[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-6770a3482d xrdp-0.9.23-1.el8 5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-2c5ac6a8d7 libtommath-1.1.0-4.el8 3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1d852648ca libssh2-1.10.0-1.el8 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing aeskeyfind-1.0-16.el8 cekit-4.9.1-1.el8 centpkg-0.8.1-2.el8 root-6.28.06-1.el8 Details about builds: aeskeyfind-1.0-16.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-dd06debd4c) Locate 128-bit and 256-bit AES keys in a captured memory image Update Information: sync bugfix with Debian ChangeLog: * Thu Sep 7 2023 Samuel Henrique - 1.0-16 - sync with the bugfix patches with Debian * Wed Jul 19 2023 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.0-15 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild * Wed Jan 18 2023 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.0-14 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_38_Mass_Rebuild * Wed Jul 20 2022 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.0-13 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild * Wed Jan 19 2022 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.0-12 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_36_Mass_Rebuild * Wed Jul 21 2021 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.0-11 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Mass_Rebuild * Mon Jan 25 2021 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.0-10 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Mass_Rebuild * Fri Jul 31 2020 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.0-9 - Second attempt - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild * Mon Jul 27 2020 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.0-8 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild cekit-4.9.1-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-2a91b0) Container image creation tool Update Information: Update to 4.9.1 Update to CEKit 4.9.0 ChangeLog: * Thu Sep 7 2023 Nick Cross - 4.9.1-1 - Release 4.9.1 * Thu Sep 7 2023 Nick Cross - 4.9.0-1 - Release 4.9.0 centpkg-0.8.1-2.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-258f609b2b) CentOS utility for working with dist-git Update Information: Update to 0.8.1. This resolves a bug with an [unneeded Python import](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235255) and [adds a none option for the `--rhel-target` flag](https://git.centos.org/centos/centpkg/issue/79). ChangeLog: * Thu Sep 7 2023 Carl George - 0.8.1-2 - Sync dependencies - Enable test suite - Switch to SPDX license identifier * Thu Sep 7 2023 Troy Dawson - 0.8.1-1 - Add the --rhel-target none option (Issue: 79) References: [ 1 ] Bug #2235255 - centpkg: unused pytz import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235255 root-6.28.06-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-77d698193a) Numerical data analysis framework Update Information: ROOT 6.28.06 ChangeLog: * Tue Sep 5 2023 Mattias Ellert - 6.28.06-1 - Update to 6.28.06 - Drop patches root-testRooAbsL-test-compares-two-doubles-and-fails.patch and root-strlcpy.patch (fixed upstream) * Sun Aug 6 2023 Mattias Ellert - 6.28.04-5 - Rebuilt for libarrow.so.1300 * Fri Jul 21 2023 Fedora Release Engineering - 6.28.04-4 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild * Sun Jul 9 2023 Mattias Ellert - 6.28.04-3 - Fix build on Fedora 39+ where glibc has strlcpy and strlcat - Enable build of root-gui-qt6webdisplay sub-package if Qt6 is available * Mon Jun 26 2023 Orion Poplawski - 6.28.04-2 - Rebuilt for Python 3.12 ___ epel-devel mailing list
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-0640e2bbd1 xrdp-0.9.23-1.el7 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-fe96e69275 libtommath-0.42.0-6.el7 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing aeskeyfind-1.0-16.el7 cekit-4.9.1-1.el7 Details about builds: aeskeyfind-1.0-16.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-e4fc2fa283) Locate 128-bit and 256-bit AES keys in a captured memory image Update Information: sync bugfix with Debian ChangeLog: * Thu Sep 7 2023 Samuel Henrique - 1.0-16 - sync with the bugfix patches with Debian * Wed Jul 19 2023 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.0-15 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild * Wed Jan 18 2023 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.0-14 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_38_Mass_Rebuild * Wed Jul 20 2022 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.0-13 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild * Wed Jan 19 2022 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.0-12 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_36_Mass_Rebuild * Wed Jul 21 2021 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.0-11 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Mass_Rebuild * Mon Jan 25 2021 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.0-10 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Mass_Rebuild * Fri Jul 31 2020 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.0-9 - Second attempt - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild * Mon Jul 27 2020 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.0-8 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild cekit-4.9.1-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-8df4cb181d) Container image creation tool Update Information: Update to 4.9.1 Update to CEKit 4.9.0 ChangeLog: * Thu Sep 7 2023 Nick Cross - 4.9.1-1 - Release 4.9.1 * Thu Sep 7 2023 Nick Cross - 4.9.0-1 - Release 4.9.0 ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2237858] perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20230907.001 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237858 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-484d1f8368 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-484d1f8368` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-484d1f8368 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237858 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202237858%23c4 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2237353] perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20230904.001 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237353 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-484d1f8368 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-484d1f8368` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-484d1f8368 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237353 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202237353%23c5 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: SPDX MIT license , what todo ?
On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 8:37 PM Sérgio Basto wrote: > > Hi, > > xdg-utils is a MIT License [1] what SPDX license have [2] ? if it is > already a valid SPDX formula , what I should write on changelog ? > Do nothing. This transition is a no-op for you. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
SPDX MIT license , what todo ?
Hi,
xdg-utils is a MIT License [1] what SPDX license have [2] ? if it is
already a valid SPDX formula , what I should write on changelog ?
Thank you
[1]
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xdg/xdg-utils/-/blob/master/LICENSE?ref_type=heads
[2]
License-fedora2spdx MIT
Warning: more options on how to interpret MIT. Possible options:
['Adobe-Glyph', 'BSL-1.0', 'Boehm-GC', 'HP-1986', 'HPND-sell-variant',
'HPND', 'ICU', 'MIT-CMU', 'MIT-Festival', 'MIT-Modern-Variant', 'MIT-
enna', 'MIT-feh', 'MIT-open-group', 'MIT', 'NTP', 'SGI-B-2.0', 'SMLNJ',
'UnixCrypt', 'Xfig', 'libtiff', 'mpich2']
{{pick MIT choice}}
Note: the input is already valid SPDX formula, But that may be a
coincidence,
because the legacy identifier represented the whole family of licenses.
Please check if the license would match one of the licenses above.
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: libtommath minor soname bump
On 9/7/23 11:40, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: On Thursday, 07 September 2023 at 11:13, František Šumšal wrote: Hello, I plan to bump libtommath to 1.2.1 in Rawhide, which bumps the respective shared library to libtommath.so.1.2.1. According to repoquery all dependencies depend only on libtommath.1, so no rebuild should be necessary: $ dnf repoquery --releasever rawhide --whatrequires 'libtommath.so.*' Last metadata expiration check: 0:20:29 ago on Thu Sep 7 10:34:05 2023. dropbear-0:2022.82-3.fc39.x86_64 firebird-0:4.0.3.2975-1.fc39.x86_64 libfbclient2-0:4.0.3.2975-1.fc39.i686 libfbclient2-0:4.0.3.2975-1.fc39.x86_64 libtomcrypt-0:1.18.2-17.fc39.i686 libtomcrypt-0:1.18.2-17.fc39.x86_64 libtommath-devel-0:1.2.0-13.fc40.i686 libtommath-devel-0:1.2.0-13.fc40.x86_64 moarvm-0:2023.06-1.fc39.i686 moarvm-0:2023.06-1.fc39.x86_64 $ dnf repoquery --releasever rawhide --whatrequires 'libtommath.so.1.*' Last metadata expiration check: 0:21:06 ago on Thu Sep 7 10:34:05 2023. <...no results...> Please correct me if I'm missing something. Your first step should be checking for any ABI changes using abipkgdiff and rpmsodiff. Only if there are removed symbols do you need to worry about rebuilding consumers. However, added unversioned symbols do mean that backwards compatibility is not preserved (i.e. an application built against a newer version, say 1.2.1, might not work with 1.2.0 installed if it depends on a symbol introduced in 1.2.1). Thanks for the pointers, much appreciated! Both abipkgdiff and rpmsodiff seem to be happy, i.e. there were no added/changed/removed symbols between 1.2.0 and 1.2.1, so the bump should be safe. Cheers, Frantisek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Summary/Minutes for today's FESCo meeting (2023-09-07)
= #fedora-meeting-2: FESCO (2023-09-07) = Meeting started by Son_Goku at 17:02:05 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2023-09-07/fesco.2023-09-07-17.02.log.html . Meeting summary --- * init process (Son_Goku, 17:03:50) * #3062 Unannounced F39 change: Dropping sshd.socket unit from openssh package (Son_Goku, 17:07:39) * AGREED: The Change to drop sshd.socket needs to be reverted before Fedora Linux 39 Beta release. If it is desired to drop this, then FESCo requests a full Change proposal for Fedora Linux 40 so all stakeholders can work on implementing it properly. (+6, 1, -0) (Son_Goku, 17:17:56) * #3059 F39 incomplete changes: 100% complete deadline (Son_Goku, 17:18:15) * Modernize Thread Building Blocks for Fedora 39 (Son_Goku, 17:27:08) * the tbb2020.3 compat package exists, but tbb has not been upgraded (Son_Goku, 17:28:44) * ACTION: zbyszek_ will email trodgers to remind him of the Change to get it done before Final Freeze (Son_Goku, 17:33:01) * LegacyXorgDriverRemoval (Son_Goku, 17:33:26) * LINK: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3059#comment-870702 ? (mhroncok_web, 17:35:17) * ACTION: nirik will email ajax about the Change to find out what's going on here, we need a status update asap (Son_Goku, 17:36:54) * Bigger ESP (Son_Goku, 17:39:15) * The ESP default size was raised to 500MiB, but the limit of 600MiB was restored. https://github.com/rhinstaller/anaconda/pull/5081 (Son_Goku, 17:43:51) * Enable bootupd for Fedora Silverblue & Kinoite (Son_Goku, 17:45:27) * ACTION: zbyszek_ will email travier/siosm to get an update on the bootupd work (Son_Goku, 17:56:11) * Enable fwupd-refresh.timer by default on IoT, CoreOS & Server editions (Son_Goku, 17:58:23) * The pull request for fedora-release needs to be merged to finish implementing it: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-release/pull-request/279 (Son_Goku, 18:00:05) * Allow Removal of tzdata (Son_Goku, 18:05:24) * AGREED: This is punted for now. We'll revisit next week. (+6, 0, 0) (Son_Goku, 18:13:21) * Next week's chair (Son_Goku, 18:13:46) * ACTION: decathorpe will chair the next meeting (Son_Goku, 18:17:30) * Open Floor (Son_Goku, 18:17:37) Meeting ended at 18:21:40 UTC. Action Items * zbyszek_ will email trodgers to remind him of the Change to get it done before Final Freeze * nirik will email ajax about the Change to find out what's going on here, we need a status update asap * zbyszek_ will email travier/siosm to get an update on the bootupd work * decathorpe will chair the next meeting Action Items, by person --- * decathorpe * decathorpe will chair the next meeting * nirik * nirik will email ajax about the Change to find out what's going on here, we need a status update asap * zbyszek * zbyszek_ will email trodgers to remind him of the Change to get it done before Final Freeze * zbyszek_ will email travier/siosm to get an update on the bootupd work * zbyszek_ * zbyszek_ will email trodgers to remind him of the Change to get it done before Final Freeze * zbyszek_ will email travier/siosm to get an update on the bootupd work * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --- * Son_Goku (122) * nirik (40) * decathorpe (34) * zbyszek_ (33) * zodbot (27) * mhroncok_web (21) * dcantrell (6) * mhayden (5) * dbelyavs (5) * dustymabe (5) * tstellar (4) * sgallagh (2) * zbyszek (0) * mhroncok (0) * Conan_Kudo (0) * Pharaoh_Atem (0) * King_InuYasha (0) * Sir_Gallantmon (0) * Eighth_Doctor (0) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.4 .. _`MeetBot`: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zodbot#Meeting_Functions -- Neal Gompa (FAS: ngompa) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Tellico license correction
While updating tellico and converting the license to a SPDX identifier I notice that the previous version was incomplete. Before it was referred as GPLv2.0-only but the code refers to it as GPL-2.0- or-later. This change should have been done several years ago but I did not noticed. Regards, -- José Abílio Matos ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG
On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 8:00 AM wrote: > > Dear all, > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >ELN SIG on 2023-09-08 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern >At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat > > The meeting will be about: Open Floor ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2237914] New: perl-Sys-Virt-9.7.0 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237914 Bug ID: 2237914 Summary: perl-Sys-Virt-9.7.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Sys-Virt Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: berra...@redhat.com, crobi...@redhat.com, jples...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, st...@silug.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 9.7.0 Upstream release that is considered latest: 9.7.0 Current version/release in rawhide: 9.4.0-3.fc39 URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Sys-Virt/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/3355/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Sys-Virt -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237914 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202237914%23c0 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Schedule for Thursday's FESCo Meeting (2023-09-07)
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Thursday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on irc.libera.chat. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2023-09-07 17:00 UTC' Links to all issues to be discussed can be found at: https://pagure.io/fesco/report/meeting_agenda = Discussed and Voted in the Ticket = F40 Change: Revitalize Forge Macros https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3061 APPROVED (+4, 0, -0) = Followups = #3059 F39 incomplete changes: 100% complete deadline https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3059 = New business = #3062 Unannounced F39 change: Dropping sshd.socket unit from openssh package https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3062 = Open Floor = For more complete details, please visit each individual issue. The report of the agenda items can be found at https://pagure.io/fesco/report/meeting_agenda If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to this e-mail, file a new issue at https://pagure.io/fesco, e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during the open floor topic. Note that added topics may be deferred until the following meeting. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
--- Original Message --- On Thursday, September 7th, 2023 at 12:47, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Looks good. > > One nitpick: > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-ce1971f63f > > You named the update "low". I suggest you edit the update and remove the name > entirely. Done, the update's name is fixed. Thanks for the information. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: SPDX Statistics - Passenger pigeon edition
On 9/2/23 5:32 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 02. 09. 23 v 13:07 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
"python-lit warning: valid as old and new and no changelong entry, please check"
The License string is valid as both the old-style Fedora license and a SPDX
expression, and the tooling did not match anything in the changelog that would
indicate the license was converted to SPDX.
Typical example is
MIT
this is valid string in old system. And also in the SPDX format. But
the old MIT represented whole family. It can be actually anything from
$ license-fedora2spdx'MIT'
Warning: more options on how to interpret MIT. Possible options:
['mpich2', 'libtiff', 'Xfig', 'UnixCrypt', 'SMLNJ', 'SGI-B-2.0',
'NTP', 'MIT', 'MIT-open-group', 'MIT-feh', 'MIT-enna',
'MIT-Modern-Variant', 'MIT-F
estival', 'MIT-CMU', 'ICU', 'HPND', 'HPND-sell-variant', 'HP-1986',
'Boehm-GC', 'BSL-1.0', 'Adobe-Glyph']
{{pick MIT choice}}
It can be converted to MIT, but also to ICU or HPND... and without any
indication in the changelog there is no way to know if you check it or
not.
This is probably a good explanation to add to our Updating Existing
Packages documentation page. I've added an issue as a reminder. Need to
probably do a documentation update soon...
Jilayne
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F38 to F39
I'm getting: Transaction failed: Rpm transaction failed. - file /usr/lib64/libnode.so.115 from install of nodejs-libs-1:20.5.1-1.fc39.x86_64 conflicts with file from package nodejs20-libs-1:20.5.1-1.fc38.x86_64 - file /usr/bin/node-20 from install of nodejs-1:20.5.1-1.fc39.x86_64 conflicts with file from package nodejs20-1:20.5.1-1.fc38.x86_64 I filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237882. Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2237858] perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20230907.001 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237858 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-484d1f8368 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-484d1f8368 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237858 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202237858%23c3 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Fedora 39 compose report: 20230907.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-39-20230906.n.0 NEW: Fedora-39-20230907.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 13 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded packages: 39.21 MiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: -155.14 KiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = Image: Silverblue dvd-ostree ppc64le Path: Silverblue/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-ppc64le-39-20230907.n.0.iso = DROPPED IMAGES = Image: i3 live aarch64 Path: Spins/aarch64/iso/Fedora-i3-Live-aarch64-39-20230906.n.0.iso Image: KDE live aarch64 Path: Spins/aarch64/iso/Fedora-KDE-Live-aarch64-39-20230906.n.0.iso = ADDED PACKAGES = = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: buildstream-1.6.9-4.fc39 Old package: buildstream-1.6.9-1.fc39 Summary: Build/integrate software stacks RPMs: buildstream buildstream-docs Size: 952.16 KiB Size change: -109.32 KiB Changelog: * Wed Jul 19 2023 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.6.9-2 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild * Tue Jul 25 2023 Python Maint - 1.6.9-3 - Rebuilt for Python 3.12 * Tue Sep 05 2023 Robin Lee - 1.6.9-4 - Backport a patch to fix build for Python 3.12 Package: gfal2-python-1.12.1-1.fc39 Old package: gfal2-python-1.12.0-3.fc39 Summary: Python bindings for gfal 2 RPMs: python3-gfal2 Size: 588.08 KiB Size change: 935 B Changelog: * Tue Jun 13 2023 Python Maint - 1.12.0-4 - Rebuilt for Python 3.12 * Wed Jul 19 2023 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.12.0-5 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild * Tue Sep 05 2023 Mihai Patrascoiu - 1.12.1-1 - Upgrade to upstream release 1.12.1 - Closes bugzilla#2154855, bugzilla#222, bugzilla#2225821 Package: libeconf-0.5.2-1.fc39 Old package: libeconf-0.4.0-6.fc39 Summary: Enhanced config file parser library RPMs: libeconf libeconf-devel libeconf-utils Size: 371.78 KiB Size change: 37.37 KiB Changelog: * Mon Aug 28 2023 Iker Pedrosa - 0.5.2-1 - Update to 0.5.2 (RH#1980774) - Fix CVE-2023-22652 (RH#2212464) - Fix CVE-2023-30079 (RH#2235236) Package: manafirewall-0.0.3-7.fc39 Old package: manafirewall-0.0.3-4.fc38 Summary: ManaTools FirewallD configuration tool RPMs: manafirewall Size: 189.94 KiB Size change: -3.68 KiB Changelog: * Thu Jun 15 2023 Python Maint - 0.0.3-5 - Rebuilt for Python 3.12 * Thu Jul 20 2023 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.0.3-6 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild * Tue Sep 05 2023 Neal Gompa - 0.0.3-7 - Add setuptools as a BR Package: mopidy-3.4.1-2.fc39 Old package: mopidy-3.4.1-1.fc39 Summary: An extensible music server written in Python RPMs: mopidy mopidy-doc Size: 898.36 KiB Size change: 18.65 KiB Changelog: * Thu Jul 20 2023 Fedora Release Engineering - 3.4.1-2 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild Package: mopidy-mpd-3.3.0-5.fc39 Old package: mopidy-mpd-3.3.0-4.fc38 Summary: Mopidy extension for controlling Mopidy from MPD clients RPMs: mopidy-mpd Size: 118.38 KiB Size change: -2.67 KiB Changelog: * Thu Jul 20 2023 Fedora Release Engineering - 3.3.0-5 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild Package: mutter-45~beta.1-4.fc39 Old package: mutter-45~beta.1-3.fc39 Summary: Window and compositing manager based on Clutter RPMs: mutter mutter-common mutter-devel mutter-tests Size: 15.53 MiB Size change: 4.96 KiB Changelog: * Mon Sep 04 2023 Jonas ??dahl - 45~beta.1-4 - Enable fractional scaling by default Package: noggin-1.7.1-4.fc39 Old package: noggin-1.7.1-1.fc39 Summary: Self-service user portal for FreeIPA for communities RPMs: noggin noggin-theme-centos noggin-theme-fas noggin-theme-openSUSE Size: 10.66 MiB Size change: -5.94 KiB Changelog: * Tue May 02 2023 Jonathan Wright - 1.7.1-2 - Add patch for building in epel9 * Thu Jul 20 2023 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.7.1-3 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild * Tue Sep 05 2023 Neal Gompa - 1.7.1-4 - Add patch to support flask-babel v3 - Reorganize patches to apply unconditionally Package: powerdevil-5.27.7-5.fc39 Old package: powerdevil-5.27.7-1.fc39 Summary: Manages the power consumption settings of a Plasma Shell RPMs: powerdevil Size: 5.46 MiB Size change: 8.13 KiB Changelog: * Fri Sep 01 2023 Adam Williamson - 5.27.7-2 - Backport MR #230 to disable auto-suspend on VMs (#2232711) * Fri Sep 01 2023 Adam Williamson - 5.27.7-3 - Fix a bug in the backported patch (thanks Natalie
[Bug 2237858] perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20230907.001 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237858 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-a3fbc13f2a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-a3fbc13f2a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237858 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202237858%23c1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2237858] perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20230907.001 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237858 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Fixed In Version||perl-Business-ISBN-Data-202 ||30907.001-1.fc40 Last Closed||2023-09-07 13:28:34 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-a3fbc13f2a has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237858 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202237858%23c2 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2237858] perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20230907.001 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237858 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Assignee|jples...@redhat.com |p...@city-fan.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237858 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Adding Passim as a Fedora 40 feature?
On Thu, Sep 7 2023 at 12:55:03 PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: Sure, but that means it will still be started on Fedora with default configuration, unless I misunderstand something? It will. D-Bus services are a little weird because they often ship systemd services but they're still effectively enabled by default even if the systemd service is disabled. The disabled preset means systemd *itself* will not activate the service, but dbus-broker still will. This is sort of an end run around the expectation that FESCo approve new services, but FESCo only approves systemd presets, and no preset is required for D-Bus services. And almost all desktop services are D-Bus services. It's actually not *too* serious of a problem IMO, because packages generally make good decisions, and somebody is going to notice if something unwanted appears. But it's probably not what you're expecting if you're thinking that new services have to be approved. Michael ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: question about dnf5 upgrade output
Am Do., 7. Sept. 2023 um 14:02 Uhr schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek : > > I'm testing the upgrade to F39, and I see the following: > > Installing group/module packages: > tlwg-waree-fontsnoarch 0.7.3-9.fc39 fedora > 250.3 KiB >replacing thai-scalable-fonts-common noarch 0.7.3-5.fc38 > 18.6 KiB >replacing thai-scalable-waree-fonts noarch 0.7.3-5.fc38 > 229.4 KiB > > tlwg-waree-fonts-0.7.3-9.fc39.noarch.rpm doesn't seem special in any way. > Are they in a separate section of the output because they are pulled in via > a comps group? dnf5 orders the sections differently, and summarizes one more: dnf4: Installing: Upgrading: Installing group/module packages: Installing dependencies: Installing weak dependencies: Removing: Downgrading: Transaction Summary Install 67 Packages Upgrade3873 Packages Remove6 Packages Downgrade 8 Packages dnf5: Removing: Downgrading: Upgrading: Installing group/module packages: Installing: Installing dependencies: Installing weak dependencies: Transaction Summary: Installing: 67 packages Upgrading: 3873 packages Replacing: 3896 packages Removing: 6 packages Downgrading: 8 packages My dnf4 lists your fonts basically in the same way as your and my dnf5, by the way. Also, dnf5 consumes double the screen space for updates - can we switch back to 1-line-update info for ordinary updates, at least as an option? Michael ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Fedora Linux 39 Beta is NO-GO
Due to outstanding blocker bugs[1], we do not have a release candidate for Fedora Linux 39 Beta. Tomorrow's Go/No-Go meeting is cancelled. The next Fedora Linux 39 Beta Go/No-Go meeting will be held at 1700 UTC on Thursday 14 September in #fedora-meeting-1. We will aim for the "target date #1" milestone of 19 September. The release schedule[2] will be updated accordingly when someone with the appropriate powers and access to the tool handles my ticket[3]. [1] https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/39/beta/buglist [2] https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-39/f-39-key-tasks.html [3] https://pagure.io/fedora-pgm/schedule/issue/113 -- Adam Williamson (he/him/his) Fedora QA Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org https://www.happyassassin.net ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
question about dnf5 upgrade output
I'm testing the upgrade to F39, and I see the following: Installing group/module packages: tlwg-waree-fontsnoarch 0.7.3-9.fc39 fedora 250.3 KiB replacing thai-scalable-fonts-common noarch 0.7.3-5.fc38 18.6 KiB replacing thai-scalable-waree-fonts noarch 0.7.3-5.fc38229.4 KiB tlwg-waree-fonts-0.7.3-9.fc39.noarch.rpm doesn't seem special in any way. Are they in a separate section of the output because they are pulled in via a comps group? Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG
Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: ELN SIG on 2023-09-08 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat The meeting will be about: Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/10568/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230907.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230906.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230907.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 6 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 130 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 1.37 MiB Size of dropped packages:885.55 KiB Size of upgraded packages: 4.15 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 21.41 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = Image: Kinoite dvd-ostree aarch64 Path: Kinoite/aarch64/iso/Fedora-Kinoite-ostree-aarch64-Rawhide-20230907.n.0.iso Image: Onyx dvd-ostree x86_64 Path: Onyx/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Onyx-ostree-x86_64-Rawhide-20230907.n.0.iso = DROPPED IMAGES = Image: Kinoite dvd-ostree x86_64 Path: Kinoite/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Kinoite-ostree-x86_64-Rawhide-20230906.n.0.iso Image: Sericea dvd-ostree x86_64 Path: Sericea/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Sericea-ostree-x86_64-Rawhide-20230906.n.0.iso Image: Kinoite dvd-ostree ppc64le Path: Kinoite/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-Kinoite-ostree-ppc64le-Rawhide-20230906.n.0.iso Image: Silverblue dvd-ostree x86_64 Path: Silverblue/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-x86_64-Rawhide-20230906.n.0.iso Image: Silverblue dvd-ostree ppc64le Path: Silverblue/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-ppc64le-Rawhide-20230906.n.0.iso Image: LXQt live aarch64 Path: Spins/aarch64/iso/Fedora-LXQt-Live-aarch64-Rawhide-20230906.n.0.iso = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: bluechi-0.5.0-1.fc40 Summary: A systemd service controller for multi-nodes environments RPMs:bluechi bluechi-agent bluechi-ctl bluechi-selinux python3-bluechi Size:777.96 KiB Package: guile-reader-0.6.3-1.fc40 Summary: A simple framework for building readers for GNU Guile RPMs:guile-reader guile-reader-devel Size:582.52 KiB Package: python-click-option-group-0.5.6-1.fc40 Summary: Option groups missing in Click RPMs:python3-click-option-group Size:37.30 KiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = Package: hirte-0.4.0-3.fc39 Summary: A systemd service controller for multi-nodes environments RPMs:hirte hirte-agent hirte-ctl hirte-selinux python3-pyhirte Size:885.55 KiB = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: Cython-3.0.2-1.fc40 Old package: Cython-3.0.0-1.fc39 Summary: Language for writing Python extension modules RPMs: python3-cython Size: 15.31 MiB Size change: 44.31 KiB Changelog: * Fri Sep 01 2023 Miro Hron??ok - 3.0.2-1 - Update to 3.0.2 - Fixes: rhbz#2235027 Package: aeskeyfind-1.0-16.fc40 Old package: aeskeyfind-1.0-15.fc39 Summary: Locate 128-bit and 256-bit AES keys in a captured memory image RPMs: aeskeyfind Size: 76.96 KiB Size change: 148 B Changelog: * Thu Sep 07 2023 Samuel Henrique - 1.0-16 - sync with the bugfix patches with Debian Package: aqualung-1.2-4.fc40 Old package: aqualung-1.2-3.fc39 Summary: Music Player for GNU/Linux RPMs: aqualung Size: 4.83 MiB Size change: 19.10 KiB Changelog: * Tue Sep 05 2023 Davide Cavalca - 1.2-4 - Unconditionally enable Monkey's Audio support - Add upstream backports: - Add more supported formats to FFmpeg decoder - Add support for recent versions of Monkey's Audio - Fix the Monkey's Audio decoder to work with current Monkey's Audio - Remove now unnecessary glib include in mac decoder - Backport upstream PR#34 to fix a build issue with Monkey's Audio - Drop obsolete patches Package: arpwatch-14:3.4-1.fc40 Old package: arpwatch-14:3.3-19.fc39 Summary: Network monitoring tools for tracking IP addresses on a network RPMs: arpwatch Size: 1.36 MiB Size change: 5.31 KiB Changelog: * Wed Sep 06 2023 Benjamin A. Beasley - 14:3.3-20 - Generate ethercodes.dat from latest oui.csv * Wed Sep 06 2023 Benjamin A. Beasley - 14:3.3-21 - Generate ethercodes.dat from latest oui.csv * Wed Sep 06 2023 Benjamin A. Beasley - 14:3.4-1 - Update to 3.4 (close RHBZ#2237532) Package: azure-cli-2.52.0-1.fc40 Old package: azure-cli-2.51.0-1.fc39 Summary: Microsoft Azure Command-Line Tools RPMs: azure-cli python3-azure-cli-core python3-azure-cli-telemetry python3-azure-cli-testsdk Size: 12.10 MiB Size change: 1.04 MiB Changelog: * Tue Sep 05 2023 Major Hayden - 2.52.0-1 - Update to 2.52.0 Package: calceph-3.5.3-1.fc40 Old package: calceph-3.5.2-2.fc39 Summary: Astronomical library to access planetary ephemeris files RPMs: calceph calceph-devel calceph-doc calceph-fortran-devel calceph-libs Size: 22.02 MiB Size change: 17.25 MiB Changelog: * Wed Sep 06 2023 Mattia Verga - 3.5.3-1 - Update to 3.5.3 (fedora#2237641) Package: chatterino2-2.4.5-4.fc40 Old package: chatterino2-2.4.5-3.fc40 Summary: Chat client for https://twitch.tv RPMs: chatterino2 Size: 12.83 MiB Size change: -294.63 KiB Changelog: * Tue Sep 05 2023 Christian Birk - 2.4.5-4 - Change build type
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
It looks like the Electrum build is currently blocked not by protobuf, but by the failure of python-qdarkstyle to rebuild for Python 3.12[1][2]. That dependency is also currently orphaned. Grepping through the Electrum source, I see: Electrum-4.3.4/contrib/requirements/requirements.txt 2:protobuf>=3.12,<4 Electrum-4.3.4/contrib/requirements/requirements-hw.txt 32:protobuf>=3.12,<4 Electrum-4.3.4/contrib/deterministic-build/requirements-hw.txt 175:protobuf==3.20.3 \ Electrum-4.3.4/contrib/deterministic-build/requirements.txt 31:protobuf==3.20.3 \ Based on that, it looks like the minimum protobuf version should actually be 3.12 (we have 3.19), not 3.20; the latter should only be the preferred version for deterministic builds. So I suspect everything will be fine if you can get python-qdarkstyle fixed. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2225768#c6 [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2220472 On 9/7/23 05:52, Jonathan Schleifer wrote: Unfortunately, it is worse than this: Electrum FTI in F39. A newer Electrum version would fix that, but F39 still has no new enough protobuf. Is there any other solution here than saying packaging Electrum for Fedora 39 is just not possible and remove the package in F39, then reintroduce it in F40 (that is, if F40 finally gets a newer protobuf)? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2237858] New: perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20230907.001 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237858 Bug ID: 2237858 Summary: perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20230907.001 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Business-ISBN-Data Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: jples...@redhat.com, ka...@ucw.cz, mspa...@redhat.com, p...@city-fan.org, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 20230907.001 Upstream release that is considered latest: 20230907.001 Current version/release in rawhide: 20230904.001-1.fc40 URL: https://metacpan.org/dist/Business-ISBN-Data/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/2674/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Business-ISBN-Data -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237858 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202237858%23c0 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Exclude i686 builders for noarch packages
On 07. 09. 23 6:11, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I'm running into an issue where python-rpds-py excludes i686:
# https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EncourageI686LeafRemoval
# Also rust-rpds is not available on i686
ExcludeArch: %{ix86}
but then my python-nbformat build gets sent to an i686 builder and fails
because python3-rpds-py is not available:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=105847966
It seems annoying to have to propagate the ExcludeArch up the stack for this.
Thoughts?
My thoughts: https://pagure.io/koji/issue/3809
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: compilation of vdr-skindesigner fails with allocator.h:184:7: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 7:39 PM Martin Gansser wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> when compiling vdr-skindesigner-1.2.21 [1] on fc38 it fails with this error
> message:
>
> g++ -O3 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches
> -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3
> -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1
> -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64
> -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection
> -fcf-protection -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer -fPIC
> -Werror=overloaded-virtual -Wno-parentheses -D_GNU_SOURCE
> -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -std=c++11
> -std=c++11 -c -DPLUGIN_NAME_I18N='"skindesigner"' -I/usr/include/libxml2
> -DSCRIPTFOLDER='"/usr/lib64/vdr/skindesigner/scripts"' -D__STL_CONFIG_H
> -DLIBSKINDESIGNERAPIVERSION='"0.1.2"' -I/usr/include/freetype2
> -I/usr/include/libpng16 -I/usr/include/harfbuzz -I/usr/include/glib-2.0
> -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/sysprof-4 -pthread
> -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/usr/include/librsvg-2.0 -I/usr/include/glib
> -2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/sysprof-4
> -I/usr/include/libmount -I/usr/include/blkid -I/usr/include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0
> -I/usr/include/libpng16 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/freetype2
> -I/usr/include/harfbuzz -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/usr/include/pixman-1
> -pthread -ljpeg -o extensions/pluginmanager.o extensions/pluginmanager.c
> *** WARNING *** there are active plugins, do not report this as a bug unless
> you can reproduce it without enabling any plugins.
> Event| Plugins
> PLUGIN_FINISH_UNIT | annobin: Generate final annotations
> PLUGIN_START_UNIT| annobin: Generate global annotations
> PLUGIN_ALL_PASSES_START | annobin: Generate per-function annotations
> PLUGIN_ALL_PASSES_END| annobin: Register per-function end symbols
> In file included from /usr/include/c++/13/string:43,
> from extensions/pluginmanager.h:4,
> from extensions/pluginmanager.c:1:
> /usr/include/c++/13/bits/allocator.h: In instantiation of 'std::allocator<
> >::~allocator() [with _Tp = std::pair std::map >]':
> extensions/pluginmanager.c:301:1: required from here
> /usr/include/c++/13/bits/allocator.h:184:7: internal compiler error:
> Segmentation fault
> 184 | ~allocator() _GLIBCXX_NOTHROW { }
> | ^
> Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source.
> See for instructions.
> The bug is not reproducible, so it is likely a hardware or OS problem.
> make: *** [Makefile:141: extensions/pluginmanager.o] Error 1
> make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
>
>
> [1]
> https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/ErrorReports/vdr-skindesigner/vdr-skindesigner.spec
>
> How can i solve this ?
Follow the instructions and file a bug report against gcc?
Fabio
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Adding Passim as a Fedora 40 feature?
On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 12:53 PM Richard Hughes wrote: > > On Thu, 7 Sept 2023 at 11:36, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > All systemd services that have an "enabled by default" preset need to do > > that: > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/DefaultServices/#_enabling_services_by_default > > It's not exactly enabled by default -- it's autostarted when required > using D-Bus system activation. If you don't ever use it (if fwupd is > configured with no active remotes, like in RHEL) then it never gets > started at all. Sure, but that means it will still be started on Fedora with default configuration, unless I misunderstand something? Fabio ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Adding Passim as a Fedora 40 feature?
On Thu, 7 Sept 2023 at 11:36, Fabio Valentini wrote: > All systemd services that have an "enabled by default" preset need to do that: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/DefaultServices/#_enabling_services_by_default It's not exactly enabled by default -- it's autostarted when required using D-Bus system activation. If you don't ever use it (if fwupd is configured with no active remotes, like in RHEL) then it never gets started at all. Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
On 06. 09. 23 9:02, Christiano Anderson wrote: --- Original Message --- On Tuesday, September 5th, 2023 at 13:54, Miro Hrončok wrote: I pushed the change only to rawhide branch, should I do the same for f39? Yes please. But also build the package for both rawhide and Fedora 39 to make it installable: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2220282 Thanks for the information, just did the build and repeated the process for f39. Could you please check if it looks fine? Looks good. One nitpick: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-ce1971f63f You named the update "low". I suggest you edit the update and remove the name entirely. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Adding Passim as a Fedora 40 feature?
On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 8:00 AM Richard Hughes wrote: > > On Wed, 6 Sept 2023 at 21:32, Adam Williamson > wrote: > > There is no -lib package split in Fedora currently. The 'passim' > > package provides the libraries. > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2278800 - there > > is no 'passim-libs'. > > Oopa, sorry. I pushed the commit: > > commit 44a1d6df6cf40912ea07bd7e71bc69bc0742e814 (HEAD -> main, > origin/rawhide, origin/main, origin/HEAD) > Author: Richard Hughes > Date: Fri Aug 25 20:53:33 2023 +0100 > > Split out a -libs subpackage > > :100644 100644 bc51e57 3ad7ccc Mpassim.spec > > ...but for some reason didn't do the build. Building now. > > > Sep 06 02:27:08 fedora systemd[1]: Starting passim.service - A local > > caching server... > > Sep 06 02:27:08 fedora (passimd)[2647]: passim.service: Failed to set up > > mount namespacing: /run/systemd/mount-rootfs/var/lib/passim/data: No such > > file or directory > > Sep 06 02:27:08 fedora (passimd)[2647]: passim.service: Failed at step > > NAMESPACE spawning /usr/libexec/passimd: No such file or directory > > Sep 06 02:27:08 fedora systemd[1]: passim.service: Main process exited, > > code=exited, status=226/NAMESPACE > > Sep 06 02:27:08 fedora systemd[1]: passim.service: Failed with result > > 'exit-code'. > > > > I'm guessing the "failed to set up mount namespacing" thing is the real > > problem, and the error about /usr/libexec/passimd not being there is > > just some odd consequence of the namespacing problem. > > Will debug today, thanks. > > > > It's intentional in that if the feature gets rejected I'd change the > > > "Recommends" to a "Suggests". If you'd rather me do the opposite (i.e. > > > move from Suggests to Recommends if the proposal gets accepted) that's > > > 100% okay with me and I can do that tomorrow. > > > > I do think that would be more appropriate. But you'd also need to split > > the libs out for this to mean anything. > > Done, also building for rawhide now. Note that if you want the passim service to be enabled by default, you will need to request approval with FESCo (or the appropriate Working Group). All systemd services that have an "enabled by default" preset need to do that: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/DefaultServices/#_enabling_services_by_default And at that point, I'd rather have this as a proper System-Wide Change Proposal than just a discussion on the mailing list. Fabio ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
Unfortunately, it is worse than this: Electrum FTI in F39. A newer Electrum version would fix that, but F39 still has no new enough protobuf. Is there any other solution here than saying packaging Electrum for Fedora 39 is just not possible and remove the package in F39, then reintroduce it in F40 (that is, if F40 finally gets a newer protobuf)? -- Jonathan Am 05.09.23 um 04:13 schrieb Ben Beasley: Interested parties have been grappling with the problem of getting protobuf updated to v4 (22.x, 23.x, etc.), but the number of impacted packages is tremendous and there are not enough people with time to work on it, so progress has been slow. The following PR represents the state of that work[1]. Note that I’m not a co-maintainer of protobuf, but I’ve been collaborating on it because it is an important dependency for grpc, and I can’t update grpc any more (including for security fixes) until we have protobuf v4. There was some sentiment that we should focus on working toward the protobuf v4 transition rather than on updating to newer 3.x branches during the F39 development cycle. However, I’m not sure if everyone really understood the full scope of that transition. At this point, and given the amount of work remaining to make protobuf v4 possible, it’s probably a good idea for protobuf to be updated to a current v3 release, ideally 3.24.2. Given the number of potentially impacted packages, and the huge list of packages that need to be rebuilt (minor version updates break ABI), it’s probably too late to land that in F39, but it should be possible for F40, and it would be a good hedge against the possibility that the v4 work drags on for another release cycle (or more?!). Input is welcome. Even more welcome is assistance working through unresolved protobuf v4 incompatibilities in dependent packages. [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/protobuf/pull-request/25 On Mon, Sep 4, 2023, at 2:39 PM, Jonathan Schleifer wrote: Am 04.09.23 um 17:10 schrieb Miro Hrončok: electrum js, orphan 0 weeks ago Electrum isn't orphaned, but cannot be updated because protobuf is not being updated. Newer versions require at least protobuf 3.20. I contacted the protobuf maintainer on 2023-06-04 and never got a reply. -- Jonathan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: libtommath minor soname bump
On Thursday, 07 September 2023 at 11:13, František Šumšal wrote: > Hello, > > I plan to bump libtommath to 1.2.1 in Rawhide, which bumps the respective > shared library to libtommath.so.1.2.1. According to repoquery all > dependencies depend only on libtommath.1, so no rebuild should be necessary: > > $ dnf repoquery --releasever rawhide --whatrequires 'libtommath.so.*' > Last metadata expiration check: 0:20:29 ago on Thu Sep 7 10:34:05 2023. > dropbear-0:2022.82-3.fc39.x86_64 > firebird-0:4.0.3.2975-1.fc39.x86_64 > libfbclient2-0:4.0.3.2975-1.fc39.i686 > libfbclient2-0:4.0.3.2975-1.fc39.x86_64 > libtomcrypt-0:1.18.2-17.fc39.i686 > libtomcrypt-0:1.18.2-17.fc39.x86_64 > libtommath-devel-0:1.2.0-13.fc40.i686 > libtommath-devel-0:1.2.0-13.fc40.x86_64 > moarvm-0:2023.06-1.fc39.i686 > moarvm-0:2023.06-1.fc39.x86_64 > > $ dnf repoquery --releasever rawhide --whatrequires 'libtommath.so.1.*' > Last metadata expiration check: 0:21:06 ago on Thu Sep 7 10:34:05 2023. > <...no results...> > > Please correct me if I'm missing something. Your first step should be checking for any ABI changes using abipkgdiff and rpmsodiff. Only if there are removed symbols do you need to worry about rebuilding consumers. However, added unversioned symbols do mean that backwards compatibility is not preserved (i.e. an application built against a newer version, say 1.2.1, might not work with 1.2.0 installed if it depends on a symbol introduced in 1.2.1). Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://fedoraproject.org There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and oppression to develop psychic muscles. -- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
libtommath minor soname bump
Hello, I plan to bump libtommath to 1.2.1 in Rawhide, which bumps the respective shared library to libtommath.so.1.2.1. According to repoquery all dependencies depend only on libtommath.1, so no rebuild should be necessary: $ dnf repoquery --releasever rawhide --whatrequires 'libtommath.so.*' Last metadata expiration check: 0:20:29 ago on Thu Sep 7 10:34:05 2023. dropbear-0:2022.82-3.fc39.x86_64 firebird-0:4.0.3.2975-1.fc39.x86_64 libfbclient2-0:4.0.3.2975-1.fc39.i686 libfbclient2-0:4.0.3.2975-1.fc39.x86_64 libtomcrypt-0:1.18.2-17.fc39.i686 libtomcrypt-0:1.18.2-17.fc39.x86_64 libtommath-devel-0:1.2.0-13.fc40.i686 libtommath-devel-0:1.2.0-13.fc40.x86_64 moarvm-0:2023.06-1.fc39.i686 moarvm-0:2023.06-1.fc39.x86_64 $ dnf repoquery --releasever rawhide --whatrequires 'libtommath.so.1.*' Last metadata expiration check: 0:21:06 ago on Thu Sep 7 10:34:05 2023. <...no results...> Please correct me if I'm missing something. Cheers, Frantisek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Adding Passim as a Fedora 40 feature?
On Wed, Sep 06, 2023 at 07:58:24AM -0400, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 at 13:31, Richard Hughes wrote: > > > On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 at 16:27, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > > It depends on the scanning from ports open to unknown shared files to > > 'why did our network costs go up so much?' > > > > Surely if you're on a local network with bandwidth costs you'd turn > > off avahi or lock down the firewall? Lots of stuff blasts out mDNS > > traffic these days. mDNS traffic is 99.9% local, shouldn't matter for metered connections. > In the Windows world, you have a one-click which says 'I am on a metered > line' which is supposed to do things like that. I don't see anything like > that on the Mac but I am only 'learning' it now. In MacOS X there's "Low data mode" switch, but it's available on WiFi connections only (it seems). -- Tomasz Torcz 72->| 80->| to...@pipebreaker.pl 72->| 80->| ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Exclude i686 builders for noarch packages
Il 07/09/23 06:11, Orion Poplawski ha scritto:
> I'm running into an issue where python-rpds-py excludes i686:
>
> # https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EncourageI686LeafRemoval
> # Also rust-rpds is not available on i686
> ExcludeArch:%{ix86}
>
> but then my python-nbformat build gets sent to an i686 builder and fails
> because python3-rpds-py is not available:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=105847966
>
> It seems annoying to have to propagate the ExcludeArch up the stack for
> this.
>
> Thoughts?
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237647
rpds tests have just been fixed upstream for i686 and I will remove the
ExcludeArch from it.
Mattia
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F38 to F39
On Thu, 2023-09-07 at 13:05 +0800, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 2:23 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > : > > > dnf --releasever=39 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f39 \ > > > > --enablerepo=updates-testing \ > > $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo > > --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \ > > --assumeno distro-sync > > > > So are the F39M modular repos empty?? (since I thought they were being > removed) > Maybe they have to stay around for F39 to allow smooth upgrades, is that > the point? Yes, and yes. You won't gain anything by explicitly enabling the updates-testing-modular repo, msuchy could probably drop that from his test command. -- Adam Williamson (he/him/his) Fedora QA Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org https://www.happyassassin.net ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Adding Passim as a Fedora 40 feature?
On Wed, 6 Sept 2023 at 21:32, Adam Williamson wrote: > There is no -lib package split in Fedora currently. The 'passim' > package provides the libraries. > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2278800 - there > is no 'passim-libs'. Oopa, sorry. I pushed the commit: commit 44a1d6df6cf40912ea07bd7e71bc69bc0742e814 (HEAD -> main, origin/rawhide, origin/main, origin/HEAD) Author: Richard Hughes Date: Fri Aug 25 20:53:33 2023 +0100 Split out a -libs subpackage :100644 100644 bc51e57 3ad7ccc Mpassim.spec ...but for some reason didn't do the build. Building now. > Sep 06 02:27:08 fedora systemd[1]: Starting passim.service - A local caching > server... > Sep 06 02:27:08 fedora (passimd)[2647]: passim.service: Failed to set up > mount namespacing: /run/systemd/mount-rootfs/var/lib/passim/data: No such > file or directory > Sep 06 02:27:08 fedora (passimd)[2647]: passim.service: Failed at step > NAMESPACE spawning /usr/libexec/passimd: No such file or directory > Sep 06 02:27:08 fedora systemd[1]: passim.service: Main process exited, > code=exited, status=226/NAMESPACE > Sep 06 02:27:08 fedora systemd[1]: passim.service: Failed with result > 'exit-code'. > > I'm guessing the "failed to set up mount namespacing" thing is the real > problem, and the error about /usr/libexec/passimd not being there is > just some odd consequence of the namespacing problem. Will debug today, thanks. > > It's intentional in that if the feature gets rejected I'd change the > > "Recommends" to a "Suggests". If you'd rather me do the opposite (i.e. > > move from Suggests to Recommends if the proposal gets accepted) that's > > 100% okay with me and I can do that tomorrow. > > I do think that would be more appropriate. But you'd also need to split > the libs out for this to mean anything. Done, also building for rawhide now. Richard. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
