, but cannot be updated because protobuf is not 
> being updated. Newer versions require at least protobuf 3.20. I 
> contacted the protobuf maintainer on 2023-06-04 and never got a reply.
>
> -- 
> Jonathan
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 1860590] perl-IPC-Signal missing in EPEL 8

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860590



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-ac6879063b has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-ac6879063b

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860590

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%201860590%23c6
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 1860592] perl-Proc-WaitStat missing in EPEL 8

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860592



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-ac6879063b has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-ac6879063b

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860592

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%201860592%23c5
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2237016] perl-SNMP-Info-3.95 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237016



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-abddbc68b8 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh
--advisory=FEDORA-2023-abddbc68b8`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-abddbc68b8

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237016

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202237016%23c6
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: KDE and GNOME Join Hands To Add Payments To Turn Flathub Into a Store for the Linux Desktop

[Kevin Kofler via devel]

Ryan Bach via devel wrote:
> What is so wrong about buying open source software?

IMHO, paying for "off-the-shelf" software is just wrong to begin with. (Of 
course, if I want software developed specifically for me, then I expect to 
obviously have to pay for that service.) Software can be copied essentially 
for free.

And the software is only FOSS if it can be redistributed by anyone at no 
charge (otherwise it fails the "freedom to redistribute" (Freedom 2) 
criterion), so I expect the repository to do exactly that.

I understand that the "Free" in "Free Software" is not about "free beer", 
but free-of-charge repositories are one of GNU/Linux's main features beyond 
just being FOSS, just like, e.g., following the POSIX standard (which is not 
a Free Software principle either), and as explained above, the Free Software 
Definition does require under "Freedom 2" that those are possible.

Kevin Kofler
(my personal opinion, not my employer's nor the Fedora Project's nor anyone 
else's)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2234803] Broken dependency for perl-IO-Interactive-tests

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2234803

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
Last Closed||2023-09-05 00:41:50



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-46db0ae756 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2234803

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202234803%23c4
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 1860592] perl-Proc-WaitStat missing in EPEL 8

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860592

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-59f25ec4ef has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-59f25ec4ef

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860592

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%201860592%23c4
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 1860590] perl-IPC-Signal missing in EPEL 8

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860590

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-59f25ec4ef has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-59f25ec4ef

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860590

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%201860590%23c5
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: PDC replacement proposal

[Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski]

On Tuesday, 05 September 2023 at 01:05, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2023-09-04 at 22:26 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> wrote:
> > On Monday, 04 September 2023 at 17:37, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > [...]
> > > BTW, the email seems kind of weird. There are lots of places where it
> > > seems like it's referring to external information - "as demonstrated
> > > here", "Previously, we followed this process to update it, but now we
> > > have transitioned to using this method" - but it does not actually link
> > > to anything external, so I have no idea what the references are meant
> > > to be?
> > 
> > The links are there in the HTML version.
> 
> I read the HTML version. I still don't see any links for those texts.
> See attached screenshot.

You're right, I misread your question. My mistake.

Regards,
Dominik
-- 
Fedora   https://fedoraproject.org
There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and
oppression to develop psychic muscles.
-- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: PDC replacement proposal

[Adam Williamson]

On Mon, 2023-09-04 at 22:26 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
> On Monday, 04 September 2023 at 17:37, Adam Williamson wrote:
> [...]
> > BTW, the email seems kind of weird. There are lots of places where it
> > seems like it's referring to external information - "as demonstrated
> > here", "Previously, we followed this process to update it, but now we
> > have transitioned to using this method" - but it does not actually link
> > to anything external, so I have no idea what the references are meant
> > to be?
> 
> The links are there in the HTML version.

I read the HTML version. I still don't see any links for those texts.
See attached screenshot.
-- 
Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
Fedora QA
Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org
https://www.happyassassin.net




___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F38 to F39

[Luna Jernberg]

well other then that i have to disable rpmfusion now when i think about it

Den mån 28 aug. 2023 kl 23:35 skrev Luna Jernberg :
>
> Did this on my Thinkpad Edge a couple of days ago, and it went fine :)
>
> Den ons 23 aug. 2023 kl 20:23 skrev Miroslav Suchý :
> >
> > Do you want to make Fedora 39 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time 
> > and try to run:
> >
> > # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
> > # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
> > sudo dnf module reset '*'
> >
> > dnf --releasever=39 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f39 \
> > --enablerepo=updates-testing \
> > $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo 
> > --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \
> > --assumeno distro-sync
> >
> >
> > This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal 
> > potential problems.
> >
> > You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command.
> >
> >
> > The `--assumeno` will just test the transaction, but does not make the 
> > actual upgrade.
> >
> >
> > In case you hit dependency issues, please report it against the appropriate 
> > package.
> >
> > Or against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in 
> > Fedora 39. Please check existing reports against fedora-obsolete-packages 
> > first:
> >
> > https://red.ht/2kuBDPu
> >
> > and also there is already bunch of "Fails to install" (F39FailsToInstall) 
> > reports:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=2168845_id_type=anddependson=tvp_id=12486533
> >
> >
> > Two notes:
> >
> > * you may want to run the same command with dnf5 to help test new dnf.
> >
> > * this command found zero issues on my personal system - great work all 
> > everybody!
> >
> >
> > Thank you
> >
> > Miroslav
> > ___
> > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives: 
> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Sandro]

On 04-09-2023 19:41, Christiano Anderson wrote:

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life

I got the following package:

python-iowait orphan 0 weeks ago


It looks like you also took python-autopep8.

Could you add neuro-sig group with commit rights for python-autopep8 
please? This package is in the dependency stack for Spyder. I've already 
adopted other recently orphaned packages needed by Spyder and intent to 
fix and update them as needed in order to keep Spyder around.


Btw, you'll find a PR for python-autopep8, which will fix the FTBFS/FTI 
bugs and allow me to fix a dependent package.



The issue RHBZ 2155014 has been fixed by adding python3-setuptools as build 
requirement. The build passed using mockbuild on my local machine (tested on 
f38, f39 and rawhide).

I pushed the change only to rawhide branch, should I do the same for f39?

Since this is my first contribution to a package, could someone take a look at 
the process and let me know if there's anything wrong with my commit?

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-iowait/blob/rawhide/f/python-iowait.spec

If everything is fine, I'll comment and maybe close the RHBZ issue.


The change looks fine. Since you have been playing around with adding 
changelog entries the old fashioned way [1], may I recommend to convert 
the package to autospec with `rpmautospec convert`? That way you will no 
longer have to worry about Release: and %changelog entries. The first 
will be calculated and for the second the git commit message is parsed.


[1] usually done with rpmdev-bumpspec

Let me know if you need help.

-- Sandro
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: PDC replacement proposal

[Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski]

On Monday, 04 September 2023 at 17:37, Adam Williamson wrote:
[...]
> BTW, the email seems kind of weird. There are lots of places where it
> seems like it's referring to external information - "as demonstrated
> here", "Previously, we followed this process to update it, but now we
> have transitioned to using this method" - but it does not actually link
> to anything external, so I have no idea what the references are meant
> to be?

The links are there in the HTML version.

Regards,
Dominik
-- 
Fedora   https://fedoraproject.org
There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and
oppression to develop psychic muscles.
-- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 1860592] perl-Proc-WaitStat missing in EPEL 8

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860592



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-ac6879063b has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-ac6879063b


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860592

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%201860592%23c3
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 1860592] perl-Proc-WaitStat missing in EPEL 8

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860592

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-59f25ec4ef has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-59f25ec4ef


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860592

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%201860592%23c2
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[František Šumšal]

On 9/4/23 17:10, Miro Hrončok wrote:


botan2    orphan, thm  0 weeks ago


It currently both FTI and FTBFS, but the latter one seems to be easily fixable 
with a patch already committed to the upstream, which in turn fixes the FTI. 
I'll prep the builds.

--
PGP Key ID: 0xFB738CE27B634E4B
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Jonathan Schleifer]

Am 04.09.23 um 17:10 schrieb Miro Hrončok:

electrum  js, orphan   0 
weeks ago


Electrum isn't orphaned, but cannot be updated because protobuf is not 
being updated. Newer versions require at least protobuf 3.20. I 
contacted the protobuf maintainer on 2023-06-04 and never got a reply.


--
Jonathan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Miro Hrončok]

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life

Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the affected
packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the affected package or
retire your depending package to avoid broken dependencies, otherwise your
package will fail to install and/or build when the affected package gets 
retired.

Request package ownership via the *Take* button in he left column on
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/

Full report available at:
https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2023-08-21.txt
grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain.

For human readable dependency chains,
see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/
For all orphaned packages,
see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan

Package  (co)maintainers   Status Change

RBTools   orphan   0 weeks ago
aiodnsbrute   orphan   0 weeks ago
andriller orphan   0 weeks ago
androwarn orphan   0 weeks ago
botan2orphan, thm  0 weeks ago
brd   orphan   0 weeks ago
btest orphan   0 weeks ago
buildstream   atim, bochecha, orphan   0 weeks ago
cacti orphan   5 weeks ago
cacti-spine   orphan   5 weeks ago
classification-banner orphan   0 weeks ago
cockpit-file-sharing  orphan   3 weeks ago
electrum  js, orphan   0 weeks ago
eric  orphan   0 weeks ago
fedora-gather-easyfix orphan   0 weeks ago
fontdump  orphan   6 weeks ago
gfal2-python  mipatras, orphan 0 weeks ago
golang-github-apache-arrowgo-sig, orphan   5 weeks ago
golang-github-caddyserver-go-sig, orphan   5 weeks ago
caddy-1
golang-github-google-slothfs  go-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
golang-github-timewasted-linode   go-sig, orphan   3 weeks ago
golang-github-vultr-govultr   go-sig, orphan   3 weeks ago
iso8859-2-fonts   orphan   6 weeks ago
librealsense1 orphan   3 weeks ago
libssh2-pythonorphan   0 weeks ago
manafirewall  orphan, thunderbirdtr0 weeks ago
material-icons-fonts  ersen, orphan3 weeks ago
maven-clean-pluginmizdebsk, mkulik, orphan 4 weeks ago
noggininfra-sig, jonathanspw, orphan   0 weeks ago
oct2spec  orphan   0 weeks ago
offlineimap   cicku, orphan,   0 weeks ago
  sergesanspaille, teuf
pcsxr orphan   3 weeks ago
php-doctrine-doctrine-bundle2 orphan   5 weeks ago
php-nrk-Predisorphan   5 weeks ago
php-phpdocumentor-reflection  orphan   5 weeks ago
php-phpmyadmin-   orphan   5 weeks ago
twig-i18n-extension
php-pragmarx-google2fa-qrcode orphan   5 weeks ago
php-swiftmailer   orphan   5 weeks ago
php-twig2 orphan   5 weeks ago
php-twig3 orphan   5 weeks ago
pico-wizard   orphan   0 weeks ago
postfix-mta-sts-resolver  orphan   0 weeks ago
pseudoignatenkobrain, orphan   0 weeks ago
pyflowtools   orphan   0 weeks ago
pyftpdlib orphan   0 weeks ago
python-acora  orphan, python-packagers-sig 0 weeks ago
python-adext  orphan   0 weeks ago

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Christiano Anderson]

--- Original Message ---
On Monday, September 4th, 2023 at 17:10, Miro Hrončok  
wrote:


> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life

I got the following package:

python-iowait orphan 0 weeks ago

The issue RHBZ 2155014 has been fixed by adding python3-setuptools as build 
requirement. The build passed using mockbuild on my local machine (tested on 
f38, f39 and rawhide).

I pushed the change only to rawhide branch, should I do the same for f39?

Since this is my first contribution to a package, could someone take a look at 
the process and let me know if there's anything wrong with my commit?

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-iowait/blob/rawhide/f/python-iowait.spec

If everything is fine, I'll comment and maybe close the RHBZ issue. 

Thanks
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 1860590] perl-IPC-Signal missing in EPEL 8

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860590

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-ac6879063b has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-ac6879063b


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860590

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%201860590%23c3
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 1860590] perl-IPC-Signal missing in EPEL 8

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860590



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-59f25ec4ef has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-59f25ec4ef


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860590

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%201860590%23c4
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2237032] perl-Log-Dispatchouli-3.007 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237032

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
   Fixed In Version||perl-Log-Dispatchouli-3.007
   ||-1.fc40
Last Closed||2023-09-04 15:55:35



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-e7861d8b91 has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237032

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202237032%23c2
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Ankur Sinha]

On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 17:36:15 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 04. 09. 23 17:30, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 17:10:55 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > python-mne-bids   neuro-sig, orphan0 
> > > weeks ago
> > 
> > This is a neuro-sig package, so I've taken over as primary maintainer.
> 
> This is one of the packages that failed the Python 3.12 rebuild:
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2220334
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2226245

Yeh, upstream published a new release of python-mne which was holding
up python-mne-bids but a test failed there too. They've published a fix
for this a few days ago, so it should be fixed asap:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2220333
https://github.com/mne-tools/mne-python/issues/11931

-- 
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2237032] perl-Log-Dispatchouli-3.007 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237032

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-e7861d8b91 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-e7861d8b91


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237032

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202237032%23c1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: PDC replacement proposal

[Adam Williamson]

On Mon, 2023-09-04 at 16:51 +0200, Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> 
> Current uses of PDC:
> 
>1.
> 
>Critical Path Package Tracking: Bodhi leverages PDC to track packages on
>the critical path.
> 
> /rest_api/v1/component-branches/: Specifically, Bodhi will handle the
> critical-path flag.
> 
> Bodhi's existing framework aligns well with releases and components. To
> enhance this, we will create an auxiliary table that pairs this data with
> additional metadata,
> 
> predominantly focusing on the critical-path flag. Previously, we had to
> query this information from PDC.
> 
> It's essential to note that PDC is not the definitive source of truth for
> critical-path packages. The Fedora Project Critical Path Package Wiki
> indicates that the source of truth lies within the Fedora Comps repository.
> 
> You can find specific information by searching for groups with the
> "critical-path-*" prefix, as demonstrated here.
> 
> While the data is accessible through DNF, generating it can be
> time-consuming. PDC serves as a pre-computed cache.
> 
> Previously, we followed this process to update it, but now we have
> transitioned to using this method.
> 
> The primary application of this information during the Fedora release cycle
> is in Bodhi, where it is used to enforce stricter requirements on
> critical-path package updates. For further details, please refer to this
> link.

This is all done already. I did it months ago:

https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/pull/4755
https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/pull/4759
https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/1294
https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/c/fea60aab95bd45960dbf4a0514c5df28a86090eb?branch=main
https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/c/842db118e88b987dbb5ab98f4d17556aba0601d6?branch=main

We no longer use PDC for critical path information and, indeed, we
dropped the code for doing so from Bodhi last month:

https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/pull/5431

BTW, the email seems kind of weird. There are lots of places where it
seems like it's referring to external information - "as demonstrated
here", "Previously, we followed this process to update it, but now we
have transitioned to using this method" - but it does not actually link
to anything external, so I have no idea what the references are meant
to be?
-- 
Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
Fedora QA
Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org
https://www.happyassassin.net



___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Miro Hrončok]

On 04. 09. 23 17:30, Ankur Sinha wrote:

On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 17:10:55 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:

python-mne-bids   neuro-sig, orphan0 weeks ago


This is a neuro-sig package, so I've taken over as primary maintainer.


This is one of the packages that failed the Python 3.12 rebuild:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2220334
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2226245

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Ankur Sinha]

On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 17:10:55 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> python-mne-bids   neuro-sig, orphan0 weeks ago

This is a neuro-sig package, so I've taken over as primary maintainer.

-- 
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2237243] Upstream released ExtUtils-ParseXS 3.51

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237243

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||perl-ExtUtils-ParseXS-3.51-
   ||501.fc40
 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2023-09-04 15:22:35



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-883d3000e2 has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237243

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202237243%23c2
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2237243] Upstream released ExtUtils-ParseXS 3.51

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237243

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-883d3000e2 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-883d3000e2


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237243

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202237243%23c1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Miro Hrončok]

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life

Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the affected
packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the affected package or
retire your depending package to avoid broken dependencies, otherwise your
package will fail to install and/or build when the affected package gets 
retired.

Request package ownership via the *Take* button in he left column on
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/

Full report available at:
https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2023-08-21.txt
grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain.

For human readable dependency chains,
see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/
For all orphaned packages,
see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan

Package  (co)maintainers   Status Change

RBTools   orphan   0 weeks ago
aiodnsbrute   orphan   0 weeks ago
andriller orphan   0 weeks ago
androwarn orphan   0 weeks ago
botan2orphan, thm  0 weeks ago
brd   orphan   0 weeks ago
btest orphan   0 weeks ago
buildstream   atim, bochecha, orphan   0 weeks ago
cacti orphan   5 weeks ago
cacti-spine   orphan   5 weeks ago
classification-banner orphan   0 weeks ago
cockpit-file-sharing  orphan   3 weeks ago
electrum  js, orphan   0 weeks ago
eric  orphan   0 weeks ago
fedora-gather-easyfix orphan   0 weeks ago
fontdump  orphan   6 weeks ago
gfal2-python  mipatras, orphan 0 weeks ago
golang-github-apache-arrowgo-sig, orphan   5 weeks ago
golang-github-caddyserver-go-sig, orphan   5 weeks ago
caddy-1
golang-github-google-slothfs  go-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
golang-github-timewasted-linode   go-sig, orphan   3 weeks ago
golang-github-vultr-govultr   go-sig, orphan   3 weeks ago
iso8859-2-fonts   orphan   6 weeks ago
librealsense1 orphan   3 weeks ago
libssh2-pythonorphan   0 weeks ago
manafirewall  orphan, thunderbirdtr0 weeks ago
material-icons-fonts  ersen, orphan3 weeks ago
maven-clean-pluginmizdebsk, mkulik, orphan 4 weeks ago
noggininfra-sig, jonathanspw, orphan   0 weeks ago
oct2spec  orphan   0 weeks ago
offlineimap   cicku, orphan,   0 weeks ago
  sergesanspaille, teuf
pcsxr orphan   3 weeks ago
php-doctrine-doctrine-bundle2 orphan   5 weeks ago
php-nrk-Predisorphan   5 weeks ago
php-phpdocumentor-reflection  orphan   5 weeks ago
php-phpmyadmin-   orphan   5 weeks ago
twig-i18n-extension
php-pragmarx-google2fa-qrcode orphan   5 weeks ago
php-swiftmailer   orphan   5 weeks ago
php-twig2 orphan   5 weeks ago
php-twig3 orphan   5 weeks ago
pico-wizard   orphan   0 weeks ago
postfix-mta-sts-resolver  orphan   0 weeks ago
pseudoignatenkobrain, orphan   0 weeks ago
pyflowtools   orphan   0 weeks ago
pyftpdlib orphan   0 weeks ago
python-acora  orphan, python-packagers-sig 0 weeks ago
python-adext  orphan   0 weeks ago

[rpms/perl-ExtUtils-ParseXS] PR #2: Replace patch update from Perl release by CPAN upstream 3.51 (rhbz#2237243)

[Jitka Plesnikova]

jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-ExtUtils-ParseXS` 
that you are following.

Merged pull-request:

``
Replace patch update from Perl release by CPAN upstream 3.51 (rhbz#2237243)
``

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-ExtUtils-ParseXS/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[rpms/perl-ExtUtils-ParseXS] PR #2: Replace patch update from Perl release by CPAN upstream 3.51 (rhbz#2237243)

[Jitka Plesnikova]

jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-ExtUtils-ParseXS` 
that you are following:
``
Replace patch update from Perl release by CPAN upstream 3.51 (rhbz#2237243)
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-ExtUtils-ParseXS/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

PDC replacement proposal

[Tomas Hrcka]

Hello all, it took us a few years but we are finally getting rid of the PDC
project. Thanks to the ARC research we identified use cases in our tooling
and proposed solution.

The essential functionalities currently provided by PDC will be
re-implemented in other applications within our release infrastructure, as
there are no immediate plans for their replacement and are currently
maintained

This work is anticipated to span several months for completion. However,
before we embark on this endeavor,

we would like to proactively share our proposed solution with all of you
and gather your valuable feedback.

Below, we outline our strategy to preserve the core functionality of PDC by
leveraging existing applications within our ecosystem.

Current uses of PDC:

Currently, we rely on the Package Database (PDC) for various data
management tasks, including:


   1.

   Critical Path Package Tracking: Bodhi leverages PDC to track packages on
   the critical path.
   2.

   Retirement of Packages and Service Level Agreements (SLAs): PDC assists
   in managing the retirement of packages and their associated SLAs.
   3.

   Metadata for Nightly Composes: Our Release Engineering and Fedora
   Quality Assurance teams rely on PDC for metadata related to nightly
   composes.


More info on the usage can be found here:
https://fedora-arc.readthedocs.io/en/latest/pdc/users.html

Specific Endpoints in Use:

We interact with the following endpoints in PDC to access and manage our
data:

/rest_api/v1/global-components: This endpoint stores package names.

/rest_api/v1/component-branches: Here, we store SLAs, track active/retired
status, and manage the critical-path flag.

/rest_api/v1/component-branch-slas: An auxiliary endpoint dedicated to SLAs.

/rest_api/v1/compose-images: This endpoint stores essential files, such as
composeinfo.json and image-manifest.json.

/rest_api/v1/releases: It houses metadata on various release types (e.g.,
GA, updates, EUS, AUS, ELS, fast, updates-testing) for product versions,
indicating their active status.

/rest_api/v1/rpms: This endpoint establishes links between RPM packages and
composes.

/rest_api/v1/product-versions: Here, we store major versions of Fedora.


More info on the endpoints:
https://fedora-arc.readthedocs.io/en/latest/pdc/endpoints.html

Upcoming Changes

Bodhi:

Bodhi will assume responsibility for the following tasks, reducing our
reliance on PDC:

/rest_api/v1/releases/: Bodhi will now manage release-related data.

/rest_api/v1/component-branches/: Specifically, Bodhi will handle the
critical-path flag.

Bodhi's existing framework aligns well with releases and components. To
enhance this, we will create an auxiliary table that pairs this data with
additional metadata,

predominantly focusing on the critical-path flag. Previously, we had to
query this information from PDC.

It's essential to note that PDC is not the definitive source of truth for
critical-path packages. The Fedora Project Critical Path Package Wiki
indicates that the source of truth lies within the Fedora Comps repository.

You can find specific information by searching for groups with the
"critical-path-*" prefix, as demonstrated here.

While the data is accessible through DNF, generating it can be
time-consuming. PDC serves as a pre-computed cache.

Previously, we followed this process to update it, but now we have
transitioned to using this method.

The primary application of this information during the Fedora release cycle
is in Bodhi, where it is used to enforce stricter requirements on
critical-path package updates. For further details, please refer to this
link.

Pagure-dist-git:

Pagure-dist-git will take over several responsibilities from PDC, including:

/rest_api/v1/product-versions

/rest_api/v1/global-components

/rest_api/v1/component-branches/

/rest_api/v1/component-branch-slas/

Pagure already has a robust database of global components (repositories)
and product versions (repository branches).

It utilizes the PDC API to query component branches when a package is
retired, and an auxiliary table in Pagure-dist-git will store the reasons
for orphaning these components.


A list of all identified uses of PDC API can be found in the original ARC
investigation: https://fedora-arc.readthedocs.io/en/latest/pdc/users.html

Projects not considered in the original arc investigation:

MDapi

Toddlers

Toddlers took over the functionality of the fedscm-admin tool and it's more
or less a 1:1 rewrite of the tool, use cases should be the same as
fedscm-admin.

Remaining Endpoints:

A few endpoints will remain unchanged:

/rest_api/v1/compose-images/: Given that we primarily store JSON blobs
here, we have decided, based on discussions, to store the JSON data on a
network-accessible file server.

/rest_api/v1/rpms/: This endpoint does not currently have a dedicated
application, but our Quality Assurance team uses it to query packages in
specific composes.

CPE is scheduled to commence work on this project 

[Bug 1860592] perl-Proc-WaitStat missing in EPEL 8

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860592

Emmanuel Seyman  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1860590





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860590
[Bug 1860590] perl-IPC-Signal missing in EPEL 8
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860592
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 1860592] perl-Proc-WaitStat missing in EPEL 8

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860592
Bug 1860592 depends on bug 1860590, which changed state.

Bug 1860590 Summary: perl-IPC-Signal missing in EPEL 8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860590

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |ASSIGNED
 Resolution|WONTFIX |---




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860592
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 1860590] perl-IPC-Signal missing in EPEL 8

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860590

Emmanuel Seyman  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|WONTFIX |---
 Blocks||1860592
   Assignee|mru...@redhat.com   |emman...@seyman.fr
 Status|CLOSED  |ASSIGNED
   Keywords||Reopened



--- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman  ---
I've been asked to supply this package by someone who wants logcheck in EPEL8+.
Taking...



Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860592
[Bug 1860592] perl-Proc-WaitStat missing in EPEL 8
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860590

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%201860590%23c2
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2237243] Upstream released ExtUtils-ParseXS 3.51

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237243

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237243
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 1860592] perl-Proc-WaitStat missing in EPEL 8

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860592

Emmanuel Seyman  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|WONTFIX |---
 Status|CLOSED  |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|mru...@redhat.com   |emman...@seyman.fr
   Keywords||Reopened




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860592
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 1860591] perl-mime-construct missing in EPEL 8

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860591

Emmanuel Seyman  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |ASSIGNED
 Resolution|WONTFIX |---
   Keywords||Reopened



--- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman  ---
I've been asked to supply this package by someone who wants logcheck in EPEL8+.
Taking...


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860591

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%201860591%23c2
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 1860591] perl-mime-construct missing in EPEL 8

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860591

Emmanuel Seyman  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|mru...@redhat.com   |emman...@seyman.fr




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860591
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2235322] perl-Crypt-CBC-3.04 of RHEL9 can not decrypt ciphertext created with 'header' => 'randomiv'

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235322

Paul Howarth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|andr...@bawue.net   |p...@city-fan.org
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Link ID||Github
   ||lstein/Lib-Crypt-CBC/issues
   ||/6




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235322
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Fedora 39 compose report: 20230904.n.0 changes

[Fedora Branched Report]

OLD: Fedora-39-20230903.n.0
NEW: Fedora-39-20230904.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images:  1
Added packages:  0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   0
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded packages:   0 B
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   0 B
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =
Image: Silverblue dvd-ostree x86_64
Path: Silverblue/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-x86_64-39-20230904.n.0.iso
Image: Workstation live aarch64
Path: 
Workstation/aarch64/iso/Fedora-Workstation-Live-aarch64-39-20230904.n.0.iso

= DROPPED IMAGES =
Image: Silverblue dvd-ostree ppc64le
Path: 
Silverblue/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-ppc64le-39-20230903.n.0.iso

= ADDED PACKAGES =

= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =

= DOWNGRADED PACKAGES =
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: KDE and GNOME Join Hands To Add Payments To Turn Flathub Into a Store for the Linux Desktop

[Ralf Corsépius]

Am 04.09.23 um 03:48 schrieb Ryan Bach via devel:

Ryan Bach via devel wrote:

First of all, as has been pointed out by others, the headline is misleading,
since KDE and GNOME are not actually parties to the proposal and since the
proposal was not even accepted.

Secondly, IMHO, allowing fee-charging downloads is an anti-feature of an
application repository that I specifically do not want. One of the nicest
features of GNU/Linux is that I can just open the package manager and
download whatever I want without having to pay anything.

And finally, Red Hat trying to monetize the Desktop would be the worst
nightmare. I do not want my desktop GNU/Linux to be "monetized" by anyone,
neither by Red Hat nor by any other company.

 Kevin Kofler

What is so wrong about buying open source software?


A lot. It's effectively cheating to your users.


Ralf
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2237243] New: Upstream released ExtUtils-ParseXS 3.51

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237243

Bug ID: 2237243
   Summary: Upstream released ExtUtils-ParseXS 3.51
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-ExtUtils-ParseXS
  Severity: medium
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: p...@city-fan.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com, mspa...@redhat.com,
p...@city-fan.org, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
ppi...@redhat.com, spo...@gmail.com, st...@silug.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Rawhide currently has ExtUtils-ParseXS 3.51 composed from ExtUtils-ParseXS 3.44
with patches from the main perl release to take it to version 3.51. The 3.51
code has now been released on CPAN, so the patching could be dropped.

The CPAN release has no code changes but there are test suite differences and
also some pod/man documentation isn't included.

Reproducible: Always


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237243

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202237243%23c0
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230904.n.0 changes

[Fedora Rawhide Report]

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230903.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230904.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images:  2
Added packages:  1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   32
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  240.77 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded packages:   155.00 MiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   750.55 KiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =
Image: Kinoite dvd-ostree ppc64le
Path: Kinoite/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-Kinoite-ostree-ppc64le-Rawhide-20230904.n.0.iso
Image: Silverblue dvd-ostree aarch64
Path: 
Silverblue/aarch64/iso/Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-aarch64-Rawhide-20230904.n.0.iso
Image: Kinoite dvd-ostree aarch64
Path: Kinoite/aarch64/iso/Fedora-Kinoite-ostree-aarch64-Rawhide-20230904.n.0.iso

= DROPPED IMAGES =
Image: Silverblue dvd-ostree ppc64le
Path: 
Silverblue/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-ppc64le-Rawhide-20230903.n.0.iso
Image: Workstation live aarch64
Path: 
Workstation/aarch64/iso/Fedora-Workstation-Live-aarch64-Rawhide-20230903.n.0.iso

= ADDED PACKAGES =
Package: golang-github-exoscale-egoscale-0.100.1-1.fc40
Summary: Exoscale Golang bindings
RPMs:golang-github-exoscale-egoscale-devel
Size:240.77 KiB


= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  OpenImageIO-2.4.15.0-1.fc40
Old package:  OpenImageIO-2.4.14.0-2.fc39
Summary:  Library for reading and writing images
RPMs: OpenImageIO OpenImageIO-devel OpenImageIO-iv OpenImageIO-utils 
python3-openimageio
Size: 21.87 MiB
Size change:  -18.42 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sun Sep 03 2023 Richard Shaw  - 2.4.15.0-1
  - Update to 2.4.15.0.
  - Update License tag to SPDX identifiers.


Package:  PyGreSQL-5.2.5-1.fc40
Old package:  PyGreSQL-5.2.4-6.fc39
Summary:  Python client library for PostgreSQL
RPMs: python3-pygresql
Size: 560.10 KiB
Size change:  3.12 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Sep 04 2023 Ondrej Sloup  - 5.2.5-1
  - Rebase to the latest upstream version (rhbz#2235341)


Package:  aws-2020-12.fc40
Old package:  aws-2020-11.fc39
Summary:  Ada Web Server
RPMs: aws aws-devel aws-doc aws-tools
Size: 15.17 MiB
Size change:  -98.12 KiB
Changelog:
  * Wed Jul 19 2023 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
2020-12
  - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild


Package:  composer-2.6.2-1.fc40
Old package:  composer-2.6.1-1.fc40
Summary:  Dependency Manager for PHP
RPMs: composer
Size: 987.23 KiB
Size change:  -8.23 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Sep 04 2023 Remi Collet  - 2.6.2-1
  - update to 2.6.2


Package:  copyq-7.1.0-1.fc40
Old package:  copyq-7.0.0-2.fc39
Summary:  Advanced clipboard manager
RPMs: copyq
Size: 9.79 MiB
Size change:  -143.35 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sun Sep 03 2023 gbcox  - 7.1.0-1
  - Upstream release rhbz#2237077


Package:  dbus-1:1.14.10-1.fc40
Old package:  dbus-1:1.14.8-2.fc39
Summary:  D-BUS message bus
RPMs: dbus dbus-common dbus-daemon dbus-devel dbus-doc dbus-libs 
dbus-tests dbus-tools dbus-x11
Size: 5.67 MiB
Size change:  21.41 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri Sep 01 2023 David King  - 1:1.14.10-1
  - Update to 1.14.10


Package:  debhelper-13.11.6-1.fc40
Old package:  debhelper-13.11.5-1.fc40
Summary:  Helper programs for debian/rules
RPMs: debhelper
Size: 1.02 MiB
Size change:  417 B
Changelog:
  * Sat Sep 02 2023 S??rgio Basto  - 13.11.6-1
  - Update debhelper to 13.11.6


Package:  debootstrap-1.0.132-1.fc40
Old package:  debootstrap-1.0.127-3.fc38
Summary:  Debian GNU/Linux bootstrapper
RPMs: debootstrap
Size: 90.22 KiB
Size change:  4.54 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Aug 28 2023 Fedora Release Monitoring 
 - 1.0.132-1
  - Update to 1.0.132 (#2129922)


Package:  dh-make-2.202302-1.fc40
Old package:  dh-make-2.202301-2.fc39
Summary:  Tool that converts source archives into Debian package source
RPMs: dh-make
Size: 52.16 KiB
Size change:  -106 B
Changelog:
  * Sun Sep 03 2023 S??rgio Basto  - 2.202302-1
  - Update dh-make to 2.202302 (#2229051)


Package:  drbd-9.25.0-1.fc40
Old package:  drbd-9.23.0-2.fc39
Summary:  DRBD user-land tools and scripts
RPMs: drbd drbd-bash-completion drbd-pacemaker drbd-rgmanager 
drbd-selinux drbd-udev drbd-utils drbd-xen
Size: 4.18 MiB
Size change:  648.09 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sun Sep 03 2023 Peter Hanecak  - 9.25.0-1
  - Upstream release of 9.25.0
  - Update of patch macro syntax


Package:  fakechroot-2.20.1-16.fc40
Old package:  fakechroot-2.20.1-13.fc38
Summary:  Gives a fake chroot environment
RPMs: fakechroot fakechroot-libs
Size: 442.80 KiB
Size change:  10.77 KiB
Changelog:
  * Thu Jan 19 2023 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
2.20.1-14
  - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_38_Mass_Rebuild

  * Wed Jul 19 2023 Fedora Release Engineering

Re: rawhide buildroot seems weird state, Child return code was: 255

[Richard W.M. Jones]

On Sat, Sep 02, 2023 at 09:40:39AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 02, 2023 at 05:00:37PM +0200, Sandro wrote:
> > On 02-09-2023 14:07, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> > > Then:
> > > 
> > > DEBUG util.py:444:  Running transaction check
> > > DEBUG util.py:444:  Transaction check succeeded.
> > > DEBUG util.py:444:  Running transaction test
> > > DEBUG util.py:444:  Transaction test succeeded.
> > > DEBUG util.py:444:  Running transaction
> > > DEBUG util.py:595:  Child return code was: 255
> > > 
> > > This does not look like BuildRequires dependency resolution failure, but
> > > some
> > > other "generic" issue.
> > 
> > Here's what I saw in about a quarter of my builds in the last hour:
> > 
> > DEBUG util.py:444:  Creating group 'input' with GID 104.
> > DEBUG util.py:444:  Creating group 'kvm' with GID 36.
> > DEBUG util.py:444:  Creating group 'render' with GID 105.
> > DEBUG util.py:444:  Creating group 'sgx' with GID 106.
> > DEBUG util.py:444:  Creating group 'systemd-journal' with GID 190.
> > DEBUG util.py:444:  Creating group 'systemd-oom' with GID 999.
> > DEBUG util.py:444:  Creating user 'systemd-oom' (systemd Userspace OOM
> > Killer) with UID 999 and GID 999.
> > DEBUG util.py:595:  Child return code was: 255
> > DEBUG util.py:167:  kill orphans
> > 
> > It happened across different archs.
> 
> I think it's this change in dnf:
> https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/pull/1854
> 
> I filed:
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2236997
> 
> on it.
> I'm not 100% sure this is the cause, but it's the only thing that looked
> likely to me. 
> 
> I've untagged those dnf updates, so if anyone sees this after now, we
> know that I was wrong and it's something else. ;) 

Whatever you did seems to have fixed the problem I was having with
Rawhide builds
(https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/6ULKYOIQ2WKHDF7YBRTVPTLEBODULCKY/)

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-builder quickly builds VMs from scratch
http://libguestfs.org/virt-builder.1.html
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: KDE and GNOME Join Hands To Add Payments To Turn Flathub Into a Store for the Linux Desktop

[Leon Fauster via devel]

Am 04.09.23 um 03:48 schrieb Ryan Bach via devel:

Ryan Bach via devel wrote:

First of all, as has been pointed out by others, the headline is misleading,
since KDE and GNOME are not actually parties to the proposal and since the
proposal was not even accepted.

Secondly, IMHO, allowing fee-charging downloads is an anti-feature of an
application repository that I specifically do not want. One of the nicest
features of GNU/Linux is that I can just open the package manager and
download whatever I want without having to pay anything.

And finally, Red Hat trying to monetize the Desktop would be the worst
nightmare. I do not want my desktop GNU/Linux to be "monetized" by anyone,
neither by Red Hat nor by any other company.

 Kevin Kofler

What is so wrong about buying open source software?



The real question should be how to compensate for the
expenses/ressources so that the development is substantially
maintained. Any more concepts? The mentioned one is just one
way. I actually would suggest a micro-pay approach, not for
the software but for the motivation of the developers ...

--
Leon

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Orphaned pseudo

[Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski]

Hi!
I decided to orphan the pseudo[1] package. I packaged it to address
some issues I had with fakeroot but I don't use either anymore.
Upstream is active, so the package could use an update. There's one
bug open[2]. The package is co-maintained by Igor, but he doesn't
seem to be very active. Cc'd just in case.

[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pseudo
[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162448

Regards,
Dominik
-- 
Fedora   https://fedoraproject.org
There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and
oppression to develop psychic muscles.
-- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Orphaning rubygem-pr_geohash

[Vít Ondruch]

I have oprhaned rubygem-pr_geohash. This package is currently FTBFS, 
broken by update of rubygem-minitest 5.19. The fix would be likely 
trivial. However, this was packaged as a dependency of rubygem-sunspot, 
which never got into Fedora after all (rhbz#721061), so it is finally 
time to let this package go.



Vít



OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Manual step in upgrade process for a FSWC

[Iker Pedrosa]

Hi,

On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 6:50 PM Steve Grubb  wrote:

> On Wednesday, August 30, 2023 5:59:18 AM EDT Iker Pedrosa wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I intend to switch pam_userdb's database provider from BerkeleyDB to GDBM
> > and I'm writing a Fedora System-Wide Change
> >  for Fedora
> 40.
> > The upgrade process would involve a manual procedure where the user needs
> > to run a conversion tool for the database. Is this acceptable?
>
> In the past, we had new requirements for bad password lockouts that did
> not
> fit into pam_tally neatly. So, we created pam_tally2 to let people migrate
> to
> the version that met requirements back in the day. Then the requirements
> changed again, so we created pam_faillock. This was all to allow people to
> migrate to the new requirements, which had radically different file
> formats.
> We didn't see a reliable way to move people and just left it to the admin.
>
> Not that you have to do it this way. But I thought I'd mention how we
> navigated changes in the past. The main thing is we didn't want people
> getting locked out by an incompatible change in the pam stack. (Especially
> for remote logins.)
>

Thank you for sharing this experience, I see that similar approaches have
been used in the past.


>
> -Steve
>
> > An automation process could be created, but the location of the database
> is
> > configurable, which increases its complexity and effort. Especially for a
> > PAM module that is not widely used. Another option I can think of is to
> > automate the conversion process for the default location, and leave the
> > manual conversion for those using a tuned location. Would that be
> > acceptable?
>
>
>
>
>

-- 

Iker Pedrosa

Senior Software Engineer, Identity Management team

Red Hat 

Txapela (gorria) buruan eta ibili munduan

(Red) hat on his head and walk the world

Basque proverb

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2237032] perl-Log-Dispatchouli-3.007 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237032

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC|iarn...@gmail.com,  |
   |jples...@redhat.com |
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237032
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2237016] perl-SNMP-Info-3.95 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237016



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-abddbc68b8 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-abddbc68b8


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237016

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202237016%23c5
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2237016] perl-SNMP-Info-3.95 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237016

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||perl-SNMP-Info-3.95-1.fc40
 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2023-09-04 08:07:34



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-3e7402a8d7 has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237016

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202237016%23c4
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2237016] perl-SNMP-Info-3.95 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237016

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-3e7402a8d7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-3e7402a8d7


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237016

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202237016%23c3
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2237016] perl-SNMP-Info-3.95 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237016

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC|jples...@redhat.com,|
   |ktdre...@ktdreyer.com,  |
   |w...@gouldfamily.org|
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237016
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue