The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-4211889c5a
seamonkey-2.53.17.1-1.el7
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-981e9f53ff
chromium-117.0.5938.92-2.el7
1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232304
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Thursday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on
irc.libera.chat.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 11:32 PM Jerry James wrote:
>
> Figuring out whether a given package is a leaf for i386 is a pain in
> the neck when done manually. How about we have a computer figure it
> out for us?
>
> Those of you who run regular reports, what would it take to run a
> report every
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 5:41 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 10:05:38AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 9:48 AM Richard Hughes wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 27 Sept 2023 at 13:23, Mattia Verga via devel
> > > wrote:
> > > > Can't this script be moved to run
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 10:05:38AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 9:48 AM Richard Hughes wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 27 Sept 2023 at 13:23, Mattia Verga via devel
> > wrote:
> > > Can't this script be moved to run in Openshift as cron-based?
> >
> > Yes! In fact, that's what I
Figuring out whether a given package is a leaf for i386 is a pain in
the neck when done manually. How about we have a computer figure it
out for us?
Those of you who run regular reports, what would it take to run a
report every week or two that lists every package X such that:
1. X has no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241058
Bug ID: 2241058
Summary: perl-Math-BigInt-1.999842 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Math-BigInt
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 5:51 PM Alberto Faria wrote:
>
> Hi, everyone!
>
> My name is Alberto Faria and I'm a software engineer from Portugal,
> working at Red Hat. I plan on maintaining the libblkio package, to
> which I've contributed a bunch over the last year and a half.
Welcome!
Let me know
On Sep 27, 2023 aig 11:56:01AM +0200, sgrìobh Miro Hrončok:
> Hello packagers,
> here is the list of packages that still need a Python 3.12 rebuild for Fedora
> 39+.
>
supervisor in fedora 39 is 4.2.2 but the version that supports python
3.12 is 4.2.5. I filed Bug 2239529 about this and have
Sébastien Le Roux writes:
> Dear all,
> in the past weeks the updates of GCC for both Fedora and Debian have
> introduce few identical Fortran modifications:
>
> fortran/108961
> fortran/109684
> fortran/110825
>
> As a result my I cannot build the RPM package (nor the Debian package)
> for my
On Wed, Sep 27 2023 at 12:52:17 PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell
wrote:
You have 5 years of excellent documentation by Florian and others to
catch up on! :-)
Random compliment: this documentation is indeed quite good.
Upstream freedesktop-sdk and GNOME build flags are based on Fedora's
because
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 11:19 AM Alexander Sosedkin
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> 6 months ago, there's been a F38 blocker: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2960
> Long story short:
> RPM has moved to sequoia,
> sequoia has started respecting crypto-policies,
> Google repos have been signed with a 1024-bit
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 12:59 PM Ron Olson wrote:
>
> I mean this sincerely: Where is the excellent documentation? I admit that
> I’ve been frustrated that web searches leads me all over the place, sometimes
> the documentation is obsolete, or it’s someone’s blog post, etc. I’ve been
>
I mean this sincerely: Where is the excellent documentation? I admit
that I’ve been frustrated that web searches leads me all over the
place, sometimes the documentation is obsolete, or it’s someone’s
blog post, etc. I’ve been surprised again and again there’s a macro
for this or that which
On 9/27/23 12:47, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 11:22:04AM -0500, Ron Olson wrote:
>> This is the first time I’ve heard of buildflags.md; where might I find this
>> file?
>
> $ ls -l -h /usr/share/doc/redhat-rpm-config/buildflags.md
> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 28K Feb 28 2023
On 9/27/23 04:43, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 6:24 AM Remi Collet wrote:
>>
>> Le 26/09/2023 à 19:32, Carlos O'Donell a écrit :
>>
In version 8.3 (F40) we'll includes the UTC definition
in our patch to use system tzdata, UTC being use
as the fallback value.
>>>
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 04:50:02PM +0100, Alberto Faria wrote:
> Hi, everyone!
>
> My name is Alberto Faria and I'm a software engineer from Portugal,
> working at Red Hat. I plan on maintaining the libblkio package, to
> which I've contributed a bunch over the last year and a half.
Welcome to
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 11:22:04AM -0500, Ron Olson wrote:
> This is the first time I’ve heard of buildflags.md; where might I find this
> file?
$ ls -l -h /usr/share/doc/redhat-rpm-config/buildflags.md
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 28K Feb 28 2023
/usr/share/doc/redhat-rpm-config/buildflags.md
On 9/27/23 12:22, Ron Olson wrote:
> This is the first time I’ve heard of buildflags.md; where might I find this
> file?
It is distributed with redhat-rpm-config as part of the documentation of build
flags.
You can see the rawhide version here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241007
Bug ID: 2241007
Summary: perl-HTTP-Message-6.45 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-HTTP-Message
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
This is the first time I’ve heard of buildflags.md; where might I find
this file?
On 26 Sep 2023, at 12:21, Florian Weimer wrote:
redhat-rpm-config-267-1.fc40 activates the first phase of compiler
flags
to avoid regressions in the Fedora C99 port. Implicit ints and
implicit
function
On Wed, 2023-09-27 at 09:48 -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> On 9/27/23 04:56, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > fail2ban
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2219991
> > https://github.com/fail2ban/fail2ban/issues/3487
> > Bugzilla ASSIGNED 2 months ago, no update since.
> > Maintainers NEEDINFOed last
Hi, everyone!
My name is Alberto Faria and I'm a software engineer from Portugal,
working at Red Hat. I plan on maintaining the libblkio package, to
which I've contributed a bunch over the last year and a half.
Regards,
Alberto
___
devel mailing list
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 09:48:04AM -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> On 9/27/23 04:56, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > fail2ban
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2219991
> > https://github.com/fail2ban/fail2ban/issues/3487
>
> With my system/network administrator hat on, this one is really
>
On 9/27/23 04:56, Miro Hrončok wrote:
fail2ban
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2219991
https://github.com/fail2ban/fail2ban/issues/3487
Bugzilla ASSIGNED 2 months ago, no update since.
Maintainers NEEDINFOed last week.
With my system/network administrator hat on, this one is really
On 19. 08. 23 23:57, Maxwell G wrote:
On Sat Aug 19, 2023 at 22:13 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 19. 08. 23 19:44, Maxwell G wrote:
Hi Pythonistas,
%pyproject_save_files automatically handles marking license files
with %license when a build backend installs them into a package's
dist-info
OLD: Fedora-39-20230926.n.1
NEW: Fedora-39-20230927.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:61
Upgraded packages: 56
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:414.10 MiB
Size
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232304
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 9:48 AM Richard Hughes wrote:
>
> On Wed, 27 Sept 2023 at 13:23, Mattia Verga via devel
> wrote:
> > Can't this script be moved to run in Openshift as cron-based?
>
> Yes! In fact, that's what I proposed about a decade ago when I wanted
> to include the data in the
On 27. 09. 23 15:58, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 11:56:01AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello packagers,
here is the list of packages that still need a Python 3.12 rebuild for Fedora
39+.
zbyszekpython-igor
I retired it now in f39 and rawhide. The first
On 27. 09. 23 15:58, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 11:56:01AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello packagers,
here is the list of packages that still need a Python 3.12 rebuild for Fedora
39+.
zbyszekpython-igor
I retired it now in f39 and rawhide. The first
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 11:56:01AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello packagers,
> here is the list of packages that still need a Python 3.12 rebuild for Fedora
> 39+.
> zbyszekpython-igor
I retired it now in f39 and rawhide. The first attempt failed halfway
because I didn't have a valid
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 11:56:01AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello packagers,
> here is the list of packages that still need a Python 3.12 rebuild for Fedora
> 39+.
> zbyszekpython-igor
I retired it now in f39 and rawhide. The first attempt failed halfway
because I didn't have a valid
Hello packagers,
here is the list of packages that still need a Python 3.12 rebuild for Fedora
39+.
Packages on this list have broken dependencies and hence the users of Fedora
Linux 39+ cannot install them at all.
Moreover, users of Fedora Linux 37 or 38 with the listed packages installed are
On Wed, 27 Sept 2023 at 13:23, Mattia Verga via devel
wrote:
> Can't this script be moved to run in Openshift as cron-based?
Yes! In fact, that's what I proposed about a decade ago when I wanted
to include the data in the metadata like Debian does. I do think it
should be managed by someone in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232304
--- Comment #3 from Paul Howarth ---
Branch requests:
perl-Mozilla-PublicSuffix:
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/56582
perl-HTTP-CookieJar:
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/56583
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232304
--- Comment #2 from Paul Howarth ---
Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232304
Report this comment as SPAM:
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 2:38 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 7:06 AM Alexander Sosedkin
> wrote:
> ...
> > Feel free to strike down these proposals
> > using whatever mechanisms Fedora governance offers.
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/StrongCryptoSettings3
>
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 7:06 AM Alexander Sosedkin wrote:
...
> Feel free to strike down these proposals
> using whatever mechanisms Fedora governance offers.
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/StrongCryptoSettings3
> rejection suggests they do work.
To be clear, that one was rejected
Il 27/09/23 13:24, Richard Hughes ha scritto:
> On Tue, 26 Sept 2023 at 03:16, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> So a stopgap solution was implemented: appstream-data. Richard Hughes
>> maintains a local mirror of the full Fedora repositories and generates
>> the appstream data from that using scripts[1] and
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230926.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230927.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 7
Dropped packages:62
Upgraded packages: 103
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 14.10 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On Tue, 26 Sept 2023 at 03:16, Neal Gompa wrote:
> So a stopgap solution was implemented: appstream-data. Richard Hughes
> maintains a local mirror of the full Fedora repositories and generates
> the appstream data from that using scripts[1] and extra data[2] to
> produce the appstream-data
On 27. 09. 23 12:49, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 11:56 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
python-rust-update-set
==
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2220488
Bugzilla ASSIGNED 2 months ago, no update since.
Maintainer NEEDINFOed last week.
That NEEDINFO won't help, the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232304
Yanko Kaneti changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|yan...@declera.com |p...@city-fan.org
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 7:40 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> Alexander Sosedkin wrote:
> > Because of that, I'd like to revert that RPM policy relaxation
> > https://gitlab.com/redhat-crypto/fedora-crypto-policies/-/commit/a12f7b20638be8f872ad1995c7d2edce41c227b5
> > in (f39) rawhide and
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 11:56 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> python-rust-update-set
> ==
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2220488
> Bugzilla ASSIGNED 2 months ago, no update since.
> Maintainer NEEDINFOed last week.
That NEEDINFO won't help, the maintainer apparently sends bugzilla
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 11:04 AM Alexander Sosedkin
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 7:47 PM Peter Robinson wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 10:20 AM Alexander Sosedkin
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > 6 months ago, there's been a F38 blocker:
> > >
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 7:47 PM Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 10:20 AM Alexander Sosedkin
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > 6 months ago, there's been a F38 blocker: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2960
> > Long story short:
> > RPM has moved to sequoia,
> > sequoia has started
Hello packagers,
here is the list of packages that still need a Python 3.12 rebuild for Fedora
39+.
Packages on this list have broken dependencies and hence the users of Fedora
Linux 39+ cannot install them at all.
Moreover, users of Fedora Linux 37 or 38 with the listed packages installed are
Hello packagers,
here is the list of packages that still need a Python 3.12 rebuild for Fedora
39+.
Packages on this list have broken dependencies and hence the users of Fedora
Linux 39+ cannot install them at all.
Moreover, users of Fedora Linux 37 or 38 with the listed packages installed are
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 6:24 AM Remi Collet wrote:
>
> Le 26/09/2023 à 19:32, Carlos O'Donell a écrit :
>
> >> In version 8.3 (F40) we'll includes the UTC definition
> >> in our patch to use system tzdata, UTC being use
> >> as the fallback value.
> >
> > I'm curious; what does this patch look
Hello.
As per [0], I (FAS: sham1) am planning to unretire and claim the X11
screensaver utility `xss-lock`.
Having been retired for more than 8 weeks on its rawhide branch, due to
having been orphaned, means that a new package review is needed for the
package, which can be found at [1].
[0]:
53 matches
Mail list logo
