On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 11:11 AM Lyes Saadi wrote:
> Oh woops, answered to Jerry James privately instead to the whole devel
> mailing list. It's indeed about blueprint-compiler.
I looked at blueprint-compiler tonight, and found 2 bugs with the
handling of bitfields. Sadly, fixing those still
According to the schedule [1], Fedora 39 Candidate Beta-1.1 is now
available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
Test coverage information for the
Hi,
it is really a pain that the Change discussion is now hidden in a web forum
behind a web link, instead of happening right here in this mailing list. It
was promised that Discourse would NOT replace the mailing lists, but that is
effectively no longer the case. Can this "Discourse for
On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 3:27 AM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > IIRC it was a condition of that proposal that we wind up on a hosted
> > version of the *open source* release of gitlab
>
> "hosted version" and "open source" is already a contradiction by itself.
>
Adam Williamson wrote:
> IIRC it was a condition of that proposal that we wind up on a hosted
> version of the *open source* release of gitlab
"hosted version" and "open source" is already a contradiction by itself.
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/network-services-arent-free-or-nonfree.html
The
Hi all,
First, is it possible to use this macro if the pyproject.toml isn't in the
root directory of the package? There doesn't seem to be an option to
specify a path, so I tried cd'ing into a path and running it, but it
seemed to run into an odd error like it was trying to include my
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-4cc86adbd2
chromium-116.0.5845.179-1.el8
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-9c17eb827f
borgbackup-1.1.18-2.el8
The following
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860590
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-IPC-Signal-1.00-39.el8 |perl-IPC-Signal-1.00-39.el8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860592
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Proc-WaitStat-1.00-39. |perl-Proc-WaitStat-1.00-39.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860592
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860590
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-IPC-Signal-1.00-39.el8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860592
Bug 1860592 depends on bug 1860590, which changed state.
Bug 1860590 Summary: perl-IPC-Signal missing in EPEL 8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860590
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238633
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
perltidy-20230912-1.fc38.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=106104775
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238633
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1988539
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1988539=edit
Update to 20230912 (#2238633)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238633
Bug ID: 2238633
Summary: perltidy-20230912 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perltidy
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238421
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-4d3ae46504 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
On Tue Sep 12, 2023 at 09:21 +0200, Sandro wrote:
> On 12-09-2023 03:36, Maxwell G wrote:
> >> It isn't packaged for Fedora yet, though. Is anyone using it, and would
> >> like to package + maintain it for Fedora?
> > IIRC, we used to have nim in Fedora and then it was retired.
>
> Indeed. That
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 1:11 PM Lyes Saadi wrote:
>
> Oh woops, answered to Jerry James privately instead to the whole devel
> mailing list. It's indeed about blueprint-compiler.
>
> Le 12/09/2023 à 19:03, Dan Horák a écrit :
> > On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 10:08:57 -0600
> > Jerry James wrote:
> >
> >>
Am Di., 12. Sept. 2023 um 20:28 Uhr schrieb Adam Williamson
:
>
> On Tue, 2023-09-12 at 17:20 +, Alessio wrote:
> > I know about this accepted change:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Color_Bash_Prompt
> >
> > But what is this number that appears time to time in the prompt?
> >
> >
On Tue, 2023-09-12 at 17:20 +, Alessio wrote:
> I know about this accepted change:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Color_Bash_Prompt
>
> But what is this number that appears time to time in the prompt?
>
> user@host:~$ ^C
> user@host:~130$ ^C
>
> user@host:~$ foo
> bash: foo:
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 10:58:24AM +0100, Barry Scott wrote:
>
>
> > On 12 Sep 2023, at 10:32, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> >
> > Am Di., 12. Sept. 2023 um 11:22 Uhr schrieb Barry Scott
> > :
> >>
> >> I have been updating my FAS account security.
> >> When I setup 2FA I was not offer any
Oh woops, answered to Jerry James privately instead to the whole devel
mailing list. It's indeed about blueprint-compiler.
Le 12/09/2023 à 19:03, Dan Horák a écrit :
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 10:08:57 -0600
Jerry James wrote:
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 10:03 AM Lyes Saadi wrote:
I have a noarch
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 10:08:57 -0600
Jerry James wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 10:03 AM Lyes Saadi
> wrote:
> > I have a noarch package which faces an issue with one of its arches
> > (s390x), and which happens to have multiple noarch packages depending on
> > it, and they won't build either
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 10:03 AM Lyes Saadi wrote:
> I have a noarch package which faces an issue with one of its arches
> (s390x), and which happens to have multiple noarch packages depending on
> it, and they won't build either if they were built on that same arch
> (but, they will still work
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 11:01:17AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 08:34:59AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > This is now merged. The new macros are:
> > %systemd_postun_with_reload, %systemd_user_postun_with_reload,
> >
Hello !
I have a noarch package which faces an issue with one of its arches
(s390x), and which happens to have multiple noarch packages depending on
it, and they won't build either if they were built on that same arch
(but, they will still work normally when installed on that arch). And
so,
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Committee on 2023-09-13 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting.
A general agenda is the following:
#topic aloha
I'd like to offer to swap reviews to get golang-github-nats-io-jwt-2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237326 into Rawhide
We already have v1 and attempting to update that package in order to
upgrade the nats stack led to some breakage and headaches a few months ago
Thanks all,
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Class-XSAccessor`
that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Package tests; Modernize spec
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Class-XSAccessor/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Class-XSAccessor`
that you are following:
``
Package tests; Modernize spec
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Class-XSAccessor/pull-request/1
___
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 09:26:44AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I think we need to figure out the way forward, but... I don't think we
> should do it here and now. Please go test f39. ;)
While I'm personally glad that the forced-onto-proprietary-gitlab
migration has effectively stalled
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347333
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
OLD: Fedora-39-20230910.n.0
NEW: Fedora-39-20230912.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 4
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:68.10 KiB
Size
On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 05:10:55PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2236235
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Net-DNS-1.40-1.fc40
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2236235
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
Hi,
I want to let you know that all packages depending on maven-clean-plugin
can most probably just use:
%prep
...
%pom_remove_plugin :maven-clean-plugin
and live happily after.
I am not aware of any purpose of maven-clean-plugin for Fedora package
builds.
On 12. 9. 2023 12:54, Markku
On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 05:10:55PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
>
> On 12 Sep 2023, at 10:32, Michael J Gruber wrote:
>
> Am Di., 12. Sept. 2023 um 11:22 Uhr schrieb Barry Scott
> :
>>
>> I have been updating my FAS account security.
>> When I setup 2FA I was not offer any recovery keys.
>
> You can register multiple OTP tokens:
>
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230911.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230912.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 5
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 51
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 17.36 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Am Di., 12. Sept. 2023 um 11:22 Uhr schrieb Barry Scott
:
>
> I have been updating my FAS account security.
> When I setup 2FA I was not offer any recovery keys.
You can register multiple OTP tokens:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/infra/sysadmin_guide/2-factor/
> In the event that I lose
I have been updating my FAS account security.
When I setup 2FA I was not offer any recovery keys.
In the event that I lose FreeOTP on my phone how do I recover?
Barry
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238421
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-4d3ae46504 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-4d3ae46504
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238421
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-version-0.99.30-1.fc40
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238421
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 9:22 AM Sandro wrote:
>
> On 12-09-2023 03:36, Maxwell G wrote:
> >> It isn't packaged for Fedora yet, though. Is anyone using it, and would
> >> like to package + maintain it for Fedora?
> > IIRC, we used to have nim in Fedora and then it was retired.
>
> Indeed. That may
On 12-09-2023 03:36, Maxwell G wrote:
It isn't packaged for Fedora yet, though. Is anyone using it, and would
like to package + maintain it for Fedora?
IIRC, we used to have nim in Fedora and then it was retired.
Indeed. That may be a good starting point.
There's also nim-srpm-macros [1],
On 11-09-2023 21:05, Michel Lind wrote:
It isn't packaged for Fedora yet, though. Is anyone using it, and would
like to package + maintain it for Fedora?
This looks like an interesting language, so #whynot (famous last words).
Would you be interested in co-maintaining?
I think if Nim makes
48 matches
Mail list logo
