[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-49fe68774a plantuml-1.2023.11-1.el8 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-9abc3565b5 chromium-117.0.5938.92-2.el8 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing partclone-0.3.26-1.el8 Details about builds: partclone-0.3.26-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-2e26ae081a) Utility to clone and restore a partition Update Information: # partclone v0.3.26 - Add the direct-io option for writing data to a TARGET device or file - Correction for item at offset 76 - Report used blocks and free space based on bitmap ChangeLog: * Mon Sep 25 2023 Robert Scheck 0.3.26-1 - Upgrade to 0.3.26 (#2240676) References: [ 1 ] Bug #2240676 - partclone-0.3.26 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240676 ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-4211889c5a seamonkey-2.53.17.1-1.el7 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-981e9f53ff chromium-117.0.5938.92-2.el7 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing partclone-0.3.26-1.el7 Details about builds: partclone-0.3.26-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-dd176349e5) Utility to clone and restore a partition Update Information: # partclone v0.3.26 - Add the direct-io option for writing data to a TARGET device or file - Correction for item at offset 76 - Report used blocks and free space based on bitmap ChangeLog: * Mon Sep 25 2023 Robert Scheck 0.3.26-1 - Upgrade to 0.3.26 (#2240676) References: [ 1 ] Bug #2240676 - partclone-0.3.26 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240676 ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Packaging guidelines - validation of AppStream metadata files
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 1:45 PM Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 7:33 PM Artur Frenszek-Iwicki > wrote: > > > > Without docs, the whole process is a black box. > > +1 > > That was actually one of the two reasons I started this thread. > > For instance, is this the package that must be rebuilt in order to see > an AppStream metadata file appear/refreshed in GNOME Software? > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/appstream-data > Could we get an explainer (for dummies) of how the entire pipeline works? > > The other reason was someone from Debian telling one of my upstreams > "Don't use appstream-util to validate the file, it's deprecated, use > appstreamcli". Frankly, that struck a chord, considering x years ago I > had spent a considerable amount of time convincing dozens of projects > to adopt "AppData" (at the time), filing tickets and submitting PRs. So here's some backstory... Way back in the days of yore (about 10 years ago), people were working on a cross-distro Software Center: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SoftwareCenter For that "software center", the AppData (renamed to AppStream) format was created initially to port over desktop files to XML for more reliable parsing at scale. The goal here was to create a cheaper and more reliable method of providing rich metadata in repositories that could be indexed and used to present useful information about applications. My understanding is that the original AppStream implementation at the time was moribund due to its maintainer being in school, so a new one was made (unhelpfully named appstream-glib... why "unhelpfully" you ask? well, the original appstream was *also* glib based!). This got plugged into what became GNOME Software. And because Fedora needed a tool to generate the indexes by scanning all the RPMs, appstream-builder was created to do that. (As an aside, appstream-glib was never used by KDE because there was no Qt/C++ binding for it, but the original AppStream did have one, so that's what Plasma Discover has always used.) But there was a problem: unlike RPM repodata generation, AppStream repodata generation is slow. Really slow. This is because AppStream repodata requires opening up the RPM, plucking data out of it, and applying the necessary transformations per repodata generation policy (downloading remote images, recompression, etc.). There are arguments about whether it's appstream-builder specific (given that Debian's archive is bigger, their package format is more complex to "pluck" from, etc and appstream-generator does fine there), but the point is that for Fedora with appstream-builder, it's too slow. Note that the context of this is back in the era where Fedora composes took half a day or longer. Adding even more hours to that process was not appealing (it would have to be done for every repo being composed for every architecture...). So a stopgap solution was implemented: appstream-data. Richard Hughes maintains a local mirror of the full Fedora repositories and generates the appstream data from that using scripts[1] and extra data[2] to produce the appstream-data package[3]. The goal is to someday get to a point where we can have this done properly as repodata through createrepo_c[4], but we're not able to do that yet. Now, appstream-util is the appstream-glib equivalent of appstreamcli. We test using appstream-util because we need the AppStream data to be valid for appstream-builder to consume it. If it is not, the application will be skipped in the next round of appstream repodata updates. If we ever move to a process that uses libappstream-compose as the backend library for producing AppStream repodata, then we can stop caring about appstream-util. But for now, here we are. [1]: https://github.com/hughsie/appstream-scripts [2]: https://github.com/hughsie/fedora-appstream [3]: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/appstream-data [4]: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/createrepo_c/issues/75 -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2240533] perl-Date-Handler-1.2-28.fc40: Should build-require and require/recommend glibc-langpack-en: Locale en_US does not seem to be implemented on this system, keeping locale
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240533 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-12f33849b5 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-12f33849b5` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-12f33849b5 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240533 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202240533%23c2 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Packaging guidelines - validation of AppStream metadata files
On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 2:46 AM Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > > Il 24/09/23 01:18, Neal Gompa ha scritto: > > On Sat, Sep 23, 2023 at 6:05 PM Michael Catanzaro > > wrote: > >> On Sat, Sep 23 2023 at 10:26:48 PM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos > >> wrote: > >>> Could someone involved > >>> with AppStream please provide some information? Shouldn't our > >>> documentation be changed to reflect these changes? Does the FPC need > >>> to decide on this? > >> From upstream perspective: appstream-util is indeed obsolete. Upstream > >> software should stop using it and switch to appstreamcli instead. > >> > >> But as you've noticed, it seems Fedora isn't ready for that yet > > Ultimately, appstream-util's output is what matters since we use > > appstream-builder (from appstream-glib) to generate our AppStream > > metadata index. If it doesn't pass that tool, it doesn't show up. > > > If upstream switched to appstreamcli, what tool do they use to generate > the index to not fail validation? > Can Fedora switch to that other tool? > There was no switching. Both appstream-util and appstreamcli are considered conformant. Ultimately, the only way we can stop relying on appstream-glib is if appstream-builder[1] was reimplemented on top of libappstream-compose. Long ago, I tried to see if we could have our AppStream data produced as repodata instead of a package, but the answer I got was that we need the functionality added to createrepo to do it[2]. If someone ever got around to making that happen, a lot of things in our pipeline could be simplified. [1]: https://github.com/hughsie/appstream-glib/tree/main/libappstream-builder [2]: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/createrepo_c/issues/75 -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
On 25-09-2023 14:00, Miro Hrončok wrote: neuro-sig: python-textdistance, python-qstylizer, python-whatthepatch, python-pyls-spyder I've adopted all of these. They are all part of the spyder dependency stack. I'll look into them and fix what needs fixing as soon as I can. -- Sandro ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230925.n.1 changes
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230923.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230925.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:5 Dropped images: 5 Added packages: 13 Dropped packages:7 Upgraded packages: 166 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 5.81 MiB Size of dropped packages:6.90 MiB Size of upgraded packages: 3.14 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 65.95 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = Image: Silverblue dvd-ostree x86_64 Path: Silverblue/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-x86_64-Rawhide-20230925.n.1.iso Image: Sericea dvd-ostree x86_64 Path: Sericea/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Sericea-ostree-x86_64-Rawhide-20230925.n.1.iso Image: Container_Base docker s390x Path: Container/s390x/images/Fedora-Container-Base-Rawhide-20230925.n.1.s390x.tar.xz Image: Silverblue dvd-ostree ppc64le Path: Silverblue/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-ppc64le-Rawhide-20230925.n.1.iso Image: Workstation live aarch64 Path: Workstation/aarch64/iso/Fedora-Workstation-Live-aarch64-Rawhide-20230925.n.1.iso = DROPPED IMAGES = Image: Server boot ppc64le Path: Server/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-Server-netinst-ppc64le-Rawhide-20230923.n.0.iso Image: Server dvd ppc64le Path: Server/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-Server-dvd-ppc64le-Rawhide-20230923.n.0.iso Image: Cloud_Base qcow2 s390x Path: Cloud/s390x/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-Rawhide-20230923.n.0.s390x.qcow2 Image: Cloud_Base raw-xz s390x Path: Cloud/s390x/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-Rawhide-20230923.n.0.s390x.raw.xz Image: KDE live aarch64 Path: Spins/aarch64/iso/Fedora-KDE-Live-aarch64-Rawhide-20230923.n.0.iso = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: fxdiv-1.0^git20201208.63058ef-2.fc40 Summary: Header for division via fixed-point math RPMs:fxdiv-devel Size:12.25 KiB Package: merkuro-23.08.1-1.fc40 Summary: A calendar application using Akonadi to sync with external services (Nextcloud, GMail, ...) RPMs:merkuro Size:3.48 MiB Package: odio-sacd-23.1.31-2.fc40 Summary: Command-line SACD decoder RPMs:odio-sacd Size:75.54 KiB Package: pocketfft-1.0^git20230214.076cb3d-2.fc40 Summary: C++ header for FFT RPMs:pocketfft-devel Size:31.91 KiB Package: python-pygdbmi-0.11.0.0-1.fc40 Summary: Get Structured Output from GDB's Machine Interface RPMs:python3-pygdbmi Size:49.22 KiB Package: python-watchfiles-0.20.0-1.fc40 Summary: Simple, modern and high performance file watching and code reload in python RPMs:python3-watchfiles Size:1.63 MiB Package: rust-ansiterm-0.12.2-1.fc40 Summary: Library for ANSI terminal colours and styles (bold, underline) RPMs:rust-ansiterm+ansi_colours-devel rust-ansiterm+default-devel rust-ansiterm+derive_serde_style-devel rust-ansiterm+serde-devel rust-ansiterm-devel Size:56.40 KiB Package: rust-deflate64-0.1.5-1.fc40 Summary: Deflate64 implementation based on .NET's implementation RPMs:rust-deflate64+default-devel rust-deflate64-devel Size:29.04 KiB Package: rust-gix-credentials-0.19.0-1.fc40 Summary: Gix implementation for interacting with git credentials helpers RPMs:rust-gix-credentials+default-devel rust-gix-credentials+document-features-devel rust-gix-credentials+serde-devel rust-gix-credentials-devel Size:74.68 KiB Package: rust-gix-diff-0.35.0-1.fc40 Summary: Calculate differences between various git objects RPMs:rust-gix-diff+blob-devel rust-gix-diff+default-devel rust-gix-diff+document-features-devel rust-gix-diff+serde-devel rust-gix-diff-devel Size:69.99 KiB Package: rust-gix-ref-0.36.0-1.fc40 Summary: Gix implementation for handling git references RPMs:rust-gix-ref+default-devel rust-gix-ref+document-features-devel rust-gix-ref+serde-devel rust-gix-ref-devel Size:141.46 KiB Package: rust-gix-refspec-0.17.0-1.fc40 Summary: Gix implementation for parsing and representing refspecs RPMs:rust-gix-refspec+default-devel rust-gix-refspec-devel Size:48.08 KiB Package: rust-libcst-0.1.0-1.fc40 Summary: Python parser and Concrete Syntax Tree library RPMs:rust-libcst+default-devel rust-libcst+trace-devel rust-libcst-devel Size:127.51 KiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = Package: cockpit-file-sharing-2.4.5-4.fc39 Summary: Cockpit user interface for managing SMB and NFS file sharing. RPMs:cockpit-file-sharing Size:1.20 MiB Package: golang-github-timewasted-linode-0-0.12.20181207git37e8452.fc39 Summary: Go library for interacting with the Linode API RPMs:golang-github-timewasted-linode-devel Size:17.34 KiB Package: golang-github-vultr-govultr-1.1.1-7.fc39 Summary: Vultr Go API client RPMs:golang-github-vultr-govultr-devel Size:65.44 KiB Package: librealsense1-1.12.4-16.24ddaec.fc39 Summary: Cross-platform camera capture for Intel RealSense RPMs:librealsense1 librealsense1-devel librealsense1-doc Size:2.34 MiB Package: pcsxr-1.9.94-31.20190306.git62467b8.fc38 Summary: A plugin based PlayStation (PSX) emulator with high compatibility RPMs
Re: Heads up: OpenColorIO 2.3.0
Forgot to mention I'm doing the test builds here: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/hobbes1069/OIIO/builds/ Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Heads up: OpenColorIO 2.3.0
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 2:11 AM Sandro wrote: > On 24-09-2023 03:26, Richard Shaw wrote: > > I haven't been able to find the new command in my email history to find > > dependencies but my old script shows the following need to be rebuilt: > > > > blender > > krita > > luxcorerender > > OpenImageIO > > usd > > This looks correct according to `fedrq`: > > $ fedrq wr -s OpenColorIO-devel > OpenImageIO-2.4.15.0-1.fc40.src > blender-1:3.6.2-1.fc40.src > calligra-3.2.1-25.fc39.src > krita-5.1.5-5.fc39.src > luxcorerender-2.7-0.5.beta1.fc39.src > usd-23.08-1.fc40.src > Thanks for confirming. Status update: usd, krita, and Blender need patching for API changes in OpenColorIO. Of the three, the first two already have pull requests in process[1,2] so I used those. Only blender doesn't build now, and per the issue[1], they don't plan to until next year. Anyone want to look at how usd and krita were updated and propose a patch for blender? Thanks, Richard [1] https://github.com/PixarAnimationStudios/OpenUSD/pull/2651/commits/9fe8cf65ed05ec53f5ddbb5ffb08851e02f4adc8 [2] https://invent.kde.org/graphics/krita/-/merge_requests/1942 [3] https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/issues/109244 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Fedora 39 compose report: 20230925.n.1 changes
OLD: Fedora-39-20230924.n.1 NEW: Fedora-39-20230925.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 5 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 31 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 251.23 KiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded packages: 1.87 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 5.90 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = Image: Workstation live aarch64 Path: Workstation/aarch64/iso/Fedora-Workstation-Live-aarch64-39-20230925.n.1.iso Image: Kinoite dvd-ostree ppc64le Path: Kinoite/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-Kinoite-ostree-ppc64le-39-20230925.n.1.iso = DROPPED IMAGES = Image: Silverblue dvd-ostree ppc64le Path: Silverblue/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-ppc64le-39-20230924.n.1.iso Image: LXQt live aarch64 Path: Spins/aarch64/iso/Fedora-LXQt-Live-aarch64-39-20230924.n.1.iso Image: Onyx dvd-ostree x86_64 Path: Onyx/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Onyx-ostree-x86_64-39-20230924.n.1.iso Image: Server boot ppc64le Path: Server/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-Server-netinst-ppc64le-39-20230924.n.1.iso Image: KDE live aarch64 Path: Spins/aarch64/iso/Fedora-KDE-Live-aarch64-39-20230924.n.1.iso = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: obs-studio-plugin-vkcapture-1.4.3-3.fc39 Summary: OBS plugin for Vulkan/OpenGL game capture RPMs:obs-studio-plugin-vkcapture Size:202.09 KiB Package: python-pygdbmi-0.11.0.0-1.fc39 Summary: Get Structured Output from GDB's Machine Interface RPMs:python3-pygdbmi Size:49.15 KiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: blender-1:3.6.2-3.fc39 Old package: blender-1:3.6.1-3.fc39 Summary: 3D modeling, animation, rendering and post-production RPMs: blender blender-rpm-macros Size: 235.44 MiB Size change: 3.78 MiB Changelog: * Sat Sep 16 2023 Luya Tshimbalanga - 1:3.6.2-1 - Update to 3.6.2 * Sat Sep 16 2023 Luya Tshimbalanga - 1:3.6.2-2 - Add missing patch erased by mistake * Sat Sep 16 2023 Luya Tshimbalanga - 1:3.6.2-3 - Restore patches erased by mistake Package: brotli-1.1.0-1.fc39 Old package: brotli-1.0.9-13.fc39 Summary: Lossless compression algorithm RPMs: brotli brotli-devel libbrotli python3-brotli Size: 3.41 MiB Size change: -1.24 MiB Changelog: * Fri Sep 15 2023 Jonathan Wright - 1.1.0-1 - Update to 1.1.1 rhbz#2233368 Package: celluloid-0.26-1.fc39 Old package: celluloid-0.25-7.fc39 Summary: A simple GTK+ frontend for mpv RPMs: celluloid Size: 1.47 MiB Size change: 78.07 KiB Changelog: * Sat Sep 16 2023 Vasiliy Glazov - 0.26-1 - Update to 0.26 Package: cmake-3.27.4-7.fc39 Old package: cmake-3.27.4-6.fc39 Summary: Cross-platform make system RPMs: cmake cmake-data cmake-doc cmake-filesystem cmake-gui cmake-rpm-macros Size: 61.56 MiB Size change: 13.13 KiB Changelog: * Wed Sep 06 2023 Panu Matilainen - 3.27.4-6 - Only require cmake-rpm-macros when rpm-build is installed part II * Thu Sep 14 2023 Bj??rn Esser - 3.27.4-7 - Add upstream patches from milestone to cmake-3.27.5 Package: embree-4.2.0-1.fc39 Old package: embree-4.1.0-2.fc39 Summary: Collection of high-performance ray tracing kernels RPMs: embree embree-devel Size: 13.96 MiB Size change: 115.89 KiB Changelog: * Thu Aug 31 2023 Ali Erdinc Koroglu - 4.2.0-1 - Update to 4.2.0 (RHBZ #2228110) Package: gap-pkg-atlasrep-2.1.7-1.fc39 Old package: gap-pkg-atlasrep-2.1.6-4.fc39 Summary: GAP interface to the Atlas of Group Representations RPMs: gap-pkg-atlasrep gap-pkg-atlasrep-doc Size: 24.29 MiB Size change: 6.30 KiB Changelog: * Fri Sep 15 2023 Jerry James - 2.1.7-1 - Version 2.1.7 Package: gap-pkg-ctbllib-1.3.6-1.fc39 Old package: gap-pkg-ctbllib-1.3.5-2.fc39 Summary: GAP Character Table Library RPMs: gap-pkg-ctbllib gap-pkg-ctbllib-doc Size: 13.97 MiB Size change: -37.05 KiB Changelog: * Fri Sep 15 2023 Jerry James - 1.3.6-1 - Version 1.3.6 Package: gnome-builder-44.2-7.fc39 Old package: gnome-builder-44.2-6.fc39 Summary: IDE for writing GNOME-based software RPMs: gnome-builder gnome-builder-devel Size: 42.29 MiB Size change: -143.78 KiB Changelog: * Thu Sep 21 2023 Kalev Lember - 44.2-7 - Temporarily disable sysprof plugin Package: grub2-1:2.06-100.fc39 Old package: grub2-1:2.06-95.fc39 Summary: Bootloader with support for Linux, Multiboot and more RPMs: grub2-common grub2-efi-aa64 grub2-efi-aa64-cdboot grub2-efi-aa64-modules grub2-efi-ia32 grub2-efi-ia32-cdboot grub2-efi-ia32-modules grub2-efi-x64 grub2-efi-x64-cdboot grub2-efi-x64-modules grub2-emu grub2-emu-modules grub2-pc grub2-pc-modules grub2-ppc64le grub2-ppc64le-modules grub2-tools grub2-tools-efi grub2-tools-extra grub2-tools-minimal Size: 37.12 MiB Size change: -31.52 KiB
Review plea - x2gokdrive
Could someone (perhaps someone interested in X2Go) please review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215420 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215421 I'd love to be able to offer a review swap, but I'm completely underwater. If anyone wants to help out on any of my packages, that would be great. I'm led to believe by https://pagure.io/pagure/blob/master/f/doc/usage/tips_tricks.rst that this[1] should show the packages that I am the primary maintainer on, but it doesn't seem to be working. 1 - https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/orion?acl=main%20admin Thanks. -- Orion Poplawski IT Systems Manager 720-772-5637 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 https://www.nwra.com/ smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Test-Announce] Fedora 39 Branched 20230925.n.1 nightly compose nominated for testing
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 39 Branched 20230925.n.1. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan Notable package version changes: lorax - 20230922.n.0: lorax-39.4-2.fc39.src, 20230925.n.1: lorax-39.4-3.fc39.src Test coverage information for the current release can be seen at: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/testcase_stats/39 You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download locations, and enter results on the Summary page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_39_Branched_20230925.n.1_Summary The individual test result pages are: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_39_Branched_20230925.n.1_Installation https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_39_Branched_20230925.n.1_Base https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_39_Branched_20230925.n.1_Server https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_39_Branched_20230925.n.1_Cloud https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_39_Branched_20230925.n.1_Desktop https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_39_Branched_20230925.n.1_Security_Lab Thank you for testing! -- Mail generated by relvalconsumer: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/relvalconsumer ___ test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2240644] New: perl-PDF-API2-2.045 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240644 Bug ID: 2240644 Summary: perl-PDF-API2-2.045 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-PDF-API2 Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: jples...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 2.045 Upstream release that is considered latest: 2.045 Current version/release in rawhide: 2.044-3.fc39 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/PDF-API2/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/3202/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-PDF-API2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240644 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202240644%23c0 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Packaging guidelines - validation of AppStream metadata files
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 7:33 PM Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote: > > Without docs, the whole process is a black box. +1 That was actually one of the two reasons I started this thread. For instance, is this the package that must be rebuilt in order to see an AppStream metadata file appear/refreshed in GNOME Software? https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/appstream-data Could we get an explainer (for dummies) of how the entire pipeline works? The other reason was someone from Debian telling one of my upstreams "Don't use appstream-util to validate the file, it's deprecated, use appstreamcli". Frankly, that struck a chord, considering x years ago I had spent a considerable amount of time convincing dozens of projects to adopt "AppData" (at the time), filing tickets and submitting PRs. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Packaging guidelines - validation of AppStream metadata files
> Ultimately, appstream-util's output is what matters since we use > appstream-builder (from appstream-glib) to generate our AppStream > metadata index. If it doesn't pass that tool, it doesn't show up. Bit of a tangent, but: is this documented anywhere? Because if if is, then I can't find it. Without docs, the whole process is a black box. I recall that a few years ago an announcement was made saying that apps need to provide at least a 64x64 icon to show up in the index; once again, I can't find any reference to that apart from the mailing list history. This makes figuring out why an app doesn't show up in Gnome Software a frustrating experience. To be clear, I don't want this to be a "someone do something" kind of message. I'd be happy to document this myself! But I have zero idea what's actually going on. A.FI. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2240458] Perl 5.38 breaks Irssi locale
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240458 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Link ID||Github ||Perl/perl5/issues/21366 --- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar --- Because 5.38.1 does not exist yet: $ git branch -a |grep origin/maint-5\\. remotes/origin/maint-5.004 remotes/origin/maint-5.005 remotes/origin/maint-5.10 remotes/origin/maint-5.12 remotes/origin/maint-5.14 remotes/origin/maint-5.16 remotes/origin/maint-5.18 remotes/origin/maint-5.20 remotes/origin/maint-5.20-votes remotes/origin/maint-5.22 remotes/origin/maint-5.24 remotes/origin/maint-5.26 remotes/origin/maint-5.28 remotes/origin/maint-5.28-sep18 remotes/origin/maint-5.30 remotes/origin/maint-5.32 remotes/origin/maint-5.34 remotes/origin/maint-5.36 remotes/origin/maint-5.6 remotes/origin/maint-5.8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240458 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202240458%23c3 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
On 25-09-2023 14:00, Miro Hrončok wrote: python-sklearn-genetic-opt I'm taking this one on behalf of neuro-sig and get it fixed asap. I just ran a quick scratch build locally. It shouldn't be too hard. python-whatthepatch This is part of the Spyder dependency stack, so I'm taking that as well. -- Sandro ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the affected packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the affected package or retire your depending package to avoid broken dependencies, otherwise your package will fail to install and/or build when the affected package gets retired. Request package ownership via the *Take* button in he left column on https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ Full report available at: https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2023-09-25.txt grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain. For human readable dependency chains, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/ For all orphaned packages, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan Package (co)maintainers Status Change RBTools orphan 2 weeks ago aiodnsbrute orphan 2 weeks ago andriller orphan 2 weeks ago androwarn orphan 2 weeks ago brd orphan 2 weeks ago btest orphan 2 weeks ago eric orphan 2 weeks ago fedora-gather-easyfix orphan 2 weeks ago golang-github-alicebob- go-sig, orphan 0 weeks ago miniredis libssh2-pythonorphan 2 weeks ago perl-Plack-Middleware-Deflaterorphan 1 weeks ago php-ocramius-generated-hydrator orphan, remi 0 weeks ago php-symfony4 orphan 0 weeks ago pico-wizard orphan 2 weeks ago pseudoignatenkobrain, orphan 3 weeks ago pyflowtools orphan 2 weeks ago python-acora orphan, python-packagers-sig 2 weeks ago python-adext orphan 2 weeks ago python-aiozeroconforphan, python-packagers-sig 2 weeks ago python-airthings orphan 2 weeks ago python-alarmdecoder orphan 2 weeks ago python-ansible-pygments orphan 0 weeks ago python-apply-defaults orphan 5 weeks ago python-btlewrap orphan 2 weeks ago python-cleepel-packagers-sig, fab, 5 weeks ago orphan python-convertdateorphan, python-packagers-sig 2 weeks ago python-cypari2orphan 2 weeks ago python-dominate fab, orphan 2 weeks ago python-elpy orphan 2 weeks ago python-flask-bootstraporphan 2 weeks ago python-fpylll orphan 2 weeks ago python-gccinvocation orphan 2 weeks ago python-grako orphan 2 weeks ago python-ipgetter orphan 2 weeks ago python-jeporphan, python-packagers-sig 2 weeks ago python-jsonrpc-server orphan 2 weeks ago python-lacrosse orphan 2 weeks ago python-lazr-smtptest orphan 2 weeks ago python-leveldborphan, python-packagers-sig 2 weeks ago python-liblarch orphan 2 weeks ago python-logging-tree orphan 2 weeks ago python-metaextractorphan, python-packagers-sig 1 weeks ago python-molecule gotmax23, orphan 0 weeks ago python-molecule-dockerorphan 0 weeks ago python-molecule-podmanorphan 0 weeks ago python-nose_fixes orphan 2 weeks ago python-notarioorphan 2 weeks ago python-py9p
spec file with aarch64 specific Fortran build flags
Dear all, in the past weeks the updates of GCC for both Fedora and Debian have introduce few identical Fortran modifications: fortran/108961 fortran/109684 fortran/110825 As a result my I cannot build the RPM package (nor the Debian package) for my program 'atomes' anymore, because the ARM 64 build failed with the same error related to an OpenMP instruction in a Fortran file. It was pointed out to me that the build succeed changing the -'O2' option of the Fortran FLAGS by '-O1'. Following this : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPMMacrosForBuildFlags I successfully updated the spec file to take this into account for a local mock build, using: %ifarch aarch64 %global _pkg_extra_fflags -O1 %endif Then the '-O2' is replaced by a '-O1' option for the ARM build. At list this works for the mock build on my computer: mock -r fedora-40-aarch64 /home/leroux/rpmbuild/SRPMS/atomes-1.1.12-2.fc38.src.rpm However the The Koji build with the same srpm fails: koji build --scratch rawhide /home/leroux/rpmbuild/SRPMS/atomes-1.1.12-2.fc38.src.rpm The mock build versions are not the same, so that might be the reason why (4.1 on Koji, vs. 5.1.1 locally). On Koji the line: %global _pkg_extra_fflags -O1 Does not seem to have any effect, the '-O2' option remains in the Fortran FLAGS. I would be more than happy to have your thoughts on the matter to find a way around this issue. Regards. Sébastien -- === Dr. Sébastien Le Roux Ingénieur de Recherche CNRS Institut de Physique et Chimie des Matériaux de Strasbourg Département des Matériaux Organiques 23, rue du Loess BP 43 F-67034 Strasbourg Cedex 2, France E-mail: sebastien.ler...@ipcms.unistra.fr Webpage: https://www.ipcms.fr/sebastien-le-roux/ ATOMES project: https://atomes.ipcms.fr/ RINGS project: http://rings-code.sourceforge.net/ ISAACS project: http://isaacs.sourceforge.io/ Fax: +33 3 88 10 72 46 Phone: +33 3 88 10 71 58 === ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2240458] Perl 5.38 breaks Irssi locale
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240458 --- Comment #2 from Marcin Juszkiewicz --- Fedora 39 is not released yet, why not bump to 5.38.1 instead of backporting? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240458 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202240458%23c2 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2240458] Perl 5.38 breaks Irssi locale
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240458 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova --- Thank you for report. The bug is fixed in perl development version and it is requested to be included in perl-5.38.1. There was lots of changes in 'locale.c'. I will check how to backported it to Perl 5.38. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240458 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202240458%23c1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the affected packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the affected package or retire your depending package to avoid broken dependencies, otherwise your package will fail to install and/or build when the affected package gets retired. Request package ownership via the *Take* button in he left column on https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ Full report available at: https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2023-09-25.txt grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain. For human readable dependency chains, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/ For all orphaned packages, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan Package (co)maintainers Status Change RBTools orphan 2 weeks ago aiodnsbrute orphan 2 weeks ago andriller orphan 2 weeks ago androwarn orphan 2 weeks ago brd orphan 2 weeks ago btest orphan 2 weeks ago eric orphan 2 weeks ago fedora-gather-easyfix orphan 2 weeks ago golang-github-alicebob- go-sig, orphan 0 weeks ago miniredis libssh2-pythonorphan 2 weeks ago perl-Plack-Middleware-Deflaterorphan 1 weeks ago php-ocramius-generated-hydrator orphan, remi 0 weeks ago php-symfony4 orphan 0 weeks ago pico-wizard orphan 2 weeks ago pseudoignatenkobrain, orphan 3 weeks ago pyflowtools orphan 2 weeks ago python-acora orphan, python-packagers-sig 2 weeks ago python-adext orphan 2 weeks ago python-aiozeroconforphan, python-packagers-sig 2 weeks ago python-airthings orphan 2 weeks ago python-alarmdecoder orphan 2 weeks ago python-ansible-pygments orphan 0 weeks ago python-apply-defaults orphan 5 weeks ago python-btlewrap orphan 2 weeks ago python-cleepel-packagers-sig, fab, 5 weeks ago orphan python-convertdateorphan, python-packagers-sig 2 weeks ago python-cypari2orphan 2 weeks ago python-dominate fab, orphan 2 weeks ago python-elpy orphan 2 weeks ago python-flask-bootstraporphan 2 weeks ago python-fpylll orphan 2 weeks ago python-gccinvocation orphan 2 weeks ago python-grako orphan 2 weeks ago python-ipgetter orphan 2 weeks ago python-jeporphan, python-packagers-sig 2 weeks ago python-jsonrpc-server orphan 2 weeks ago python-lacrosse orphan 2 weeks ago python-lazr-smtptest orphan 2 weeks ago python-leveldborphan, python-packagers-sig 2 weeks ago python-liblarch orphan 2 weeks ago python-logging-tree orphan 2 weeks ago python-metaextractorphan, python-packagers-sig 1 weeks ago python-molecule gotmax23, orphan 0 weeks ago python-molecule-dockerorphan 0 weeks ago python-molecule-podmanorphan 0 weeks ago python-nose_fixes orphan 2 weeks ago python-notarioorphan 2 weeks ago python-py9p
[Bug 2240584] New: perl-Time-ParseDate-2015.103-24.fc40 FTBFS: tests fail without tzdata package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240584
Bug ID: 2240584
Summary: perl-Time-ParseDate-2015.103-24.fc40 FTBFS: tests fail
without tzdata package
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/perl-Time-Pa
rseDate?collection=f39
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Time-ParseDate
Assignee: de...@fateyev.com
Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: de...@fateyev.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
xav...@bachelot.org
Blocks: 2168842 (F39FTBFS), 2231791 (F40FTBFS,RAWHIDEFTBFS)
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
perl-Time-ParseDate-2015.103-24.fc40 fails to build in Fedora 40 and 39 because
tests fail if tzdata package is not installed:
t/metdate.t ... skipped: It seems localtime() does not honor $ENV{TZ} when set
in the test script.
t/order1.t 1/?
# Failed test 'Europe/Moscow, DST permanent 2009'
# at t/order1.t line 33.
# got: '1257033600'
# expected: '1257022800'
# Failed test 'Europe/Moscow, DST permanent 2013'
# at t/order1.t line 34.
# got: '1369872000'
# expected: '1369857600'
# Looks like you failed 2 tests of 5.
t/order1.t Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200)
Failed 2/5 subtests
t/order2.t 1/?
# Failed test 'Europe/Moscow, DST permanent 2013'
# at t/order2.t line 31.
# got: '1369872000'
# expected: '1369857600'
# Failed test 'Europe/Moscow, DST permanent 2009'
# at t/order2.t line 32.
# got: '1257033600'
# expected: '1257022800'
# Looks like you failed 2 tests of 5.
t/order2.t Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200)
Failed 2/5 subtests
A difference between passing and failing build roots is at
.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168842
[Bug 2168842] Fedora 39 FTBFS Tracker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231791
[Bug 2231791] Fedora 40 FTBFS Tracker
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240584
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202240584%23c0
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2240533] perl-Date-Handler-1.2-28.fc40: Should build-require and require/recommend glibc-langpack-en: Locale en_US does not seem to be implemented on this system, keeping locale
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240533 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-12f33849b5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-12f33849b5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240533 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202240533%23c1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2240533] perl-Date-Handler-1.2-28.fc40: Should build-require and require/recommend glibc-langpack-en: Locale en_US does not seem to be implemented on this system, keeping locale
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240533 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-Date-Handler-1.2-29.fc ||40 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240533 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2240459] perl-Module-ScanDeps-1.34 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240459 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Fixed In Version||perl-Module-ScanDeps-1.34-1 ||.fc40 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Last Closed||2023-09-25 10:07:46 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-4329126a23 has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240459 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202240459%23c2 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2240459] perl-Module-ScanDeps-1.34 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240459 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-4329126a23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-4329126a23 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240459 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202240459%23c1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[rpms/perl-Module-ScanDeps] PR #2: 1.34 bump (rhbz#2240459)
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Module-ScanDeps` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` 1.34 bump (rhbz#2240459) `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Module-ScanDeps/pull-request/2 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[rpms/perl-Module-ScanDeps] PR #2: 1.34 bump (rhbz#2240459)
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Module-ScanDeps` that you are following: `` 1.34 bump (rhbz#2240459) `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Module-ScanDeps/pull-request/2 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: F39 Change Proposal: Allow Removal of tzdata (System-Wide)
Le 25/09/2023 à 10:38, Vít Ondruch a écrit : Dne 22. 09. 23 v 16:01 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 10:43:05AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2233281#c3 This probably answers my question. So heads up to others. Dne 22. 09. 23 v 10:39 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): Was this implemented in past days? I am asking because this FTBFS suggest so: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/rubygem-timecop?collection=f40 Yes. The change was done in rawhide a while ago, but it got pushed to F39 only recently, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2233281#c3. Dealing now with FTBFS rubygem- packages, the change proposal briefly mentions: "In June of 2021, we proposed creating a new tzdata sub-package that would only provide the UTC timezone.". I assume that this have not happened, but I don't remember why and it seems that this could be helpful. We have the same issue with PHP and lot of recent FTBFS timezone is really mandatory for PHP In version 8.3 (F40) we'll includes the UTC definition in our patch to use system tzdata, UTC being use as the fallback value. Remi ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: F39 Change Proposal: Allow Removal of tzdata (System-Wide)
Dne 22. 09. 23 v 16:01 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 10:43:05AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2233281#c3 This probably answers my question. So heads up to others. Dne 22. 09. 23 v 10:39 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): Was this implemented in past days? I am asking because this FTBFS suggest so: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/rubygem-timecop?collection=f40 Yes. The change was done in rawhide a while ago, but it got pushed to F39 only recently, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2233281#c3. Dealing now with FTBFS rubygem- packages, the change proposal briefly mentions: "In June of 2021, we proposed creating a new tzdata sub-package that would only provide the UTC timezone.". I assume that this have not happened, but I don't remember why and it seems that this could be helpful. Vít Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: An update on RHEL moving to issues.redhat.com
On 9/15/23 20:27, Colin Walters wrote: One thing I find amusing about this list (which like some others is kind of a long-running soap opera that happens to sometimes produce software as a side effect) is that many times, I can see just two bits of information: - The subject of the email - The name of the person responding And I basically *know* what they're going to say. Yeah, I've noticed this as well. It's what happens in a long relationship, such as marriage. You develop these certain trigger exchanges that replay over and over again, even as you often are aware of them. Many are mostly harmless (does ananas belong in pizza?), but not all. Married to the community, now there's a thought :D Maybe one morning I'll be drinking my coffee, reading a thread like this that has "issues.redhat.com" in the Subject and see e.g. Kevin Kofler reply, open up the email and he'll say actually something like "JIRA is so awesome! I love the query language!"¹ and I'll just spew coffee all over my keyboard laughing in surprise. We could all chose to reply to threads we ordinarily wouldn't, in a different way - just to, you know, spice things up a bit. Keep the viewers^Hreaders entertained. Yes, the rarity of those trigger sequences going off rails makes them absolutely priceless. Like when the person hating olives suddenly changes their mind after 20 years. - Panu - ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Test-Announce] Fedora CoreOS 39 Test Week starts today!
Hey All! During the week of September 9-25 2023, the Fedora 39 CoreOS Test Week will be happening. The test week is an opportunity for the community to test FCOS based on Fedora 39 content before it is released as part of the `testing` and `stable` streams. As part of the Test Week, we'll host a virtual in-persion session on Tuesday September 26 from 10:00 AM - 11:30 AM EDT (2:00 PM - 3:30PM UTC) where you can drop in, ask questions, and get help from members of the Fedora CoreOS team. If you want to participate in the Test Week, check out the Fedora Wiki page for details and log your results on the Test Day page. - Wiki: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:Fedora_39_CoreOS - Test Day Results: https://testdays.fedoraproject.org/events/159 - FCOS Tracker: https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/1565 - QA Ticket: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/issue/727 - Tues September 26 Meeting Link: https://meet.google.com/hxq-bhkt-jea - Tues September 26 Notes Doc: https://hackmd.io/@24gWVfTVTWqlWDNdf74G8Q/Sysd3Gw1T Thanks for your interest and we hope to see you online! -- //sumantro Fedora QE TRIED AND PERSONALLY TESTED, ERGO TRUSTED ___ test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Unresponsive packagers: kubo
Good Morning Everyone, Since June 30th, we have been emailing daily the following user to notify that the email they have set in FAS does not correspond to a valid bugzilla account. This is a requirement for Fedora packagers. Does someone know how to contact kubo? kubo is watching rpms/golang-github-docopt-docopt-go kubo is maintainer of rpms/perl-Array-Utils kubo is maintainer of rpms/perl-Astro-FITS-CFITSIO kubo is maintainer of rpms/perl-Crypt-Rijndael kubo is maintainer of rpms/perl-DBD-MariaDB kubo is maintainer of rpms/perl-DBD-Mock kubo is maintainer of rpms/perl-DateTime-Event-Recurrence kubo is maintainer of rpms/perl-DateTime-Set kubo is maintainer of rpms/perl-DateTimeX-Easy kubo is maintainer of rpms/perl-Digest-Perl-MD5 kubo is maintainer of rpms/perl-Email-Valid kubo is maintainer of rpms/perl-Excel-Writer-XLSX kubo is maintainer of rpms/perl-Exception-Class-TryCatch kubo is maintainer of rpms/perl-File-Path-Tiny kubo is maintainer of rpms/perl-HTML-Table kubo is maintainer of rpms/perl-HTML-Template-Pro kubo is maintainer of rpms/perl-HTTP-Body kubo is maintainer of rpms/perl-Heap kubo is maintainer of rpms/perl-MooseX-Aliases kubo is maintainer of rpms/perl-MooseX-NonMoose kubo is maintainer of rpms/perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class kubo is maintainer of rpms/perl-PDL kubo is maintainer of rpms/perl-SQL-Abstract kubo is maintainer of rpms/perl-Statistics-Descriptive kubo is maintainer of rpms/perl-Test-Spec Thanks for your help, Pierre ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Heads up: OpenColorIO 2.3.0
On 24-09-2023 03:26, Richard Shaw wrote: I haven't been able to find the new command in my email history to find dependencies but my old script shows the following need to be rebuilt: blender krita luxcorerender OpenImageIO usd This looks correct according to `fedrq`: $ fedrq wr -s OpenColorIO-devel OpenImageIO-2.4.15.0-1.fc40.src blender-1:3.6.2-1.fc40.src calligra-3.2.1-25.fc39.src krita-5.1.5-5.fc39.src luxcorerender-2.7-0.5.beta1.fc39.src usd-23.08-1.fc40.src -- Sandro ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2240533] New: perl-Date-Handler-1.2-28.fc40: Should build-require and require/recommend glibc-langpack-en: Locale en_US does not seem to be implemented on this system, keeping locale
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240533
Bug ID: 2240533
Summary: perl-Date-Handler-1.2-28.fc40: Should build-require
and require/recommend glibc-langpack-en: Locale en_US
does not seem to be implemented on this system,
keeping locale
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Date-Handler
Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Running tests without glibc-langpack-en produces a lot of warnings:
+ make test
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 "/usr/bin/perl" "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-MTest::Harness"
"-e" "undef *Test::Harness::Switches; test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')"
t/*.t
t/0compiles.t ok
Locale en_US does not seem to be implemented on this system, keeping locale
Locale en_US does not seem to be implemented on this system, keeping locale
Locale en_US does not seem to be implemented on this system, keeping locale
[...]
This is because en_US is a default locale Handler.pm uses:
use constant DEFAULT_LOCALE => 'en_US';
[...]
sub new
[...]
$self->{locale} = "";
if(defined $args->{locale})
{
$self->SetLocale($args->{locale}) ||
$self->SetLocale($self->DEFAULT_LOCALE());
}
else
{
$self->SetLocale($self->DEFAULT_LOCALE());
}
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240533
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202240533%23c0
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
