[Bug 2244582] perl-Perl-Critic-1.152 is available

2023-10-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244582 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of perl-Perl-Critic-1.152-1.fc38.src.rpm for rawhide failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=107629194 -- You are

[Bug 2244582] New: perl-Perl-Critic-1.152 is available

2023-10-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244582 Bug ID: 2244582 Summary: perl-Perl-Critic-1.152 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Perl-Critic Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 2244582] perl-Perl-Critic-1.152 is available

2023-10-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244582 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1994246 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1994246=edit Update to 1.152 (#2244582) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for

Fedora Food SIG

2023-10-16 Thread Benson Muite
Hi, Recently submitted a review for AnyMeal - A free and open source recipe management software[1]. There is other free and open source software related to food see for example [2]. Would there be interst in a SIG to discuss FOSS software for food? The target members are all people who like food

Re: Heads up: Rawhide builds currently failing openQA gating

2023-10-16 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2023-10-16 at 11:39 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hey, folks. If you have a Rawhide update stuck in openQA gating - we're > aware of the issue. A KDE package was prematurely rebuilt against kf6 > before https://pagure.io/fedora-kde/SIG/issue/399 was sorted out, and > this ultimately

Re: Is package (gnome-shell extension) split into legacy and current required?

2023-10-16 Thread Michel Lind
Hi, On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 12:02:05PM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > Hello, > > I maintain the gnome-shell extension for bubblemail. I was informed by > the upstream developer that in order to support GNOME ≥ 45, he is > rewriting most of the code. What is currently the master branch will

Re: Is package (gnome-shell extension) split into legacy and current required?

2023-10-16 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
Hi Kevin, On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 7:51 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 12:02:05PM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I maintain the gnome-shell extension for bubblemail. I was informed by > > the upstream developer that in order to support GNOME ≥ 45, he is

Heads up: Rawhide builds currently failing openQA gating

2023-10-16 Thread Adam Williamson
Hey, folks. If you have a Rawhide update stuck in openQA gating - we're aware of the issue. A KDE package was prematurely rebuilt against kf6 before https://pagure.io/fedora-kde/SIG/issue/399 was sorted out, and this ultimately triggers file conflicts which prevents dnf update from working in the

Re: Is package (gnome-shell extension) split into legacy and current required?

2023-10-16 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 12:02:05PM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > Hello, > > I maintain the gnome-shell extension for bubblemail. I was informed by > the upstream developer that in order to support GNOME ≥ 45, he is > rewriting most of the code. What is currently the master branch will >

[rpms/perl-DBD-MySQL] PR #2: 5.001 bump; Package tests

2023-10-16 Thread Michal Schorm
mschorm commented on the pull-request: `5.001 bump; Package tests` that you are following: `` Also applies to the other 4 occurrences in the code. `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-DBD-MySQL/pull-request/2 ___

[rpms/perl-DBD-MySQL] PR #2: 5.001 bump; Package tests

2023-10-16 Thread Michal Schorm
mschorm commented on the pull-request: `5.001 bump; Package tests` that you are following: `` I don't think the ` >= 8` is relevant. Unless you expect this code to be picked to the RHEL 7. :smile: RHEL 8 and later has MySQL 8 as a default version. `` To reply, visit the link below

[Bug 2243140] perl-Devel-NYTProf-6.13 is available

2023-10-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2243140 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

Re: Execute RPM dependency generators on the .spec file which ships them

2023-10-16 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 16. 10. 23 v 16:35 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a): Dne 16. 10. 23 v 16:16 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): Can somebody help me please with a package review? The package can't be simpler. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2244428 Thx in advance Done. You are welcome. Thx a lot

Re: Execute RPM dependency generators on the .spec file which ships them

2023-10-16 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 16. 10. 23 v 16:16 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): Can somebody help me please with a package review? The package can't be simpler. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2244428 Thx in advance Done. You are welcome. -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCA Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT,

Re: Execute RPM dependency generators on the .spec file which ships them

2023-10-16 Thread Vít Ondruch
Can somebody help me please with a package review? The package can't be simpler. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2244428 Thx in advance Vít Dne 06. 10. 23 v 18:06 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): I am still playing with idea of executing RPM dependency generators on the .spec

[rpms/perl-DBD-MySQL] PR #2: 5.001 bump; Package tests

2023-10-16 Thread Jitka Plesnikova
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-DBD-MySQL` that you are following: `` 5.001 bump; Package tests `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-DBD-MySQL/pull-request/2 ___ perl-devel mailing

Fedora 39 compose report: 20231016.n.0 changes

2023-10-16 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-39-20231015.n.0 NEW: Fedora-39-20231016.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Re: status openssl1.1

2023-10-16 Thread Dmitry Belyavskiy
Dear Peter, On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 1:43 PM Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 10:05 AM Dmitry Belyavskiy > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 10:21 AM Petr Pisar wrote: > > > > > > V Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 08:55:12AM +0200, josef radinger via devel > > > napsal(a): > > > >

Re: status openssl1.1

2023-10-16 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 10:05 AM Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 10:21 AM Petr Pisar wrote: > > > > V Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 08:55:12AM +0200, josef radinger via devel napsal(a): > > > Hi > > > > > > openssl1.1 reached EOS on recently (11th September 2023 I assume) > > >

Re: status openssl1.1

2023-10-16 Thread josef radinger via devel
On Mon, 16 Oct 2023, Petr Pisar wrote: V Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 08:55:12AM +0200, josef radinger via devel napsal(a): Hi openssl1.1 reached EOS on recently (11th September 2023 I assume) https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2023/03/28/1.1.1-EOL/ according to https://www.openssl.org/source/: ...

Is package (gnome-shell extension) split into legacy and current required?

2023-10-16 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
Hello, I maintain the gnome-shell extension for bubblemail. I was informed by the upstream developer that in order to support GNOME ≥ 45, he is rewriting most of the code. What is currently the master branch will support (recent) GNOME versions up to 44.x and there will be another branch for 45

Review swaps - hyprland packages

2023-10-16 Thread Pavel Solovev
Could someone (perhaps someone interested in Hyprland) please review: hyprland-protocols - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244285 hyprland - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244377 xdg-desktop-portal-hyprland - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244378 I'd

Re: [Fedora-legal-list] SPDX short name for "Redistributable, no modification permitted" (firmware)

2023-10-16 Thread Richard Hughes
On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 at 09:46, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > Or possibly we end up with a mixture of (2) and (3) where most firmware > are under an umbrella but a few oddballs with unusual terms justify a > dedicated LicenseRef. I'm also interested from a LVFS firmware point of view. At the moment

F40 Change Proposal: PostgreSQL 16 (Self-Contained)

2023-10-16 Thread Aoife Moloney
Wiki Link: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PostgreSQL_16 Discussion.fpo Link: https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f40-change-proposal-postgresql-16-self-contained/92811 This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux. This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes

F40 Change Proposal: PostgreSQL 16 (Self-Contained)

2023-10-16 Thread Aoife Moloney
Wiki Link: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PostgreSQL_16 Discussion.fpo Link: https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f40-change-proposal-postgresql-16-self-contained/92811 This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux. This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes

Re: status openssl1.1

2023-10-16 Thread Dmitry Belyavskiy
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 10:21 AM Petr Pisar wrote: > > V Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 08:55:12AM +0200, josef radinger via devel napsal(a): > > Hi > > > > openssl1.1 reached EOS on recently (11th September 2023 I assume) > > https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2023/03/28/1.1.1-EOL/ > > > > according to > >

F40 Change Proposal: F40 MariaDB MySQL repackaging (Self-Contained)

2023-10-16 Thread Aoife Moloney
Wiki Link: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F40_MariaDB_MySQL_repackaging Discussion.fpo Link: https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f40-change-proposal-f40-mariadb-mysql-repackaging-self-contained/92810 This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux. This document represents a proposed

F40 Change Proposal: F40 MariaDB MySQL repackaging (Self-Contained)

2023-10-16 Thread Aoife Moloney
Wiki Link: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F40_MariaDB_MySQL_repackaging Discussion.fpo Link: https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f40-change-proposal-f40-mariadb-mysql-repackaging-self-contained/92810 This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux. This document represents a proposed

F40 Change Propsal: BogofilterSqlite (Self- Contained)

2023-10-16 Thread Aoife Moloney
Wiki Link: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BogofilterSqlite Discussion.fpo link: https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f40-change-proposal-switch-bogofilter-to-use-sqlite-self-contained/92809 This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process, proposals are

F40 Change Propsal: BogofilterSqlite (Self- Contained)

2023-10-16 Thread Aoife Moloney
Wiki Link: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BogofilterSqlite Discussion.fpo link: https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f40-change-proposal-switch-bogofilter-to-use-sqlite-self-contained/92809 This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process, proposals are

Re: [Fedora-legal-list] SPDX short name for "Redistributable, no modification permitted" (firmware)

2023-10-16 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 03:02:34PM -0400, Richard Fontana wrote: > On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 5:13 AM Robert-André Mauchin > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I'm doing a MR on an old package that contains firmware data. > > > > I wanna convert to SPDX, what is the equivalent to "Redistributable, no > >

Re: status openssl1.1

2023-10-16 Thread Petr Pisar
V Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 08:55:12AM +0200, josef radinger via devel napsal(a): > Hi > > openssl1.1 reached EOS on recently (11th September 2023 I assume) > https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2023/03/28/1.1.1-EOL/ > > according to > https://www.openssl.org/source/: > ... > The previous LTS version

Re: status openssl1.1

2023-10-16 Thread Alexander Sosedkin
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 8:55 AM josef radinger via devel wrote: > openssl1.1 reached EOS on recently (11th September 2023 I assume) > https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2023/03/28/1.1.1-EOL/ > > according to > https://www.openssl.org/source/: > ... > The previous LTS version (the 1.1.1 series) is

status openssl1.1

2023-10-16 Thread josef radinger via devel
Hi openssl1.1 reached EOS on recently (11th September 2023 I assume) https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2023/03/28/1.1.1-EOL/ according to https://www.openssl.org/source/: ... The previous LTS version (the 1.1.1 series) is also available but has recently gone out of support. ... paid extended